Friday, August 31, 2018

Reframing aging

During last month’s American Society on Aging (ASA) webinar, Reframing Aging: Organizational Adoption & Integration in San Francisco, San Francisco Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Executive Director Shireen McSpadden discussed the catalyst for San Francisco’s Reframing Aging Initiative coming from:
·       growing older population (1 in 5 San Francisco residents is an older adult, and this will grow to 1 in 4 by 2030),
·       population parity (Dignity Fund for seniors and adults with disabilities, similar to Children and Youth Fund),
·       interest from foundation partners (Metta Fund), and
·       needs assessment findings that highlight need to improve awareness and understanding of services, and to mitigate ageism and ableism as barriers for older adults (who desire to be seen; feel safer and connected to community; safety and access to mobility in public transit and streets; respect need for accommodation).
Shireen talked about reframing aging as a challenge to ageism: reducing avoidance of aging due to fear, stigma and lack of knowledge; ensuring systems for engagement, inclusion and support as people age—instead of leaving people to figure things out on their own until there is a crisis.  She also mentioned Vision 2025: Sustainable Aging Services, which has the tagline, Aging is All About Living,” adopted by California Area Agencies on Aging (C4A).
Shireen said DAAS is engaging service providers (more than 60 community-based organizations, including Self-Help for the Elderly whose CEO Anni Chung briefly presented during webinar) to develop buy-in and gain insight so all voices are heard. She talked about next steps to operationalize this initiative: form small working group of stakeholders, hire project manager to lead group process, implement outreach and train 380 department staff.  She concluded with this performance measurement list: creation of handbook, consistent language across DAAS programs and materials (acknowledging her use of “older adult” instead of “older person” word choice recommended by FrameWorks Institute), launch of citywide campaigns, biennial city survey, and media coverage of aging-related issues. 
This month’s follow-up ASA webinar, A Deeper Exploration of Research-Based Messaging Strategies for the Field of Aging, by FrameWork’s Reframing Aging Master Trainers framed aging, partly through a social work lens:
·       emphasize values of social justice and collective responsibility (e.g. “ageism leads to social injustice and unequal treatment or exclusion”) to tap emotions like curiosity, concern and can-do for policy thinking;
·       explain aging in person-in-environment context that shapes decisions and outcomes; and
·       ageism as problem can be solved (interventions in systems and supports can change outcomes).
This training included viewing a short video, The Student, from USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center’s Hollywood, Health and Society Program.  It showed a day in the life of an unseen, age-unknown person behind the camera who is on campus with younger students during the day, shopping for food and then sharing mealtime with older adults.  It ended with the words “Life is Ageless" and Rethink Aging.  While one trainer liked it (because "surprising that older Asian woman was on other side of camera"), I didn't really care for the age-segregation.  Perhaps the video should have been shot at San Francisco State University, where classes are filled with students of all ages.
  
Anyway, Reframing Aging training concluded “frailty is not the whole story…” with suggestions to “avoid discussing or showing older people as ‘vulnerable’” and place greater emphasis on the “more positive story of aging, too.”  After all, framing is about choosing how information is presented, including "what to leave unsaid" based on "what will that story do?" (Assisted living marketers rarely show images of residents using walkers and wheelchairs.)
Yet for the past three years, I have worked primarily with older adults who are frail, mostly homebound in private homes and assisted living, and they sometimes cycle in and out of hospitals, with limited opportunities to be seen and heard by the public.  As a gerontologist who advocates for community living opportunities, I think it’s important to spend time with older adults who are less visible in the continuum of care to avoid the perception of us versus them (aka "the other"). 

As a former Meals on Wheels San Francisco (MOWSF) social worker, I met so many interesting clients that I often referred them to our Marketing and Communications Director to profile.  Many oldest-old (age 85+) clients who outlived savings and peers were living in poverty and isolation, which would make any human vulnerable—at any age, so no shame in "discussing or showing older people as 'vulnerable.'" (Social workers are expected in help people in need, especially vulnerable and oppressed people; also, Older Americans Act programs are intended to protect "vulnerable elders" and target older adults with the greatest economic or social need.)  MOWSF presents these compelling facts about its homebound senior clients (aka "older people" by FrameWorks), which are important to understand why we need to support its mission to provide “a network of services that allow seniors to live in their homes with dignity and independence as long as possible”: 
·       75% of MOWSF seniors live below the Federal Poverty Level ($970/month)
·       67% of MOWSF seniors live alone (many are “elder orphans”)
MOWSF’s Friendly Visitor Program has an awesome video, “Need to spice up your friend demographics?” showing a cool homebound senior Violet playing the ukulele while describing her likes and interests, and appropriately, the song “Fast Friends” by Rocketship Park plays. 

Another awesome example is Flossie Lewis, who earned her PhD at age 73 after retiring as a high school English teacher, and resides with dignity in a retirement facility in Oakland (after a young friend playfully pushed and caused Flossie to fall at age 80).
Yes! Since Flossie Lewis appeared on PBS Newshour two years ago at age 91, her Brief but Spectacular take on growing old went viral with more than seven million views! I became an instant fan because Flossie was the real deal, telling us how “getting old is a state of mind”:
·       Perceived “real” (deficits): accepting the body is going to go (“there is indigestion and your teeth fall out and suddenly you need hearing aids”)
·       Ideal (strengths): but the personality and character doesn’t have to go (“You pick yourself up and you say, ‘I’m going to get through it because I have a reason to get through it’”)
·       Opportunities to keep stimulated: taking walks outdoors with her walker or wheelchair, writing for publication, watching politics
Over a hundred people, including yours truly who sat among Flossie's former Lowell High School students, turned out at the Commonwealth Club for Brief but Spectacular Stories, which kicked off with a 10-minute documentary screening of “Flossie Lewis: Back in the Classroom!” Afterwards, 94-year-old Flossie took the stage with Brief but Spectacular producer Steve Goldbloom and poet Mahogany Browne for a conversation with Inflection Point radio host Lauren Schiller. 

In this social media age of curated personalities, Steve searches for authenticity and found Flossie to be “an original force of nature.”  Flossie was critical of Twitter, not because of the President’s use of it but accepting it as a form of composition is moving toward “duckspeak” in 1984. (In contrast, much younger Mahogany has used Twitter as a writing prompt and published her collection of tweets in #Dear Twitter: Love Letters Hashed Out Online in 140 Characters or Less.) 
When Lauren asked, “How do you prioritize time, decide what to do each day with time left?” Flossie replied, “if you live in a retirement community, there are activities. You can participate, or you can sit; and if you sit, invariably you will fall asleep.” Then she talked about her participation in a poetry group.

 “We have to rethink what we value because so much of our life has reached fruition;...Now we have to find meaning in places we might not have bothered about when we were younger and half of a couple: solitude, friendship, bird and animal watching, and a closer following of music, painting, and theatre. This replacement alone can be a soul-wrenching shift that forces us to ask ourselves: What matters now?
…As with other old people, after I’ve finished the necessary examination of my life (knowing that living in the past is a trap), of death itself, and of my limited future, which will probably not be glorious, I have found myself quite inadvertently savouring the moment and focusing on it not as part of the spiritual and therapeutic practice known as “mindfulness” but as a natural development in and of the state of being old. It is through this attention to the moment that true joy in the wonders of being alive in the world, so rare otherwise in adulthood, finally comes.”
--Sharon Butala, “Against Ageism: It’s time to stop treating senior citizens as a burden,” The Walrus (April 6, 2018) 

4 comments:

  1. Javad Hekmat-panah:“Elderly”—an outdated and potentially harmful term
    March 1, 2019
    Words convey meanings and messages that can differ across countries, cultures, and eras. Some words lose their original meaning or convey unrelated messages; others become derogatory or insulting. In medicine, elderly is one such term: it is outdated, conjures up bias, and does harm.
    While the word is still in use for certain administrative purposes, it has no clear definition. It conveys that a person is old, but not how old, or old in what capacity. In some cultures, it conveys “age 65 and above,” or that a person is at their retirement age, but with people increasingly retiring later and enjoying good health for longer, these meanings are increasingly blurred.
    Medicine is based on biological science. It has an internationally consistent terminology, which is used for diagnosis, communication, and treatment of diseases based on individual age, severity of illness, and comorbidities. The ambiguous term elderly offers no useful information about any of this. In medicine it can evoke false ideas about the person being described as elderly in the listener’s mind, introduce unfair social biases and generalisations, and generate ill conceived policies. I’d argue that the term elderly is like “imbecile” or “idiot,” which have become anachronistic and offensive; its use must be avoided in medicine. Stating a patient’s actual age is more appropriate and more informative.
    Everyone struggles through hardships in order to live a longer life, but nobody wants to grow old or be called old. Older age, however, is unfairly compared to youth: it is a misperception that old age unquestionably leads to illness, unhappiness, loss of attractiveness, and the capacity to make social contributions. These perceptions will only lead to older aged individuals being valued less, treated with diminished respect, and becoming a target for bias and unfair policies.
    We are not born with biases; they are attitudes or behaviors that we acquire. Once formed, however, these attitudes can remain hidden within us like a disease. Unless we diagnose these biases and make an effort to excise them, they can erupt later on.
    We know that bias against older people has already found its way into medicine.
    …Aging is not a disease, it is a progressive biological change and there may be vast differences in the health of people who are aged 65 and over. One older patient may not be able to tolerate a medical treatment because of accumulated comorbidities, but another of the same age without comorbidities may easily do so. Despite this, I’ve often come across investigators in medical research who’ve arbitrarily lumped everyone aged 65 and above in one group, instead of using the same sequential period as younger age groups. This averaging can result in treating a relatively healthy 65 year old patient identically to one much older or less healthy.
    …My suggestion that we avoid the term elderly in medicine goes beyond the word itself to encompass all that it connotes: stereotypes, unwarranted impressions, and bias. This is essentially a human rights issue. Medicine is the science and art of individualised communication, evaluation, recommendation, and treatment. Each patient has the right to be treated as an individual, according to medical standards based on their specific age, general condition, and comorbidities. To label everyone above a certain age as elderly and to treat them identically defies this principle, which should be at the heart of medicine.
    Javad Hekmat-panah is a professor of neurology and neurosurgery at the University of Chicago with 40 years of practice in paediatric and adult neurological and neurosurgical conditions. He is the published author ofCommunication with and on Behalf of Patients, and has a broad interest in communication and neuro-ethics.
    https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/03/01/javad-hekmat-panahelderly-outdated-potentially-harmful-term/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Social media outraged over a nearly 30-year-old clip of Maya Angelou
    Many are coming to the deceased writer's defense
    Drew Costley, SFGATE
    Friday, March 15, 2019
    There are a lot of things people on the Internet could have been outraged on Friday, March 15, 2019: a mass shooting that killed 49 people, the ongoing college admissions scandal, calls by WhatsApp's founder to delete Facebook.
    And sure, some people are mad about that stuff, but thousands of others are also focusing their anger on a nearly 30-year-old clip of legendary poet, author and civil rights activist, Maya Angelou. Angelou, who died in 2014, was trending on Twitter after footage surfaced of her on a television show in 1990 correcting a young woman who called the longtime Bay Area resident by her first name.
    In the clip, a young woman of color named Kim asked "Maya," as she put it, her views on interracial relationships.
    Immediately Angelou responded, "Thank you, and first, I'm Ms. Angelou. I'm not Maya. I'm 62 years old. I have lived so long and tried so hard that a young woman like you, or any other, have no license to come up to me and call me by my first name.
    "That's first. Also, because at the same time, I'm your mother, I'm your auntie, I'm your teacher, I'm your professor. See?"
    But many people on Twitter expressed outrage, or even embarrassment, over the clip. "Maya Angelou did NOT have to READ this innocent girl down on national TV like that," wrote Twitter user @Doogi_, along with three crying emojis.
    Another Twitter user, @DragonflyJonez, said that the clip going viral and the ensuing discussion about it, "has me reliving all of the cringe worthy times I responded with "yes ma'am" when a lady has told me to stop calling her ma'am and now I wanna crawl under a rock and die thanks a lot guys."
    Maybe they have a point. Later in the television program, Angelou apologized to Kim "for being so short."
    Still, there were a lot of people who rushed to Angelou's defense. Some brought up the fact that Angelou has been deceased for five years now as reason why people should not be talking about the clip.
    "Maya Angelou is dead she is the literal definition of unbothered can y'all stop trying to drag a new dead person every week when you're bored," wrote Ira Madison III, a television writer.
    Others jokingly (I hope) saw the consternation over Angelou's comments as reason to lose faith in humanity.
    "Please know that Maya Angelou is trending nationally because there are some young folks who are offended that she directed a young woman to call her Ms. Angelou instead of Maya in a [29-year-old] clip," wrote journalist Yashar Ali. "We are doomed."
    https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/outrage-Maya-Angelou-first-name-young-person-13692595.php

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ageism: A ‘Prevalent and Insidious’ Health Threat
    By Paula Span
    April 26, 2019
    …forms ageism often takes: pervasive employment discrimination, biased health care, media caricatures or invisibility. When internalized by older adults themselves, ageist views can lead to poorer mental and physical health.
    “It’s an incredibly prevalent and insidious problem,” said Alana Officer, who leads the World Health Organization’s global campaign against ageism, which it defines as “stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination” based on age. “It affects not only individuals, but how we think about policies.”
    …announced in 2016, W.H.O. has invested half a million dollars in research. Four teams around the world are collecting and assessing the available evidence on ageism — its causes and health consequences, how to combat it, and how best to measure it.
    Their work will appear in a United Nations report to be published within a year, and will culminate in international mobilization, organizers hope.
    …Cornell University, has already completed its task, and is about to publish its study in the American Journal of Public Health…
    The team spent a year and a half sifting through dozens of articles, from the 1970s through last year, evaluating anti-ageism programs. Such efforts popped up around the country in the years after psychiatrist and gerontologist Dr. Robert Butler coined the term ageism in 1969.
    “But are they doing any good?” asked Karl Pillemer, a gerontologist and senior author of the study.
    ...Almost universally, after such interventions, participants showed significantly less ageism on attitude tests and greater knowledge of aging than comparison groups that hadn’t taken part. The combined educational and intergenerational approach proved the most effective.
    “The message is loud and clear,” Dr. Pillemer said. “Ageist attitudes don’t seem as baked in as we think. They may be relatively malleable.”
    …“These stereotypes can have direct impact on older people’s health and function,” said Becca Levy, a social psychologist at the Yale School of Public Health, and the leader of the W.H.O.-sponsored review of studies on health consequences.
    …Dr. Levy has shown that older people who see aging in positive terms are much more likely to recover from disability than those who believe negative age stereotypes.
    They’re also more likely to practice preventive health measures such as eating well and exercising. They experience less depression and anxiety. They live longer.
    … “With negative stereotypes, older people have a higher risk of dementia,” she said. “They have greater accumulations of plaques and tangles in the brain, the biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease, and a reduced size of the hippocampus,” the part of the brain associated with memory.
    …Yet “there’s a lot of social acceptance of ageism,” Dr. Levy noted, pointing to television, social media and everyday interactions. Although studies have found that children as young as three or four already hold ageist ideas, now “we have research showing that we can overcome it.”
    …The studies the Cornell group analyzed followed participants for an average of 15 weeks, so we don’t know how long the positive effects of such interventions last. There’s scant data, too, on how to shift older people’s own internalized ageism.
    Nor do we know whether and how positive attitudes translate to action. Will less ageist citizens support stronger enforcement of laws against workplace age discrimination? Or defend Medicare and Social Security from heedless budget cutters?
    But seeing how even short-lived interventions can move the attitudinal needle, I’m encouraged to continue my personal anti-ageism campaign. (Author and activist Ashton Applewhite has established a helpful online clearinghouse called Old School.)
    It’s not always easy to find the balance between shrugging off offensive messages and counterproductive scolding, but individuals can speak up about ageist generalizations…
    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/26/health/ageism-elderly-health.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. PBS NewsHour Named Recipient of Six News & Documentary Emmy Award Nominations
    Arlington, VA (July 25, 2019) — PBS NewsHour was today named the recipient of six News & Documentary Emmy Award nominations from The National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. This year’s awards will be presented at a ceremony in New York City on September 24, 2019…
    Flossie Lewis, Still Spectacular at 94
    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/viral-sensation-flossie-lewis-is-still-a-spectacular-teacher-at-94
    Category: Outstanding Feature Story in a Newscast nominee
    Flossie Lewis, Still Spectacular at 94 offers a nuanced look into the life of a woman who inspired generations of Bay Area students. All of us have a Flossie – a teacher who profoundly shaped us into fully realized people, and who challenged us to discover talents we didn’t know existed. The ten-minute video offers not only background on who Flossie was but also a critical look at who she is today and, quite frankly, what she’s capable of. We spent time following Flossie in her retirement community, where she hosts a poetry group and writes light verse for the newsletter, interviewed fellow residents, and invited her former students to return to Flossie’s classroom at Lowell High School in San Francisco for a special lecture.
    Executive Producers: James Blue, Steve Goldbloom, Sara Just
    Producers: Zach Land-Miller, Melissa Williams
    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/press-releases/pbs-newshour-named-recipient-of-six-news-documentary-emmy-award-nominations

    ReplyDelete