Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Models of care

At the 53rd annual meeting and conference of the Society for Social Work Leadership in Health Care (SSWLHC) in age-friendly Portland, more than half of the over 300 attendees were new members, including yours truly. The four-day conference theme, Transforming Health Care Through Social Work Leadership and Advocacy, covered the entire lifespan with emphasis on mental/behavioral health and later life.

Older adults who are hospitalized often risk functional decline and more disabilities due to hospital routines such as bedrest (wastes muscles, causes blood and other fluids to redistribute in ways that can cause dizziness and balance problems, leads to pressure sores), sleep disruption (contributes to delirium), sleeping pills (potential for polypharmacy and falls), bladder catheter (risks infection and incontinence), etc.  As part of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare’s Independence at Home Medical Practice Demonstration Program is testing an innovative home-based primary care model targeting Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions and a substantial burden of functional limitations.  In addition, Medicare’s Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) attempts to link payments to quality of hospital care by penalizing acute-care hospitals with relatively high 30-day readmission rates for targeted conditions.
  
However, social factors—such as poverty, living alone and older age—may have a greater role in hospital readmissions than hospital quality of care. Therefore, medical social workers/patient advocates can address social determinants of health (SDOH) in care coordination/discharge planning with linkages to community resources (social, financial, nutritional, logistical support).  This social model considers the person-in-environment context to promote holistic health (“complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” per World Health Organization) and health equity, while the dominant medical model emphasizes diagnosis and treatment of disease.

For example, I work with one resident who was admitted over a year ago to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) following a cerebral infarction (stroke).  Under the medical model, resident was diagnosed with dysthymia (persistent depressive disorder) and treated with psychotropics and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).  In addition to adjusting to functional losses on the right side of her body and life in a SNF, the resident has been grieving over separation from her BFF (Best Friends Forever) dog. The social model includes periodic dog visits by volunteers from SPCA Animal Assisted Therapy (AAT) program in resident’s care plan. However, resident longs for more routine interaction with a dog rather than pining for monthly dog visits, so I have been exploring ways to make this happen (though I am allergic to most furry animals).  After all, human-animal bonding interactions produce oxytocin, endorphins and serotonin—all hormones that reduce stress and elevate moods, and may even improve motivation to participate in treatment protocols like physical therapy.  Mental health counselors incorporate AAT into traditional therapies to promote comfort and sense of safety, as well as normalize life and add to quality of life.  In long-term care environments, Dr. Bill Thomas made the presence of house pets one feature of his Eden Alternative movement to de-institutionalize sterile nursing home culture.

“There’s no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face.” – Sir Bernard Williams (1929-2003)   

The SSWHLC conference did not specifically address AAT, but offered other practice ideas for the role of geriatric social workers within an interdisciplinary health care team in addressing SDOH (home and community resources), integrating behavioral health, discussing end-of-life (including medical aid-in-dying), understanding “medical” conditions (pain, post-intensive care syndrome) relating to behavioral changes for care coordination/discharge planning, etc.  With mid-term elections just a month away, there was no mention of politics at this conference as the focus was primarily clinical social work (“micro”) than advocating for systemic/policy changes (“macro”).  Conference presenters were mostly social workers or health practitioners, instead of academic researchers, so gained practical information for everyday practice.
As a newbie, I attended Orientation to learn the history of SSWLHC, which began in 1965 (Medicare and Medicaid passage!) for Hospital Social Work Directors and expanded in 1997 to its current name to include all levels of social workers who are leaders.  In 1986, Medicare Conditions of Participation required that hospitals provide social work services and ongoing discharge planning program.  Members took the stage to share testimonials about membership benefits like networking and continuing education.
Hands on Greater Portland set-up station for DIY! Love Letters for Meals On Wheels and Lift Urban Portland that deliver food to homebound seniors and low-income residents – offering conference participants a nice break from power point presentations to create personalized greeting cards to cheer up food recipients!
Immediately after Orientation, enjoyed Reception which featured build-your-own ramen bowl.
Kermit B. Nash Lecture, Keeping Client at the Center: How Social Determinants of Health Have Driven One Organization’s Growth & Innovation, presented by Associate Medical Director Eowyn Rieke and Chief Housing and Strategy Officer Sean Hubert of Portland-based Central City Concern (CCC).  Since 1979, CCC has provided comprehensive solutions to ending homelessness by integrating affordable housing (now 1,800 units), health care (including primary care, substance use disorder treatment and behavioral health services), and employment. 
Not surprising, housing is the greatest of social needs:
·       National research shows a connection between rent increases and homelessness: $100 increase in rent is associated with a 6% to 32% increase in homelessness 
·       America’s affordable housing crisis is driving its homelessness crisis         
This Recuperative Care Program (RCP) is an intervention addressing SDOH with the basics after hospital discharge:  low-barrier short-term housing and intensive case management for homeless people with a severe medical condition that could benefit from stabilization.  In 2016, CCC launched its Housing is Health project: six health organizations providing funding for a new clinic and 379 new units of housing, which are scheduled to be completed by July 2019.
Oregon’s Death with Dignity Law: Twenty-One Years and Lessons Learned keynote presented by Susan Hedlund, Manager of Patient and Family Support Services at Oregon Health & Sciences University (OHSU), which developed POLST.  Oregon made history by passing its controversial law (which didn’t take effect until 1997 when repeal referendum defeated) allowing terminally ill Oregonians to obtain medication to end their lives.  To date, six other states (Washington and Montana 2009, Vermont 2015, Colorado 2016, California 2016 but pending appeal, Hawaii 2018) and the District of Columbia (2015) allow medical aid-in-dying (MAID).

Lawmakers and health care professionals often look to Oregon to guide the process of MAID implementation.  Yet the Pacific Northwest is unique, with its pioneer spirit, rugged individualism, very white population, least “Churched” state in the nation, and end-of-life practices (88.6% die at home, 88.7% enrolled in hospice, 99.2% had some form of health insurance; first state to combine Advance Directive and Healthcare Power of Attorney in 1980; Right to Hospice and Comfort Care in 1989; Right to Pain Relief in 1993; and Right to Refuse/Withdraw Treatment in 1993). 
17% of Oregonians potentially interested in Death With Dignity Act (DWDA), only 1-2% actually request it—mostly for reasons related to maintain independence, self-care and quality of life.  Significantly depressed patients seem to lack wherewithal to follow through process.  Some practice take-aways:
·       If patient inquires about, or indicates desire to pursue, Oregon’s DWDA, then this offers the opportunity to explore more deeply: reasons for request, meaning behind it, other issues that need to be addressed (symptom management), existential concerns, etc.
·       Desire to die in terminally ill people may be expressions of depression, suicidal intent, or coping
·       Person’s desire to die talk as coping: used to promote feelings of control, invite discussion of existential concerns, elicit help, express “readiness”
·       Professional must be aware of own reactions to desire to die statements because these will influence conversations: if unable to support MAID, important to refer (last year, family of deceased cancer patient Judy Dale filed lawsuit against UCSF for its alleged "backtracking" in obtaining medication to help her die under California's End of Life Option Act); find meaning in patient’s words and continue to assess concerns, mental health and intent; “sit with suffering,” bear witness to questions and concerns, and tolerate not being able to fix everything 
Transforming Mental Health Care in Emergency Room, presented by Amal Elanouari and Ashley Hartoch, discussed Stanford Hospital Emergency Department (ED)’s 2015 introduction of a new model of collaborative case management and integrative care by replacing its nurse case manager/social worker team with a mental health complex care manager (MH-CCM), a LCSW with expertise in mental health to provide comprehensive crisis intervention services to those with psychiatric illnesses.  This MH-CCM model addresses the growing challenge of treating patients with mental health conditions who visit hospital ED, and has facilitated improved patient flow to inpatient psychiatric units or community placements, reduced patient lengths of stay in the ED, and greater satisfaction for patients and family member. 
Comic relief: Groovy Guy in tie-dye shirt welcomed us Beautiful People to the Commune of Portland, inviting us to free food and join love-in at Mellow Marriott, so don’t be a Conscientious Objector, buy tickets before they sell out to Funky Foundation fundraiser event with lava lamps, brownie recipes and lifetime membership to Sierra Club.  Go with the flow! 
Networking and roundtable topics lunch: nothing geriatric so joined mental health table. 
Carby lunch of pasta and veggies
AARP table offered age-friendly publications
Community Care Management: Keeping our Patients Safe at Home, presented by June Simmons, President/CEO/Founder of Partners in Care Foundation.  She also appeared on The Journal of America’s Physician Groups (APG) cover story, “Letting Doctors Focus on Medicine,” discussing APG’s partnership with her organization’s network that provides SDOH services.  Thanks to the Creating High-Quality Results and Outcomes Necessary to Improve Chronic (CHRONIC) Care/Advancing Chronic Care, Extenders, and Social Services (ACCESS) Act of 2018, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) allow Medicare Advantage plans to provide SDOH services, such as home modifications/renovations, transportation, nutrition, care management, and evidence-based health promotion and disease prevention programs.  
June reminded us that health happens at home, so Community Integrated Health Care System 3.0 seeks integration of medical care and home/community-based social services to address SDOH. Community-based organizations (CBOs) are the “eyes and ears” in the home:
·       gathering data and information typically not shared in a medical setting (comprehensive psychosocial and functional assessment, home safety and fall risk evaluation, link medication issues with evidence-based pharmacist intervention, advance directives)
·       service coordination and connection to benefits/discounts
·       attention to caregivers: education/training, support, respite
·       evidence-based health self-management and fall prevention workshops to empower consumers 
Engaging Social Work in Social Determinants of Health Screening Initiative, presented by Meredith Brink of Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus.  Because SDOH influence about 80% (40% socioeconomic factors + 30% health behaviors + 10% physical environment) of health outcomes, social work leadership at Nationwide Children’s Hospital rolled out a universal SDOH screen to all ambulatory and inpatients once a year to identify needs, compile and analyze data, and offer resources in one-page handout.  Four questions asked:
1.   Food: Within the past 6 months, you worried that your food would run out before you had money to buy more?  If urgent, do you need help getting food now? Do you need emergency food today?
2.   Housing: Do you think you are at risk of becoming homeless?  If urgent, are you currently homeless?
3.   Transportation: In the past 12 months, has lack of transportation kept you from medical appointments or from getting medications?  If urgent, do you need help with transportation today? Do you have a plan to get home today?
4.   Utilities: In the past year, has the utility company shut off your service for not paying your bills?  If urgent, are your utilities shut off now?
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS): What Social Workers Need to Know plenary presented by Kimberly Joseph, MD, from Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM).  
Roughly 30-50% of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survivors may not be able to return to work after a year due to cognitive (problems with memory and attention, nightmares), physical (weakness, low energy, pain, trouble walking, breathing problems) and psychological (depression, anxiety, PTSD) impairments from PICS. Patients with PICS may go to rehabilitation facilities or home with significant home care needs after discharge.  Social workers can promote resilience, coping and recovery strategies that capitalize on existing strengths, and coordinate continuity of care. (Aging and PICS covered at AAGP conference.) In particular, social workers in ICU can advocate for patient and family, help healthcare providers recognize discharge issues, encourage communication between ICU team and those who will care for patient after ICU (primary care physician, nurse practitioner, rehab team, etc.). 
Putting the “Medical” in Medical Social Work, presented by Rachel Union from Dell Children's Medical Center in Austin.  Many behavioral changes may have medical etiologies that are often overlooked by medical providers and mistakenly diagnosed as psychiatric disorders. (See Missing the Diagnosis: The Hidden Medical Causes of Mental Disorders, by William Matteson.)  Psychosocial stressors can result from medical illness, so ask about the patient’s medical history.  In conducting holistic “bio-psycho-social-spiritual” assessments of patients, medical social workers can consult with medical professionals to rule out possible medical conditions that may otherwise be missed (“Is it possible …?”)  Rachel provided presented several case studies to illustrate examples of how multiple medical illnesses can manifest through psychological symptoms, such as anxiety, speech irregularity and hallucinations.  For example, an older adult with a bladder infection, which is hard to detect, might present as delirium.
Piloting a Hospital Social Work Liaison to a Medical Home to Address ER “Super-Users”: A Stanford Health Care-Ravenswood Family Health Center Collaboration, presented by Loretta Sun. She shared her experience as a social worker to reduce over-usage of the ED and avoid unnecessary readmissions of ED “super-users” by care coordination (health, behavioral health, social services), patient and family engagement and empowerment as patients were assigned to Ravenwood for primary care and Stanford for specialty care.  
Implementing a Complex Discharge and Transition Team for the Hardest to Discharge Patients: Using a Centralized Model to Efficiently Manage Resource Intensive Cases to Reduce Length of Stay, presented by Ashley McLoud from University of Washington Medical Center, which piloted a Complex Discharge and Transition Team (CDTT) with the goal of reducing length of stay for the hospital’s most resource intensive patients.  LACE (Length of stay, Acuity of Comorbid Emergency visits) + risk assessment tool to predict pre-admission risk based on factors such as homelessness, polysubstance, ESL, high risk meds, social isolation, no funding, estimated stay > 30 days, undocumented. 
Reducing Mental Health Readmissions-Hospital, Post-Hospital & Collaborative Community Interventions, presented by Janis Seiders, RN Coordinator of READY Program and Karen Sandnes, LCSW Manager of Social Services from Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, which provides a continuum of care (ages 65+ are called “mature adult”).  Of the top 10 most common Medicaid 30-day readmissions for patients age 18-64 in 2011, four involved behavioral health:
·       #1 Mood disorders – 41,600 total readmissions at cost of $286 million
·       #2 Schizophrenia & other psychotic disorders – 35,800 total readmissions at $302 million
·       #5 Alcohol-related disorders – 20,500 total readmissions at $141 million
·       #10 Substance-related disorders – 15,200 total readmissions at $103 million

Janis and Karen adapted evidence-based processes (AHRQ Re-Engineered Discharge Tool Kit) used with medical patients to a mental health population in a Discharge READY (Resources Education Aftercare Direction Your recovery) Manual:  patient input, follow-up services within 7 days of discharge, medication and illness education, medication reconciliation, supportive calls after discharge (information absorbed, services started, barriers reduced/eliminated), warm line to call, resources to support recovery (e.g., pill boxes, fridge magnets to hold reminders, recovery tools developed in hospital using natural and formal supports).  They provided a handout of 5 things to consider to reduce the likelihood of readmission:
1.   Assess for suicidality or homicidality, use Columbia or PHQ-9 for depression screening.
2.   Assess if issue is relationship that could be resolved.
3.   Assess if there are issues that if solved, would reduce feelings of hopelessness.  Identify needs and work to resolve top 1 or 2.
4.   Assess for substance abuse issues.
5.   Educate on Meds, Diagnosis, and Recovery.
Development of an Innovative Palliative Care Program, presented by Keisha Berglund of Mount Sinai Palliative Care Institute in New York.  She shared her experience of starting an early palliative care intervention to support patients at diagnosis, with social work’s role in promoting ongoing communication and information sharing between family and medical team during the illness trajectory.  This service can improve patient quality of life, reduce length of stay in the hospital and avoid re-hospitalization after discharge. Three step process:
1.   Explore (1st visit) – prior to meeting patient, review with primary team for medical background, understand medical condition, treatment options including benefits/burdens, prognosis with/without therapies, recommended plan and expected timeline for hospitalization; next, patient assessment of advance care planning (ACP) for conversation preferences, understanding, impact of disease on quality of life, priorities, treatment preferences, current goals and limitations (“Given this, what are you hoping for as you look toward the future?”), feedback to interdisciplinary team; refer to additional in-house supports
2.   Align (2nd visit) – interdisciplinary patient and family discussion of medical update, facilitate discussion regarding patient goals, align treatment goals to these long-term goals, complete ACP documents
3.   Confirm (subsequent visits) – follow-up meeting; assess understanding; continue collaboration; transition planning support; grief/bereavement support

Educational resources:
·       Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC
·       State-by-state advance directives: EverPlans 
·       Mastering Communication with Seriously Ill Patients (2009) by Anthony Back, Robert Arnold, James Tulsy 

Older adults are more likely to have higher levels of pain compared to younger populations, so looked forward to last session on Increasing Social Work’s Role in Chronic Pain Care, presented by Katie Levy of University of Washington Medical Center for Pain Relief.  She facilitates a support group for patients living with chronic pain and explained social work’s roles in pain care: psychosocial assessment (incorporating pain-specific questions), education about chronic pain (retrain the brain), mental health training for co-occurring disorders, crisis management (suicidal ideation), care coordination and resources (psychology, physical therapy, and insurance barriers).

Since 1990s, opioid has become treatment of choice: however, after 90 days, benefits of opioids shrink and can cause opioid-induced hyperalgesia; instead, buprenorphine treats pain as well as opioid use disorder.  She shared assessment tools for pain, both physical and psychological.  Evidence-based treatments are multidisciplinary involving medical doctors, complementary medicine, physical therapy, pain psychology, care coordination, cognitive behavioral therapy (gold standard), dialectical behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, hypnosis, mindfulness based stress reduction, and support groups. 

Age-friendly Portland!

Portland was the only U.S. city to collaborate with the World Health Organization (WHO) in its Global Age-Friendly Cities project in 2006, and then a pioneer member of the WHO Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities in 2011. 
As usual, I skipped the conference site hotel in favor of lodging at a hostel ($33 per night, plus complimentary breakfast and live music like traditional American old time jam).  Located 1.5 miles away from conference site, so very walkable even in the rain.  Trimet 1-day pass was $5.
Design Museum Portland is a nomadic museum with no gallery space, dedicated to design exhibits all over town to bring communities together. StreetSeats: Urban Benches for Vibrant Cities was exhibited at the World Trade Center Portland, within walking distance from the conference venue.  Fern bench designer Jingyie Liang of Helsinki said, “To some extent, a bench to a city is just like the fern plants to an area of forest. They are growing lower on the ground, and everywhere.” 
Portland-based Kyle and Alyssa Trulen designed A Quiet Place to Sit and Restreferring to the an old man’s use of a tree stump after the tree had given fruit and building materials for a house and ship during his lifetime, inspired by Shel Silverstein’s The Giving Tree book.  The couple designed their stump with a protective ring, made of thermally treated pine and ash, to reflect hope for a healthier, reciprocal relationship between people and a tree.
B_tween (“celebrating diversity one bench at a time”)  focuses on inclusivity to enable a wheelchair user to sit in the middle rather than on the side, designed by Gamma Concepts and inspired by Benji Borastero, a Paralympian and accessibility advocate.  B_tween also gets bonus points for its use of sustainable building materials: scavenged, recyclable steel and reclaimed wood.
Folio team designed this colorful LOOPLAY, engaging people of all ages and activities to sit, lie down, crawl or play.

Several museums offered free admission on first Thursday of the month!
Portland Chinatown Museum opened Descendent Threads – the first group exhibition by Asian American female artists in Portland!  My favorites by Roberta May Wong:
All Orientals Look Alike (1984) in funerary setting to mourn the loss of identity imposed by stereotypes but shows collective power of individuals to shatter stereotypes by the middle interwoven image, a composite of the four individual portraits.  
Red, White and Blue (2004) represents occupations by Chinese immigrants: three aprons soiled by cooks hanging below folded aprons cleaned by laundry workers.  All-American (2003) cleaver chopping braided queue on round block represents immigrants who sacrifice part of their cultural identity to become hyphenated Americans.
Chinks III (2004) is wall of books whose foundations built on encyclopedia sets from 1950s purchased by artist’s immigrant father but books were full of “chinks” – missing histories of racial minorities. 
Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education (OJMCHE
Second floor core exhibit, Discrimination and Resistance, An Oregon Primer 
Home … Who are you? How do you express your culture?
Three dozen donuts fit inside this coffin at 15-year-old Voodoo doughnut shop
Old Dirty Bastard with decadent chocolate frosting, oreo cookies and peanut butter
Keep Portland Weird? Make Portland Age-Friendly!
GrayDogz music at Saturday Portland Farmers Market on Portland State University campus.

7 comments:

  1. February 19, 2019
    Surgical Decision Making for Older Adults
    Jill Q. Dworsky, MD, MS1; Marcia M. Russell, MD2
    JAMA. 2019;321(7):716. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.0283
    Surgery in older patients involves an increased risk of complications and subsequent changes to quality of life.
    Considering Health Goals
    Before deciding to undergo an operation, patients should establish their health care–related priorities, such as the importance of prolonging life, preserving independence, or maintaining quality of life. Once these are determined, patients should discuss with their surgeon how the proposed operation will influence those priorities. For example, a patient considering hip replacement surgery whose goal is to improve pain and function may decide to proceed with the operation in order to meet that goal. In another example, patients who have rectal cancer needing surgical resection must consider the risks of postoperative complications and not being able to care of themselves at home for a very long time. If your personal priority is maintaining a certain quality of life and being independent (for example, living at home) rather than living longer but depending on others, you may decide not to proceed with surgery.
    What Will the Recovery From Surgery Be Like?
    Older patients take more time to recover and need more support compared with younger patients. Some patients go directly home after surgery and are able to recover without assistance or with minimal help from a friend or family member. More commonly, some sort of assistance is needed to help recover, such as home visits from nurses or physical therapists. Some patients are transferred to a skilled nursing facility from the hospital after surgery to receive full-time care. It is important to ask what will likely happen in your case when you leave the hospital. While a surgeon may not be able to provide a definite answer, he or she will consider your preoperative physical status and the type of operation needed to assess what your recovery process might be like.
    After Recovery, What Will Daily Life Be Like?
    After the recovery process is complete, a patient’s return to his or her previous state of health depends on many factors such as physical strength and how major the operation was. New mobility aids or treatments such as a walker, supplemental oxygen, or medications may be necessary. Even if you are able to return to your baseline function after surgery, certain aspects of daily life may be different. It is important to ask the surgeon about these things before an operation to accurately balance the risks and benefits of surgery and to determine the effect of surgery on daily life. Every patient is different, and the surgeon will use his or her best judgment to advise you about what your life after surgery might be like.
    Final Decision Making
    The decision whether to have surgery is personal. You should gather as much information as possible about the proposed surgery and how it will affect you. Ask your doctors about every aspect of care that you have concerns about. You should also talk to family members and loved ones to help make your decision. There is no right or wrong answer, only what is best for each patient personally.
    American College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator
    https://riskcalculator.facs.org/RiskCalculator/
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2725235

    ReplyDelete
  2. Making Smarter Decisions About Where To Recover After Hospitalization
    By Judith Graham
    APRIL 11, 2019
    Every year, nearly 2 million people on Medicare — most of them older adults — go to a skilled nursing facility to recover after a hospitalization.
    …If asked for a recommendation, hospital staffers typically refuse, citing government regulations that prohibit hospitals from steering patients to particular facilities and that guarantee patients free choice of medical providers. (This is true only for older adults with traditional Medicare; private Medicare Advantage plans can direct members to providers in their networks.)
    …Where older adults go is important “because the quality of care varies widely among providers,” MedPAC’s report notes, and this affects how fully people recover from surgeries or illnesses, whether they experience complications such as infections or medication mix-ups, and whether they end up going home or to a nursing home for long-term care, among other factors.
    The Basics
    Who needs post-hospital care in a rehabilitation center?... But older adults who have difficulty walking or taking care of themselves, have complex medical conditions and complicated medication regimens, need close monitoring or don’t have caregiver support are often considered candidates for this kind of care, according to Kathryn Bowles, professor of nursing at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
    Medicare will pay for short-term rehabilitation at SNFs under two conditions: (1) if an older adult has had an inpatient hospital stay of at least three days; and (2) if an older adult needs physical, occupational or speech/language therapy at least five days a week or skilled nursing care seven days a week.
    Be sure to check your status, because not all the time you spend in a hospital counts as an inpatient stay; sometimes, patients are classified as being in “observation care,” which doesn’t count toward this three-day requirement.
    Traditional Medicare pays the full cost of a semiprivate room and therapy at a skilled nursing facility for up to 20 days. Between 21 and 100 days, patients pay a coinsurance rate of $170.50 per day. After 100 days, a patient becomes responsible for the full daily charge — an average $400 a day. Private Medicare Advantage plans may have different cost-sharing requirements.
    Nationally, the average stay for rehabilitation is about 25 days, according to a recent editorial on choosing post-hospital care in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
    Quality Varies Widely
    …In April, for the first time, Medicare’s Nursing Home Compare website is separating out performance measures for short-term stays in SNFs, for people who are recovering after a hospitalization, and long-term stays, for people with severe, chronic, debilitating conditions…
    Questions To Ask
    Before making a decision on post-hospital care, older adults and family members should address the following issues:
    Your post-hospital needs. What is my anticipated recovery, and what do you think the most difficult parts of it might be?
    What the SNF provides. Is a doctor readily available? What kind of equipment and specialized services are on-site? Can the facility accommodate people with cognitive issues or who need dialysis, for instance?
    Getting information early. … insist on seeing a discharge planner soon after entering the hospital and start the planning process early.
    Burke warns that doctors don’t typically know which SNF is likely to be the best fit for a particular patient — a topic he has written about. He suggests that older adults or their families insist they be given time to contact facilities if they feel rushed. While there’s considerable pressure to discharge patients quickly, there’s also a requirement that hospital discharges be safe, Burke noted. “If we’re waiting for a family to tell us which facility they want a patient to go to, we can’t make a referral or discharge the patient,” he said.
    https://khn.org/news/making-smarter-decisions-about-where-to-recover-after-hospitalization/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Meet the Canadian doctor who prescribes money to low-income patients
    Boosting people’s incomes to help boost their health outcomes — could this model work in the US?
    Sigal Samuel
    May 3, 2019
    Gary Bloch became a doctor because he wanted to help people who were less privileged than him. For years, he tried his best to treat patients coping with poverty and homelessness.
    …in 2005, instead of prescribing only medication, he started developing the concept of prescribing money.
    …Bloch connects his patients to ways of boosting their income, like applying for welfare or disability support. Often, it means guiding patients to fill out their tax forms so they can access government benefits. Is it a doctor’s responsibility to do this? Yes, Bloch says, because if you don’t treat the social determinants of health (like income and housing), you’re not actually doing what you can to ensure your patients get healthier.
    Similar to the notion behind universal basic income, the idea here is that if you really want to help people, the most effective starting point might be to simply give them more money.
    As a family doctor at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Bloch hasn’t contented himself with prescribing income in one-on-one appointments…wants to see systemic change, including a more robust social assistance program. In 2016, he was appointed to an Ontario government commission tasked with creating a 10-year road map to income security for the province…
    (Gary Bloch interview)
    …World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Determinants of Health, which came out in 2008. It said that there is no real separation between social conditions and health, and that health practitioners must do something about this.
    …first thing I developed …clinical tool on poverty, a three-page handout offering a three-step approach to dealing with poverty in the context of a typical primary care appointment. It’s basically: Ask everybody about their income, be aware of the evidence linking poverty to poorer health outcomes, and then actually do something about it — connect patients to supports.
    The first version came out in 2009. This [handout] took off like wildfire, which was a real surprise to me. It was picked up by major medical organizations in Canada, it was replicated in every province and territory across the country, and it got international pickup as far as Japan.
    …Say someone comes in and you find out they have low income and they have some degree of disability. You ask them if they’re getting disability support, and tell them about the different supports available — federal programs, provincial programs, etc. …You can say to people, “You know what? I think you should get an application for the Ontario disability support program.
    …We managed to put in place a whole series of social risk-focused interventions. The first was income security specialists — we have two full-time people, permanent salaried staff funded by the government, who are focused only on improving our patients’ income security…work on financial literacy and getting bank accounts and getting them to file their taxes.
    We also put in place a lawyer and a legal assistant…deal with…housing and income.
    …challenge is getting governments to think long-term
    …people need to go beyond just income. My fear is that putting in basic income could be used as an excuse to get rid of other social programs: disability support, health support, child care support. What you lose is the ability to individually target groups that are at high need for certain services.
    … UK called “social prescribing” …in the last five to 10 years. Health providers identify social needs, including loneliness, and then connect patients to social supports.
    …biggest challenge is the social policy environment — there’s less interest in the US in proper social programs. There’s only so much the health institutions can do without the government getting on board.
    https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/5/3/18524482/canada-health-doctor-prescribing-money-income-poverty

    ReplyDelete
  4. A Secret to Better Health Care
    It seems obvious: better social services. So why are things like food stamps and housing not part of the conversation?
    By Robert E. Rubin and Kenneth L. Davis
    May 27, 2019
    Health care is at the center of the national policy conversation, and with the 2020 presidential election now in full swing, that is where it will probably remain. But for all the talk about how to increase access and reduce costs, we’re missing a critical piece of the puzzle: the inverse relationship between health care costs and spending on social programs.
    One reason the United States spends more on health care than any other nation — more than 17 percent of gross domestic product, compared with an average of 9 percent for other advanced economies — is that we spend far less on social services like food stamps, free school lunches and public housing.
    If our spending on social programs were more in line with other developed countries, our health care costs would fall. That means that as policymakers evaluate a social program, they should weigh not only its direct and second-order benefits — from reducing crime and recidivism to increasing productivity — but also its effect on lowering federal health care costs.
    These safety net programs can lower health care costs by strengthening what medical professionals call the “social determinants of health”: the environment in which people are born, grow, live and work. Effective social programs provide access to good nutrition, clean and safe shelter and a subsistence income, which are critical to avoiding disease…
    Especially important are programs that ameliorate poor housing conditions and prevent disease, including lead abatement, control of mold and dampness and heating-system repairs. Consider a real-life example.
    Days after an elderly patient was treated for heart failure at Mount Sinai Hospital and returned home, the elevator in his apartment building broke down. Lacking the ability to climb stairs, he became a prisoner in his own home, unable to go out for a walk, shop for fresh food and visit his doctors for follow-up care.
    A social service worker took up his case, and the elevator was repaired. His substandard housing was literally a threat to his health; the intervention of the social worker may have saved his life — and certainly saved him from a possible relapse and expensive hospital care.
    Two programs — one in Chicago, the other in Los Angeles — show the multidimensional benefits of social spending…
    But the United States continues to spend a relative pittance on such programs. Housing programs, including rental assistance, public housing and homeless-assistance grants, account for one-quarter of 1 percent of G.D.P. Nutrition programs, such as food stamps and the Women, Infants and Children nutrition program, amount to one-half of 1 percent of G.D.P.
    Our underinvestment sets us apart from other advanced nations around the globe, particularly in Western Europe. France, Sweden and Britain commit far more than the United States to social services, as a percentage of their economy, while spending significantly less per capita and as a percentage of their economy on health care — and boast a higher life expectancy.
    Many factors influence discrepancies in health care spending and outcomes between the United States and its counterparts: vastly different views about the financial incentives in health care; the high cost of prescription drugs, diagnostic tests and administrative expenses; and cultural expectations about end-of-life care. But we won’t effectively reduce costs, and improve outcomes, until we think bigger and recognize the critical link between health care spending and social programs.
    Robert E. Rubin, secretary of the Treasury from 1995 to 1999, is a chairman emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations. Kenneth L. Davis is the president and chief executive of the Mount Sinai Health System.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/27/opinion/health-care-social-services.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. SF General program helping HIV survivors to age ‘masterfully’
    LAURA WAXMANN
    Jun. 27, 2019 7:00 p.m.
    …the first generation of HIV-positive individuals living to be over 50.
    Advances in medicine, like antiretroviral treatments, have prolonged the lives of those living with HIV and reduced the risk of new infections. However they have also highlighted new gaps in care for this aging population, which often faces challenges including comorbid diseases, mental health issues and social isolation.
    At Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, a two-year old program in Ward 86 is aiming to bridge this gap by providing The City’s aging HIV population with comprehensive care.
    The ward, one of the first dedicated HIV outpatient clinics in the nation, is staffed by UCSF and provides services to some 2,600 patients.
    “It’s a holistic care program that is aimed at making people do better as they age. A lot of people, although they are surviving, have long term complications, like cardiovascular conditions, liver and kidney problems, possibly due to the medicine,” said Dr. Monica Gandhi, Ward 86’s medical director.
    This year marks the first year in which half of the people living with HIV have reached the over-50 age group — a statistic that is expected to rise to 70 percent in the next decade.
    Many of those now aging with HIV failed to plan for their golden years and were unable to have families that could care for them in older age, according to 71-year-old Jeff Mills, an advocate for the elderly HIV positive community who is also living with HIV…
    In San Francisco, new infections dropped to 221 in 2017 from roughly 2,000 annually when AIDS mortality reached its peak in 1992. The goal is to get to zero by 2020.
    Simultaneously, the number of people living with HIV has been steadily increasing.
    In 2017, the year for which the most recent data is available from the San Francisco Department of Public Health, some 3,050 people over the age of 60 were living with HIV.
    …With a $750,000 grant over three years from Gilead, a pharmaceutical company that develops antiviral drugs used to treat HIV, Ward 86’s Golden Compass program focuses on a holistic approach with four “points” to better serve the needs of people over 50 living with HIV.
    The program was initially launched with $175,000 in funding over two years from AIDS Walk SF. Gilead has funnelled a total of $18 million in grants over the next three years into 30 organizations ranging from healthcare providers to advocacy groups working to improve the coordination of care.
    The four focal points of the Golden Compass program represent the cardinal directions — north for the heart and mind, east for bones and strength, west for dental, vision and hearing, and south for “network and navigation,” said Gandhi.
    …run by a multidisciplinary team that includes Gandhi, a registered nurse, a medical assistant, a cardiologist,a pulmonologist, and a social worker…
    “Changes in cognitive needs can be accelerated in HIV positive patients that have been on medication for a long time,” said registered nurse Mary Shiels, who added that Golden compass offers routine screenings, operates support groups and facilitates social connections.
    …When Ward 86 was first established in 1983, very few lives were saved — at the height of the epidemic, patients were admitted primarily to die comfortably…
    In 2010, Ward 86 became the first clinic in the world to recommend Universal Antiretroviral Treatment. While its patients credit their survival to the clinic, its leadership hopes that the services, including the Golden Compass program which currently serves about 300 patients at ZSFGH, may be replicated across the country.
    …In San Francisco, challenges remain, including serving those who are homeless and living with HIV. The Department of Public Health is currently focusing efforts on pop up clinics, to meet this population of patients where they are at…
    https://www.sfexaminer.com/the-city/sf-general-program-helping-hiv-survivors-to-age-masterfully/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Medically tailored meals save lives. Health plans should cover their cost
    By DAVID B. WATERS
    JULY 5, 2019
    If nutritious meals can provide the same kind of benefit as medication, then why don’t health plans cover the cost of medically tailored meals, just as they cover prescription medications? It’s a question my colleagues and I at Community Servings, a nonprofit organization that provides nutritious meals for people with critical illnesses who are too sick to feed themselves or their families, have been wrestling with for years.
    The meals we provide keep people alive. Community Servings started in 1990 at the height of the AIDS crisis with meals for those living with HIV/AIDS. At the time, many people with this disease died of malnutrition as lean body mass was consumed to fight the virus. Today it serves people with a broad cross section of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and kidney disease. Community Servings now makes and delivers about 2,500 meals a day for as many as 15 different diets specially designed for particular illnesses or, in some cases, combinations of illnesses. Essentially, we manage complex dietary restrictions for people who are unable to do it on their own.
    A new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine provides added validation of the medical and economic benefits of medically tailored meals…found a 16% reduction in health care costs among patients who received medically tailored meals. The savings were attributed to a reduction in admissions to hospitals and nursing homes.
    An earlier study, published in Health Affairs, found an almost identical reduction in health care costs among people receiving medically tailored meals …The savings in the study were due to fewer ambulance trips, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions.
    …now ample evidence for health plans across the nation to consider including medically tailored meals as a service for their members living with chronic illnesses. Poor nutrition and food insecurity are increasingly recognized as key social determinants of health. In other words, if someone does not have enough to eat, or their daily diet is inappropriate for a certain chronic illness, then it could be detrimental to their health.
    Community Servings partners with the Commonwealth Care Alliance, a Boston-based community health care organization that provides coordinated care management to individuals living with a range of complex medical, behavioral health, and social needs who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. It has also entered into a partnership with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts to provide medically tailored meals to its Medicare Advantage members who need post-acute care for congestive heart failure.
    The Medicaid program in the state has transitioned to a new model in which accountable care organizations are paid a fixed fee for providing all care to their members. Next year, accountable care organizations will be required to address social determinants of health by offering services that can improve health, even though they are not services that have been traditionally reimbursed by health plans.
    …The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plan to more broadly integrate social determinants of health into Medicare and Medicaid design.
    The Food is Medicine Coalition is….a national group of 15 nonprofit providers of medically tailored meals… help patients overcome four common barriers to achieving health: They improve access to healthy food; make it easier to change dietary behavior; remove the uncertainty of food supplies so individuals can focus on other aspects of disease management; and free up money for medications that would otherwise be spent on food.
    All of this hews to Hippocrates’ edict to “let food be thy medicine” while acknowledging the reality that by addressing nutrition first-hand we are addressing — and alleviating — illness and improving lives.
    David B. Waters is the CEO of Community Servings.
    https://www.statnews.com/2019/07/05/medically-tailored-meals/

    ReplyDelete
  7. UCSF leads national research on ‘deprescribing’ patients taking too many meds
    Erin Allday
    Dec. 27, 2019
    …Polypharmacy is a widespread problem that’s gained national attention. But resolving it, a practice known as deprescribing, can be tricky.
    Now a team of doctors, based out of UCSF and Johns Hopkins University, has put together a research platform to study how best to identify people at risk of taking too many meds and safely get them off one or more of those drugs.
    “This is not a new problem, but it’s definitely gotten worse over time,” said Dr. Michael Steinman, a UCSF geriatrician who is co-leading the new U.S. Deprescribing Research Network, which is being funded with a $6.2 million grant from the National Institute on Aging. “We keep throwing more and more medicines at people, and there’s not a corresponding program for realizing when we need to stop those medicines.”
    Studies have found that roughly 40% of people 65 and older in the United States are taking five or more prescription drugs. It’s not unusual, doctors say, for patients to be taking twice as many medicines, especially when nonprescription drugs and supplements are included.
    Many of those drugs are surely helpful. But polypharmacy can put people at risk of side effects that can severely impact their quality of life and even cause life-threatening symptoms. Some drugs become dangerous when they interact poorly with other meds, or they may cause more harm than good as people get older.
    …Gusick, 88, who was taking 11 prescription drugs at one point, including two kinds of blood thinners.
    Steinman took him off four of those drugs and lowered his dose of others. Gusick said he had been having problems with dizziness and had fallen several times, but that hasn’t been an issue since his blood pressure medication was reduced two years ago.
    Side effects like dizziness or nausea can be compounded when they’re stacked up in two or three or more drugs. Many physicians say that, anecdotally, they’ve come across older patients who seemed overly fatigued or cognitively impaired, even on the cusp of dementia, only to learn that it was a drug cocktail causing their symptoms.
    “I have a patient who is 86 years old, and her family noticed she was really declining. They said she had been independent but they were thinking they’d have to move her into a care home,” said Dr. Maisha Draves, a family physician with Kaiser Permanente in Vallejo who has studied deprescribing efforts. “We decided to take her off some of her medications, and she perked right back up. She lived at home, alone, for five more years.”
    …sometimes patients are wary to stop taking a drug if they think it’s still working; that’s common with medications for pain and sleeping. Other times, doctors may be hesitant to take patients off drugs for things like high blood pressure or osteoporosis, even if research tells them those pills may no longer be necessary. Doctors may worry that their patients’ health will nosedive if they tinker with their prescriptions.
    “A lot of times we can’t know for sure what’s going to happen when we stop a medicine,” Steinman said. “But we can’t let that paralyze us.”
    ... Draves and her colleagues had found that some older patients weren’t doing well with their long-term meds — in fact, they were suffering higher rates of emergency room visits and hospitalization from low blood sugar.
    …So the team developed plans to slowly taper certain drugs and monitor the patients to make sure their diabetes was still under control. The strategy seemed to work — patients taken off the drugs or moved to lower doses had fewer incidences of low blood sugar, and their diabetes remained under control.
    Deprescribing efforts like that are effective — but they require time and resources that many primary care physicians may feel they don’t have, doctors and pharmacists said…
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/UCSF-leads-national-research-on-14931622.php

    ReplyDelete