Sunday, June 29, 2014

Justice, not just us

In The Boston Globe's June 20 op-ed piece, “Aging isn’t the challenge; building an equitable society is," gerontologists Laura L. Carstensen and John W. Rowe wrote
Aging too often plays out much differently among less advantaged people. Instead of deepening expertise and well-being, the cumulative effects of poverty, harsh working conditions, and persistent stress leave an alarming proportion of people with little in the way of personal resources. A fifth of married couples and half of unmarried people rely on Social Security alone for at least 90 percent of their income.”

The New York Times today published its last article, “Inequality Is Not Inevitable,” in The Great Divide series, moderated by American economist Joseph E. Stiglitz, who wrote:
“Justice has become a commodity, affordable to only a few. . . .More than a half-century ago, America led the way in advocating for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948. Today, access to health care is among the most universally accepted rights, at least in the advanced countries. America, despite the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, is the exception. It has become a country with great divides in access to health care, life expectancy and health status.” 
Americans make up 5% of the world’s population yet consume 25% of its resources, and comprise 25% of the world’s prisoners.  And 99% of Americans are subject to the wealthiest 1%, who control more than 40% of the nation's wealth.
STOP BEING POOR (The Art Show) at Incline Gallery in San Francisco's Mission District: “. . . inspired by the sentiment that many politicians and media correspondents have reverberated: If you’re poor, stop being poor.  . . . With skyrocketing rents and massive neighborhood takeovers, our home, the Bay Area, has become a difficult place in which to live. We invite everyone to come see, but also, purchase art. Can you help us? We need to stop being poor.

According to the Brookings Institution, the gap between the rich and poor in San Francisco is growing faster than any other city in the nation, and San Francisco’s income inequality is on par with developing countries in Central America and sub-Saharan Africa.  San Francisco risks losing its diversity, especially seniors and persons with disabilities who can no longer afford to live in an increasingly expensive city.

While there is much work to overcome rising inequality and barriers to justice, let's remember people power with this summer’s commemoration of the 15th anniversary of Olmstead case (June 22, 1999 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that under the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals with mental disabilities have a right to live in the community rather than institutions) and 50th anniversary of Civil Rights Act (CRA enacted July 2, 1964 outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin). Knowledge of existing rights and resources can help identify gaps or areas for improvement; for example, CRA has been supplemented with Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (July 26).

Elder justice
 
San Francisco Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) sponsored World Elder Abuse Awareness Day (WEAAD, June 15) Symposium at Born Auditorium in the Human Services Agency building. 
Jill Nielsen, Adult Protective Service (APS) Program Director at DAAS, rattled off the following statistics:
  • 5 million, or 1 in 10, older adults in the U.S. are victims of elder abuse, neglect or exploitation
  • For every case reported, as many as 23.5 cases go unreported (according to New York prevalence study)
  • San Francisco APS received over 6,500 reports of abuse last year, and 580 reports in May 2014 alone
Elizabeth Aguilar Tarchi, San Francisco Assistant District Attorney (DA) for the past 27 years, explained her office’s no drop policy (DA can aggressively hold perpetrators accountable based on evidence, even if victim does not want to pursue action) and vertical prosecution (victim is assigned DA to follow through from charge of crime, rather than have victim re-live experience when dealing with different DAs).  The DA’s Office handles elder abuse cases involving physical and financial crimes.
Any known/suspected abuse should be reported to APS (24-hour hotline at 415.355.6700 or statewide at 800.814.0009) or the Police Department; if immediate harm, call 911.  (If abuse/neglect occurs to a resident in a long-term care facility, call Long-TermCare Ombudsman at 415.751.9788.) 
Mary Twomey, Co-Director at Center of Excellence on Elder Abuse and Neglect based in University of California at Irvine, reminded us that elder abuse is a public health and human rights issue. She performed rap with audience joining her refrain:
I am old, and I am positive
I have wisdom, I’m gonna tell it like it is
I may be disabled, but I’m not obtuse
There’s no excuse for elder abuse! 

At the federal level, Congress has appropriated nothing to implement Elder Justice Act of 2010.  At the state level, California Elder Justice Coalition requested increased funding for statewide training of APS staff and state-level coordinator for county APS.  Mary invited us to wear aqua-colored UNITED AGAINST ELDER ABUSE bracelets, speak up and get involved with her organization, Ageless Alliance

Shawna Reeves, Director of Elder Abuse Prevention at Institute on Aging (IOA), discussed the following trends in elder financial abuse with greater coverage: PBS Frontline program on Residential Care Facilities For the Elderly (RCFE) and Castro Valley RCFE abandonment case; California has 12 bills addressing RCFE abuse; and even a TV show dedicated to hoarding.  She described popular scams like the grandparent scam (phone call from perpetrator who claims to be grandchild requesting emergency funds), sales presentations at senior centers, tax prospecting by insurance agents, pension advance loans, etc.  IOA’s Access to Justice Project details San Francisco civil legal resources specializing in remedies for elder financial abuse.


Housing & health justice 
Third Annual Howard Grayson Elder Life Conference: Housing & Health for All! at LGBT Center opened with performance by Stonestown YMCA Senior Taiko Drummers! 
Moderator Sue Englander with housing panelists Seth Kilbourn, Openhouse Executive Director; Brian Basinger, AIDS Housing Alliance Director; and Tommi Avicolli Mecca, Housing Rights Committee Director of Counseling Programs.

Tommi presented the following facts:
  • 29% of San Francisco’s homeless identify as LGBT, and 3% as transgender
  • District 8 (including Castro, which he says is being “de-gayed”) has been hardest hit by evictions, with 2,000 units affected since 1997 during the first dot-com boom
  • Two-thirds of seniors live in fear that their building will be sold by a speculator who will evict them and flip rentals for profit
Tommi called for the following 11-point plan of action:
  1. eviction defense: demonstrate against speculators (Ellis Act evictions are elder abuse)
  2. public relations to denounce evictions: organize, stand and block doors to Sheriff
  3. affordable housing advocacy: Community Land Trust alternative
  4. develop abandoned property: 300 buildings could be used for housing; only 150 Otis housing (for low-income homeless veterans) was developed in past 12 years
  5. moratorium on market rate housing: this is unconstitutional, but so was same-sex marriage
  6. rental assistance fund: LGBT Aging Task Force recommended Mayor build 30,000 units; first 8,000 to homeless to get off streets, and fill remaining with low-income
  7. stronger eviction protection: relocation for no-fault, Ellis, owner move-in
  8. repeal Ellis Act: Costa Hawkins Bill not allow vacancy rent control; need to extend rent control beyond pre-1979 constructed buildings 
  9. anti-speculation tax: on November ballot would limit 5-year re-sale of building
  10. City shelters need to be LGBT-friendly
  11. campaign to reduce LGBT homeless by 50% in 5 years
During the Q&A, Tommi said they could declare a state of emergency to impose vacancy control and roll back rents because the system is broken so we need a revolution to build systems to address the problem, a PR gimmick to “make headlines like Newsom” and “bring outrage to the planet,” while adding “it’s all about theatrics.”

Brian said that activism and advocacy work: once the fringe challenges the status quo, they win because the fringe makes it safe to get what you ask for, and there is opportunity in crisis.  He proposed the following:
  • resurrect last legislation that late Supervisor Harvey Milk worked on, two days prior to his murder: tax 100% profits of residential building that is bought and sold within two years, which takes away economic incentive driving evictions.  This anti-speculation tax will be on November ballot.
  • introduce legislation to require developers to adopt anti-discrimination protections based on sexual/gender orientation; ask and dialogue to have impact
  • organize homeless to develop policy, join budget advocacy, link arms and stand together to force issue and get fair share
He also mentioned the need to elect the right people who are willing to fight and move forward to support the poor, versus moderates who will not rock boats, like former Mayor DiFi who opposed vacancy control and anti-speculation tax.
 
Seth discussed Openhouse’s partnership with Mercy Housing to develop 55 Laguna, 110 units of affordable senior (age 55+) housing that is “LGBT-welcoming” with construction beginning this October, and the next development of additional 70 units, which he hopes to get HUD rent subsidy. Applications for 55 Laguna housing will be available in mid-2015, and then selection will be made by lottery.  He noted this new housing is just a “drop in the bucket” so it’s important to keep people in their homes.  Policy change solution is critical to dis-incentivize speculators from kicking out seniors and to strengthen anti-eviction.    
Snack table and resource fair included Openhouse, CARA, Gray Panthers, SDA and DAAS.



Host Denise D’Anne, former co-president of Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club, introduced health care panelists Miss Major, Transgender, Gender Variant & Intersex Justice Project (TGIJP) Director; Susan Pfeifer, Organizing for Action; Celia Chung, Transgender Law Center; and Barry Hermanson, Green Party candidate.  Panelists acknowledged Affordable Care Act (ACA) is not perfect but huge first step for universal coverage by requiring citizens to purchase insurance or face penalty (greater of $95 or 1% of income); ultimate solution is Medicare for All: “the best universal single payer health care system in the world.”  
After screening of 2005 Emmy-winning documentary for historical/cultural program, Screaming Queens:The Riot at Gene Compton’s Cafeteria, Q&A with Felicia Flames and director Victor Silverman. Three years prior to the June 28, 1969 Stonewall riots in New York, transgender community members in San Francisco’s Tenderloin District fought back to protest police harassment which resulted in improved police community relations and support services through Department of Public Health’s Center for Special Problems, including issuance of ID cards with their new gender.  Felicia, a screaming queen who said she will be 68 next month, is also a Vietnam veteran and 27-year survivor of AIDS.

Administration for Community Living (ACL) released an online learning tool, Building Respect for LGBT Older Adults, which is designed to increase awareness of issues faced by LGBT individuals living in long-term care facilities.  

Access to income

Positive Resource Center (PRC) and Senator Mark Leno sponsored Thriving in 2014: A Day Long Institute on Access to Income and Healthcare for People Living with HIV/AIDS at Milton Marks Conference Center in the State Office Building. 
Access to Income panel included:
  • Amy Orgain, Staff Attorney at AIDS Legal Referral Panel: private long-term disability insurance may pay 60-70% of income, but only up to age 65 or Social Security retirement age
  • Joe Ramirez-Forcier, Employment Services Managing Director at PRC: individuals with HIV may face discrimination based on age rather than HIV status because the average person with HIV in San Francisco is age 50, when there is more turnover in job market so skill refreshment needed  
  • Jerry McIntyre, Directing Attorney at National Senior Citizens Law Center: last year’s Windsor decision (providing for equal treatment of same sex marriage) means Social Security spousal benefit available to same-sex married and domestic partners; however, being recognized as married couple is no advantage for SSI benefits due to combining resources and income of spouses, and SSI does not consider spouse if civil union/domestic partner
  • Fernando Aguayo-Garcia, Senior Bilingual Benefits Advocate at PRC: non-citizens, who are not eligible for SSI, might be eligible for Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI); HIV itself is not disabling, but combined with mental health or diabetes symptoms to make disability
Budget justice

Budget Justice Coalition held a press conference on the steps of San Francisco City Hall an hour before the packed budget hearing. 
San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi called for increased funding for eviction legal defense because only 10% of tenants had lawyers to defend them in eviction suits brought by landlords, of which 90% had lawyers.
 
Colleen Rivecca of St. Anthony’s Foundation and San Francisco Food Security Task Force called for additional $10 million for home-delivered meals to serve vulnerable seniors and persons with disabilities (PWD) so they can remain in their homes. 
Marie Jobling, on behalf of San Francisco Long-Term Care Coordinating Council, requested additional $3 million funding for Community Living Fund, created in 2006 with initial funding of $3 million, to help re-establish Laguna Honda patients into the community. 
At budget hearing, seniors and PWD spoke first. SDA Executive Director Jessica Lehman requested funding to fix broken elevators in SRO hotels.
 
In the overflow room in City Hall’s North Light Court, Project Open Hand (POH) Operations Director Simon Pitchford and Executive Director Kevin Winge (seated second row) watch budget hearing on screen.  POH provides “meals with love” at 18 congregate meal sites for seniors and PWD in San Francisco.  In 1998, DAAS selected POH to replace The Salvation Army, which lost its senior congregate meals contract when it failed to comply with a 1997 ordinance requiring anyone who did business with the City to provide nondiscriminatory domestic partners benefits. 
 
At Potrero Hill Health Fair, POH Associate Director of Senior Services Noah Lopez (FOOD=LOVE) and Senior Sites Manager Darin Raffaelli (MEALS with LOVE) model fashion-forward POH T-shirts.  

Long-term care

Basics of Medicare and Medi-Cal presentation, hosted by On Lok Lifeways, addressed long-term care needs. 
Shibin Tharayil of San Francisco Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP) explained that after a 2-night hospital stay, the hospital should (and one should make sure the hospital does) admit one as an inpatient versus “observation” status —an important distinction because one must spend at least 3 full days in the hospital as an admitted patient to receive Medicare coverage for first 20 days in a skilled nursing facility. 
 
On Lok Medi-Cal Eligibility Specialist Daniel Sullivan covered Medi-Cal Basics.  In California, Medi-Cal Managed Care (such as On Lok Lifeways) is available to low-income, undocumented persons with PRUCOL (Permanent Residence Under Color of Law) status, or persons who are not lawfully residing in U.S., but the immigration agency does not intend to pursue deportation. 
 
On Lok Outreach and Enrollment Specialist John Lam provided an overview of Lifeways’ consolidated model of long-term care for adults age 55+ who are certified by the state as meeting the need for nursing home level of care, and funded by Medicare and Medi-Cal waivers.  John also organized Gray Pride community space (rest area, water, snacks, private ADA-accessible bathroom) for seniors at LGBT PRIDE Festival.
  
Civil rights

Born after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, I view this landmark legislation as history that comes alive when I hear older adults share their reminiscences of those dark ages when “discrimination with a smile” was the norm.  The San Francisco Federal Building hosted Celebrating & Collaborating: The 50th Anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 
Steven Anthony Jones, Artistic Director of Lorraine Hansberry Theatre and artistic collaborator of Civil Rights at 50, asked the audience to interject “and women” whenever he said "men" as in “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men. . . and women!"  According to some reports, Rep. Howard Smith, a segregationist from Virginia who was against civil rights, included sex-based discrimination so the civil rights bill would be too controversial to pass, but it did pass! 
In this panel discussing the accomplishments and impact of the CRA, Senior U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson was the token senior at 80 years old.  As a 1962 graduate of UC Berkeley’s Boalt Hall School of Law, he was the first African-American lawyer in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and recalled being sent to the South to monitor local law enforcement for civil rights abuses, including investigation of the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church bombing that killed four black girls. (Other panelists were Zoe Polk, Director of Policy & Social Justice at San Francisco Human Rights Commission, and Reuel Schiller, Professor of Law at Hastings College of Law.)

Closing digital divide 
At yesterday’s Older Women's League (OWL) meeting, Community Living Campaign (CLC) Director Marie Jobling presented on 10 Things to Love (and 5 Things to Hate) about Technology.  When technical difficulties delayed her showing of the trailer for Cyber Seniors documentary, Marie quipped, "Computers teach you patience." 

First, Marie's top 10 loves about technology:
  1. connects us: skype, google, twitter, blogger, youtube, linkedin, facebook
  2. facilitates lifelong learning 24/7 in every language (google translate, Duolingo), every subject
  3. levels playing field to break down barriers for PWD, limited English: assistive technology, large print, more disability access built-in
  4. language and disability access
  5. pathway to employment & volunteer opportunities
  6. convenient shopping
  7. helps us take control of our health & well-being: research, connect with health providers, fitness apps
  8. we can make & promote our own “news”: blogs, digital photo sharing, customize what you read (google alerts)
  9. keeps mind & memory sharp: learn new things, brain fitness games, genealogy
  10. fun: online entertainment
 
Then, Marie's 5 things to hate about technology:
  1. discourage connections in-person: lack basic courtesies, create new class of haves & have-nots, don’t know when to put screen down
  2. not available to all: limited affordable access
  3. problem with p@ssW0rds: hard to remember all, complex to be secure
  4. privacy: keep info secure, know how to be safe, what to share
  5. things change too fast: hard to keep up, too expensive
CLC, which organized the 2012 Aging & Disability Technology Summit at City Hall, provides technology training through SF Connected program. CLC Connector LaNay Eastman demonstrated technology tools for persons with vision and/or hearing disabilities.  Independent Living Resource Center of San Francisco (ILRCSF) is the local assistive technology network, where one can "try before you buy."

8 comments:

  1. Equality for all requires some restrictions of liberty
    Martin Benjamin
    Published 5:21 pm, Thursday, July 3, 2014
    On a sightseeing trip to New York with our Bay Area grandchildren, I was struck by a certain imbalance as we passed the Statue of Liberty. Liberty, as represented by the statue, is an important national value. Equality, however, is no less important. Yet as a nation we increasingly represent and celebrate liberty at the expense of equality.
    Liberty is necessary for a meaningful life. To be forced to live a life scripted by others is dehumanizing. In a democracy, however, a decent and meaningful life should be open to everyone, not just some.
    The Declaration of Independence states we are all "created equal." But what does this mean? It cannot mean we are physically and mentally equal. We differ widely with regard to sex, height, weight, strength and various other physical and mental characteristics. We are all created equal in the sense that we all desire and have an equal right to a decent life. And this requires more than just liberty.
    A person cannot lead a decent and meaningful life without resources, including food, shelter, clothing, good education and access to health care. Access to such resources for all who need them requires that the liberty of some be restricted by taxation to provide these and other resources for decent and meaningful lives to those who cannot provide them for themselves.
    As Isaiah Berlin has written: "Both liberty and equality are among the primary goals pursued by human beings through many centuries: but total liberty for wolves is death to the lambs, total liberty of the powerful, the gifted, is not compatible with the rights to a decent existence of the weak and less gifted. ... [L]iberty may have to be curtailed in order to make room for social welfare, to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to shelter the homeless, to leave room for the liberty of others, to allow justice or fairness to be exercised."
    Thus, while acknowledging the value and importance of liberty, we must resist the efforts of Johnny One Note libertarians to make it a fetish. The liberty of the reasonably well off to spend all their income and wealth as they see fit must be limited to provide equal opportunity for decent and meaningful lives for all. . . .
    http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/Equality-for-all-requires-some-restrictions-of-5599279.php

    ReplyDelete
  2. When Poverty Makes You Sick, a Lawyer Can Be the Cure
    By TINA ROSENBERG
    July 17, 2014
    Being poor can make you sick. Where you work, the air you breathe, the state of your housing, what you eat, your levels of stress and your vulnerability to crime, injury and discrimination all affect your health. These social determinants of health lie outside the reach of doctors and nurses.
    In the early 1990s, Barry Zuckerman, the chief of pediatrics at Boston City Hospital (now Boston Medical Center), decided he was tired of seeing kids cycling back into the hospital again and again — asthmatic kids who never got better because of the mold in their houses, infants with breathing problems because their apartments were unheated. He’d write letters to the landlord, who ignored them, . . .Then at a cocktail party, someone listening to his complaints asked Zuckerman: What does the law say?
    Zuckerman thought it was an important question. In 1993, he established the Family Advocacy Program with three lawyers to prod landlords, secure government benefits families were entitled to and fight with Medicaid, insurance companies, schools and other bureaucracies.
    There were few medical-legal partnerships until about five or 10 years ago, but now 231 health care institutions have them, according to the National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership. . .
    Medical-legal partnerships are growing in part because of increasing attention to social determinants of health. Talking about inequality means talking about the vicious cycles that keep people poor; one of the most important is the intersection of poverty and health. . . .
    The vast majority of low-income Americans have unresolved legal problems: debt, immigration status, custody issues, child care, benefits, back pay, housing, a special education plan for a child — you name it. All of these affect stress levels, which is in itself a health issue, but many have a more direct connection to health. . . .
    Clinics that have medical-legal partnerships approach health differently than others. When doctors have no options for helping patients with the social determinants of health, they tend not to ask about them. With a medical-legal partnership, they do. At Cincinnati Children’s, each patient’s family is asked: Do you have housing problems? Problems getting your benefits? Are you depressed? Are you unsafe in your relationship? Would you like to speak to a lawyer or social worker about any of these things? . . .
    A legal letter can often get a response where a doctor’s or social worker’s letter does not. The lawyers also save doctors time. “Everyone works at the top of their profession instead of the physician figuring out why mom is going to be evicted tomorrow and what they can do about it,” said Ellen Lawton, co-principal investigator at the National Center for Medical-Legal Partnership.
    The reverse is also true: adding doctors makes legal work easier. Lawton said that lawyers’ arguments carry more weight when they include a medical opinion. “The health of the kids changes the advocacy conversation,” she said. “It goes from ‘this is the law and you have to comply’ to a conversation that’s about community well-being and health. And when you’re able to use the clinical viewpoint rather than a legal framework, you’re able to resolve the issue much more rapidly.”
    Most important, a medical-legal partnership goes beyond curing an individual. Child HeLP’s actions in Cincinnati’s sick buildings made life better for all the families there. . . “Look for the pattern and find what’s making kids sick in the first place. The power of the model is moving upstream, going from person to person to population level” — legal action as preventive medicine.
    Like other forms of preventive care, medical-legal clinics are a bargain. . .
    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/07/17/when-poverty-makes-you-sick-a-lawyer-can-be-the-cure/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not so golden: Wealth gap lasting into retirement
    By Michael Hill, Associated Press
    Sun, Aug 3, 2014
    With traditional pensions becoming rarer in the private sector, and lower-paid workers less likely to have access to an employer-provided retirement plan, there is a growing gulf in the retirement savings of the wealthy and people with lower incomes. That, experts say, could exacerbate an already widening wealth gap across America, as more than 70 million baby boomers head into retirement — many of them with skimpy reserves.
    Because retirement savings are ever more closely tied to income, the widening gulf between the rich and those with less promises to continue — and perhaps worsen — after workers reach retirement age. That is likely to put pressure on government services and lead even more Americans to work well into what is supposed to be their golden years.
    Increasingly, financial security for retirees reflects how much they have accumulated during their working career — things like 401(k) accounts, other savings and home equity.
    Highly educated, dual income couples tend to do better under this system. The future looks bleaker for people with less education, lower incomes or health issues, as well as for single parents, said Karen Smith, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, a Washington think tank.
    "We do find rising inequality," said Smith, who added that it's a problem if those at the top are seeing disproportionate gains from economic growth.
    Incomes for the highest-earning 1 percent of Americans soared 31 percent from 2009 through 2012, after adjusting for inflation, according to data compiled by Emmanuel Saez, an economist at University of California, Berkeley. For everyone else, it inched up an average of 0.4 percent
    Researchers at the liberal Economic Policy Institute say households in the top fifth of income saw median retirement savings increase from $45,539 in 1989 to $160,000 in 2010 in inflation-adjusted dollars. For households in the bottom fifth, median retirement savings were down from $8,433 in 1989 to $8,000 in 2010, adjusted for inflation. The calculations did not include households without retirement savings. . . .
    The days of retirees being able to count on set monthly payments from pensions continue to fade among non-government workers. Only 13 percent of private-sector workers now participate in "defined benefit" plans, compared with a third of such workers in 1985. They've been eclipsed by "defined contribution" plans, often 401(k)s, in which employers match a portion of employee contributions.
    Americans know they need to save for retirement. The trick for many is actually doing it. It's estimated that about half of private-sector workers don't take part in a retirement plan at their current job. . . .
    EBRI, a Washington-based nonpartisan research group, projects that more than 55 percent of baby boomers and the generation that follows them, Generation X, will have enough money to last through retirement.
    But EBRI also found the least wealthy boomer and Gen X households are far more likely to run short of money in retirement. Under some models, 43 percent of those in the lowest quarter run short of money in the first year of retirement.
    VanDerhei, EBRI's research director, said members of that group are relying mostly on Social Security and lacked consistent access to retirement plans over their careers.
    Many of those retirees will find that it won't be enough, David John of AARP's Public Policy Institute said, noting the average monthly Social Security retiree benefit last year was about $1,300. . .
    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/not-golden-wealth-gap-lasting-154419333.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bay Area must invest in health services for older adults
    Louise Aronson
    Published 5:42 pm, Wednesday, July 30, 2014
    So the problem isn't what we do have here in the Bay Area, it's what we lack: health care and philanthropic giants focused on the segment of our population that does routinely need medical care: older adults.
    People over age 65 constitute 14 percent of the U.S. population but over 40 percent of all hospital days. This matters because, much like children, older adults - particularly those who are frail, over age 80 or have multiple medical problems - do better with facilities and care specialized to their unique physiology and age-related needs.
    Of course, saving a child may mean making an entire lifetime possible, while caring for an older adult will save years or decades at most. But that sort of math confuses quantity with quality of life, and cure with care. It also pits age groups against one another when a healthy society requires attention to both, and it neglects one of this century's most promising opportunities for significant humanitarian, economic and societal impact.
    We all know that a 90-year-old is as distinct in appearance, function and physiology from a 50-year-old as a 10-year-old is from that same middle-aged adult, yet as our population ages at unprecedented rates, we invest in and market children's hospitals but don't do the same for hospitals serving seniors.
    This makes no sense - not for those who are old today, not for the rapidly aging Baby Boomers caring for their parents and anticipating their own old age, and not for society, which too often gets a poor return on investment from care for its oldest and sickest.
    Conservative estimates find that 1 in 5 older adults is hurt (experiences a fall, incurs infections, receives wrong or inadequate medications or treatments) by medical care each year. Older patients are among the groups least likely to get evidence-based care, and about one-third of the Medicare dollar is spent on aggressive end-of-life care for critically ill older patients who often reject such treatment if offered a choice. Most families have stories of an elderly loved one who returned from the hospital with their disease treated and their life ruined.
    It's not that we have no specialized services for older adults. It's that we have nowhere near enough.
    The Bay Area is known for cutting-edge social programs and tech innovation. Putting the two together to improve health care for older adults is like mounting a sports team with a brilliant offense and a powerful defense. To be sure, health care for older adults is a complex challenge, but with our local resources - human, financial, scientific, social and technological - we can lead the nation in providing compassionate, innovative, cost-effective and personalized health care to our aging population in the 21st century.
    Sports teams win matches by scoring the most points. Health care, it turns out, isn't so different. The winners provide the best care to the most people.
    I'd love to see a Bay Bridge World Series, but I'd rather see our health care and philanthropic leaders invest in transforming care for patients of all ages, including the older adults who need it most.
    Louise Aronson is an associate professor of geriatrics at UCSF and the author of "A History of the Present Illness" (Bloomsbury, 2013).
    http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/Bay-Area-must-invest-in-health-services-for-older-5658165.php#photo-6662661

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Fed: Yes, income inequality is as bad you thought
    Posted on Friday, September 5 at 8:04am | By Andrew S Ross
    It doesn’t get much more official than this.
    The Federal Reserve says that the rich have gotten richer from the economic recovery while the majority of Americans have been left behind ”consistent with increasing income concentration during this period.” And those at the bottom of the heap are being pushed down further than ever.
    “Consistent with income trends and differential holdings of housing and corporate equities, families at the bottom of the income distribution saw continued substantial declines in real net worth between 2010 and 2013,” the Fed finds in a report published Wednesday.
    For those older and poorer Americans it probably won’t get much better, the Fed piles on. ”Retirement plan participation in 2013 continued on the downward trajectory observed between the 2007 and 2010 surveys for families in the bottom half of the income distribution.”
    Things are a little better for the middle class; their average income has stayed pretty much where it was, but still below what they were making on the eve of the Great Recession in 2007. ”Only families at the very top of the income distribution (the top 3%) saw widespread income gains,” the Fed added, just in case we didn’t get the point.
    The quantitative easing and rock bottom interest rates the Fed has been using to boost the economy don’t seem to have eased the lot of the majority of Americans. And while the Fed report is not news, it bears repeating, as does Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen’s observation during her confirmation hearing last year that increasing inequality is ”a very deep problem.”
    Unfortunately, she said, “many of the underlying factors are things that are outside of the Federal Reserve’s ability to address.”
    http://blog.sfgate.com/bottomline/2014/09/05/the-fed-yes-income-inequality-is-as-bad-you-thought/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Income Inequality Grows With Age and Shapes Later Years
    Paula Span
    Oct. 12, 2015
    …Old people contend with lots of common ordeals: struggles with health and mobility, thinning social networks, dismissal by a youth-besotted culture.
    “But people face these challenges on an uneven playing field,” said Corey Abramson, a sociologist at the University of Arizona. “The inequality that shapes our lives from birth onward doesn’t end with the first Social Security check.”
    Socioeconomic inequality, he noted, helps determine who gets to grow old.
    Dr. Abramson’s book “The End Game: How Inequality Shapes Our Final Years,” and a report from the National Academy of Sciences last month on the growing life expectancy gap, underscore the effect of income and education on old age.
    Ronald Lee, a demographer at the University of California, Berkeley, and a co-chairman of the committee that studied the gap, told me he was staggered by its findings.
    Dividing the population into lifetime earning levels, the committee found that men born in 1930 who reached age 50 had a life expectancy of another 26.6 years if they were in the lowest income bracket and 31.7 years in the highest bracket. But projections for men born in 1960 showed no improvement for the lowest earners — and an additional seven years for the highest. In three decades, the life expectancy gap had widened from about five years to more than 12 — “shockingly large,” Dr. Lee said.
    The longevity gains we’ve all heard (and written) so much about, in other words, are going to the men atop the economic ladder.
    And, even more strikingly, to the women at the top. Lower-earning women actually have declining life expectancies in simulations that compared the 1960 cohort with those born in 1930. “That’s largely explained by differences in starting and quitting smoking,” Dr. Lee said. But those in the top earnings bracket who reach 50 can now expect, on average, another 41.9 years. The gap by income has surged from four years to more than 13.
    Those widening gaps mean that the rich get richer when it comes to federal benefits — Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. In the 1930 birth cohort, lifetime benefits for low- and high-earning men were about the same. Among those born in 1960, however, men in the highest earning bracket will receive $132,000 more on average than those in the lowest; the highest-earning women will receive $28,000 more.
    “The increasing gap in life expectancy means even more inequality over a lifetime,” said Peter Orszag, co-chairman of the committee and former director of the federal Office of Management and Budget.
    …Such inequality in life spans, in physical environments, in health care and in public benefits means that policy makers and legislators, who are often enthusiastic about cutting “entitlement programs,” should proceed cautiously, the National Academy committee chairmen warned.
    Their report analyzed several proposed reforms, including raising the age at which people can draw on Social Security, reducing cost-of-living increases and increasing the eligibility age for Medicare. Some tactics would only slightly narrow the gap between high and low earners; others would actually worsen inequality.
    “Any policy argument based on an average is going to be misleading; it ignores that the average masks very different trends,” Dr. Orszag said.
    Inequality at older ages, moreover, offers a powerful case for cross-generational responses. Generational conflict — older voters opposing school bonds, younger workers chafing at Social Security taxes — has never made much sense, given that the young, if they’re lucky, eventually become the old.
    “If we fail to invest at younger ages, the impact can show up at older ages,” Dr. Orszag said, arguing for an all-in-it-together approach. “There are lots of opportunities for expanding access to health care and education for younger people, and that has lifelong effects.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/13/health/income-inequality-grows-with-age-and-shapes-later-years.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Disparity in Life Spans of the Rich and the Poor Is Growing
    By SABRINA TAVERNISE
    FEB. 12, 2016
    …Despite big advances in medicine, technology and education, the longevity gap between high-income and low-income Americans has been widening sharply.
    The poor are losing ground not only in income, but also in years of life, the most basic measure of well-being. In the early 1970s, a 60-year-old man in the top half of the earnings ladder could expect to live 1.2 years longer than a man of the same age in the bottom half, according to an analysis by the Social Security Administration. Fast-forward to 2001, and he could expect to live 5.8 years longer than his poorer counterpart.
    …economists at the Brookings Institution found that for men born in 1920, there was a six-year difference in life expectancy between the top 10 percent of earners and the bottom 10 percent. For men born in 1950, that difference had more than doubled, to 14 years.
    For women, the gap grew to 13 years, from 4.7 years…
    Over all, according to the Brookings study, life expectancy for the bottom 10 percent of wage earners improved by just 3 percent for men born in 1950 compared with those born in 1920. For the top 10 percent, though, it jumped by about 28 percent. (The researchers used a common measure — life expectancy at age 50 — and included data from 1984 to 2012.)
    An Expanding Longevity Gap
    It is hard to point to one overriding cause, but public health researchers have a few answers. In recent decades, smoking, the single biggest cause of preventable death, has helped drive the disparity, … As the rich and educated began to drop the habit, its deadly effects fell increasingly on poorer, uneducated people…
    Obesity, which has been sharply rising since the 1980s, is more ambiguous. The gap between obesity rates for high earners and low earners actually narrowed from 1990 to 2010, according to an analysis by the National Academy of Sciences. By 2010, about 37 percent of adults at the lower end of the income ladder were obese, compared with 31 percent at the higher end.
    More recently, the prescription drug epidemic has ravaged poor white communities, a problem that experts said would most likely exacerbate the trend of widening disparities.
    Limited access to health care accounts for surprisingly few premature deaths in America, researchers have found…
    At the heart of the disparity, said Elizabeth H. Bradley, a professor of public health at Yale, are economic and social inequities, “and those are things that high-tech medicine cannot fix.”…
    The growing longevity gap means that benefits like Social Security are paid out even more disproportionately to the better-off because they are around for more years to collect them. Last summer, the National Academy of Sciences convened a panel of experts to study the implications. It concluded that disparate life expectancies are making the country’s biggest entitlement programs, like Social Security and Medicare, increasingly unfair to the poor and suggested officials consider policy changes to address the problem.
    Poor health outcomes for low-income Americans have dragged the United States down to some of the lowest rankings of life expectancy among rich countries.…
    Many researchers believe the gap in life spans from lower- to upper-income Americans started widening about 40 years ago, when income inequality began to grow. Earlier in the 20th century, trends in life spans were of declining disparities, some experts say, because improvements in public health, such as the invention of the polio vaccine and improved sanitation, benefited rich and poor alike. The broad adoption of medication for high blood pressure in the 1950s led to a major improvement for black men, erasing a big part of the gap with whites, ,,,But medical improvements can also drive disparity when they disproportionately benefit affluent Americans; for example, cutting-edge cancer treatments.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/13/health/disparity-in-life-spans-of-the-rich-and-the-poor-is-growing.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. SRO elevators fall into disrepair
    By Michaela Payne on June 15, 2016 1:00 am
    …frequent elevator breakdowns that plague …many of San Francisco’s some 180 single-room occupancy hotels — commonly referred to as SROs — prompted a group of residents and community activists to rally Tuesday morning outside the hotel at 51 6th St. and demand more city funding to improve and replace SRO elevators.
    …Doug Hosterman said. When the elevator breaks, he’s able to descend a steep staircase that winds around the elevator shaft, but very slowly with an unsteady gait.
    Going up the stairs to his single room and private bathroom on the seventh floor is a big problem. The climb takes him 30 minutes.
    “How are you going to get the gurneys down when somebody has a heart attack up there?” Hosterman asked.
    Half of the buttons on the Hillsdale’s old machine no longer light up. It opens with a heavy gate that pinches fingers, misaligns its metal parts and closes on passengers’ bodies as they enter, Hosterman warned.
    “I moved in 12 years ago. The elevator didn’t work at all. For four-and-a-half months, I climbed the stairs, at that time to the sixth floor. I was in better shape then. My disabilities have taken hold 12 years later,” Hosterman said.
    The 1912 hotel houses 84 residents, more than half of whom are seniors or people with disabilities, health troubles and mobility issues. Elevator breakdowns mean residents in wheelchairs and walkers become confined to their rooms and hallways. Meals on Wheels can only deliver food meant for residents to the second-floor offices of their case workers.
    “The elevator is a lifeline,” said Tony Robles, who advocates for senior and disabled housing. “When people are stuck in these elevators, it leads to isolation and missed appointments.”
    ...“Given The City’s affordability crisis, many seniors live in SRO hotels because it is the only housing that they can afford,” Robles said.
    Mona Lisa Caldwell became the Hillsdale’s property manager ... In the six months since she started, she estimated $10,000 has been spent in elevator repairs.
    “Most of the time it is due to tenant negligence,” Caldwell said, like not waiting until the elevator comes to a complete stop or beating on the doors.
    “It’s expensive to do it … doesn’t matter if you’re just replacing a screw,” she continued. Though Caldwell has hired various elevator repair companies, they often charge overtime or take hours to arrive, and sometimes the antique parts must be custom-made.
    The Hillsdale lease is held by the Episcopal Community Services, which operates 11 San Francisco SROs and the Navigation Center at Mission and 16th streets, plus various community buildings and programs.
    SRO property owners can receive free, no-strings-attached elevator assessments through the Mayor’s Office on Disability, though not for repairs, which can cost each facility as much as $300,000, deputy director Arfaraz Khambatta said.
    The Board of Supervisors set aside an assessment fund of $250,000 in 2014 that is available on a first-come, first-served basis to property owners who reach out to mod@sfgov.org or call (415) 554-6789.
    Khambatta said SRO tenants should ask their property owners and managers to take advantage of the assessment program.
    http://www.sfexaminer.com/sro-elevators-fall-disrepair/

    ReplyDelete