My she-ro, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, died on Erev Rosh Hashanah, which makes her Tzadik (person of righteous deeds), according to Jewish tradition. May her memory be a blessing.
Like many RBG followers and her neighbors, who posted sidewalk sign “If you won’t wear a mask to protect your friends and family, do it to protect RBG,” I worried that she might get COVID-19. Earlier this month, reports circulated about 87-year-old RBG officiating a wedding – outdoors, but no masks worn and no distancing for harm reduction—just two weeks after her latest hospitalization for cancer, a co-morbidity that raised her risk for severe COVID-19 if infected. Very disappointed: The bride’s careless tweet, “don’t worry, we tested negative!” sounded like President Trump’s testing only strategy, providing absolutely no reassurance, as false-negatives occur. RBG’s death was reported as due to “complications from pancreatic cancer.”
I mourn the
loss of RBG, who modeled how to fight for causes: Her pragmatic, incremental approach enabled laws to catch up with social movements over time, leading former
opposers to join her. RBG’s monumental Olmstead decision (1999) makes possible my encore career advocating for community living/aging in place,
and her fight for gender equality has my eternal gratitude. RBG brilliantly applied Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Equal
Protection Clause for inclusion of people with mental disabilities and both
genders, previously denied rights and opportunities due to discrimination.
I paid tribute
to RBG, along with Mister Rogers, when their documentary films were released two years ago. They are so inimitable that I have not seen
actors imitating them in Hollywood films, On the Basis of Sex and A
Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood. However, I plan to listen to Derrick Wang’s Scalia/Ginsburg comic
opera via WNED Classical radio on Nov. 7 @ 1 pm EST.
You can’t
have TRuth without Ruth!
“When
you write a dissent, you’re writing for a future court that will see the
error into which your colleagues have fallen.”—RBG, “In Her Own Words,” Elle
(Oct. 2014)
I will miss
RBG’s reasoned voice of dissent (for liberal minority), especially in
these times when shouting and interrupting pass as debate. RBG’s style was subtle like dropping
“respectfully” before “I dissent.”
Retirement
After RBG’s
death, I was appalled at the meanness of people blaming RBG for not retiring 7 years ago during Obama’s 2nd term so he could nominate a younger
replacement to prolong “liberal” legacy. Why the fixation on life expectancy, based on risk factors like age and disease?
To address partisan battles, consider judicial term limits instead of pressuring octogenarian
justices to retire?
At the
funeral of Justice John Paul Stevens (JPS), who died from a stroke at age 99
last year, RBG shared her exchange with JPS in the last week of his life when
they attended a conference in Lisbon:
RBG to JPS: My dream is to remain on
the Court as long as you did.
JPS to RBG: Stay longer!
JPS retired
at age 90, after serving 35 years in the U.S. Supreme Court, and then went on
to author 3 books, including 560-page memoir!
Thankfully for RBG’s retirement dissent, she became Notorious RBG at age 80. RBG epitomized the Power of Oldness!
With a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993 (at age 60), why would RBG retire from a meaningful job that she loved after only 20 years? Sure, she had health issues, including 5 bouts of cancer, heart surgery, fractured ribs, etc. but nevertheless, she persisted with “full steam.” Nothing affected RBG’s brain or ability for legal reasoning. Grateful for her fierce work ethic and commitment fighting to protect our rights to the very end! Working Longer Solves (Almost) Everything: The Correlation between Employment, Social Engagement and Longevity.
American Society on Aging (ASA) CEO Peter Kaldes hosted The Four Pillars of the New Retirement: Dramatic Changes for Aging and Aging Services, based on study prepared by Ken Dychtwald of Age Wave (pictured with his Medicare statement, which he said needs to be more user-friendly), and Ken Cella of Edward Jones, finding that people of all ages are reimagining the pillars of retirement: health, family, purpose, and finances.
This was a
more holistic approach than traditional retirement planning, based on 3-legged
stool of employer-sponsored retirement plans + personal savings + social
security (safety net). Yet, since study was sponsored by financial services company, lots of messaging
how people are not financially prepared to retire and need to start saving/retirement
planning while younger...and send $$$$ to professional investment managers to collect fees! Same old, same old messaging when I worked in financial
services/retirement plans until Great Recession.
No surprise older generations (Silent Gen, Boomers) have remained more emotionally/psychologically resilient than younger generations (Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X) during COVID-19 pandemic. Ken D mentioned safety net helps mental health. Yes, thank compassionate ageism for facilitating old-age welfare state!
Almost 70% of Americans who plan to retire in the next 10 years say they have no idea what their healthcare and long-term care (LTC) costs will be in retirement. This graph might help: expect 10 years in poor health for Americans who live to age 78.5.
Thought about this chart after learning about two singer-songwriters who died yesterday at age 78.5+: Helen Reddy of “I am Woman” (1971), my empowerment theme song forever (relate to “wisdom born of pain,” but not so much “I am invincible”), died in MPTF nursing home, no cause of death reported but she had dementia during last 5 years; and Mac Davis of “In the Ghetto” (1969), social justice song about vicious cycle of poverty, died after heart surgery.
This month,
89-year-old Chuck Feeney, described to be “in poor health” and living with his
wife in rented SF apartment, set aside $2 million for their retirement after donating
more than $8 billion to various charities (including UCSF Global Brain Health
Institute) via Atlantic Philanthropies. Way
to go, Giving while Living, Chuck!
Family and community are important to living well with purpose. Research found definition of family broadened, mostly driven by younger generation, to include "families of affinity” (66%) and related by blood/marriage/legal adoption (34%). Majority (67%) of Americans say pandemic brought family closer together. 72% of retirees say one of their biggest fears is becoming burden on families; 71% of retirees willing to offer financial support to family, even if this could jeopardize their own financial future. Wonder if this is reciprocal: Would adult offspring be willing to offer financial support to their retired parents, even if this could jeopardize their own financial future?
U.S.
Government Accountability Office published Older Women Report Facing a Financially Uncertain Future (Sept. 24, 2020), based on focus groups with older women
mostly age 70+. Highlights: concerns
about future of safety net (Social Security, Medicare), costs of health care
and housing, lack of personal finance education negatively affected ability to
plan for retirement, etc.
Cost of retirement living highest in Hawaii, New York and California.
Things to
care about (lead others to join): Long-term care
At ASA Public Policy Town Hall, journalist Jay Newton-Small moderated audience poll and panel discussion with Charlene Frizzera, consultant (retired after 30 years at Centers for Medicare and Medicaid); Kathy Greenlee, JD, consultant (and former U.S. Assistant Secretary for Aging, 2009-16); and Kevin Prindiville, JD, Executive Director of Justice in Aging. ASA Public Policy Committee asked U.S. Presidential candidates about policy initiatives to meet needs of older adults: Trump has not responded yet, Biden’s response posted on ASA advocacy site.
In LTC reform, 79% of audience supported nursing homes that are “reimagined” as smaller, more home-like settings. Kathy added systemic changes needed for nursing home staff to be paid more; private rooms for residents; Medicaid paying for LTC impact on state budgets; disability community needs more options; more attention to health equity/intersectionality.
Nearly 62% of audience polled preferred to receive information electronically, followed by 26% talking with someone. Charlene said COVID has been opportunity to force older adults to use digital tech; Kevin viewed information access as equity issue; Kathy added access needs to consider cognitive impairment, non-English, ADA, facilitation for telehealth.
When it comes
to monitoring and/or analyzing legislation, Kathy recommended looking to trusted
experts who can do this for a living (yes, subscribe + donate to Justice in Aging!), at federal level sometimes it’s not about legislation but (agency) regulation, focus
on budget driving programs so need “people on the ground” locally talking to
legislators back home to advance budget items.
Whether
candidates for elected office fully understand issues faced by older adults and
are offering coherent policy recommendations, 94% of poll think candidates
“need improvement.”
After mentioning that her father hid his Alzheimer’s diagnosis for 10 years due to stigma fears, Jay noted how Presidential candidates seemed to weaponize age and mental acuity, and asked is it appropriate to ask whether someone is sharp enough to be President at a certain age? Kevin replied this was inappropriate as ageist and ableist.
(University
of Illinois longevity researcher Jay Olshansky found that 77-year-old Biden and
74-year-old Trump are likely “super-agers,” who maintain their mental and
physical functioning and tend to live longer than the average person.)
Jay read my question
(submitted anonymously) on whether candidate with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) can properly hold public office? Long silence, then finally Kevin
responded in politically correct manner, “is there such a candidate? All kinds
of people with all different kinds of abilities can represent our country.” I dissent, submitting that people with
NPD lack empathy needed for leadership and NPD might explain failure to model COVID-19 public health orders like mask
wearing!
When Jay
asked about cancel culture, Kathy mentioned she turned age 60 (making her
eligible for Older Americans Act programs 😊), recognized term political
correctness renamed cancel culture can be taken to extreme to shut down people,
which she believes is a symptom, not cause, of distrust and lack of
conversation. For example, when she created
Administration for Community Living to combine disability with aging, she
worked hard to earn trust from disability field, asked “am I saying this
correctly?” to learn her way, doing more listening than talking. (According to
POLITICO survey, Gen Z and Millennials favor cancel culture more than Gen X and
Boomers.)
Ken Stern of Longevity Project, in collaboration with Stanford Center on Longevity, hosted Longevity and the Pandemic: A Look Back, A Look Ahead, virtual panel discussion with Laura Carstensen, Stanford Center's founding director (pandemic accelerating changes underway like addressing equity); Andrew Scott, London Business School economist/author of self-help book, The 100 Year Life: Living and Working in an Age of Longevity (2016) (pandemic as “viral attack on aging” and reveals which countries equipped to deal with aging society); Jack Rowe, Columbia Professor and Successful Aging co-author (need “complete redesign” of LTC, more intergenerational spaces via tax breaks and incentives, telemedicine paid by Medicare and insurance here to stay per stock market). Perhaps in response to my question about diversifying panel in July, this program included pre-recording from John Eu-Li of National University of Singapore (discussed Singapore’s success with infection control, Seniors Go Digital program).
Gray Panthers SF convener Art Persyko moderated meeting on Nursing Home Crisis and Struggle for Aging in Place:
·
Marilyn
Albert, Registered Nurse (retired) and advocate with Healthy California Now, explained problem out
in open with 76,270 COVID-19 deaths in LTC facilities: private equity consolidation of for-profit hospital system invaded nursing home system to the
detriment of health care quality.
·
Pat
McGinnis, Executive Director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform
(CANHR), recommended lawsuits for nursing home deaths, take profit out of
nursing homes; prioritize keeping people out of nursing homes by creating more affordable
models to stay at home; get more legislators to care about issue than wait
until their own family member needs LTC; non-profit Front Porch + Covia senior living
communities.
·
Jodi
Reid, Executive Director of California Alliance for Retired Americans (CARA),
discussed successful fight against state cuts to Home and Community Based
Services (HCBS) and advocacy for HCBS Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) in Master Plan on Aging (MPA).
Coronavirus Commission on Safety and Quality in Nursing Homes released
its final report, with lone dissent by Justice in Aging Directing
Attorney Eric Carlson due to its imbalance: recommendations for federal
government, but not enough to make nursing homes responsible for resident
safety and quality of life.
National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) hosted virtual forum on Strengthening California’s Care Infrastructure: Poverty, Inequality, and Universal Long-Term Care. Kim Alvarenga of the California Domestic Workers Coalition moderated lively discussion with Fernando Torres-Gil, PhD, of UCLA's Center for Policy Research on Aging; California State Senator Richard Pan, MD, MPH (pediatrician); and Christina Mills of California Foundation for Independent Living Centers.
Christina and
Fernando shared their lived experiences that inform their commitment to
strengthening formal safety net to fill gap in absence of informal
supports. As chair of both Senate Committee
on Health and Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee on Health & Human
Services, Richard recognized underinvestment in aging and sponsored SB 512 for
actuarial study to create LTSS social insurance program, which was folded into
Governor’s MPA. He talked about building political will and framing
issue: how much will it cost if we don’t do social insurance program for LTSS? This
will make people understand this is better choice for tax dollars.
In response
to question about Billionaire’s Tax to help finance LTC insurance (similar to
state’s Proposition 63 Millionaire’s Tax that funds expanded public mental health services),
Richard cautioned about need for stable financing system as being dependent on state
income tax is subject to swings like last year’s $20 billion surplus to this
year’s $50 billion deficit.
(Likelihood of
achieving universal health care not good where there’s too much income
inequality.)
Advancing
Action, 2020: A State Scorecard on LTSS for Older Adults, People with Physical
Disabilities, and Family Caregivers is
based on these performance indicators: Affordability and Access; Choice of
Setting and Provider; Quality of Life and Quality of Care; Support for Family
Caregivers; Effective Transitions. Top
10 LTSS states are: Minnesota, Washington, Wisconsin, Oregon, Vermont,
Connecticut, Hawaii, Colorado, California, and Massachusetts. Interesting to note that Florida, which has 2nd
largest population of older adults (after California), took last place at #51!
Dishing with Debbie Toth, President of Choice in Aging and member of MPA Stakeholder Advisory Committee, featured Louise Aronson, UCSF geriatrician and author of Elderhood: Redefining Aging, Transforming Medicine, Reimagining Life (2019), on discussion of ageism’s impact on health. Dr. Aronson mentioned insufficient medical school training in geriatrics, yet older adults are disproportionately patients; need health care system focus on continuum of care, body function, prevention v. medical system care for organs/disease that incentivizes serious illness in ICU/hospital and fails to view LTC as part of system.
Debbie talked
about planning Choice in Aging’s Aging in Place campus: relocation of existing adult day health care and preschool, construction of 81-unit
affordable senior housing, addition of case management. She obtained 14 streams of funding for housing
but no funding for services, though LTSS in HCBS cost is less than nursing
home.
Brave
space: race + age
Attended Critical Race Theory (CRT) as Tool to Dismantle Anti-Blackness in API Community, hosted by Asian Pacific Islander (API) Social Work Council, to get my dues worth as member of National Association of Social Workers (NASW). In contrast to safe space, prefer brave space community guidelines: confidentiality; embrace discomfort; “I” statements; controversy with civility; own your intentions and your impact. This Zoom session had mixed race audience with optional (voice by choice) interaction via video or chat: important to have conversations to understand where people are coming from, maybe find common ground, and keep Socratic dialogue going.
When and how should cultural identity (gender, race, age) differences matter? Try to figure out without constitutional law framework (i.e., discrimination based on race is suspect class subject to strict judicial scrutiny, gender is quasi-suspect subject to intermediate scrutiny, age/disability is subject to rational basis). For example, why wasn’t old age included in diversity and inclusion criteria by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which announced eligibility reforms to best picture category, effective in 2024, addressing women, LGBTQ, underrepresented race/ethnicity, and disability? This could encourage inauthenticity of Hamilton musical, or re-make The Good Earth with real Chinese actors?! Older people “treated” better in documentaries, like RBG, Ralph Nader (An Unreasonable Man), and 7-Up adults (Up series).
Colorblindness reminds me of MLK’s aspirational “I Have a Dream” about not being judged by skin color but by character. According to CRT, colorblindness can be a problem that perpetuates fallacy of meritocracy, like Asian model minority myth. Reality is people have faced discrimination based on appearances like race, gender and age, so critical theory is helpful to question power/privilege and oppression in historical and cultural contexts, engage in consciousness-raising to see need for social change (“dismantle structural oppression”), and work toward emancipation of those who are oppressed.
Oops, here’s
where CRT can provoke/upset dominant groups, like President Trump’s Executive
Order banning federal agencies from using tax dollars on CRT training, criticized for how it “engenders divisive, anti-American propaganda.” Instead of coddling minds via cancel culture/censorship
of different viewpoints, learning is about hearing other perspectives (beyond white-washed history), questioning for understanding, engaging in thoughtful silence, always reserving the right to dissent if you care; and if there’s
thoughtless noise/profanity, best tune out!
I embrace my discomfort with identity politics that lead to us v. them tribalism. Colorblindness and age-lessness not enough, because sad reality is people from the same tribe oppress each other, too…since Biblical times, “man has dominated man to his injury” (Ecclesiastes 8:9). And experiences of privilege and oppression are fluid in the context of time and place.
Racism and ageism are hurtful. Gerontologist Erdman Palmore's research on ageism had its roots in his research on racism: while studying at the University of Chicago in the 1950s, Palmore noticed similarity between stereotypes of Blacks and Old people.
Colorblindness also calls to mind what RBG accomplished for gender equality, based on gender
blindness, when (impressively in her first U.S. Supreme Court brief, Reed v. Reed, in 1971!) she successfully argued against different treatment of women
based on a supposed pedestal that was often a cage for women, that so-called
protections for women were limiting their opportunities. And systems such as divisive laws permitting gender discrimination also
oppressed men, whom she also represented so that they could receive government benefits
(tax deduction, survivor benefits) enabling them to be caregivers to parents
and children. Instead of bashing all men who represented patriarchy, fair-minded
RBG recognized equal partner in her hubby (who was more extroverted with
connections to help advance RBG’s legal career to the Supremes) and found
common humanity with her ideological opposite buddy Justice Antonin Scalia
(“some very good people have some very bad ideas”).
In her first U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in 1973 case, RBG citing powerful quote
from abolitionist Sarah Grimké "I ask for no favor for my sex. All I ask
of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks,” triggers image
of white police officer kneeling into neck of Black man lying face-down?
What to think
about compassionate ageism, which places older people in “deserving”
pedestal, based on risks associated with old age, such as poverty, frailty,
dependency, discrimination, etc., enabling old age welfare system, mandatory elder
abuse reporting, reserving seats for “seniors” near front of bus, etc.? While
Social Security Act (1935) facilitated de-institutionalized ("aging in place") solutions for
old-age poverty, Medicaid (1965) continued traditional indoor relief (poor
house/nursing home) for people with chronic disease/disability conditions.
Compassionate
ageism also has “othered” older people as passive and “deserving” of retirement. Retirement might be anathema for people with
a strong work ethic. Gray Panthers
founder Maggie Kuhn protested her forced retirement at age 65, especially the
prospect of old age segregation at senior centers passing time with bingo
games, sing-a-longs, no-strain-the-brain activities. Homer Gere, father of actor Richard,
delivered “meals and human interaction” as octogenarian volunteer for Meals on
Wheels, featured in folksy public service announcement videos. (Now the elder Gere is 97 years old, unknown
if he’s still delivering meals.)
“Pizza delivery man, 89, receives $12K tip after going viral on TikTok” article included comments like “Somebody at that age should not be working that
much” because he was working 30 hours a week during pandemic. Was this compassionate ageism? Reportedly, he
started delivering pizza because he couldn’t “afford his bills on Social
Security alone.” Unlike Chuck Feeney, he didn’t have $2 million
in retirement savings, and safety net has become more precarious. Social Security was amended in 1972 to provide for Supplemental Security
Income, which is means-tested, so often refused as “lacking dignity”/stigmatized
by Silent Gen (born 1928-1945) cohorts with strong work ethic.
Racialization discussion here got dicey, with example of questioning neutrality of laws in guise of benevolence like mandatory child abuse reporting due to concerns that welfare systems contribute to racialization, or respond in ways to reinforce stereotypes of certain minorities as criminals in need of social control. Is there a similar argument for compassionate ageism’s mandated elder abuse reporting laws intended to protect older adults, who are viewed as a group that is vulnerable to certain age-related diseases that impair functional abilities including decision-making capacity (that is fluid) and potentially placing older people under conservatorship?
NASW-CA supports Proposition 16 amending California’s Constitution to restore affirmative action based on race/ethnicity and sex, which was repealed in 1996’s Proposition 209. Anything less of meritocracy is contrary to values of Tiger Mom Amy Chua, who identified “character traits” of superiority complex, insecurity, and impulse control to "rise" in socio-economic mobility among diverse cultural/ethnic groups like Chinese, Jewish, Mormons, Cuban exiles, Nigerian, Lebanese, South Indian, etc. in The Triple Package: How Three Unlikely Traits Explain the Rise and Fall of Cultural Groups in America (2014, co-authored with her Jewish hubby, recently suspended from Yale for his sexual misconduct). Add social capital, which helped pull “forgotten poor white American” like Hillbilly Elegy's J.D. Vance (mentored by his Yale Law Prof. Chua) out of poverty.
Before Proposition 209, in Regents
of UC v. Bakke (1978), U.S. Supreme Court upheld affirmative
action by allowing consideration of race, but not racial quotas used by UC
Davis Medical School, in admissions decisions…so white applicant Alan
Bakke was admitted to UC. But what
really struck me was this: Bakke was denied admissions by at
least two other med schools because he was considered “too old”—when
he was in his early 30s during early 1970s—which is prohibited under Age
Discrimination Act of 1975! Race gets more attention than age...
Among Spirit of 1848 listserv members, there was lively debate about COVID-19 dashboards reporting on decedents’ underlying conditions and race, which began with a post of Vanderbilt History Professor Arleen Tuchman’s opinion piece, “Stop blaming COVID-19 deaths on diabetes: Once again, health disparities are being blamed on specific and allegedly racial traits while ignoring the role of structural racism.” Discussion got controversial as some members felt identification of race promoted racism, and thus argued unnecessary to report data on race. So déjà vu like initial reluctance to report race data during early days of COVID-19 pandemic due to xenophobia, fear and stigma associating Chinese with COVID-19.
I prefer disclosure of data that can inform interventions. Race is not a
problem, but racism is a problem! In contrast, older age presents greater vulnerability
to COVID-19 due to less functional immune system, plus ageism is a problem! Yet confusion reigns because race is
socially constructed. Race might be useful
in interpreting impact of racism on chronic diseases—as Professor Tuchman points out how
racism exacerbates diabetes by raising stress and glucose levels. Her book, Diabetes: History of Race
and Disease (Aug. 2020) opens with chapter, “Judenkrankheit, a Jewish
Malady,” finding that diabetes was considered a Jewish disease due to high prevalence and blaming racial stereotypes of neuroticism or gluttony (rather than poverty and stress of Jewish immigrants fleeing pogroms) in late 19th and early 20th centuries. This was during a time when racial constructs in the
U.S. were influenced by immigration policy, so there was debate about the degree
of whiteness among Jews after immigration increased among East European
Ashkenazi Jews, who many argued should be classified as
Oriental (“purebred Asiatics") and thereby denied entry under Chinese
Exclusion Act. According to Professor Tuchman, history of racism and blaming "lifestyle choices" continue with diabetes associated with Native Peoples and African Americans.
Virtual
Hawaii
Decided to
postpone trip to Hawaii, which has 14-day quarantine for visitors and seemed
less safe during this COVID-19 pandemic due to science-defying policies that place
people at greater risk of harm, like closing access to free public outdoors
spaces but allowing for-profit indoor bars, gyms and strip clubs to remain open?
Why, in light of science community’s greater understanding of risks for airborne
transmission of coronavirus in closed spaces? I dissent, and stuck to safer virtual
visits to Hawaii…
Indulged in more Chinese-Jewish (called Pake-Jew in Hawaii) connection and listening to Silent Gen by joining PBS Hawaii screening + discussion of Harbor from Holocaust documentary about 20,000 European Jews who escaped Holocaust by immigrating to Shanghai, which already had a Jewish community and did not require visas for entry at a time when U.S. and Canada closed its doors to refugees. Vienna-based Chinese diplomat Ho Feng-Shan issued about 2,000 visas to allow Jews to leave Austria for Shanghai. (Humble Dr. Ho lived in my SF neighborhood until his death, and I studied at Fudan University in Shanghai via American University program with mostly Jewish socialists.)
PBS Hawaii Director
Leslie Wilcox (leaving next year to mainland for family caregiving) hosted
discussion with this woman-majority production team: Shanghai-born director Violet
Du Feng, producer Darryl Ford Williams, and 86-year-old Shanghailander Doris
Fogel. Doris related living in cramped
quarters during violent Japanese occupation, making friends with Chinese who
were equally vulnerable (“together, we didn't have much but we took care of
each other”) and learning street smarts during her 9 years in China, then left for
Illinois after WWII ended.
Documentary
also featured 79-year-old Laurence Tribe, recently retired Harvard
Constitutional Law Professor, who was born in Shanghai to Russian Jewish
immigrant parents, and then left for SF. Wish he was included in PBS
Hawaii discussion as he successfully represented the state before U.S. Supreme
Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984), upholding
state’s use of eminent domain to force transfer of leased land to fee simple in
land redistribution scheme. (Arguably, this landmark case facilitates aging in
place because ownership is more secure than leasehold.)
Got more of my dues worth attending NASW Hawaii’s Webinar Wednesday on Grief, Loss, and End of Life Transition During a Pandemic with Leilani Maxera, MSW, MPH (and Mills sista!), sharing survival guide tips like Go outside (or look outside)!
COVID-19 update
According to
SF Department of Public Health (DPH) COVID-19 data
tracker based on 506,677 test results reported to date: 11,275 positive cases
and 104 deaths (68% male; 52% age 81+, 19% age 71-80, 15% age 61-70, or 86% of
deaths age 60+; 39% Asian, 28% Latinx, 17% White, 8% Black; 1% homeless). Total COVID-19 deaths: 205,859 in U.S., over 1
million worldwide. Yale researchers believe COVID-19 deaths in
U.S. could be undercounted by as much as 28%.
UCSF infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, who has presented many COVID-19 townhalls (with Diana Lau, RN, interpreting in Cantonese) since COVID-19 pandemic declared in March, moderated (monolingual English) Asian Health Institute (AHI) COVID-19 Roundtable with UCSF faculty representing internal medicine, infectious disease, cardiology, oncology, psychiatry, endocrinology, and women’s health. Despite COVID-19’s disproportionate impact on older people, geriatrics missing from panel! Janet Chu, MD, MPH, discussed challenges due to inconsistent reporting of data for Asians, who might be aggregated with Pacific Islanders or “other.” (Filipinos can claim to be Asian, Hispanic/Latinx, or Pacific Islander.)
According to
APM Research Lab’s The Color of Coronavirus findings from COVID-19 data
as of Sept. 15, 2020: 1 in 1,400 Pacific Islander Americans has died (or 71.5
deaths per 100,000), 1 in 2,470 Asian Americans has died (or 40.4 deaths
per 100,000).
In SF, Asians continue to have highest COVID-19 death rate and low COVID-19 testing rates. Are Asians as model minority (who took to wearing protective masks early in the pandemic) being perpetuated in failure to include Asians as one of the vulnerable populations at risk of COVID-19 in SF DPH's Health Advisory: Prioritizing Populations with Structural Barriers to Health in COVID-19 Care Response (which lists Black, Latinx, Native/Indigenous, and Pacific Islander)?
Asian
COVID-19 deaths were highest in age groups 65-74 (18%), 55-64 (17%), 75-84
(15%), 45-54 (13%) and 85+ (12%) – statistically different from studies
reporting increased risk of COVID-19 at older ages. Discrepancy might be related to inaccurate reporting of Asians with COVID-19?
UCSF infectious disease specialist Monica Fung, MD, discussed COVID-19 symptoms while noting 40-45% of infections are asymptomatic. This upcoming flu season may be confusing as fever, chills, body aches, sore throat, nausea/vomiting/diarrhea are symptoms of both flu and COVID-19; one distinguishing symptom of COVID-19 is sudden loss of smell/taste.
UCSF geriatrician Anna Chodos presented Our Crisis: Geriatrics and the Public Health Response in Nursing Homes and Residential Care Settings during COVID-19: 40% of U.S. COVID-19 deaths are linked to nursing homes.
Quadruple aim for COVID-19 response for LTC facilities: readily available testing of staff and residents; sufficient and properly used PPE; stellar infection prevention; and emergency preparedness/incident command mode.
RCFEs aka assisted living facilities (ALFs) are non-medical facilities, less regulated than nursing homes with respect to staffing and infection control requirements. They have experienced “significant increase” in COVID-19 cases and deaths, while mostly left on their own to respond. In SF, memory care unit in ALF reported COVID-19 outbreak affecting 17 residents and 12 staff, with at least one death.
During my stint in SNF, there was full-time RN infection control specialist and dozen Social Services staff. SNFs require social services – critical role, though no mandate for licensed clinical social worker (LCSW) – which seems to reinforce their lower status in medical model/nursing home relative to other mostly licensed/certified staff for nursing (RN), physical therapy, nutrition (RD), psychologist, physician assistant, geriatrician, psychiatrist, etc.
SF DPH finally updated health order to allow outdoor visits at LTC facilities, so retired geriatrician Teresa Palmer’s in-person visits with her 102-year-old mother were featured in SF Chronicle and J Weekly!
Two weeks ago, Laguna Honda sent email seeking volunteers to observe outside visitation. Wondered if this could be opportunity to resume my thesis research on Nursing Home Social Work Interventions, so called to inquire. Volunteers need to sign-up for 4-hour afternoon shift, which involves volunteer taking COVID-19 nasal swab test, reviewing rules (masks, distancing, no contraband, 1-hour limit), and reporting violations to staff for enforcement; visitation was being rolled out gradually with just one visit per day. Need to wait for better air quality.
Yes, geriatricians rock! Dr. Chodos co-authored study of first 50 COVID-19 deaths in SF, nearly half from LTC facilities. Nearly half of COVID-19 decedents in LTC facilities did not present with typical COVID-19 symptoms of fever, cough or shortness of breath. Instead, COVID-19 facility residents more likely presented with altered mental status like confusion or lethargy, and more likely to have dementia.
Older adults continue
to be excluded from COVID-19 vaccine and cardiovascular clinical trials.
Dr. Anthony
Fauci said that even an effective COVID-19 vaccine won't replace the need
for other public health measures, such as wearing a mask, distancing and
washing hands.
Yesterday, SF moved from the state’s red to orange tier, allowing reopening of restaurant dining rooms.
"We have to be on guard, unfortunately. Everyone is yearning to aspire to the life pre-COVID and this isn’t the time for that. COVID is still simmering in the community. It’s not like the plague is over and we can all hold hands and rejoice…I think if I was older and had co-morbidities, I personally wouldn’t do the riskier things and I’d still be leery of indoor stuff, especially until this orange status has sustained for a longer time,—UCSF infectious disease expert Peter Chin-Hong, MD, “Experts urge caution as San Francisco expands reopening,” SF Gate (Sept. 30, 2020)
Last month, he
called out people’s failure to distance and wear masks at Dolores Park as
“reckless” and “as scary as American Horror story, the COVID version.” Not long after, smoke from wildfires added to plague.
More things to care about (lead others to join): Community care
In addition to dying disproportionately from COVID-19, an estimated additional 1,200 to 3,000 Californians age 65+ died between August 1 and September 10 from wildfire smoke-related health conditions, according to Stanford researchers; most had pre-existing medical conditions.
Amid this
unprecedented wildfire season, California Governor issued
executive order to phase out sales of new gas-fueled vehicles by 2035 in effort
to combat climate change. 94-year-old Sir David Attenborough hopes
to fight climate change in a way that others will follow him on Instagram:
“Don’t waste anything!”
September 10 is World Suicide Prevention Day, so IOA hosted Older Adult Suicidal Ideation During COVID-19: Understanding & Prevention with Patrick Arbore, EdD, who founded Center for Elderly Suicide Prevention’s Friendship Line in 1973. He discussed how COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk of suicide for older people, especially those who live alone as physical distancing mandates strain coping strategies when the tendency is to reach out to people in physical spaces and in-person encounters that have that have been restricted during pandemic. The emotional consequences of chronic stress exacerbate feelings of anxiety, fear, depression, loneliness, and social isolation that can lead to thoughts of suicide.
Before the pandemic, suicide rates were increasing (after falling 1979-2000). According to California DPH, suicide rates peak at multiple stages throughout lifespan: young adults ages 25-29, middle ages 50-64, and highest at age 85+ group; suicide rates are highest among American Indian/Alaskan Native & White populations; firearms (37%) are leading method of suicide death.
Interpersonal theory of suicide explains late-life suicide: as older people are more likely to experience shrinking social networks (decreased belongingness) and dependence on others due to functional decline (increased burdensomeness). Being socially connected helps individuals maintain a sense of control and access coping resources; opposite effects with social network losses, such as experienced during late life transitions (retirement, widowhood, residential moves, etc.).
Patrick called COVID-19 pandemic “a time of collective sorrow.” According to California DPH, as of Sept. 6, 2020: out of 13,596 COVID-19 deaths, 82% were people age 60+. Ambiguous loss associated with COVID-19 deaths (lacking clarity/finality due to unpredictable losses, denial of being present at time of death/burial ritual) make it very hard to move forward. Patrick quoted Weir (2020), “We’re talking about grieving a living loss—one that keeps going and going.” He noted that mental health effects of pandemic are profound, so suicide prevention needs urgent consideration. Patrick mentioned that most intervention and prevention programs are based upon known risk factors for Caucasians due to their higher rate of suicide in the past.
Patrick offered these communication strategies:
·
Remember
grief + loss is uniquely personal experience
·
Listen
compassionately to individual’s stories about their suffering
·
Reassure
individuals that you will not abandon them
·
Be
aware of resources in communities that support lonely people
·
Ask
directly about suicidal thoughts; discuss both sides of suicide equation:
reasons for wanting to take one’s life, and one’s psychological strengths and
life-affirming reasons for not doing so
·
Pay
attention to “daily hassles” experienced by older adults
Linda McKay related her 64-year-old husband Eric Swenson’s suicide by shooting himself at Mission Police Station in 2011, and his suicide note explaining his depression and not wanting to be a burden.
Joined virtual meeting of All Together Now: Dr. Vivek Murthy in Conversation with Dr. Anita Friedman, who asked what’s going on during this pandemic with older adult population who are “losing their zest for life” due to isolation? Dr. Murthy, author of Together: The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World (2020), responded: you see a peak of loneliness often after the age of 80, but many people who are in their 60s and 70s experience loneliness at lower levels than people who are adolescents and young adults.
“It has to be wrong reinforcing as it does that to be older is to be lonely, isolated, dependent, lacking resilience, sick, in poverty, frail, voiceless and disempowered, the list is endless. Increasing profits or donations by turning me into a commodity and then marketing my ageing self or feelings and emotions in ways that I do not recognise, is dehumanizing and offensive…The notion of victimhood within the context of loneliness feeds the ageist myths… appointing a Minister of Loneliness (England) normalizes the continual exploitation of older adults and is simply a political absurdity.”—Mervyn Eastman, “Manufacturing and manipulation of loneliness in later life narrative,” Co-operative Merv Unleashed (Aug. 9, 2020)
Merv’s dissent reminds us that “chronic loneliness is not confined to our later years, but exists across all generations” and "loneliness is an economic and societal challenge brought about by lack of meaningful human interaction, belonging and purpose.”
nature +
design
COVID-19 pandemic
and wildfire smoke (including Sept. 9 when SF sky was dark orange) has reinforced importance of fresh air and sunlight, which are part of nature. Ideally, our built environment is designed to
maximize our connection to nature which is healing.
Joined Northern California Psychiatric Society (NCPS) and Psychiatric Foundation of Northern California (PFNC) for Nature’s Healing Benefits presentation by Ecotherapy Specialist Darlene DeRose, who worked in financial services before returning to JFK University to study Ecotherapy, Consciousness and Transformative Studies. We can experience physical, mental, social and spiritual health benefits from being exposed to nature 20-30 minutes a day, based on theories of attention restoration and stress recovery.
Yes, nature sounds—water, wind, birdsong—do not include construction noise (lots of remodeling going on in my neighborhood) and neighbor's barking dog who probably needs to be let loose outdoors (ecotherapy includes animal-assisted therapy if conducted outdoors).
After this Zoom presentation, I was ready for ecotherapy, so inspired to take a walk outside and reconnect with nature…but remained cooped indoors because AirNow quality was very unhealthy purple (“risk of health effects is increased for everyone”).
As an aging-in-place advocate, I enjoy learning about designing “forever” homes, incorporating universal design. COVID-19 pandemic has inspired re-design of LTC facilities for better infection control, improved air ventilation and other resilient design features.
“During Florence Nightingale’s time as a nurse in the 19th century, she recognized the benefit of fresh air and sunlight for patients. It seems that we have come away from that, but are trying to circle back. Aesthetics are quite important including ventilation, views to nature and access to sunlight…Many people say that for architects, the concept of place matters, but I would like to suggest that for everyone, design matters.”—Diana Anderson, MD, MArch, “Remodeling healthcare through architecture,” Doctors Who Create
Trauma Informed Design: Designing for Dignity, Healing, and Joy! introduced this framework to design built environment to help people experience resiliency.
Questions to
ask: How to tell if a building is trauma-informed?
·
How
have people with lived experience had a say in design of this project?
·
How
has the specific lived experiences or identities of potential residents
informed the design of amenity space (indoor/outdoor), apartments?
·
How
does this building assist individuals in building relationships, both with
staff and fellow residents?
·
How
does this building help residents experience joy? Create space for grounding?
Offer dignity? Ensure residents feel and are safe?
Biophilia design
features focus on nature in space (daylight, natural elevation, indoor/outdoor
balance), natural analogues (elements of nature shapes/materials), and nature
of space (viewpoints offer feelings of expansiveness and security, while places
of refuge provide protection and comfort; circular spaces, getting outside).
Environmental gerontologist Esther Greenhouse (who has perfect last name for the work she does) presented Equity by Design series on Creating Enabling & Equitable Housing and Multigenerational Communities, based on AARP International Statement of Built Environment Principles.
Urban planner Ifeoma Ebo created Safe Places, Active Places! Community Playbook for Transforming Public Spaces in Your Neighborhood (2019) to improve safety and well-being through the built environment, programs and policies that activate ethic of care and compassion; pandemic resilience design makes use of open spaces on ground floor, housing with outdoor spaces.
Other pandemic
designs: low-maintenance Freedom House with wraparound porch; World Alzheimer Report 2020’s Design, Dignity, Dementia: dementia-related
design and the built environment for and with people living with
dementia.
While air
quality was poor, watching The Dark Divide was like virtual forest bathing. After fresh air returned, took “awe walk” through SF Botanical Garden, communing with plants from around the world!
OPINION: 2020 Election: 10 Questions About Aging in America for the Presidential Candidates
ReplyDeleteBy Ken Dychtwald Aging and Boomers Expert
October 19, 2020
…As the boomers are turning 70 at the rate of 10,000 a day, America is becoming a “gerontocracy.”
This demographic transformation will surely create wonderful new lifestyle, social contribution and marketplace opportunities, as well as potentially devastating medical, economic and intergenerational crises.
Are we prepared? No.
Are President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden addressing this “age wave” and offering innovative solutions? No.
Other than sparingly mentioning “senior this” or “senior that” a few times, they have pretty much avoided all of the issues that arise in our long-lived, six-generation aging nation.
Is it because they don’t want anyone to think they’re old — even though they are? Maybe. And why isn’t their age something they are proudly boasting about?
In a moment, I’ll share 10 questions I believe that Trump and Biden must answer if we are to know where they stand with regard to how America will navigate the unprecedented demographically driven challenges that could make or break our economy, our communities and our health care system in the years ahead.
…But here we are now, with two men in their eighth decade of life competing to be our President.
Other than sparingly mentioning “senior this” or “senior that” from time to time, they have pretty much avoided all of the issues that arise in our long-lived, six-generation aging nation. That’s not only gerontophobic (“an abnormal fear of old people or the idea of growing old”), it’s also reckless.
In order for the nearly 110 million Americans over 50 to have a better idea how they and their families’ lives are going to be positively or negatively impacted in the years ahead, and to inform their voting decisions, here are the 10 questions we all should want Elder Trump and Elder Biden to answer:
My 10 Questions for Trump and Biden
1. At what age do you think that people become “old” today and therefore when should “old age benefits” begin?
2. Do you think of yourself as a “senior?”
3. Why do you think you’re the right age for you to be running for president?
4. Since Alzheimer’s is by far the greatest health fear of older adults, are you willing to make beating this disease your “moonshot” and commit whatever resources are necessary to make it happen?
5. Considering that more than 40 million Americans are providing care to an elder loved one, what changes would you make to the tax code and work/leave policies to help them out?
6. How would you avert poverty among the tens of millions of aging boomers who have no pensions and insufficient savings for their retirement?
7. How would you describe Social Security as you think it should be for the millennial and Gen Z generations?
8. For you personally, has aging been an ascent or a descent and why?
9. Do you think of yourself as a role model for purposeful aging?
10. What is your biggest idea for what America’s 68 million retirees could be doing to contribute further to our society?
Whether the aging of America turns out to be a triumph or a tragedy will be shaped by our next president. We should know what he’s thinking.
https://www.nextavenue.org/2020-election-10-questions-about-aging-in-america-for-trump-biden/
For-Profit Nursing Homes' Pleas For Government Money Brings Scrutiny
ReplyDeleteOctober 22, 2020
INA JAFFE
Nursing homes have been overwhelmed by the coronavirus. Residents account for more than a quarter of all COVID-19 deaths nationwide. The industry says that facilities have also been overwhelmed by costs, and they're asking for billions in aid from the federal government.
But recent studies suggest that for-profit ownership may have endangered residents by skimping on care, while funneling cash to owners and investors.
…Charlene Harrington, professor emerita of Social Behavioral Sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, says 70% of nursing homes are for-profit and low staffing is common.
"They're trying to make money," she says. "And the main way to make money is to keep labor costs low."
…The pandemic has revealed that this strategy comes at a cost. Studies looking at thousands of nursing homes across the country have connected for-profit ownership and low nurse staffing to increased coronavirus infections.
The nursing home industry rejects those studies and promotes earlier research that concluded that outbreaks are largely caused by community spread of COVID-19 outside of nursing homes.
…Mark Parkinson, president and CEO of the American Health Care Association, which mostly represents for-profit facilities, says they hadn't faced a virus like this before…nursing homes didn't have the reserves to deal with it…underfunded by the government, especially Medicaid. In fact, most nursing home revenue comes from the taxpayers, through Medicaid and Medicare.
But it's also the nursing home owners themselves who keep the operations lean.
…says nursing home real estate appraiser, Jim Tellatin. He reviewed some of of the records at NPR's request.
…owners could be doing just fine. They've paid themselves hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars in annual rents for each building, though some of that could be going to pay mortgages…owners have stakes in companies that the nursing homes do business with: from consulting to insurance to therapy to laundry. So a lot of the money is kept in the family, so to speak.
This is a common arrangement in the industry, according to the American Health Care Association's Mark Parkinson….
"They want to separate the real estate, they want to separate the operation because there are so many lawsuits against nursing homes, that if you have everything combined, you put the entire operation at risk."
So if someone sues the nursing home, there won't be much for them to get. The money's in the real estate…
This system has worked out well for the industry, says Dr. Michael Wasserman, immediate past president of the California Association of Long Term Care Medicine.
"The operations have a very low margin. And it allows the industry to complain that they need more money."
But now the system is showing cracks. Occupancy rates are down, so there are fewer residents to bring in money. At the same time, the costs for testing and protective equipment have risen.
In fact, the American Health Care Association warns that only about a quarter of their members can last more than a year without government help.
Nursing homes have already received about $7.5 billion from federal coronavirus relief legislation and billions more in Paycheck Protection funds. Now the industry is asking for another $100 billion for all health care providers, with a "significant" amount of that going to nursing homes. Michael Wasserman wants to know what they'll do with the money if they get it.
"What percentage of that funding is actually finding its way to direct patient care? To the front line staff?," he asks…
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/22/918432908/for-profit-nursing-homes-pleas-for-government-money-brings-scrutiny
Where are real portrayals of women over 50 on screen? New study highlights dearth of leading roles
ReplyDeleteAndrea Mandell
USA TODAY
Oct. 28, 2020
Where are the leading roles for women over 50 in major movies?
A new study finds that women of a certain age group are relegated to supporting roles in films – or are consistently portrayed as grumpy, frumpy or worse.
The Ageless Test study, released Tuesday by TENA in partnership with the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media at Mount Saint Mary’s University, reveals only 1 in 4 films passed what they call the Ageless Test.
The test examines whether women 50 or older are presented as having fully realized lives "rather than serving as scenery in younger people’s stories," according to the study. In order to pass the Ageless Test:
• The film must have at least one female character who is 50+ who matters and is tied into the plot in such a way that their removal would have significant effect
• The character must be presented in humanizing ways and not reduce to ageist stereotypes
The study analyzed 2019’s top grossing films from the U.S., U.K., France and Germany.
More:Geena Davis says Hollywood could achieve parity: 'Cross out' men in scripts and sub women
The results were sobering: No women over 50 were cast in leading roles in 2019's top films, while two men over 50 were featured as leads. And when older women did appear, they were cast in stereotypical fashion (stubborn, 33%; unattractive, 17%; grumpy, 32%; unfashionable, 18%).
"Given that adults 50+ are 20% of our global population, we need to not only include diverse adults 50+ in our stories, but also show them having full lives in order to de-stigmatize the stereotypes around aging," Davis said in a statement.
Hollywood survey:Men more likely than women to view entertainment industry as valuing diversity
The study noted that male stars enjoy a far wider berth: Women make up only 25% of characters over 50, compared with 75% of men, the study found.
Add the rub that in characters over 50, women are more than twice as likely to be shown as physically unattractive, more likely to be depicted as lonely (19%) and homebound (16%) than males.
"Ageism is pervasive in this industry," Jessica Lange told AARP Magazine in 2017. "It’s not a level playing field. You don’t often see women in their 60s playing romantic leads, yet you will see men in their 60s playing romantic leads with co-stars who are decades younger. I think about how few wonderful actresses of my generation are still doing viable, important film work. You go to television. You go to the stage. You do whatever you can because you want to keep working."
And older romance is thrust off-screen, the study found.
Characters under 50 are three times more likely than characters over 50 to be depicted in a sex scene, "sending the message that older bodies are not as worthy to be shown in a sexual way," the study said.
"It's one of the great myths that you lose your sexuality as you get older," Glenn Close told the Guardian last year while promoting "The Wife," which earned her a seventh Oscar nomination. "I feel as free and as creative, as sexual and as eager as I ever have."
The study called for content creators to cast more women over 50, increase diversity in older characters, avoid stereotyping and embrace older characters being sexual (and show it).
https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2020/10/27/women-over-50-losing-out-major-movie-roles-study-finds/6048202002/
You’re Not Too Old to Talk to Someone
ReplyDeleteStudies have shown that older people do as well in psychotherapy as younger ones. But finding and affording therapy can prove difficult.
By Paula Span
Nov. 1, 2020
…Health experts and practitioners also wish that more older adults could access psychotherapy and other kinds of mental health care, especially now… one in four people over age 65 said they experienced anxiety or depression in August, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis — more than twice the figure in 2018. Loneliness and isolation have taken a toll on older people, and geriatric psychiatrists anticipate an increase in grief disorders.
“It makes their existing issues worse,” Dr. Mi Yu, a geriatric psychiatrist in Nashville, said of the pandemic’s effects. “All my patients seem to have experienced more distress and anxiety and they’re requiring more frequent sessions,” which lately are conducted by video or phone.
…older people, particularly those over 80, seem more reluctant to seek treatment for psychological disorders. “The greatest generation are the pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps group,” said Dr. Daniel Plotkin, a geriatric psychiatrist in Los Angeles. Acknowledging psychological problems still carries a stigma, particularly among rural residents and Black Americans.
Age bias can infect practitioners, too, Dr. Plotkin said. “The unfortunate attitude that most people have, including doctors, is that older people can‘t change, that they’re stuck in their ways.” In fact, he noted, studies have shown that older people do as well in psychotherapy as younger ones.
Practitioners may prefer to treat younger clients because they have decades ahead during which to reap the benefits…
“I was dumbfounded,” Dr. Yu said. “We actually find elderly patients are more open to therapy. They’re more reflective. Realizing that they have limited time left in life gives them a sense of urgency; they want to resolve something and they don’t have time to lose.”
...Traditional Medicare covers individual and group psychotherapy, with no cap on the number of sessions; beneficiaries pay 20 percent of the authorized amount. It also covers treatment of alcohol and drug abuse and provides for free annual depression screening. Co-payments for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries vary from plan to plan.
But many mental health practitioners won’t accept Medicare, in part because the reimbursement is so low…
Researchers at George Mason University and Mathematica reported earlier this year that in a national survey, only about 36 percent of mental health providers accepted new Medicare patients, compared to 83 percent of physicians.
Moreover, although Medicare covers mental health treatment by a variety of providers (including doctors, clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, nurse practitioners and physician assistants), it won’t reimburse licensed professional counselors or marriage and family therapists.
…“They comprise about 40 percent of the mental health work force, but they’re not eligible under Medicare,” said Matthew Fullen, a counselor educator and researcher at Virginia Tech.
…Practitioners also hope that Medicare’s temporary coverage of telemedicine — helpful when older clients can’t easily make in-person visits — will become permanent after the pandemic…
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/30/health/mental-health-psychotherapy-elderly.html
'You are no longer my mother': A divided America will struggle to heal after Trump era
ReplyDeleteBy Tim Reid, Gabriella Borter, Michael Martina
…In interviews with 10 voters - five Trump supporters and five backing Democratic candidate Joe Biden - few could see the wrecked personal relationships caused by Trump’s tenure fully healing, and most believed them destroyed forever.
Throughout his nearly four-year norm-smashing presidency, Trump has stirred strong emotions among both supporters and opponents. Many of his backers admire his moves to overhaul immigration, his appointment of conservative judges, his willingness to throw convention to the wind and his harsh rhetoric, which they call straight talk.
Democrats and other critics see the former real estate developer and reality show personality as a threat to American democracy, a serial liar and a racist who mismanaged the novel coronavirus pandemic that has killed more than 230,000 people in the United States so far…
Now, with Trump trailing Biden in opinion polls, people are beginning to ask whether the fractures caused by one of the most polarizing presidencies in U.S. history could be healed if Trump loses the election.
“Unfortunately, I don’t think national healing is as easy as changing the president,” said Jaime Saal, a psychotherapist at the Rochester Center for Behavioral Medicine in Rochester Hills, Michigan.
“It takes time and it takes effort, and it takes both parties – no pun intended – being willing to let go and move forward,” she said.
Saal said tensions in people’s personal relationships have spiked given the political, health and social dynamics facing the United States. Most often she sees clients who have political rifts with siblings, parents or in-laws, as opposed to spouses.
Trump’s election in 2016 divided…president’s own freewheeling tweets have also inflamed tensions.
A September report by the non-partisan Pew Research Center found that nearly 80% of Trump and Biden supporters said they had few or no friends who supported the other candidate.
A study by the Gallup polling organization in January found that Trump’s third year in office set a new record for party polarization. While 89% of Republicans approved of Trump’s performance in office in 2019, only 7% of Democrats thought he was doing a good job.
Gayle McCormick, 77, who separated from her husband William, 81, after he voted for Trump in 2016, said, “I think the legacy of Trump is going to take a long time to recover from.”…because each believes the other to have a totally alien value system.
…Sarah Guth, 39, a Spanish interpreter from Denver, Colorado, said she has cut several Trump-supporting friends out of her life…“We had such fundamental disagreements about such basic stuff. It showed both sides that we really don’t have anything in common. I don’t believe that will change in the post-Trump era.”
Fervent Trump supporter Dave Wallace, 65, a retired oil industry sales manager in West Chester, Pennsylvania, is more optimistic about feuding families in a post-Trump world…“I think it’s just Trump, the way he makes people feel. I do think the angst will decrease when we’re back to a normal politician who doesn’t piss people off.”
Jay J. Van Bavel, a professor of psychology and neural science at New York University, said this “political sectarianism” has become not only tribal, but moral.
“Because Trump has been one of the most polarizing figures in American history around core values and issues, people are unwilling to compromise and that is not something you can make go away,” Van Bavel said…
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-families/you-are-no-longer-my-mother-a-divided-america-will-struggle-to-heal-after-trump-era-idUSKBN27I16E
Nontraditional nursing homes have almost no coronavirus cases. Why aren’t they more widespread?
ReplyDeleteBy Rebecca Tan
November 3, 2020 at 3:00 a.m. PST
Not a single resident has contracted the coronavirus at Goodwin House’s small residential facility in Northern Virginia, where about 80 seniors live in homey apartments and keep their own sleeping and meal schedules. There’s been just one case at the Woodlands at John Knox Village in Broward County, Fla., where all 140 residents live in private rooms and are cared for by nurses who earn enough not to take a second job.
These facilities, part of a national movement to create less-institutionalized long-term care, stand out in a pandemic that has killed more than 61,000 nursing home residents since March. At “Green House” homes, the best-known nontraditional model, residents are one-fifth as likely to get the coronavirus as those who live in typical nursing homes — and one-twentieth as likely to die of the disease it causes.
For Harvard-trained doctor Bill Thomas, who specializes in geriatrics, the contrast is bittersweet.
He has spent two decades calling for the “abolition” of standard nursing homes in favor of the Green House model, which allows the elderly to live in groups of eight to 10 in settings that resemble homes rather than hospitals.
The model has been praised by academics and doctors and seems far better suited than traditional facilities to stave off the spread of infection and the isolation that has devastated the elderly in recent months. But it remains on the fringes of a $137 billion industry.
…As of this year, the 2,500 Green House residents represent just 0.2 percent of the 1.3 million nursing home residents nationwide. Of the 10 largest nursing home chains in the country, which collectively operate 2,000 facilities, none have adopted the Green House model.
Some in the movement say corporations and government leaders have been unwilling to take the necessary steps, such as revamping the reimbursement system for Medicare and Medicaid or slashing paychecks for executives. Others fault what they see as a national tolerance of injustice toward the elderly and the mostly immigrant and minority workers who care for them.
…In 1997, a group of 33 administrators, ombudsmen and geriatricians who had been independently researching alternative models of skilled nursing care met at Fagan’s home in Rochester, N.Y., to join forces in a unified overhaul effort.
Among others, there were Bill and Jude Thomas, founders of the Eden Alternative in Ithaca, N.Y.; Barry and Debby Barkan from the Live Oak Institute in Berkeley, Calif.; Joanne Rader, a geriatric nurse from Oregon; and Charlene Boyd, a nursing home administrator from Seattle.
Inside a red-brick building that housed a historic women’s club, attendees outlined what nursing homes should look like: small, localized facilities where employees had enough time and resources to develop personal relationships with each resident. Staff members would provide support for mental as well as physical health, and let residents make their own decisions when possible. Residents would be seen foremost as people, not patients.
…movement was also stunted by a lack of financial and regulatory support from state and federal governments.
…American Health Care Association said nursing homes had been “blamed” for the pandemic’s high toll and announced a $15 million media campaign to “fight back.” Chief executive Mark Parkinson urged members to support state and federal lobbying efforts to secure immunity clauses that would shield facilities from lawsuits alleging negligence.
…When the crisis eventually abates, it will fall to public officials to take the initiative, advocates say. But even with more than 61,000 dead and nearly 270,000 infected, there’s no guarantee…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/green-house-nursing-homes-covid/2020/11/02/4e723b82-d114-11ea-8c55-61e7fa5e82ab_story.html
College loans cast long shadow on students and their parents
ReplyDeleteNov 4, 2020
By Maureen Downey, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Retired local college professor Rick Diguette writes about an increasingly common family challenge in Georgia -- paying off college debt.
In a guest column, Diguette talks about his decision to look for a full-time job to help his son pay off his college loans. His son attended college during the Great Recession.
A study on the class of 2010 found only 56% had found a job nine months after they graduated. And those jobs were often temporary posts that didn’t require a college degree and provided no benefits. Research has also shown people who graduate during a recession suffer large initial earnings losses, amounting to about 9% of annual earnings in the initial stage. While high unemployment rates have a minimal impact on workers with two or more years of work experience, the consequences are more significant for those only entering the job market.
Students in Georgia graduate with slightly above $28,000 in average student loan debt, according to a new report by the Institute for College Access & Success. About 56% of Georgia students left college with debt.
…here is Diguette’s essay…
My son reached one of life’s major milestones in 2008: he turned 21. Still in college at the time, he was adding about $15,000 to his student loan debt every 12 months. My wife and I were able to avoid the most common outcomes of those perilous economic times, from which many people our age still haven’t fully recovered. We kept our jobs and, although the market value of our home plummeted, we held on to that as well. Looking back, we feel extremely fortunate to have emerged from the Great Recession unscathed. Our son hasn’t been so lucky.
A report published in 2018 shows that his age “cohort is at greatest risk of becoming a ‘lost generation’ for wealth accumulation.” Young people like him are more likely to be living at home well into their late twenties. Even those who aren’t living in their parent’s basement earn less and own fewer assets than members of earlier generations.
…Although I took early retirement in 2017 and am one of the fortunate few who collects a pension in addition to Social Security, I am looking for full-time work with one goal in mind: to pay off my son’s student loans. Whether I succeed depends on the willingness of an employer to hire someone born in 1954.
I have marketable skills and plenty of experience, but ageism is a factor in the job market, and why wouldn’t it be? I am not the person I was 20 years ago, but age comes with certain qualifying compensations. There is little likelihood I’ll come to work hung over, or in the grips of a tempestuous romance, or always on the lookout for a better gig. As for my cell phone, it’s a convenience, not a time-consuming distraction.
With age, or so the old saying goes, also comes wisdom. That doesn’t mean I consider myself infallible or all-knowing. But experience is a reliable teacher. I know things now, about other people and myself, that escaped my notice 20 years ago. My perspective is also different. I have achieved success and now enjoy a level of financial independence that at one time I would have thought unattainable. This took years to accomplish, and there were bumps in the road. The job market didn’t always look like it cared much about me. That’s one thing my son and I have in common.
It can be argued that my return to the work force may deprive a young person of an employment opportunity, and there’s obviously some truth to that. Nonetheless, I’m more than willing to put my Golden Years on hold to retire my son’s student loan debt. I will sleep better knowing that my efforts are hastening him closer to the day when success and independence are more than words, they’re meaningful touchstones in his life.
https://www.ajc.com/education/get-schooled-blog/college-loans-cast-long-shadow-on-graduates-and-their-parents/YPJ4XWFEQZCH3GT5WUTEAHMCTE/
Not just COVID: Nursing home neglect deaths surge in shadows
ReplyDeleteBy MATT SEDENSKY and BERNARD CONDON
November 18, 2020
…As more than 90,000 of the nation’s long-term care residents have died in a pandemic that has pushed staffs to the limit, advocates for the elderly say a tandem wave of death separate from the virus has quietly claimed tens of thousands more, often because overburdened workers haven’t been able to give them the care they need.
Nursing home watchdogs are being flooded with reports of residents kept in soiled diapers so long their skin peeled off, left with bedsores that cut to the bone, and allowed to wither away in starvation or thirst.
Beyond that, interviews with dozens of people across the country reveal swelling numbers of less clear-cut deaths that doctors believe have been fueled not by neglect but by a mental state plunged into despair by prolonged isolation ̶ listed on some death certificates as “failure to thrive.”
A nursing home expert who analyzed data from the country’s 15,000 facilities for The Associated Press estimates that for every two COVID-19 victims in long-term care, there is another who died prematurely of other causes. Those “excess deaths” beyond the normal rate of fatalities in nursing homes could total more than 40,000 since March.
These extra deaths are roughly 15% more than you’d expect at nursing homes already facing tens of thousands of deaths each month in a normal year.
“The healthcare system operates kind of on the edge, just on the margin, so that if there’s a crisis, we can’t cope,” said Stephen Kaye, a professor at the Institute on Health and Aging at the University of California, San Francisco, who conducted the analysis. “There are not enough people to look after the nursing home residents.”
Comparing mortality rates at homes struck by COVID-19 with ones that were spared, Kaye also found that the more the virus spread through a home, the greater the number of deaths recorded for other reasons. In homes where at least 3 in 10 residents had the virus, for example, the rate of death for reasons besides the virus was double what would be expected without a pandemic.
That suggests the care of those who didn’t contract the virus may have been impacted as healthcare workers were consumed attending to residents ill from COVID-19 or were left short-handed as the pandemic infected employees themselves.
Chronic understaffing at nursing homes has been one of the hallmarks of the pandemic, with a few homes even forced to evacuate because so many workers either tested positive or called in sick. In 20 states where virus cases are now surging, federal data shows nearly 1 in 4 nursing homes report staff shortages.
…LeadingAge, which represents not-for-profit long-term care facilities, said staffing challenges are real, and that care homes are struggling in the face of federal inaction…
When facilities sealed off across the country in March, advocates and inspectors were routinely kept out too, all while concerning reports trickled in, not only of serious injuries from falls or major medical declines, but of seemingly banal problems that posed serious health issues for the vulnerable.
https://apnews.com/article/nursing-homes-neglect-death-surge-3b74a2202140c5a6b5cf05cdf0ea4f32
Dianne Feinstein’s Missteps Raise a Painful Age Question Among Senate Democrats
ReplyDeleteBy Jane Mayer
December 10, 2020
…Dianne Feinstein, the senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who, at eighty-seven, is the oldest member of the Senate,…
…YouTube, under the headline “Senator Feinstein just asked the same question twice and didn’t realize she did it,” adding an emoji of someone covering his face with his hand in shame, along with bright red type proclaiming “Time to Retire!!” Six days later, under growing pressure from progressive groups who were already outraged by her faltering management of Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Feinstein released a statement announcing that she would step down from the Democrats’ senior position, while continuing as a non-ranking member of the committee…sad turning point for Feinstein and a reckoning for the Senate, which runs on the seniority system. The presumption has been that it’s up to voters to fire aging senators who can no longer effectively serve. But voters rarely do. As Paul Kane, who covers Congress for the Washington Post, wrote in 2017, the Senate was then the oldest in history. Its eight octogenarians were almost twice the number that had simultaneously served before. According to the Senate Historical Office, all of them held positions of vital importance to the country. And while several were regarded as wise and effective, others had disruptive health problems that clearly undermined the Senate’s ability to function.
Twitter and other social-media platforms are exposing lawmakers’ infirmities to new and harsher scrutiny, violating an unspoken culture of complicity and coverup…physical and mental fitness of Trump, who is seventy-four, and Joe Biden, who is seventy-eight, have also been extensively covered.
…declining male senators, including Strom Thurmond, of South Carolina, and Robert Byrd, of West Virginia, were widely known by the end of their careers to be non-compos mentis…
But many others familiar with Feinstein’s situation describe her as seriously struggling, and say it has been evident for several years. Speaking on background, and with respect for her accomplished career, they say her short-term memory has grown so poor that she often forgets she has been briefed on a topic, accusing her staff of failing to do so just after they have.
… Feinstein ran for reëlection in 2018. “She should have gone out on top in 2018,” said a former Senate aide who continues to admire her, but who pointed out that many of Feinstein’s peers retired selflessly…As one of the current aides to a different senator notes, “In her defense, Feinstein has had to fight for everything she’s gotten. She didn’t get where she is as a woman in politics by listening to the men.” Whether Feinstein will serve out the remainder of her term, which will end in 2024, when she is ninety-one, is a matter of speculation among some of those who have worked with her.
Meanwhile, the Feinstein situation has triggered the latest round in a larger generational fight in the Democratic Senate caucus. Unlike the Republican leadership in the Senate, which rotates committee chairmanships, the Democrats have stuck with the seniority system. Some frustrated younger members argue that this has undermined the Democrats’ effectiveness by giving too much power to elderly and sometimes out-of-touch chairs, resulting in uncoördinated strategy and too little opportunity for members in their prime.
…But Congress’s gerontocracy problem shows no sign of abating. If Republicans hold the Senate majority next year after Georgia’s two runoff races, the likely chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee will be Chuck Grassley, of Iowa. Now eighty-seven, he is just three months younger than Feinstein. And he has said that he is considering running for reëlection in 2022.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/dianne-feinsteins-missteps-raise-a-painful-age-question-among-senate-democrats
Yes, Feinstein is the oldest U.S. senator. But she should be able to retire on her own terms
ReplyDeleteBy GEORGE SKELTON
DEC. 17, 2020
California Sen. Dianne Feinstein says she hasn’t thought about retiring soon despite some assertions that the 87-year-old lawmaker should step aside because her cognitive abilities have allegedly declined.
“No, I haven’t,” she told me in response to a brief question about whether she’d considered retiring early. Her fifth full term doesn’t expire until the end of 2024 when she’ll be 91. She’s currently the oldest U.S. senator.
There are also six other octogenarians in the Senate — all men.
...“I don’t feel my cognitive abilities have diminished,” she said in answer to my question about whether she felt they had...
That seems to be the main rap on her: short-term memory loss.
During my roughly half-hour phone interview with Feinstein on Tuesday, she did repeat herself a couple of times after she’d moved on to talk about other things. That’s normal for many people, especially as they get older. But I hadn’t noticed it before in her.
…“People are willing to work with me across the aisle,” she said. “I’m respected. I have an effective staff …
“We do get things done and we do pass bills. You do get older, that’s true. But I have been productive.”
…last week in a lengthy article by veteran reporter Jane Mayer in the New Yorker magazine…cited several anonymous sources — none of whom understandably wanted to be quoted by name — as saying that Feinstein’s “short-term memory has grown so poor that she often forgets she has been briefed on a topic, accusing her staff of failing to do so just after they have.
“They describe Feinstein as forgetting what she has said and getting upset when she can’t keep up.”
Times columnist Erika D. Smith followed by writing that readers should urge Feinstein “to step down early … so that California will have two open seats in the U.S. Senate instead of just one.”
Smith noted that Gov. Gavin Newsom is being pressured by Black and Latino leaders to appoint one of their own to the Senate seat being vacated by Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. One solution would be for “Feinstein to be selfless and retire early,” Smith wrote. That would allow Newsom to name two new senators.
“Now is absolutely the time to be an ally to communities of color and let another younger lawmaker represent the evolving values of this state,” Smith wrote. “For to adequately address the many longstanding, race-based disparities in everything from healthcare to housing,
California needs a Black senator and a Latino senator.”
…One of the biggest criticisms of centrist Feinstein by liberal activists is that she’s too civil and mannerly. Not harsh enough on Republicans. Too willing to compromise.
That’s also why she has been an effective senator.
“I like to work in a bipartisan way,” she said…
Feinstein was widely criticized by liberals for her handling — as the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee — of the confirmation hearings for conservative Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett. They thought she was too soft…
Feinstein later stepped down as the committee’s No. 1 Democrat.
Jerry Roberts, a former San Francisco Chronicle top editor and political writer who wrote a book about Feinstein’s stint as San Francisco mayor, says:
“She deserves great respect. She was a political pioneer in advancing the cause of equality of women in electoral politics and it is sad if not disgusting — as well as sexist as hell — to see and hear political operatives and hacks with no sense or regard for history attack and dismiss her.”
Agreed. She was the first female mayor of San Francisco and — along with Barbara Boxer — the first female senator from California. She passed the nation’s first assault weapon ban at great political cost.
Feinstein may be over the hill. But she has earned the right to decide on her own when to descend all the way without being pushed.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-12-17/skelton-dianne-feinstein-retirement-calls-senate
Horrors Aren’t Heartwarming
ReplyDeleteWorkers walking six miles and nurses scrounging up sick leave isn’t heartwarming- it’s an indictment of the system that forces them to.
Nathan J. Robinson
20 December 2020
…The disturbing thing here is that injustice is so normalized in this country that what should be enraging can pass for heartwarming. But it happens constantly. This kind of “uplifting” human interest story is in the news constantly. There was the 89-year-old pizza delivery man who got a $12,000 tip—he “works 30 hours a week to make some extra money because his monthly bills cost more than his social security covers,” and someone was disturbed enough by it to raise some money for him…
The focus is on the initiative shown by the helpers. But the reporters’ framing misses the crucial question: why were things like this in the first place?...
Samantha Grasso, in an excellent analysis of “feel good” stories from last year, calls them a “rose-colored coverup of public resource failures,”…
In each case, the problem is the same. We are zeroing in on the human response to unjust conditions, when an equally important job of journalists is to expose the causes of those conditions. Framing matters just as much as facts, and you can frame the same information as either an indictment of corporate profit-seeking or a celebration of mutual aid. If you make it the latter rather than the former, viewers will not be left with the right questions in their mind. They will think their dystopian surroundings are normal, that this is how things are, that we just have to give each other our sick days when we get sick. The possibility of an employer actually treating an employee well is excluded from the discourse, just as the possibility of everyone who needs medical care getting it for free (which happens in other countries) is off the radar.
Cody Johnston, in an excellent Some More News video breaking down these kinds of “inspirational” stories, calls them “a symptom of a sick society that is unable and unwilling to care for its own citizens.” While “at first glance” they may seem harmless tales of “neighbors helping each other out or overcoming strife through hard work and determination” they perniciously normalize the profoundly wrong…The job of a responsible news organization would be to find out how many workers were struggling to afford transit costs and shame the corporations that give money to shareholders that they should be giving to their workers.
…Grasso, in her analysis, encourages journalists to be more self-critical and start thinking about what their stories say and whose interests they serve, which questions they ask and which they don’t….
We need to get them to focus on the true villains and put the right questions in the minds of their readers and viewers. People need to come away angry, but also with raised expectations for what they and their fellow humans deserve. We should all be in awe of the human capacity to share our last crumbs with one another, but we should also demand that in an age of abundant wealth everyone has guaranteed healthcare, housing, food, and leisure time. My own heart will be warmed when I see people’s basic human rights being granted. Until then, this stuff should only churn our stomachs.
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2020/12/horrors-arent-heartwarming
A New Tool in Treating Mental Illness: Building Design
ReplyDeleteResearch into the health effects of natural and man-made surroundings is spurring the development of psychiatric facilities that feel more residential and welcoming.
By Jane Margolies
Jan. 5, 2021
…For decades, psychiatric hospitals were grim settings where patients were crowded into common rooms by day and dorms at night. But new research into the health effects of our surroundings is spurring the development of facilities that feel more residential, with welcoming entrances, smaller living units within larger buildings and a variety of gathering spaces. Nature plays a big role: Windows provide views of greenery, landscapes decorate walls, and outdoor areas give patients and staff access to fresh air and sunlight.
The new approach, promoted as healing and therapeutic, has produced environments that are more calming and supportive. And it feels particularly timely, given the surge in mental health issues created by the pandemic.
…Even before the pandemic, the number of Americans affected by mental illness was at a new high. One in five adults was experiencing depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress or some other malady, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. The rates were significantly higher for adolescents (about 50 percent) and young adults (about 30 percent).
…A recent Gallup poll showed that Americans felt their mental health was “worse than it has been at any point in the last two decades.”
Demand for treatment has soared, and the construction of mental health facilities has been outpacing that of other specialty hospitals. Last year, 40 percent of the specialty hospitals under construction were psychiatric hospitals and behavioral health centers…
exposure to nature has been shown to lower cortisol levels, a measure of stress. Adding healing gardens and other greenery can help soothe agitated patients and give staff a place to decompress.
Research specific to mental health care settings is also coming into play. Studies have shown that reducing crowding by providing private rooms and multiple communal spaces may lessen patient and employee stress and aggression. Lowering noise…
…no one-size-fits-all design solution. And safety — for both patients and staff — remains paramount.
Codes and guidelines fine-tuned over many years have sought to eliminate room features that patients have used to harm themselves and others. Window glazing is made of polycarbonate compounds to reduce breaking. Doors are hung on quick-release hinges to allow staff to enter a room if a patient is barricaded in. Plumbing and other fixtures have been designed to prevent the possibility of hanging or strangulation.
…also a move to give patients some control over their surroundings. Manual thermostats allow patients to adjust the temperature in their rooms,…dimmer switches let them modulate the lights.
…Psychiatric institutions used to be tucked away, but today they are likely to be part of hospital campuses or otherwise conveniently situated.
…Care early in life is crucial because half of all lifetime mental illnesses present themselves by age 15 and 75 percent by age 24, said Dr. Susan Swick, Ohana’s physician in chief.
…asked architects at NBBJ for a design that would possess some of the wonder of a children’s museum or a public library — “a place you step into that gives you a sense of soaring possibility,”…Paths will be lined with cedars and pines, rosemary and lavender — plants whose scents activate “natural killer” cells that can strengthen immunity…
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/05/business/mental-health-facilities-design.html
Sen. Feinstein, 87, files initial paperwork to run for re-election in 2024
ReplyDeleteMatthew Tom, SFGATE
Jan. 12, 2021
Dianne Feinstein 2024.
That appears to be a real possibility after L.A. Magazine reported that the 87-year-old U.S. senator from California filed the initial re-election paperwork with the Federal Election Commission on Tuesday.
By the 2024 election, Feinstein, who is already the oldest sitting senator, will be 91. If she were to win re-election and serve her entire term, she would be 97.
It was just last month that prominent liberal commentators suggested that Feinstein should retire, citing "cognitive decline."
"It's time for Sen. Feinstein to retire," wrote UC Irvine law professor and CNN contributor Rick Hasen. "She did some great work in Senate. But it's been clear for last few years that her cognitive decline is serious. Let Gov. Newsom appoint someone who can fully represent CA's interests until election."
According to a New Yorker article in December, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer , D-N.Y., had to ask Feinstein twice to step down from her role as the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee because she forgot the first conversation. The article cites an aide to another Democratic senator who stated, “She’s an incredibly effective human being, but there’s definitely been deterioration in the last year. She’s in a very different mode now.”
The article also cites several unnamed sources close to Feinstein and the Senate who say "her short-term memory has grown so poor that she often forgets she has been briefed on a topic," and that her "staff has said that sometimes she seems herself, and other times unreachable."
Feinstein stepped down from her position as the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee in late November after facing criticism for her handling of Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation hearings just weeks before the election. Some Democrats wanted Feinstein to be more aggressive in efforts to stop Barrett's confirmation.
Feinstein has said she hasn't considered retiring early.
“We do get things done and we do pass bills. You do get older, that’s true. But I have been productive,” she told the Los Angeles Times last month.
https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Sen-Feinstein-87-files-paperwork-to-run-for-15866190.php
To Improve Healthcare For Older Adults, Look To Geriatrics
ReplyDeleteSachin H. Jain
Jan 18, 2021
…Primary care for older adults is broken. Most of it is grounded in an internal medicine, clinic-based chassis that ignores patients’ goals and strips them of their autonomy. Too often, this approach results in care that is reactive and inconvenient, and which often leads to inappropriate treatments and poor outcomes. That’s because primary care wasn’t designed for older adults. Geriatric care was. And by reinvigorating the practice of geriatric care by aligning it with the Medicare Advantage payment model, we can provide better care for more older adults that costs less, produces better health outcomes, and—most important—enables older adults like Mrs. J to live the independent, vigorous lives they keep telling us they want.
…The fact of the matter is that taking care of older adults requires its own body of knowledge. “Older adults have dementia (now the sixth leading cause of death in that population), falls (the number one injury-related death in people over 65), pressure ulcers, and many other illnesses seldom seen in middle-aged adults,” writes Elizabeth Eckstrom, a professor of internal medicine and geriatrics at Oregon Health & Science University. She argues that high mortality rates due to polypharmacy and rampant missed dementia diagnoses are all indicative of a system where older patients are not being treated appropriately by physicians with expertise in their specific ailments.
…specific philosophy of care that this endeavor requires, reflexively administering treatment…full understanding of the patient’s perspective….“were framed within the person’s socioemotional context, including the impact of medications on interpersonal relationships, emotional wellbeing, and activities that add meaning and quality to life.”
…since the field of geriatric medicine first came into its own in the United States in the late 1970s, its practitioners have pioneered models of care specifically tailored to older adults that produce excellent outcomes, reduce costs, and increase patients’ autonomy and overall satisfaction. For example, in the hospital setting, a recent study found that providing people with inpatient geriatric consultations “resulted in significant reductions in daily charges, ICU days, potentially inappropriate medication use, and use of physical restraints and increased end‐of‐life planning.”
Why do we see such disparities between traditional primary care and geriatric care? I see three overall reasons:
1. Geriatricians have deeply studied the diseases that affect older adults and how they manifest and react differently to treatment as we age…
2. Geriatricians think about how to balance treatment for disease with patient quality of life and function, and weigh the pros and cons of intervention...
3. Geriatricians understand how, as patients age, their needs expand beyond just treatment for physical health, into mental and social limitations, and they work collaboratively in teams to solve these many issues….
…geriatric care should be used to treat all older people as they progress across the aging spectrum to keep them healthy and autonomous and to forestall decline.
…30,000 geriatricians will be required by 2030 to care for about 21 million older Americans, according to the American Geriatrics Society. We currently have about 7,000, and last year more than one-third of graduate fellowship spots in the field went unfilled.
…Under capitated payment models, physicians receive a flat fee to provide care for each patient…used by most Medicare Advantage plans, which cover more than a third of today’s Medicare beneficiaries... aligns with the philosophy behind geriatric care. It rewards providers and insurers who align their care with the goals of their patients…
https://www.forbes.com/sites/sachinjain/2021/01/18/to-improve-healthcare-for-older-adults-look-to-geriatrics/
The Role of Elder Justice in Our National Racial Justice Reckoning
ReplyDeleteVivianne Mbaku
August 3, 2021
…The definition of elder abuse changes depending on the cultural context. For example, an outsider might see a family pooling financial resources, including an older adult’s retirement benefits, as financial exploitation while the older adult may feel that it is a part of their culture and identity to share their resources with their loved ones.
…Black older adults are not likely to seek help for abuse because of fear of racial discrimination. These responses are rooted in the lived experiences of these communities.
Looking at Elder Abuse in Context
Imagine a Black older adult who is 80 years old. They have lived through Jim Crow-era laws, the civil rights movement and now our current racial justice movement. They have most likely known someone who died because of police brutality (1 in 1,000 Black men will die at the hands of the police, according to researchers) and have faced discrimination (overt and covert) at every major junction of their lives.
Now, if they are facing elder abuse and are reluctant to report it to the police or Adult Protective Services (APS), in light of everything they have seen, their behavior seems quite logical.
In spite of these findings, our elder abuse structures are deficient in the options they provide for older adults of color.
In the United States, elder abuse prevention work is intertwined with law enforcement. In many states, APS is required to report abuse cases to law enforcement and often the police are the first call when elder abuse is suspected.
We should be alarmed that an older adult facing abuse and exploitation would consider not accessing services and supports because the system has harmed them and their community in the past so much that they no longer trust they will be served properly.
How to Protect All Older Adults
If we want to achieve the goals of elder justice, and protect all older adults, we need to take a close look at the ways we are trying to achieve these goals.
First, we should consider policies related to policing and elder abuse and create alternatives to policing and prosecution.
Elder justice has criminal prosecution baked into the definition which, if taken at face value, seems correct. We want to punish those who commit elder abuse and keep them from abusing others, right? Yes, in theory. But in practice this is not always what is happening.
The most common perpetrators of elder abuse are family members, who are often the caregivers and possibly the source of housing for the victim.
When we layer the complexities of race and implicit biases in policing onto this already complex situation, one can quickly see where problems arise.
How can we purport to serve all older adults when there are many who fear the system and its outcomes more than their own abuse and exploitation?
A Place for Restorative Justice
A theory of justice known as restorative justice provides us with an approach that may work better for these complex situations where the underlying relationships are deep and the older adult fears their loss. One advocate has described restorative justice as a way of considering abuse as a violation of people and relationships, rather than as a violation of the law.
Restorative justice allows parties to come together and come to an agreement about how to remedy the harm done and prevent harm in the future. It provides the space for a relationship to continue between the elder abuse victim and the elder abuse perpetrator.
This approach is much more holistic, culturally responsive and trauma informed. I am not saying that this approach is appropriate, or will work, in every case. But it does provide an option that moves us away from policing as the panacea for all elder abuse cases…
https://justiceinaging.org/the-role-of-elder-justice-in-our-national-racial-justice-reckoning/