Friday, July 31, 2020

Pause

According to San Francisco Department of Public Health (SF DPH) COVID-19 data tracker based on 249,599 test results reported: 6,575 positive cases and 59 deaths (39 male=66%; 33 age 81+, 11 age 71-80, 10 age 61-70, 91.5% of deaths age 60+; 26 Asian=44%, 14 Latinx, 12 White, 6 Black; 1 homeless).  This month SF reported its first COVID-19 death in age 51-60 group; still no COVID-19 deaths in age groups <18 and 31-40.
After July 4th weekend, SF DPH Director Grant Colfax, MD, returned to press conferences, calmly sharing what keeps him up at night: SF’s reproductive rate rising above 1 (meaning each person infected with COVID-19 is infecting more than one other person, contributing to spread that could overwhelm our health care system).  As a result of rising COVID-19 hospitalizations, SF was placed on state watch list, requiring further pause on reopening.  Dr. Colfax reported that the average age of COVID-19 patient at SF General Hospital has been 41 years, debunking the belief that only older people are most at risk. 
Yesterday, Dr. Colfax noted rapid increases in SF’s COVID-19 cases: took 38 days to go from 2,000 to 3,000 COVID-19 cases, half as long to go from 3,000 to 4,000, and just 10 days this month from 5,000 to 6,000! Based on current estimates, he projected more than 750 COVID-19 hospitalizations by October and more than 600 COVID-19 deaths in 2020; worst case scenario projected 2,400 hospitalizations and 1,800 deaths!

Epidemiologists estimate that every death from COVID-19 will leave approximately nine bereaved in U.S.  If data does not persuade people to follow public health orders (distancing, masking), then perhaps sharing more personal stories of losing family and friends to COVID-19 might be more compelling.

In just six weeks, COVID-19 hospitalizations rose from 26 to 109, with one-quarter in intensive care units (ICU); acute care and ICU beds have grown 15% each week this month.  As a result of this COVID-19 surge, SF officials announced plan for temporary overflow hospital in the Presidio for non-COVID-19 patients in case hospital beds need to be cleared for COVID-19 patients. 

“Get back to normal”?
This pause might continue through the next year, according to yesterday’s UCSF Medicine Grand Rounds COVID-19 update on Testing, Treatments, and Vaccines. Can we use this pause to do better than “get back to normal”?

In Gerontological Society of America’s webinar, Aging Native American, Rural, and Homeless Populations: Engagement and Advocacy During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Curry Senior Center Director David Knego, MSW (SFSU), talked about serving homeless older adults in Tenderloin, SF’s skid row. 
Lack of coordination partly explains why it took a minimum of 2 years to house a homeless senior in 2018!
Last year, SF Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing launched Coordinated Entry system to improve response to homelessness. During this pandemic, SF made progress in housing homeless older people (age 65+) who receive priority under Project Roomkey. Notably, settlement from UC Hastings School of Law’s suit against SF resulted in rapidly moving over 400 people living in tents crowding sidewalks in Tenderloin to hotels leased by the City with wraparound services for duration of emergency.  Can this be a New Normal, making temporary relief into permanent supportive housing? 

Before COVID-19, “normal” rent for 1-bedroom in SF was $3,500 per month. Since COVID-19 pandemic, SF rents have dropped because younger people are leaving the high cost of living, as more people lose jobs or work from home, and many attractions (restaurants, theater, libraries, community events, etc.) have closed.  This has eased the housing shortage for people who remain and wish to age in place.

Mask wearing
When President Trump said wearing a mask made him look like Lone Ranger (eye mask with peep holes?), wonder if he covered his nose and mouth? UCSF’s Bob Wachter, MD, suggested having “sports and media influencers” instead of politicians to persuade people to act safely.  Very sad comment on who people trust?! University of San Francisco data research scientist Jeremy Howard launched #masks4all movement “for people and Governments to follow the overwhelming scientific evidence that shows we need to wear homemade masks in public to slow COVID-19.”  If not homemade, one can buy a mask (preferably tightly woven, 100% cotton, layered, snug fit; not uncomfortable N95 mask). 

On July 22, SF DPH updated its order expanding mandatory mask wearing to age 10+.  Dr. Colfax reiterated enforcement focus on businesses/institutions, while leaving individuals to voluntary compliance based on his belief that “best way to change the social norm” is messaging by “trusted community members” to provide information and support, including facial coverings.  How will this “benefit of the doubt” approach address violators who don’t care about community while they insist mask wearing infringes on their civil liberties?  SF needs to consistently enforce its own health orders to protect health and ensure safety during this pandemic!

CDC Director Robert Redfield said, “If all of us would put on a face covering now for the next 4-6 weeks, we could drive this epidemic to the ground.”  SF entrepreneur Marc Benioff said 3 weeks of mask wearing "would not have anymore coronavirus", and invited young innovators, ages 15 to 24, to submit ideas for “culturally cool” masks in $1 million Next Gen Mask Challenge. Why limit challenge to Gen Z only? Need to engage all ages who are not wearing masks!

#FindSomethingNew!
#FindSomethingNew does not refer to ongoing research about novel coronavirus/COVID-19 and the latest policies/health orders. (Huge relief to learn coronavirus is not easily transmitted from touching surfaces, so no longer fear snail mail and ok to bring reusable bags for shopping again!) Instead, it’s the name of White House’s American Workforce Policy Advisory Board (AWPAB) campaign launched this month to urge Americans who are underemployed/unemployed (especially with federal pandemic unemployment benefits ending) to #FindSomethingNew! AWPAB co-chairs are 38-year-old Ivanka Trump, advisor to (and daughter of) U.S. President, and 82-year-old Wilbur Ross, Secretary of U.S. Department of Commerce.

Ivanka tweeted, "There has never been a more critical time for Americans of all ages and backgrounds to be aware of the multiple pathways to career success and gain the vocational training and skills they need to fill jobs in a changing economy." Example: Wilbur Ross told NPR that his decision to drop out of a college English course that required writing 1,000 words a day because he ran out of things to write about after 2 weeks, "probably saved me from a life of poverty." You go, Wilbur! If you can’t think to FindSomethingNew—like look at a picture worth 1,000 words—to write about, and value liberal arts education to expand your horizons, then go to trade/vocational school… After graduating with Harvard MBA, he spent 55 years in banking and became a billionaire.  Then he launched encore career at age 79, oldest first-time Cabinet appointee in U.S. history! 
  
During this pandemic, bored homebodies #FindSomethingNew:
Got tired of baking bread
So I went out to build a garden bed…
The first time now I know
The difference between parsley and cilantro
Now I’m growing all these veggies and herbs
And I’m watching birds with binoculars
Bored in the USA…
--Penn Holderness, “Bored in the USA” (COVID-19 parody of Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the USA”) 

#FindSomethingNew supports a neoliberal agenda to crank out worker bees, so it misses inspiring stories of entrepreneurship like 93-year-old Ray Boutwell, Navy cook who worked in food service throughout his life, started boozy cupcake business and became instant media darling. 

Stop faking “normal”
According to ProPublica, 56% of Americans age 50+ are forced to leave “stable” jobs before they want to retire, often suffering irreversible financial harm.   
Joined Elder Action Network’s Elder Activists for Social Justice Curious Listening Initiative featuring Elizabeth White, author of 55, Underemployed, and Faking Normal: Your Guide to a Better Life (2019).  Now at age 66, she reflected on her experience over a decade ago during the Great Recession while in her mid-50s: broke, piecing together gigs while trying to keep up appearances like everyone else – after her career of privilege and Harvard MBA. She learned she was not alone: 40% of people near retirement may face poverty, not due to financial struggles throughout their lives, but middle-class facing downward mobility for the first time, hearing that she was “overqualified” which she interpreted as code for ageism.  Instead of being stuck in feeling shame, she got practical like starting a resilience circle to find solutions for living a “richly textured life on a modest income” and adjusting to her new reality, including downsizing. 

Elizabeth’s message—stop faking “normal” and tell the truth—was reinforced in another talk scheduled afterwards, Noetic Approaches to Aging, with Elizabeth joining a panel about conscious aging, or “getting closer to being the person we’d like to be.”  Take-aways: People can speak only from their own experience.  When she shares her own vulnerabilities, it allows others to share their own truth with less or no shame.  If you don’t talk about the problem, you can’t solve it! 
Marc Blesoff, retired criminal defense attorney turned mediator, talked about gerotranscendence: bypass the monkey mind, not rely on rational mind, better acquaint with intuition and what’s really important.

New Ageism?
This year 2020 has been compared to 1968 in a “shattered America” with racial, political and economic divisions expressed in civil unrest.  Add ageism, a term coined in 1968 by geriatric psychiatrist Robert Butler, who witnessed generational clashes as a delegate to the 1968 Democratic National Convention.  During this COVID-19 pandemic, social media seem to make divisions sharper with #BoomerRemover and frustration over restrictions to “protect older people.”
“Whatever care we extend to the aged we consider a gift, or an act of charity, and not something we owe them because they exist… The elderly are no more or less human than they were in their 20s. They aren’t a contagion to be sequestered, or a burden to reluctantly tolerate. Whatever system we build from the ruins of the moment, it ought to be as inclusive as the experience of old age itself.”—Sarah Jones, “No One Should Be Surprised That America Abandoned the Elderly to Die,” New York magazine (July 9, 2020) 

Ken Stern, Chair of the Longevity Project, moderated A New Ageism? Fallout from the Pandemic panel discussion on “how society has been responding to the most vulnerable population during the coronavirus pandemic and what that means going forward.”  In this age of being woke to racial equity, the program poster featured a black man, yet the panelists appeared to be from the same tribe: Louise Aronson, UCSF geriatrician; Richard Eisenberg, Next Avenue managing editor (who published program highlights); and Paul Irving, chairman of the Milken Institute Center for the Future of Aging.  My question in Zoom Q&A was ignored: “If you could add a BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, Person of Color) to diversify this panel, who would you choose?”

Moderator acknowledged my Zoom chat comment in favor of Dr. Aronson’s remark: “We’re all aging …Being old in and of itself should not elicit respect any more than being young should. I think behavior should.  If you have more needs, you’ve reached a stage of dependence, which we all begin in, and most of us end in, and most us experience intermittently in between. You need some compassion,..best way to address is to increase our humanism, not say respect or reverence, but see people as humans.”  Yes, this why SF has Dignity Fund! The dignity v. respect difference: Dignity refers to inherent worth as humans apart from actions (e.g., Biblical command to “honor” parents); Respect refers to admiration for someone, earned because of their qualities or achievements.

Gerontological Society of America (GSA) released Understanding Ageism and COVID-19 infographic to dispel myths, such as suggesting:
·       “only older people should worry about getting COVID-19”
·       age is the primary risk factor for COVID-19”
·       “only older people are dealing with loneliness and isolation because of social and community lives disrupted by COVID-19”
·       “isolation is particularly difficult for older people because they cannot use technology to communicate with family and friends.” 

The Onion satirically reported, “Teen Who Died From Coronavirus Probably Had Undiagnosed Old Age”!  Notably, during this pandemic, my email account has been filled with invites to virtual meetings focused on loneliness/isolation and technology solutions relating to older people.

Isolation & Technology
Motion Picture & Television Fund (MPTF), a non-profit that provides a safety net of health and social services for entertainment industry members in Southern California, hosted 3-hour Social Isolation Summit. The opening panel discussion on Confronting Loneliness in a Turbulent World presented common sense from SCAN CEO Sahin Jain, MD, influenced by his Harvard Public Policy Professor Robert Putnam, author of Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (2000) and Better Together: Restoring the American Community (2003): everyone has power to solve problem of isolation and loneliness, without spending $; he called for a national conversation for a social contract that prioritizes community and connection; relying on technology is the wrong direction as we have an opportunity to get to a higher plane by thinking collectively, looking out for one another, visiting/making phone calls to family/friends/neighbors, and caring for one another the way we used to. Yes, we need Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood
Nora Super of Milken Institute Center for the Future of Aging moderated all-female BIPOC panel discussion on Identifying and Filling Loneliness Gaps Across California through government and non-profit initiatives: maintain connections using continuum of technology, old tech telephone (conference call, phone tree) in diverse languages, listen to older people to design more user-friendly online technology rather than expect them to adapt, importance of agency in older people as “venerable” v. vulnerable, intergenerational supports, yada yada. 

Zoom chat was relevant with contributions by people working directly with clients (not mere administrators overseeing others’ work), and not so relevant by marketing folks trying to sell services (which I mostly ignored):
·       CyberSeniors to bridge digital and generational divides
·       Making “right” connection counts (Jon Schaeffer, Dementia Activity Club in Los Angeles): just calling/being friendly face/offering general activities is not what seniors truly need; instead, virtual visit/phone call has to target and honor their developmental tasks of maintaining control and working through their legacy; every activity should give them the opportunity to share their life stories, or they will leave this earth unfulfilled; and we need to hear their stories for our journey. Yes, power to older people
·       Promote independence and build resilience (Lualhati Anderson): older adults have lived through much more challenging times and continue to build resilience; important to assess skills level and needs before offering buffet of services available; sometimes offering too many services can create dependency
·       Peer mentoring (Clayton): The Impact of Peer Mentoring on Loneliness, Depression, and Social Engagement in Long-Term Care (outcomes of peer mentoring show 30% drop in depression scores); tips for peer mentoring; The Need for a Social Revolution in Residential Care (being passive recipient of care fosters loneliness and depression, peer support and social productivity help create valued social identities)
·       Age-friendly public health system (Jane Carmody): work with community-based organizations—e.g., AARP’s Experience Corps, Villages, community health workers—to provide older adults with opportunities for social interaction and development of new friendships    
·       Resilience & connection (Len Muroff): resilience is about becoming, not overcoming; vulnerability and fracture from trauma can lead you toward connecting to something greater than yourself, connecting to others and to the divine; refer to Sherri Mandell’s 7 steps of resilience (Chaos, Community, Choice, Creativity, Commemoration, Consecration, and Celebration) 
·       Unlonely Project (Jeremy Nobel, MD, Foundation for Art and Healing): sharing stories about ourselves through creative expression to improve well-being and connection, Unlonely Film Fest (free streaming); StuckatHome (together) community 

At this month’s SF Tech Council Meeting on Isolation, Loneliness, and Technology, UCSF geriatrician Ashwin Kotwal presented his research based on 150 SF community-based older adult study participants (age 60 to 96):
·       over half reported worsened loneliness due to restrictions related to COVID-19
·       over a third were socially isolated, driven by lower use of video communication (4/5 not using regularly, 1/4 not using internet at all for socializing)
·       “incredible ability” to adopt new technologies
·       not all older adults have access to technologies for social connection and many feel discomfort with available technologies
·       recommended including older adults with classes, volunteers, other methods to facilitate training, age-friendly design
Maureen Feldman, Director of Social Isolation Impact Project at MPTF, talked about Daily Call Sheet, a social call program that pairs trained volunteers of all ages with retired MPTF members for telephone chats several times a week, and has seen a 41% increase in new volunteers since COVID-19 pandemic.

My clients have complained that their discomfort with video technology has to do with computer vision syndrome and blue light that disrupts their sleep. SFSU Health Professor Erik Peper, PhD, author of TechStress: How Technology is Hijacking Our Lives, Strategies for Coping, and Pragmatic Ergonomics (Aug. 2020), recommends taking momentary breaks from screens to relax our eye muscles by looking at a far distance and in different directions—preferably objects green in color; palming; and blinking many times. 

I find that looking at myself displayed on a screen is like staring into a mirror for periods much longer than necessary, so I often have my video off during Zoom, and move around while listening. Before and during this pandemic, telephone calls are more comfortable for movement, eye rest, and usually better sound quality.  Advocacy groups like Gray Panthers and Senior & Disability Action have been awesome in offering meetings via Zoom or telephone.

Technology ideas to make real: Echo Silver (“Alexa for the greatest generation”) and Blacklexa (modify to be “better ally” to old people, start video at 1:30).

As an introverted old soul, I reframe social isolation as an opportunity for solitude rather than loneliness.  Solitude or alone time is refreshing to cut out noisy distractions, and enjoy quiet thinking, reading, and writing… seriously, no problem writing 1,000 words a day!
“Loneliness is failed solitude, when the absence of company is enforced and unwelcome…the impact of the pandemic has been to place a new premium on solitude. Households that were spacious enough when most of their occupants were away in offices or schools during the day now seem unbearably crowded. Prohibitions on walks out of doors are all the more frustrating…Human beings are social animals. But they need breaks from each other’s company.”—David Vincent, “The Pandemic Has Raised Fears About Loneliness. History Suggests We Should Worry About the Opposite, Too,” Time (July 8, 2020) 

Geriatric neuropsychiatrist Dilip V. Jeste, Director of Stein Institute for Research on Aging at UC San Diego, presented his related idea of wisdom as an antidote to loneliness—during two webinars this month (Loneliness: COVID-19 Toll on Elderly and Loneliness in Seniors: Wisdom as an Antidote).  According to Dr. Jeste, increasing globalization and advances in technology causing modern behavioral pandemics of loneliness, opioid abuse, and suicides point to need for societal wisdom:
·       Self-reflection: ability to look inward at one’s own behavior and change
·       Compassion: kindness to oneself and others
·       Emotional regulation: ability to control our emotions and remain calm despite ups and downs of life situations; face reality and still be more contented
·       Accept diversity: humility (Serenity Prayer)
·       Spirituality: purpose in life (“Those who have a ‘why’ to live, can bear with almost any ‘how’.”—Viktor E. Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning

Long-term care (LTC) facilities
In U.S. LTC facilities, over 62,000 residents and workers have died from COVID-19, representing more than 40% of nation’s COVID-19 deaths.  In Canada, 81% of COVID-19 deaths have been linked to LTC facilities. Hong Kong reported its first COVID-19 death in nursing home. 
Popular culture (satire or not) reinforces stigma of LTC facilities as modern-day poorhouses (congregate settings benefit from economies of scale) for elderly who have been abandoned by families: SF Mime Troupe presented Tales of Resistance online with 2-minute commercial for The Palms nursing home (10 minutes after start time).   The Onion headline read, “Family Left Elderly Grandmother To Die In Nursing Home But Not Like This” and reported her “inevitable death at the assisted-living facility” (confusing nursing home with assisted living). 

In fact, families have been advocating to visit their loved ones in LTC facilities since March when paternalistic policies required LTC residents to isolate in rooms and restricted in-person visits. Family members are finding workarounds, such as wife who took job as dishwasher to see her husband residing in facility (originally misstated as nursing home, then corrected to memory care center); or daughter who moved into assisted living facility where her nonagenarian parents resided during COVID-19 outbreak until both parents contracted COVID-19 and died in hospital, while she quarantined after contracting COVID-19 herself. 

During my stints in LTC facilities, isolation in a unit might last up to a month during seasonal flu outbreaks.  With COVID-19, isolation and loneliness (failed solitude) have exacerbated and there seems to be no end in sight…so long as there is community spread, no vaccine, lack of rapid testing, shortages of PPE, etc.
While California DPH and Department of Social Services finally (on June 26) issued respective visitation guidelines (outdoor visits allowed, unless prohibited by local public health order) for nursing homes and assisted living, SF DPH maintains more restrictive visitation in nursing homes and assisted living, unless “necessary” (“urgent health, legal or other issues that cannot wait until later”).

DPH’s imposition of obnoxious (however well-meaning) policies have caused harm and suffering to LTC residents separated from their loved ones. What happened to harm reduction for residents of LTC facilities? Rather than base decisions solely on the biomedical model (prevent bodily deaths from COVID-19), how about a more holistic model or collaboration with interdisciplinary (bio-psycho-social-spiritual) approaches like gerontology, as well as consultation with stakeholders like older people about their wants/needs? To borrow from the disability civil rights movement: Nothing about us, without us! 

Moving into LTC facilities should not mean losing agency for residents.  While no one wants to overwhelm hospitals with severely ill COVID-19 patients, why not allow visits with precautionary measures (distancing, masking) in place outdoors, and especially if both LTC residents and visitors have executed advance health care directives and POLST forms declining life-prolonging treatment like feeding tubes and/or ventilators? (Check out UCSF webinar, Preparing for Potential COVID-19 Infection: What are Odds and What are Options?

Can we have a New Normal that supports frail older people to retain Dignity with greater agency to evaluate their own risk tolerance in decision-making?
National Center on Elder Abuse and the National Consumer Voice for Quality LTC released checklists:
·       Should I Take My Loved One Home during COVID-19 Crisis? First, ask if resident wants to leave? Is your home equipped? Who will provide care; if you bring outside help, who will pay? How will you protect from COVID-19? Will loved one be able to return to LTC facility (find out if you can hold bed)? What led to decision to place loved one in LTC facility in first place, what has changed? 

Older age and frailty risk for COVID-19 severity
According to U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, risk for severe illness from COVID-19 increases with age, with older adults at highest risk. UK researchers stressed frailty as a risk factor for COVID-19 death, as much as old age or having an underlying health condition. 
In American Thoracic Society’s Promoting Recovery in Critically Ill Older Adults with COVID-19: Bench to Bedside webinar, Canadian immunologist Dawn Bowdish, PhD, presented on how features of aging immune system contribute to risk and hamper recovery of COVID-19:
·       Age, chronic health conditions, frailty are independent!
·       Frailty (increased vulnerability from decline in reserve and function, less resilience to stress) is better predictor of outcome to infectious disease/hospitalization than chronological age; this might explain COVID-19 survival of centenarians who are not frail.
·       Frail individuals may present different diseases, more likely to report abdominal symptoms, fatigue, shortness of breath
·       Infections in older people are chronic (not acute), enhance age-related inflammation; COVID-19 increases risk of stroke, cardiac damage, decreased lung function, increased frailty/disability
COVID-19 does not follow U-shaped curve in infectious disease like pneumonia and flu, where susceptibility high among very young (immunologically naïve) and severity high among very old (immune senescence, co-morbidities), with mid-life ages protected; instead, middle-age also susceptible to COVID-19.  Older adults with COVID-19 less likely to present fever and respiratory symptoms.
What older people need to recover from COVID-19: dedicated interdisciplinary geriatrics team; careful monitoring for emerging health issues; tailored physiotherapy – rehab focus on building muscle, weight training gives reserve and helps mitigate chronic inflammation.
She added that COVID-19 outbreaks in LTC facilities are not inevitable; instead, need to create “rings of steel” to keep out infection, minimize exposures because dose influences immune response, and facilities have problematic air circulation.
UCSF geriatrician/pulmonologist Leah Witt and pulmonologist/hospitalist Lekshmi Santhosh discussed promoting recovery in critically ill older adults from COVID-19, based on 4 Ms of age-friendly care: what Matters (advance care plan), Medication (avoid errors after discharge), Mentation (cognitive change, effects of delirium), Mobility (functional impairment), within holistic and multidisciplinary integration (pulmonary, geriatrics, psychiatry, integrative med, cardiology and neurology). 

Storytelling
“Many cultures revere old people because of their storytelling ability like the old lady from Titanic.” –Michael’s Tutorial on Avoiding Ageism, The Office US (satire, 2015) 

During webinars about older people, saw and heard talking heads discuss ageism as happening to “other” rather than personal lived experience; excluded were voices of older people impacted by oppressive policies requiring cocooning.  In fact, there are stories by older people—though few from LTC residents—during this pandemic.  Storytelling can be powerfully moving for advocacy, but these personal narratives amount to “swamp,” until they can be curated to present major themes and connect to policy proposals, then presented in 2-minute sound bites during public hearings. 

“Suddenly, you started thinking, oh, my God, yes, I'm actually older than I think; I'm actually older than I feel. Suddenly, people have all kind of gathered round you, pointed a finger and said, you're old; you need minding. And you think to yourself, ah, sweet Jesus, no, how could this have happened overnight?” –68-year-old Jimmy Hoban, Lemon Drizzle Cakes And Radio Show: How 1 Irish County Helps Elderly During Pandemic, NPR All Things Considered (July 23, 2020) 

Are these paternalistic policies, sheltering older people from risk of coronavirus transmission, actually helping them feel more vulnerable by doing things for them when they are capable? Such policies are not helpful, but dis-empowering people.

At British Gerontological Society’s virtual conference, UK-based Boomer researcher Naomi Woodspring interviewed Meredith Minkler, Professor Emerita at UC Berkeley School of Public Health, from her home where she is “point & click activist.”  It was refreshing to hear Meredith speak as gerontologist + older person, how COVID-19 pandemic has magnified devaluation of older people. When Meredith began her gerontology career 40 years ago, her focus was critical gerontology/political economy; now as an older gerontologist, she has embraced the humanities to better focus on moral and ethical issues, and what it feels to be an older person who’s less visible and at future risk of having her rights slip away, particularly her risk for dementia that has affected 3 generations in both sides of her family. 
Joined Reimagine’s Fireside Chat with Dave Isay, founder of StoryCorps, and Ira Byock, MD, founder of Institute for Human Caring’s Coronavirus Chronicles, exploring how stories build human connection during a global health crisis.
Planned to rest my eyes while listening to stories, but this was “show and tell” audio-visual program…so kept eyes on screen and caught “aloha” message in Zoom chat box from gerontologist Hope Levy, who recently completed 14-day quarantine in Hawaii!

California-based Ira (standing) and New York-based Dave (sitting) appeared to be from same tribe, with matching blue oxford shirts and eyeglasses.  In response to COVID-19 pandemic, Dave launched StoryCorps Connect allowing interviews to “collect wisdom of humanity” (Great Questions include 16 relating to COVID-19 pandemic) via video conference technology; he shared a sweet video exchange between his mother Jane (whose grandmother died in 1918 flu pandemic) and his 11-year-old son Tobey who survived COVID-19.  StoryCorps collaborated with LeadingAge to create a toolkit for organizations serving older adults and participant packet for older adult and families.  Ira’s website also offers questions and opportunity to share stories online.

Last month, Changing the Narrative Colorado launched On the Same pAGE series of intergenerational conversations (on social connection, future of work, technology, health equity, arts and culture, ageism) and provided a facilitator toolkit (questions on COVID-19 and isolation, stereotyping, language, intergenerational relationships, etc.).
At virtual Tucson Festival of Books, Stu Mellan facilitated conversation with Louise Aronson (SF) and Judy Heumann (Washington, DC) about their respective books on aging and disability, Elderhood: Redefining Aging, Transforming Medicine, Reimagining Life (2019) and Being Heumann: An Unrepentant Memoir of a Disability Rights Activist (2020).  Louise, who disclosed her visual disability (but not age) and writing her book as a process to come to terms with her “inner ageism,” discussed the intersection of ageism and ableism. Judy, who disclosed being born in 1947 (now age 72), having polio at 18 months and using a wheelchair for most of her life, focused more on changing systems for inclusion of people with disabilities like herself fighting to attend public school and obtain license to teach (when education system considered her a “fire hazard”), demanding civil rights legislation (504, ADA), never giving up when someone says no, understanding that it may take decades before getting to yes. 

Woo-hoo, way to go, yes to human rights! I’ve already read Elderhood, now I must read Being Heumann! What struck me was Judy owning her disability, but what does it mean to own aging (process) as “old”—which seems to lack clear definition (chronological age, function, life stage, etc.)? For example, some people didn’t even realize they were “old” until the invention of policies intended to protect them from COVID-19, starting at various ages when they fall under “vulnerable” category: 60 (SF), 65 (California), 70 (Ireland), etc.
At another virtual book talk, Chinese Historical Society of America’s college interns Anna (Stanford computer science major) and Chris (Berkeley math major) interviewed 78-year-old author Maeley Tom (SFSU social work major).  After serving as the first woman and ethnic minority at the highest level of California legislature— Chief Administrative Officer of California State Assembly under Speaker Willie Brown, Jr., and later appointed Chief of Staff to State Senate President David Roberti—Maeley retired and self-published her memoir, I’m Not Who You Think I Am: An Asian American Woman's Political Journey (2020).  Born to parents who were traveling Cantonese opera performers (similar to Bruce Lee’s Chinese-Jewish parents), she grew up in foster home with French Basque family, learned to be self-reliant at an early age and graduated from college at age 16.  Maeley shared her toughest life lesson was learning that some people wanted her to fail when she always wanted to be liked, so she met challenges by doing “what people say you cannot do,” stressed doing homework, and developed reputation for her people and communication skills to get things done. However, she had no desire to run for political office out of fear of "losing face" if she lost, and now she feels “too old.”  Say that to leading Presidential candidates, Biden (77) and Trump (74)!

Advocacy & Celebration
Today's California Alliance for Retired Americans (CARA) Celebration included Call to Action by CARA Legislative Director Hene Kelly to protect and expand safety net programs.  Hene dated classmate Bernie Sanders while they were at University of Chicago in the 1960s, and endorsed him for U.S. President! 

U.S. Postal Service - 245 years (July 1): Congress should support the $25 billion included in the HEROES Act to protect the USPS, which seniors rely on to deliver their life-saving medications.
LaborFest screening and discussion of Gone Postal documentary with filmmaker Jay Galione, whose father was a postal clerk for 30 years enduring toxic work culture related to privatization pressures, and employer retaliation.

Older Americans Act – 55 years (July 14) 

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) – 30 years (July 26) 
Monthlong celebrations included:
·       George and Barbara Bush Foundation’s The ADA at 30: “Let the Shameful Wall of Exclusion Come Down,” taken from President Bush’s remarks as he signed the ADA
·       Disability Rights California's Celebration of 30th Anniversary of ADA discussion with pioneers like Judith Heumann and Dr. Fred Schroeder, DRC advocates Yolanda Vargas, Rosy Tellez, and Eric Harris 
·       Disability Action Coalition’s ADA for Next Generation 
·       Senior & Disability Action hosted Crip Camp: A Disability Revolution (2020) watch party with audio description and discussion about power of community and diverse abilities for civic engagement.  

Medicare and Medicaid – 55 years (July 30)
Medicare: Congress Should Enact Lower Drug Costs Now Act (HR 3) requiring government to negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare and provide discount rate to all payers; cap yearly out-of-pocket spending in Medicare to $2,000 and limit drug price increases in Medicare Part B and D to the rate of inflation; savings would be reinvested into Medicare to expand benefits for vision, hearing, and dental.  Also, SUPPORT Medicare for All Act (HR 1384) creating Improved Medicare for All system where everyone gets the care they need, where they need at prices they can afford, choice of providers and a comprehensive benefit plan.

All of me, health care for you and me
Co-pay free, with a choice of providers
Eyes and teeth – Don't want to lose them!
Local clinics – I want to use them!
Say goodbye to costs that soar sky-high
Middlemen – we'll do better without them
Long-term support, you won't get sold short
With Medicare for you and me!
All of me, health care for you and me
Guaranteed from pre-birth to departure
Change your job, and you won't lose it
Unemployed? You can still use it
Dignity, no fear of bankruptcy
When in need, everybody's covered
Let's win the fight, good treatment is our right
With health care for you and me!

Medicaid: Congress Should Increase the Federal Medicaid Assistance Program (FMAP) to help provide for uninsured individuals during this pandemic, and adopt 10% increase in FMAP for Home and Community-Based Care included in the House’s HEROES Act to keep seniors in their homes and out of nursing homes.

Social Security – 85 years (August 14)
Congress Should SUPPORT Strengthening Social Security Act (HR 2654) to improve the solvency of the trust fund by SCRAPPING the CAP; improve the annual COLA – basing it on the CPI-E; improve benefits for widows and widowers.  Also, support Social Security Fairness Act (HR 141) which would repeal the Government Pension Offset/Windfall Elimination Provision that denies certain public employees their earned benefits.
Congress Should OPPOSE Cutting the Payroll Tax, which funds Social Security program, to avoid jeopardizing the trust fund and benefits of current and future retirees.  Also, OPPOSE any Efforts to Enact the TRUST Act (S. 2733 and HR 4907) that creates closed-door commissions to cut Social Security and Medicare; provides no beneficiary protections from benefit cuts, nor does it mandate plan adequacy given the growing number of Americans who rely on these programs. 
National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) hosted 4-hour Intergenerational Dialogue: Why Social Insurance? Inspired by Why Social Insurance? (1999) essay by E.J. Dionne, op-ed columnist for The Washington Post, a discussion of how the nation's social contract might evolve in light of both COVID-19 pandemic and increased calls for social justice.  With conviction of AOC, NASI intern Alexandra Allen spoke out about how social insurance enables systemic inequality because it relies on wealth of incoming payroll tax, whereas most wealth comes from stock capital and intergenerational transfers; because Social Security benefits are insufficient, she proposed funding Social Security via progressive payroll and capital gains tax, as well as expanding Medicare to all by investing away from military and to the community!

Age-friendly developments/”New Normal” ideas
·       Protecting community members in SF: Right to Recover Fund, would provide two weeks-worth of wage replacement up to $1,285 for up to 1,500 SF residents who test positive for COVID-19; another program offers smaller one-time payment to assist with groceries and other supportive services. 
·       Charles Sabatino, director of American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging, proposed to defund nursing homes in favor of Dr. Bill Thomas’ Green House Model (smaller “households” with private room/bath, flattened hierarchy, cross-trained staff) to replace problematic institutional nursing home model of warehousing frail older people into hospital-like buildings with high staff turnover
·       Terry Fulmer of Hartford Foundation proposed rethinking LTC, calling for hospitals to return to inpatient acute care for patients who require intensive rehab (instead of discharging to skilled nursing facilities for short-term rehab), enhanced community based supports for people who need help with activities of daily living and can remain at home, and nursing homes as true LTC facilities for people who truly can no liver live at home  
·       Framework for Aging-Friendly Services and Supports in the Age of COVID-19 on strengthening person-centered services and supports for older adults, via in-home acute and primary medical care, expansion of video telehealth and social interaction, and implementation of volunteer/paid intergenerational service. 
·       Justice in Aging’s What Older Adults Need from Congress 
·       Media and public learn about MOCA, or cognitive test taken by President Trump, though increasing concern about test utility when much of content shared in media

More gerontology conferences go online:
·       Aging & Social Change: 10th Interdisciplinary Conference/New Ageism in Times of Pandemic: Tensions between Active Aging & Risk-Group Definitions (Sept. 24-25) 
·       Grantmakers in Aging (Oct. 14-16) 
·       Gerontological Society of America Turning 75: Why Age Matters (Nov. 4-6)

19 comments:

  1. Aging Together and Apart: From the Pivot to the Pirouette
    Sally Chivers
    JULY 29, 2020
    With COVID-19, what scholars and activists of aging have long feared and warned about has come about... stealthy and overt privatization of health care, particularly in the long-term care sector, means undervalued and underpaid precarious workers contract the virus that spreads through nursing homes “like wildfire”...
    Perhaps more than ever, the ability to understand the work that a story does in the world is vital...about humanity in times of crisis, about how to thrive in solitude, and about what we are missing when we look around us through panicked lenses.
    As often happens during a crisis, media commentators and public health units alike admonish us to check on our “elderly neighbors,” as though we ourselves are never the elderly and as though we are better equipped than they are to understand and manage this situation. A blanket designation of vulnerability obscures the diversity of a group of older people—a few generations of them—who collectively and individually possess considerable expertise and the potential to offer at least mutual support to those of us who are new to being pushed to remain at home, no longer able to do what we choose when we choose.
    ...we want to escape what this global situation reveals about our own vulnerabilities...
    ...Desperate for a sense of purpose and meaning, many of those least affected by the virus itself are rediscovering art, culture, joy, and connection amidst fear, hunger, solitude, and uncertainty...humanities’ time to shine,...with need for little else besides time, books, essays, and a decent pencil/laptop/fountain pen, and, these days, a reliable Internet connection—and, I guess, a room of one’s own would be ideal.
    I have found myself thinking back on the 2008 Academy Award-winning short animated Japanese film “The House of Small Cubes” to find hope and another perspective on older neighbors during difficult times. The film was created after artist Kunio Katō showed paintings to screenwriter Kenya Hirata. They collaborated with composer Kenji Kondo to produce this multilayered evocation of solitude, resolve, and memory amidst natural disaster, pinning their hopes and fears for the future on a solitary older man...
    The protagonist is not the picture of active aging all too common in public media, nor is he the dangerously socially isolated senior whose choices condemn him to poor health and unhappiness... Isolated, dangerously separated from services, but still managing to age-in-place happily enough, the protagonist presents a meaningful late-life agency relatively free from, and even in resistance to, the neoliberal structures that pressure people to sacrifice themselves to the good of the economic whole, opting out once they are no longer economically useful. Amid COVID-19, his tale speaks to the hidden layers obscured when we render generations of adults as in need rather than imagining the reciprocal connections that have newly become visible and more possible.
    Prior to COVID-19, public discourse, social media, research calls, and gerontological scholarship worked collectively to emphasize the dangers of social isolation. Now, the very group of older adults who had been publicly exhorted to resist social isolation are publicly mandated to self-isolate. Instead of casting this group as helpless, we should be thinking of this faceless throng of “elderly neighbors” as a massive source of knowledge about how to navigate solitude and what it means to inhabit a world where you can no longer do exactly what you want, when you want, almost but not quite regardless of your wealth and station. This is not a suggestion to launch research projects that get people interviewing their neighbors, but an appeal to listen and learn while we have the chance.
    https://medicalhealthhumanities.com/2020/07/29/aging-together-and-apart-from-the-pivot-to-the-pirouette/

    ReplyDelete
  2. How we rely on older adults, especially during the coronavirus pandemic
    We miss too much when we treat all seniors as helpless
    By Sally Chivers
    August 1, 2020
    “Unprecedented” might be the word of the COVID-19 pandemic. But for many, especially older adults, life has taken many abrupt turns. Maybe it’s their first pandemic, …but it’s not the first time they’ve pivoted without calling it that and created a new normal.
    Yet, we persist in treating people over 70 as an undifferentiated blob of neediness and vulnerability. When we do, we once again miss what older adults contribute.
    As an aging studies scholar, my focus is on the portrayal and treatment of older adults in literature, film and popular culture. During COVID-19, dire fictional portraits of nursing homes as places to avoid and escape appear to be coming alive. We hear a lot about them, but less attention lands on older adults living and making do at home. Public health issues reminders to check on what they call “elderly neighbours.” Those reminders ignore what older people in and out of nursing homes offer to the rest of us.
    …During the 1998 ice storm that cut power throughout much of Eastern Canada and the northeastern United States, …I was trapped in my third floor walk-up Montréal apartment…My neighbours, two retired men, checked on me…taught me about times before they’d had electricity in their homes. They reminded me about postwar austerity and other hard times.
    Reporters then repeated that older adults were more vulnerable to the effects of the ice storm than others. Check on your “elderly neighbours,” we were told again and again. These older adults were never directly addressed though they likely made up a large portion of the broadcast audience. There was no airtime for the knowledge, skill and expertise they had from surviving through past wars and depression eras. No one else seemed to be getting their espresso from their retired neighbours.
    More than 20 years after that ice storm, I find myself yet again essentially trapped in my home… disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resemble the difficulties revealed during the ice storm, when the need for adequate long-term care spaces similarly revealed the problems that arise when we treat people like products, and care like a business.
    …Calls to check on our “elderly neighbours” still refuse to acknowledge that the people receiving those instructions might themselves be old. This harnesses ageist language to make it seem as though people between 70 and 100 are all from the same generation, with the same needs and desires.
    This approach ignores how older adults collectively and individually possess considerable expertise. It misses their potential to offer at least mutual support for younger people who are no longer able to do whatever we want. Studies are already showing that older adults are better equipped to manage the stress brought on by continued isolation.
    I’m not the only one whose hand-sewn mask was made by someone over 70, who got my bread recipe from a senior, who sung in a choir led by a guy in his 60s who learned how to Zoom in a heartbeat and who follows streamed exercise classes led by a woman in her 70s.
    Besides ignoring their many contributions, this belittling of older Canadians clashes with how some are coming out of retirement to help combat COVID-19. What a contradiction to be viewed as only in need of help, instead of part of a reciprocal system, and to be perceived as needing to sacrifice themselves.
    https://www.econotimes.com/How-we-rely-on-older-adults-especially-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic-1588888

    ReplyDelete
  3. Being Old Is Not a Death Sentence, Even Now
    By: MARGARET MORGANROTH GULLETTE
    AUGUST 27, 2020
    Contrary to popular opinion, no one living in a nursing home needs to die of COVID-19. Seven months into the pandemic, a nursing home in Baltimore, Maryland, whose residents could be considered high risk — older African Americans, some chronically ill or disabled — has had zero deaths from COVID-19 and zero infections. Best practices are well known; they needed only to be put in place by people who cared.
    ...It needs to be said plainly, and apparently, over and over: Being older is not by itself a death sentence from the virus...“super-survivors,” like Sylvia Goldsholl, who also survived the 1918 flu...resident of a NJ nursing home. Choosing congregate living is not a sign of being near the end of life. Recovering from an operation in a nursing home is not a sign of being in decline. Being disabled or frail does not mean we are close to dying... People who live in nursing homes — even those with co-morbidities, even those with cognitive impairments — can enjoy life and want it to go on.
    ...People over 65 are not a group doomed to die by our physiology.
    Why then was an enormous percentage of all deaths in the US visited on people living in nursing homes? The keyword we need to take to heart is ageism. Ageism (often intersecting with racism and classism, ableism, neuroageism or “dementism,” indigeneity, and sexism) can be murderous too. We need this useful concept to explain, as the president of the British Society of Gerontologists, Thomas Scharf, put it, “why old people’s lives appear not to matter” in the era of COVID-19.
    Ageism has many varieties. Let’s consider only the deadly ones.
    ...Trump’s government let months go by early in 2020 without preparing to protect any of the American people,...very likely because the first victims, in Seattle...nursing home. It came to be believed...COVID-19 was unimportant because “only old people die.” This stereotype continues to have fatal consequences for people of all ages.
    ...“opening up the economy” as long as they think “only old people die” when precautions are relaxed.
    ...triage guidelines used by many states suggest denying ventilators to people over forty when they are gasping for air in the hospital ICUs.
    ...older adults as a group may be left out of some of the COVID-19 vaccine trials.
    ...Despite civil rights movements...ageism and ableism have worsened in the few months of the COVID-19 era. Age bias is more visible in attitudes and speech, in behavior and public policy.
    ...If you see why this is so, in this painful teaching moment of COVID-19, you are taking a necessary step in empathetic understanding. Ask yourself henceforth, of any intention concerning people in later life, “Have we heard from them?What do they want? Do they think this passes the test of equal treatment? Is this the way I would prefer to be treated? How can I help?”
    Professor Kathleen Woodward, a founder of the field of age studies, points out that individualism and “the collapse of care on the part of the [neoliberal] state” render it “altogether reasonable to fear old ageing.” Yes, but each of us has private mantras that guide our thinking, that move our reactions to others, that may help us survive. Consider adding this: Fear Ageism, Not Aging.
    “Anti-ageism” means, at the very least: For more of us to live to enjoy the longevity dividend, our nation needs age justice. Let’s add #OldLivesMatter to our multi-generational, multi-racial movement. Nothing changes for the better until we truly believe that old people want to live...
    We urgently need ...reform the negligent home-care industries and the government agencies tasked with keeping our elders safe and respected. But even more deeply, we need heart changes, based on real information, knowledge, and caring. Can Americans learn to attack ageism on all fronts, out of their hearts, as the allies in #Black Lives Matter are attacking racism?
    https://lareviewofbooks.org/short-takes/old-not-death-sentence-even-now/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Japan has the world’s oldest population. Yet it dodged a coronavirus crisis at elder-care facilities.
    By Simon Denyer and Akiko Kashiwagi
    August 30, 2020
    …Japan has the world’s oldest population, with an average age of 47 and a life expectancy of more than 81 years. More than 28 percent of its people are over the age of 65, ahead of Italy in second place with 23 percent, and compared with 16 percent of Americans.
    …Japan has recorded 1,225 deaths from covid-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus, compared with nearly 180,000 in the United States. In Japan, 14 percent of the deaths were in eldercare facilities. That is compared with more than 40 percent in the United States, despite a lower proportion of U.S. seniors living in nursing homes.
    Fewer than 1 percent of Americans live in nursing facilities, compared with 1.7 percent in Japan.
    The disasters that unfolded in nursing homes in the United States and Western Europe during the pandemic have exposed the neglect and underfunding that have bedeviled elderly care in much of the West. Japan’s more positive experience may offer important lessons for the entire industry as it reviews policies and protocols for the next possible world health crisis.
    Ready for pandemic
    The contrast is partly because Japan reacted more quickly than Western nations to developments in nearby China, and swiftly tightened controls on staff and visitors at its eldercare homes...
    But culture also appeared to play an important role: Experts point to a higher priority given to elderly care within society, stronger measures already in place at care homes to prevent infections and high standards of hygiene.
    …Staff and visitors disinfect their hands, take their temperatures and fill in forms about their recent medical history before they enter the spotlessly clean cafe and administration facilities on the ground floor.
    Access to the second floor, where residents live, is very closely controlled, with even close family members excluded — except in cases where a patient is near death, when one or two close relatives are allowed to visit.
    …Perhaps surprisingly, staffers don’t usually wear face masks. It makes it harder to communicate with elderly patients who may be suffering from dementia, explained the home’s manager, Masayuki Mori.
    Instead, the idea is to keep the infection out in the first place.
    …staff who have basically put their own lives on hold so they don’t bring the virus in.
    …In Japanese tradition, the job of caring for the elderly would fall on the eldest son’s wife, and there was social stigma around the idea of placing relatives in a nursing home.
    That changed after the introduction of long-term care insurance in 2000, with a tax levied on everyone over the age of 40 to pay for elderly care. But there is still a level of expectation within society that elderly people should not be neglected, and that care homes should be carefully regulated.
    …Japan’s nursing homes are not without staffing problems, and controls were far from perfect when the coronavirus struck. More than 100 clusters of cases have been identified at elderly facilities, the Health Ministry says, and a wave of infections almost overwhelmed the system in April…
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/japan-coronavirus-elderly-death-rate/2020/08/29/f30f3ca8-e2da-11ea-82d8-5e55d47e90ca_story.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Report: ‘Revolving door’ system for homeless focuses too much on short-term assistance
    Advocates argue for longer-term emphasis on housing, treatment and stability
    CARLY GRAF
    Sep. 3, 2020
    ...Based on interviews with 584 currently unhoused San Francisco residents and 25 focus groups, a new report depicts a “revolving door” between the streets and services that focus too much on immediate, short-term assistance and not enough on long-term stabilization.
    Released Thursday by a team of advocacy groups, nonprofits and academics known as the Our City Our Home coalition, the report emphasizes the need to provide a wide variety of supportive housing options, move away from the exclusive focus on congregate shelters and navigation centers and make mental health and substance use treatment options more accessible.
    …43% lost their housing because they couldn’t afford rent, due as much to job loss as to wages being insufficient…
    Nearly 51% of survey respondents said they were without a lease before they became unhoused…
    One of six individuals surveyed reported previously having lived in these units at some point before experiencing homelessness…
    nearly 80% of people interviewed have either used or tried to use a shelter in the past five years.
    They reported long waitlists, few beds, and complicated curfews as well as prior bad experiences as primary barriers. Other said discrimination, fear of theft and rigid rules that made it hard to work certain jobs or exacerbated mental health conditions kept them away.
    Around 58% said they’d prefer sanctioned encampments with basic amenities such as showers and a toilet — similar to the safe sleeping sites in the Haight and at Civic Center — to existing shelters.
    Jennifer Friedenbach, executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness, attributed this preference to the lack of dignity and privacy associated with group settings. A sense of autonomy is key to someone’s chances at self-actualization and stabilization, she added.
    …The study concluded there’s a need for flexible treatment philosophies as well as individualized support that can respond to the “wide range of variability” in the intervention needs of the unhoused. For example, while one person might benefit greatly from an abstinence approach, another might first need stability earned from other wraparound services for basic necessities such as food and clothing.
    …setting up a direct pipeline between treatment and various stages of supportive housing is essential to creating positive outcomes…
    https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/report-revolving-door-system-for-homeless-focuses-too-much-on-short-term-assistance/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is Extended Isolation Killing Older Adults in Long-Term Care?
    Five months of COVID-19 lockdowns have created a mental health crisis
    by Emily Paulin, AARP, September 3, 2020
    …Data on the mental health effects of the long lockdown at America's nursing homes and other long-term care facilities is scant. But experts, resident advocates, and those with loved ones on the inside say that lockdown is fueling a mental health crisis that's amplifying the devastating impacts of the pandemic on the long-term care industry, where more than 70,000 long-term residents and staff have already died from COVID, accounting for 4 in 10 pandemic deaths. They say that feelings of loneliness, abandonment, despair and fear among residents — and their toll on physical and neurological health — are only pushing the pandemic's death toll higher.
    "We're hearing from a number of family members and [long-term care] ombudsmen that many residents are just losing the will to live,” says Robyn Grant, director of public policy and advocacy for the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care. She highlights that in Minnesota, “social isolation” is being listed as a cause or contributing factor on the death certificates of some long-term care residents who have died during the pandemic. “Failure to thrive” is a common cause being listed in other states.
    …Most states are allowing nursing homes that have successfully managed or avoided COVID cases to resume communal activities and in-person visits. But even in those cases, activities require social distancing and most visits are infrequent, short, outdoors and highly regulated — nothing like conditions before the pandemic.
    …Even before the pandemic, social isolation (the objective state of having few social relationships) and loneliness (the subjective feeling of isolation) were considered serious health risks for older Americans…
    Lockdown measures appear to be exacerbating that crisis in long-term care facilities… “We're seeing an increase in depression, anxiety, frustration and irritability,” says Heather Smith, lead psychologist at the Milwaukee Veterans Affairs Medical Center. “We're also seeing an uptick in dementia-related behaviors,”…
    …Nursing homes were prodded into lockdown in mid-March. COVID's spread prompted the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to issue guidance urging a ban on visitors and nonessential personnel from the nation's 15,400 nursing homes. Internal group activities, including communal dining, were canceled, too.
    Many other long-term care facilities, such as assisted living facilities and memory care units, followed suit. None wanted to be the next Life Care Center of Kirkland, Washington, which lost 37 people to COVID-19…
    Federal guidance on resuming communal activities and visits puts the onus on state and local officials to figure out when it's safe to do so. So far, more than 30 states have issued guidelines or both nursing homes and assisted living facilities, which outline standards – for testing, infection rates, levels of personal protective equipment, and others – that the facilities must meet before recommencing visitation.
    But "many of these care facilities are on their own,” says Patricia McGinnis, executive director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, noting that the guidance is often long, convoluted and difficult to follow, and that limited resources and funding can prevent facilities from meeting the criteria. She says it has led to “inconsistencies everywhere” when it comes to combating isolation and loneliness. The disjointed framework for America's long-term care industry, with a mix of federal and state rules and regulators, is another barrier to a coherent national response…
    https://www.aarp.org/caregiving/health/info-2020/covid-isolation-killing-nursing-home-residents.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Under pressure from relatives, SF allows outdoor nursing home visits
    Sarah Ravani
    Sep. 4, 2020
    The San Francisco Public Health Department has issued a new health order letting nursing home residents receive visitors outdoors — a victory for hundreds of people like Teresa Palmer, who hasn’t seen her 103-year-old mother since March and feared she would never see her in person again.
    …Palmer and other relatives have complained to the city for months about its restrictions, which barred even authorized decision makers from the premises despite state guidance that has allowed outdoor visits at nursing homes since June 26. San Francisco even prohibited window visits.
    The city’s new rules took effect Saturday and allow nursing homes that have been free of new coronavirus infections for 14 days to offer supervised one-hour visits outdoors or from cars or through windows, or all three.
    …San Francisco has at least 19 nursing homes. The new rules cover all but two of them, Laguna Honda and the facility at San Francisco General Hospital, where outdoor visits will also be allowed but under separate policies, a department representative said.
    Hugging, hand-shaking and touching are prohibited under the new rules. Nursing homes will have to screen visitors for coronavirus symptoms and ensure that masks are worn and social distancing is followed. Indoor visits are still not allowed. Four people from one household or two people from different households can visit.
    Palmer’s mother, who lives at the Jewish Home skilled nursing facility, has a difficult time understanding her daughter on Zoom. Talking on the phone is even harder. That’s because she’s deaf. And 103 years old.
    Palmer hasn’t seen her mother for nearly six months since San Francisco issued its ban on nursing home visits March 10 and extended it July 30 to protect residents and staff from the coronavirus.
    “You can’t keep people in prison,” said Palmer, a retired geriatrician…
    She and other families say their relatives in these homes are suffering, and the isolation is having a negative impact on their health. For residents with disabilities or dementia, family members are often their eyes, ears and voice in demanding proper care. Some families were so frustrated with the policy that they removed their relatives from skilled care.
    Brian Etemad’s mother, a nursing home resident in San Francisco, stopped eating when he was barred from seeing her in person. Two months ago, he brought her to his home in San Mateo County. “She was thrilled,” Etemad said.
    Without access, families said they couldn’t ensure their relatives were receiving the care they needed.
    Palmer is among several families that for months had urged the city’s Public Health Department to permit outdoor visits. Their unanswered demands prompted Chicotel to file a civil rights complaint against the department on behalf of nursing home residents on Aug. 18.
    Palmer welcomed the new health order, but said it didn’t go far enough.
    “It’s an important start…That is the absolute minimum. There are people who are losing weight, who are distressed ... who are too cognitively impaired to understand why their families can’t be there.”
    Palmer said the city needs to allow a designated family member to take “all the precautions that staff take” to enter the premises. It’s a guideline that is permitted by the state if a city meets certain requirements.
    …Throughout the spring, coronavirus infections and deaths at nursing homes drove the pandemic. Deaths there and at assisted-living facilities still account for nearly 39% of all COVID-19 deaths in California.
    But new cases in nursing homes are falling. Across California new coronavirus cases in nursing homes have plunged. The seven-day average was 99 on Sept. 4, down from 481 on July 4. The average number of deaths over seven days on the same dates also dropped by nearly half: to 22 from 41.
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Under-pressure-from-relatives-San-Francisco-15544392.php

    ReplyDelete
  8. Isolation, Loneliness of Lockdowns Is Tough on America's Seniors
    By Dennis Thompson
    Sept. 9, 2020
    Seniors are among those most at risk for dying from COVID-19, and so they've been urged to socially distance during the pandemic.
    But experts fear this isolation, while protecting them from a potentially fatal infection, might be wearing away at their health in other ways.
    "By older adults being less socially engaged and less active, they are absolutely seeing changes in physical function and in cognitive sharpness," Dr. Carla Perissinotto, associate chief of geriatrics clinical programs at the University of California, San Francisco, said during an HD Live interview.
    Social isolation has been associated with a 50% increased risk of developing dementia, according to a report released earlier this year from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).
    Isolation is hard on the body as well, the report says. Loneliness has been associated with a 59% increased risk of functional decline and a 45% increased risk of death.
    Poor social relationships specifically appear to increase a person's risk of heart disease and stroke, the report found. For example, loneliness among heart failure patients nearly quadruples their risk of death, and it increases their risk of hospitalization by 68%.
    Even prior to the pandemic, social isolation was a major concern among aging Americans. About 1 in 4 people aged 65 and older were considered to be socially isolated, the NAS report said, and 43% of those 60 and older reported feeling lonely.
    Now, people in long-term care facilities have gone months without being able to see their loved ones due to COVID lockdowns, and even seniors still living independently are going long stretches without seeing friends and loved ones.
    …Perissinotto and other gerontologists are concerned that the social distancing measures used to protect older folks from COVID-19 are damaging their mental and physical health, and that these effects may be long-lasting.
    "The longer we go on ignoring the importance of social connection, the worse the outcomes are and the harder it's going to be to come back to a period of normalcy," Perissinotto said.
    Despite these concerns, Perissinotto warned against assuming that your older friend or relative is unhappy just because they're isolated.
    "You can't assume that because someone is alone, that they are lonely. And the reverse is true -- because they're with other people, that they're not lonely," Perissinotto said.
    Instead, keep an eye out for telltale signs of decline.
    "If they're showing more signs of withdrawal and even worsened confusion, this may be a sign that there needs to be increased socialization and stimulation," Perissinotto said. "Is someone more disheveled? Are they losing weight?"
    Folks also might be anxious or depressed from the pandemic, or could be suffering medical problems like high blood pressure because they're having difficulty filling their usual prescriptions, she added.
    People worried about older friends or relatives should ask them to see their doctor, who can use validated tools to assess whether they are truly suffering from loneliness or isolation, Perissinotto said.
    Technology like Zoom or FaceTime can help ease loneliness for some, but not all.
    "It's not going to work for some people who have severe cognitive impairment or hearing impairment or visual impairment," Perissinotto said. "For others it might accentuate more of the loss of not being able to see people in person."
    There are creative ways to reach out to seniors you love, to let them know they're not alone.
    …"Look around you. You may have neighbors you have assumed were OK. There's nothing wrong with a ring on the doorbell to say, 'Hey, do you need anything?'" Perissinotto said.
    https://consumer.healthday.com/infectious-disease-information-21/coronavirus-1008/isolation-loneliness-of-lockdowns-is-tough-on-america-s-seniors-761073.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. Are your patients lonely during COVID-19? They’re not alone
    SEP 9, 2020
    Timothy M. Smith
    More Americans are living alone, but the COVID-19 pandemic has quickly elevated loneliness as a universal experience in the U.S. And while research has shown loneliness can have profound long-term health effects—including dementia, cardiovascular disease and premature death—often it’s thought of as a social issue, not a medical one, and its diagnosis is obstructed by stigma and shame.
    Carla Perissinotto, MD, MHS, a geriatrician, palliative care specialist and associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, talked about why loneliness needs to be included in the national dialogue about health and health care, as well as how to identify it in a patient’s social history.
    A longstanding and growing problem
    In the 50 years from 1969 to 2019, the share of U.S. households of just one person grew from less than 17% to more than 28%, according to the National Academy of Sciences. Some 35 million Americans now live alone.
    Of course, some people living alone do so by choice and are quite happy, Dr. Perissinotto noted. But many have been forced into social isolation, with serious effects on their health.
    “There's often a misconception that, by being alone, you are automatically lonely and that is absolutely not the case,” she said. “One way to think about it is—being alone—is it a choice and something you desire, or is it something that you're forced into and that is causing distress?”
    Still, medicine has had a hard time understanding how to conceptualize social determinants of health and the magnitude of how they affect health, and, “in many ways, loneliness and isolation actually fit into this framework of a social determinant,” Dr. Perissinotto said.
    Compare with depression
    One of the things keeping physicians from tackling loneliness with patients is that research on the topic often shows up in social sciences literature but not medical literature, Dr. Perissinotto said.
    “I would compare this … to what we saw decades ago when we first started asking about depression,” she said. “And though there's still some stigma around mental health—depression being part of mental health—there’s improvement, because there's been a more open dialogue around ... this is a significant thing that affects us and affects our health.’”
    Give patients a chance to talk
    One of the tools already available to physicians to introduce discussion of loneliness with patients is the three-item loneliness questionnaire.
    “What's nice about it is that it’s quick,” she noted. “It’s three questions, it’s validated, it's been used in different languages. And it's pretty reasonable to be able to implement that into routine care."
    Ways to meet the moment
    What’s distressing to geriatricians about the response to the COVID-19 pandemic from an ethics perspective, Dr. Perissinotto said, is that rules and recommendations often have been placed on older adults and other vulnerable people before anyone has asked what they want for themselves.
    This is common practice in institutional settings, she said, “but it may even be family members deciding for their parents: ‘We’re not going to see you because we don't want you to get sick.’”
    Surrogates should instead ask what the person’s preferences are and whether they feel they can manage the associated risks.
    "Because some older adults may actually say, ‘You know what? I would prefer to see you for a small amount of time, because of my quality of life, rather than not see you for months. And how can we do that safely?’” she added.
    https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/are-your-patients-lonely-during-covid-19-they-re-not-alone

    ReplyDelete
  10. Why SF has the lowest COVID-19 death rate of any other major city
    By Amy Graff
    Tuesday, September 22, 2020
    …A chart created in September by Dr. Jim Marks, a physician at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital…shows S.F.'s percent of deaths per cases was 0.87% as of Sept. 4, significantly lower than 10 other major cities.
    …second-lowest rate was Miami at 1.63%,…New York City had the highest rate at 10.26%...
    …San Francisco has kept its number of cases relatively low, with some ups and downs, yet not a major surge that overwhelmed the city's healthcare system and impacted its ability to provide optimal care. The city of nearly 900,000 residents has reported 10,807 cases and 99 deaths as of Sept. 21.
    "The low case rate is a result of people acting well, and acting well is everything from city health leaders doing the right thing to the people doing the right thing," said Dr. Bob Wachter, chair of the Department of Medicine at UCSF. "We have very high rates of mask-wearing, probably the highest in the country. I think from the beginning people have trusted the science, trusted the guidance. You don’t hear in S.F. that COVID is a hoax. People have generally taken this very seriously and I think the leadership from the mayor and the regional health directors has been terrific."
    With cases kept relatively under control, the number of patients landing in hospitals has been lower than other major cities, and those infected patients in S.F. requiring hospitalization have received focused, personal care, according to Wachter.
    In April, Wachter sent a team of UCSF doctors to New York to help during the height of the East Coast city's pandemic and his colleagues told "horror stories about what they saw in good hospitals."
    "At UCSF, you’ll have one nurse taking care of you," he said. "In Queens, at the height of things, it was one nurse to seven or eight patients. That can’t be done safely. You’ll have a world-class team of intensive-care doctors taking care of you in San Francisco. In New York, the team might have included an eye specialist or dermatologist. They may be great doctors but their speciality isn’t COVID. Everyone was called to help. They were overwhelmed. We’ve never had that in SF."
    UCSF epidemiologist Dr. George Rutherford added that San Francisco saw its rise in cases later than New York and this gave the city time to prepare.
    …The sickest COVID patients are cared for in intensive care units on ventilators,...survival rate on a ventilator at UCSF and SF General has averaged around 80% while the national average "is more in the order of 60% or 70%."
    At a press conference on Sept. 15, Dr. Grant Colfax, the city's public health director, echoed Wachter's sentiment, saying the city's "world-class medical facilities" are a key reason for the low death rate.
    …Wachter said the S.F. Department of Public Health and hospitals learned how to work together in a crisis during the AIDS epidemic, and now in the coronavirus pandemic, they are drawing from lessons learned.
    …"If you think about the risk factors for people having bad outcomes, it’s not only advanced age. It's also obesity and history of smoking," he said. "San Francisco has a relatively low rate of obesity and a very low rate of smoking."
    Of those who are higher risk, the city said in a statement that it has prioritized the care of its most vulnerable population, especially people over age 60.
    SFDPH spokesperson Karaline Bridgeford said early health orders required surveillance testing in skilled nursing facilities, supported cleaning and other preventive measures in Single Room Occupancies (SROs) and limited visitors to facilities where vulnerable populations live and receive care, such as long-term care facilities…
    https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-city-U-S-lowest-death-rate-country-15578435.php

    ReplyDelete
  11. How Ruth Bader Ginsburg Challenged Ageism
    A role model who defied ageist stereotypes and discrimination.
    Posted Sep 20, 2020
    Sheri Levy Ph.D.
    We mourn the passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who was a giant champion of equality and fairness and who fought stereotypes and discrimination. RBG was no stranger to stereotyping and discrimination, as she was often unfairly judged through labels such as woman, working mother, Jew, older adult, and older woman.
    RBG is fondly remembered for her immense accomplishments, including challenging age discrimination and becoming a role model who defied ageism and gendered ageism.
    For over 25 years, RBG faced blatant ageism with persistent public calls to step down as a U.S. Supreme Court Justice, a position that uniquely has a lifetime appointment. Justice Ginsburg would aptly point out that Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens retired at 90. Why should an active and leading justice such as RBG be expected to retire before 90?
    Active is undoubtedly a word that quickly comes to mind when thinking of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. RBG defied stereotypes of older individuals and older women as inactive, frail, and weak. RBG served on the highest court until her passing at age 87. She worked tirelessly on the court through family tragedy and illness and was well-known for rarely missing oral arguments. She rode horses into her 70s.
    RBG continued her famous workouts through 2020. The celebrated “RBG workout” involved hour-long cardio and strength training and was documented in a book by her longtime personal training, Bryant Johnson. RBG was a strong person both figuratively and literally, and she easily earned the title, "Unstoppable Ruth Bader Ginsburg: American Icon" by Antonia Felix.
    Exemplifying RBG as a continued leading voice on the Supreme Court and in the legal fight against age discrimination, RBG led and wrote the 2018 unanimous ruling that expanded the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to apply to employers with less than 20 workers (see the case of two fire captains who were terminated; Mount Lemmon Fire Distrct v Guido et al).
    As Patricia Barnes noted: “It is little known, for example, that Justice Ginsburg is the author of what is arguably the only positive decision about age discrimination to come out of the U.S. Supreme Court in decades.”
    This was an important victory against age discrimination in a country that condones ageism in the workplace, in healthcare where triaging occurs and health problems are dismissed as “normal” aging or complaining, in home and care settings where neglect and abuse occur, and at a broad cultural level where billion-dollar industries support anti-aging treatments.
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg was many things to many people. She is fondly remembered as a role model, tireless fighter, pioneer, crusader, trail-blazer, Notorious R.B.G., and cultural icon. She was a giant champion of justice and equality. She made the world a better place for countless individuals.
    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/taking-ageism-seriously/202009/how-ruth-bader-ginsburg-challenged-ageism

    ReplyDelete
  12. COVID-19-Associated Deaths in San Francisco: the Important Role of Dementia and Atypical Presentations in Long-term Care Facilities
    15 September 2020
    Janice K. Louie MD, MPH, Hyman M. Scott MD, MPH, Wendy Lu MPH, Anna Chodos MD, Amie DuBois RN, PHN, Natalya Sturtz RN, PHN & Juliet Stoltey MD, MPH
    Journal of General Internal Medicine (2020)
    …demographic and clinical characteristics of the first 50 fatalities with COVID-19 in San Francisco.
    From March 5 to July 14, 2020, 50 decedents with confirmed COVID-19 were reported. Of these, 46 had COVID-19 listed as the underlying cause of death…
    …The average age was 81 years (range 30–100), and the most common race-ethnicity was Asian (49%). The most common co-morbidities included dementia (46%), diabetes mellitus (43%), cardiac disease (41%), and chronic lung disease (28%). Common presenting symptoms included dyspnea (48%), fever ≥ 100.0 °F (46%), cough (30%), and altered mental status (25%). Thirty-nine (89%) were hospitalized, 24 (59%) required intensive care, and 19 (44%) were intubated. The mean time from symptom onset to death was 14.1 days (range 4 h–42 days).
    Twenty-one (46%) decedents resided in a LTCF…Ten (48%) LTCF decedents presented without any fever, cough, and/or dyspnea; in six, altered mental status (e.g., confusion or lethargy) was the sole presenting symptom. When compared to community decedents, LTCF decedents were more likely to have a dementia diagnosis and to present with altered mental status and were less likely to present with cough, be hospitalized, receive intensive care or intubation, or be diagnosed with sepsis or acute renal failure.
    DISCUSSION
    Consistent with other reports, older adults in San Francisco remain the most likely to die due to COVID-19. In San Francisco, as of July 30, 2020, persons ≥ 60 years comprise 14% of COVID-19 infections, yet 90% of deaths.3 Asians accounted for nearly half of deaths, though they comprise only 10.2% of COVID-19 infections in San Francisco. In contrast, statewide and nationally, higher proportions of Latinos, Whites, and Blacks have died due to COVID-19. This finding may be due to demographics specific to San Francisco; in 2019, of persons ≥ 60 years, 43% were Asian.
    Most decedents had multiple co-morbidities reported by others, including diabetes and chronic cardiac and lung disease. However, we found dementia was the most frequent co-morbidity, driven predominantly by LTCF residents who comprised nearly half of our decedents. Additionally, LTCF decedents were more likely to present with altered mental status; nearly half did not present with any typical COVID-19 symptoms of fever, cough, or dyspnea. Presentation with altered mental status has also been reported in older COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency medical services. Although we found that LTCF cases were less likely to be hospitalized, receive aggressive medical interventions, or develop complications of sepsis or acute renal failure, they progressed more rapidly to death after symptom onset, likely reflecting the frail, debilitated state of many LTCF residents who are near end-of-life and have a DNR/DNI or comfort care status.
    Our findings are a reminder that clinicians should remain vigilant for COVID-19 in older adults with dementia, who may present with atypical signs and symptoms and deteriorate quickly. Populations at risk for dying can vary greatly from region to region, and therefore public health policymakers should utilize local surveillance data to inform and target educational messages and prevention strategies.
    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-020-06206-1

    ReplyDelete

  13. Covid-19 turned active retirees into elderly people overnight, and made us feel expendable
    Just a few months ago, we were only as old as we felt; now we’re just old.
    Oct. 18, 2020
    By Peshe Kuriloff, retired professor of education at Temple University
    On March 15, when we began to shelter in place, I was 72 years old and my husband was 77 — not young or middle-aged for sure, but we didn’t consider ourselves old…
    In a youth-oriented society like ours, we had shied away from becoming seniors, rejecting that view of ourselves as lesser: less active, less capable, less technologically savvy, less attractive. We had no intention of living out the stereotype of old people as bad drivers with faulty memories. We exercised, took care of our bodies, paid attention to how we looked, stayed well-informed and engaged in current events and our families. We worked or volunteered and took pride in sharing our wisdom and continuing to help improve the world and our communities.
    When my son, who lives close by us in Philadelphia, texted at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic to tell us that we wouldn’t be able to see our grandchildren for some time, that we were to stay home and not go into stores, that he or someone else would do our shopping for us, we were in shock.
    We thought he was overreacting, but more than that, we thought he was presuming a lot. Didn’t he understand that we were strong and hearty, young for our years, engaged in the world, perfectly able to take care of ourselves and others?...
    Suddenly, all that changed. From one day to the next, our self-image shifted and we began to feel vulnerable, to realize our lives might truly be at risk…soon there was no denying that the obituaries were full of people our age who had been living independent lives, engaged with their families and communities — people like us.
    …we read in the spring that doctors and medical personnel across the country with too many sick patients to manage were preparing to ration care, and age is definitely a big factor. Rising numbers suggest that situation could recur.
    We get the message that we’ve had our chance and must now surrender to other social priorities; yet we feel entitled to more than that…to a fair shot at a longer life, more time to complete unfinished projects, to pass on what we’ve learned. But it feels like nobody shares our point of view.
    The young and fearless give little thought to our fate or our feelings as they party in bars and public places. Their carelessness feels like a slap in the face. We would have sacrificed to keep our elders alive. Today’s youth mostly seem content to let us take our chances.
    Like wolves picking off the old and sick, the virus strikes vulnerable people, people like us whose only crime was reaching a certain age; people often discounted by the young and strong…
    Looking at ourselves during virtual cocktail hours with friends on Zoom, we now notice our wrinkles, the flesh hanging on our necks and the double chins on display when the camera is pointing up, the gray and even white roots exposed, the shaggy beards and fuzzy eyebrows — and we look someplace else on the screen. That isn’t ourselves we are seeing but a version of ourselves the virus has revealed, a version we thought we had rejected but secretly fear is really who we are.
    There’s no question we’ve all aged dramatically. Just a few months ago, we were only as old as we felt; now we’re just old. It’s been obvious to everyone but us. Even my 7-year-old grandson knows he can’t hug his grandparents because they’re old and he might make them sick. Of course, he knew we were old long before all of this happened. Only we didn’t know. Well, maybe some of us did. Like it or not, we all know now.
    https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/covid-19-turned-active-retirees-elderly-people-overnight-made-us-ncna1243790

    ReplyDelete
  14. UCSF doctor estimates US death total if entire country acted like SF
    Amy Graff, SFGATE
    Oct. 26, 2020
    San Francisco has become the poster child for how to control coronavirus cases and deaths amid the pandemic, with its residents wearing masks, businesses and schools reopening slowly and scientists and politicians working together to create public health orders.
    The result of the county and city's vigilant behavior has been the lowest death rate of any major city in the country and remarkably low cases rates considering S.F. is a densely populated city.
    What if all Americans followed the Northern California city's approach to the pandemic?
    A lot of deaths would have been avoided, UCSF coronavirus expert Dr. Bob Wachter told the LA Times for a story on S.F.'s COVID-19 success.
    "There would be 50,000 dead from the pandemic instead of more than 220,000," Wachter told the Times.
    San Francisco County (pop. 880,000) has recorded 12,152 cases and 140 deaths since the start of the pandemic, with roughly 1,373 cases and 16 deaths per 100,000 residents, according to Johns Hopkins University. By comparison, Los Angeles County (pop. 10 million) has recorded 299,760 cases and 6,993 deaths, with 2,966 cases and 69 deaths per 100,0000; New York County (Manhattan, pop. 1.6 million) falls in at 33,128 total cases and a death toll of 2,545, with 2,034 cases and 156 deaths per 100,000.
    Because of its low case and death rates, San Francisco is the first urban center in California to see viral transmission reach the “minimal,” or yellow, tier in the state's reopening plan. Several rural counties with small populations, such as Shasta and Mendocino counties, are in the most-restrictive purple tier due to widespread infection, requiring many businesses and activities to close.
    While many other major U.S. cities such as New York experienced terrifying periods with skyrocketing cases that filled hospital beds beyond capacity, San Francisco has kept its number of cases relatively low, with some ups and downs, yet no major surge that overwhelmed the city's health care system and impacted its ability to provide optimal care.
    "The low case rate is a result of people acting well, and acting well is everything from city health leaders doing the right thing to the people doing the right thing," Wachter, chair of UCSF's Department of Medicine, told SFGATE for a previous story on the city's low death rate. "We have very high rates of mask-wearing, probably the highest in the country. I think from the beginning people have trusted the science, trusted the guidance. You don’t hear in S.F. that COVID is a hoax. People have generally taken this very seriously and I think the leadership from the mayor and the regional health directors has been terrific."
    In April, Wachter sent a team of UCSF doctors to New York to help during the height of the East Coast city's pandemic and his colleagues told "horror stories about what they saw in good hospitals."
    "At UCSF, you’ll have one nurse taking care of you," he said. "In Queens, at the height of things, it was one nurse to seven or eight patients. That can’t be done safely. You’ll have a world-class team of intensive-care doctors taking care of you in San Francisco. In New York, the team might have included an eye specialist or dermatologist. They may be great doctors but their speciality isn’t COVID. Everyone was called to help. They were overwhelmed. We’ve never had that in S.F."
    https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/San-Francisco-coronavirus-lowest-death-rate-US-15676503.php

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bay Area seniors struggle with loneliness as pandemic drags on: ‘It’s four walls and a TV’
    Erin Allday
    Oct. 26, 2020
    Shirley Drexler died two months into the coronavirus pandemic, but not from COVID-19. She died of despair…
    In the months since her death on May 20, Rhoda Goldman and facilities like it have lifted some restrictions for residents to help reduce isolation and loneliness…those who work with older adults are trying to combat the isolation and associated mental health issues that many are struggling with as the pandemic drags on.
    The concern is that the measures put in place to protect the generations of adults age 60 and over may be killing some of them, or profoundly disrupting their quality of life.
    Even as much of San Francisco and the rest of the Bay Area starts to reopen, many seniors still feel trapped and unable to go back to anything like normal life. It may be a year or longer before vaccines are widespread and the pandemic is truly over, which means it’s critical for older adults’ mental and physical health that more efforts be made to help them connect with the world outside their homes…
    The needs of older adults in the pandemic are varied, as are their appetite for risk.
    People who are otherwise healthy may prefer to keep physically distant from everyone…communicate with video and other technology. Others, who feel like their time is limited, may want to figure out how to balance their safety with the very powerful desire to hug a grandchild…
    And not everyone is suffering right now. Some older adults say they are enjoying the solitude. Others who live in multigenerational households say they’ve never had so much quality time with children and grandchildren.
    “I don’t feel lonely,” said Pobed Lavrentjev, 75. “I don’t have time for it.” He spends his days alone in his Tenderloin apartment studying music — he’s trying to master Mozart’s Piano Concerto No. 23 on his keyboard — and diving into the YouTube rabbit hole.
    But many of his generational peers are not doing so well.
    The extended shelter-in-place has been difficult for almost everyone, from children and teens missing school and friends to adults struggling with financial hardships and dozens of other stresses. But older adults can have separate and more profound issues.
    They are more vulnerable to severe illness and death if they become infected, and so they are encouraged, or even forced, to take more dramatic steps to protect themselves. Some won’t leave their homes…As hair salons, movie theaters and restaurants reopen, seniors are told to remain vigilant and stay home as much as they can.
    Many older adults also are more vulnerable to the secondary effects, physical and emotional, of isolation. A UCSF study released last week reported older adults suffering from loneliness, depression and anxiety related to the pandemic. Only about a quarter of study participants used video technology to socialize, and less than half socialized on the internet.
    Doctors report that older adults in isolation may be at greater risk of falls or delirium. They may not be getting proper care for chronic conditions like diabetes or heart disease. Geriatricians report cases of older people arriving in emergency rooms malnourished or dehydrated because they haven’t been eating, either from lack of food or disinterest in it.
    …geriatricians say the pandemic response in many ways has been overly paternalistic toward older adults, who should have more say over the risks they want to take. But in nursing homes, it’s not just the individual at risk, but entire facilities.
    …Older adults who live in the community often are alone, and in some ways it can be more challenging to find opportunities for them to socialize than it is for those in skilled nursing facilities. Many seniors say all of their previous options for being around others are now gone…
    But many other places that cater to older adults say they’re not yet ready to invite people back inside…
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Bay-Area-seniors-struggle-with-isolation-15673820.php

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dr. Philip Lee Is Dead at 96; Engineered Introduction of Medicare
    By Sam Roberts
    Nov. 3, 2020
    Dr. Philip R. Lee, who as a leading federal health official and fighter for social justice under President Lyndon B. Johnson wielded government Medicare money as a cudgel to desegregate the nation’s hospitals in the 1960s, died on Oct. 27 in a hospital in Manhattan. He was 96.
    The cause was heart arrhythmia, his wife, Dr. Roz Lasker, said.
    From his office at the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, as the assistant secretary for health and scientific affairs from 1965 to 1969, Dr. Lee engineered the introduction of Medicare, which was established for older Americans in 1965, one year after Johnson had bulldozed his landmark civil-rights bill through Congress.
    …Provisions in the Medicare legislation subjected 7,000 hospitals nationwide to rules barring discrimination against patients on the basis of race, creed or national origin. The law required equal treatment across the board — from medical and nursing care to bed assignments and cafeteria and restroom privileges — and barred discrimination in hiring, training or promotion.
    Before the law took effect in 1966, fewer than half the hospitals in the country met the desegregation standard and less than 25 percent did in the South.
    …Dr. Lee hailed from a family of physicians — his father and four siblings were doctors — and while working in the Palo Alto Medical Clinic (now the Palo Alto Medical Foundation), which his father founded, he saw firsthand the effects on the poor and the elderly of inadequate health care and the lack of insurance coverage.
    As early as 1961, he was a consultant on aging to the Santa Clara Department of Welfare in California, and as a member of the American Medical Association and a Republican at the time, he defied both the A.M.A. and his party in testifying before Congress on behalf of a precursor to Medicare that would have helped pay for hospital and nursing home care through Social Security for patients over 65.
    Dr. Lee was branded a socialist and a Communist (no matter that he had served as a doctor in the Korean War).
    In 1987, after leading the University of California, San Francisco, and heading health policy and research programs there as a professor of social medicine, he further riled fellow physicians when, as chairman of Congressional commission, he recommended a standardized national limit on how much doctors enrolled in the Medicare program, with a vast pool of patients available to them, could charge above a fixed schedule.
    He was called back to Washington in 1993, again to be an assistant secretary, this time of the renamed Department of Health and Human Services under the Clinton administration. Serving until 1997, he advised the White House on its ultimately failed effort on health care reform.
    In 2015 he endorsed the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act and suggested that the country could go even further in guaranteeing universal health care…
    Philip Randolph Lee was born in San Francisco on April 17, 1924, to Dr. Russell Van Arsdale Lee, who had lobbied for national health insurance as a member of a commission appointed by President Harry S. Truman, and Dorothy (Womack) Lee, an amateur musician.
    His interest in medicine, he told Stanford Medicine Magazine in 2004, “began with house calls with my dad from the age of 6 or 7.”
    …His prominent role in shaping Medicare and other federal health policies was preceded by a stint, 1963-65, as director of health for the Agency for International Development. As chancellor of the University of California, San Francisco, he was credited with increasing racial diversity among its staff, faculty and student body.
    In 2007, the university named its Institute for Health Policy Studies, which he founded in 1972, in his honor.
    He was also lauded for his aggressive role in confronting the AIDS epidemic as the president of the newly-formed Health Commission of the City and County of San Francisco from 1985 to 1989…
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/03/us/dr-philip-lee-dead.html

    ReplyDelete
  17. Facing another retirement home lockdown, 90-year-old chooses medically assisted death
    Avis Favaro, Elizabeth St. Philip, Alexandra Mae Jones
    Thursday, November 19, 2020
    TORONTO -- When 90-year-old Nancy Russell died last month, she was surrounded by friends and family…as a doctor helped her through a medically-assisted death.
    It was the exact opposite of the lonely months of lockdown Russell had suffered through in the retirement home where Russell had lived for several years…
    Across Canada, long-term care homes and retirement homes are seeing rising cases of COVID-19 and deaths yet again, a worrisome trend that is leading to more restrictions for the residents.
    …Residents eat meals in their rooms, have activities and social gatherings cancelled, family visits curtailed or eliminated. Sometimes they are in isolation in their small rooms for days. These measures, aimed at saving lives, can sometimes be detrimental enough to the overall health of residents that they find themselves looking into other options.
    Russell, described by her family as exceptionally social and spry, was one such person. Her family says she chose a medically-assisted death (MAID) after she declined so sharply during lockdown that she didn’t want to go through more isolation this winter.
    “Being mobile was everything to my mom,” her daughter, Tory, told CTV News…
    But the first wave of COVID-19 restrictions in March ended her daily walks, library visits and all the activities in her Toronto retirement home. Her daughter says they had plastic dividers in the dining rooms and supervised visits in the garden.
    “She, almost overnight, went from a very active lifestyle to a very limited life, and they had, very early on, a complete two week confinement just to her room,” Tory said.
    During those two weeks, since she couldn’t exercise by walking to the library or doing her own shopping, Russell would stand up and sit down, again and again in her room, counting the times, her daughter said.
    “In that two weeks, all of us were phoning and she learned Zoom…”
    … during that more restricted, two-week confinement to Russell’s room that her family saw the decline.
    “She was just drooping,” Tory said. “It was contact with people that was like food to her, it was like, oxygen. She would be just tired all the time because she was under stimulated.”
    …“I do want to underscore the fact that she wanted medical assistance in dying at some point…but the application was hastened by the impact of the lockdown measures.”
    …In Canada, you do not need to have a fatal or terminal condition to apply for MAID, but you must have a serious condition, be in an advanced stage of irreversible decline, be experiencing mental of physical suffering that cannot be relieved and be at the point where “your natural death has become reasonably foreseeable,” according to Health Canada.
    …Dr. Samir Sinha, a geriatric specialist at Mount Sinai Hospital,…“balance of evidence out there actually says that these restrictions, in too many circumstances, are overly restrictive and actually causing unnecessary harm,”…
    Researchers have noted rising rates of loneliness and despondence among residents in in senior homes during COVID-19 lockdowns, something they call confinement syndrome.
    “When you stick someone alone and deprive them of the usual things that bring them interest in joy, that can be an incredibly isolating, lonely, depressing experience…significant psychological consequences that can really give people no real will to live anymore…Frankly, we’ll find that a lot of the restrictions that are being put in place right now actually violate the rights of the residents themselves, their families, their substitute decision makers, and what really pains me is when I hear stories of people saying, ‘I’d just rather die,’” Sinha said…
    https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/facing-another-retirement-home-lockdown-90-year-old-chooses-medically-assisted-death-1.5197140

    ReplyDelete
  18. For Seniors Especially, Covid Can Be Stealthy
    By Paula Span
    Aug. 10, 2021
    …The population over 65, most vulnerable to the virus’s effects, got an early start on Covid vaccination and has the highest rate in the country — more than 80 percent are fully vaccinated. But with infections increasing once more, and hospitalization rising among older adults, a large-scale new study in the Journals of Gerontology provides a timely warning: Covid can look different in older patients.
    “People expect fever, cough, shortness of breath,” said Allison Marziliano, lead author of the study...But when the researchers combed through the electronic health records of nearly 5,000 people, all over the age of 65, who were hospitalized for Covid at a dozen Northwell hospitals in March and April of 2020, they found that one-third had arrived with other symptoms, unexpected ones.
    …about one-quarter of older patients reported a functional decline. “This was falls, fatigue, weakness, difficulty walking or getting out of bed,” Dr. Marziliano said.
    Eleven percent experienced altered mental status — “confusion, agitation, forgetfulness, lethargy,” she said. About half the group with atypical symptoms also suffered from at least one of the classic Covid problems — fever, trouble breathing, coughing.
    “Clinicians should know, older adults should know, their caregivers should know: If you see certain atypical symptoms, it could be Covid,” Dr. Marziliano said.
    The rate of atypical symptoms rose significantly with age, affecting about 31 percent of those aged 65 to 74, but more than 44 percent of those over 85. These symptoms occurred more commonly in women, in Black patients (but not in Hispanics) and in those who had other chronic diseases, particularly diabetes or dementia.
    Because people in the atypical group were less likely to experience breathing problems and require ventilation, they were less likely to need intensive care. But both groups spent about 10 days in the hospital, and roughly one-third of each group died.
    “These people were in the hospital for as long,” Dr. Marziliano said. “Their mortality rate was as high. So this shouldn’t be dismissed.”
    The research mirrors findings from other, smaller studies of older people conducted early in the pandemic in the United States and Europe. During a Covid outbreak in a nursing home in Providence, R.I., for instance, a Brown University study found that the most common symptom was loss of appetite, followed by lethargy, diarrhea and fatigue.
    “We’re not necessarily surprised by this,” said Dr. Maria Carney, a geriatrician and an author of the Northwell study. “Older adults don’t always present like other adults. They may not mount a fever. Their metabolisms are different.”
    Younger diabetics, for instance, may become sweaty and experience palpitations if their blood sugar falls, Dr. Carney explained. An older person with low blood sugar could faint without warning. Older people who suffer from depression may have appetite loss or insomnia but not necessarily feel sad…
    Diagnosing Covid quickly in older patients can make a world of difference…Dr. Mylonakis added, “It’s paramount to start any kind of treatment early.”
    Understanding that something as vague as weakness, confusion or appetite loss might signal a Covid infection can also help protect friends and family, who can then isolate and get tested themselves…
    A Covid diagnosis can also ward off needless tests and procedures….“a nasal swab for Covid is quick, relatively cheap and now widely available.
    With widespread vaccination, the symptoms of Covid-19 in older adults may become even more subtle…Dr. Carney pointed out, whereas “we don’t necessarily notice if someone has stopped eating.”
    Her counsel, for older patients and their caregivers and doctors, is to stay alert for changes that occur quickly, over a matter of days. “When there’s a change in behavior, physical or cognitive, it may not look like an infection, but keep Covid at the top of your list,” she said…
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/08/health/coronavirus-symptoms-elderly.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. Inflation Outstripping Social Security Adjustments, Senior League Says
    MARCH 22, 2022 • JACQUELINE SERGEANT
    What seemed like a generous raise for seniors in October has been all but wiped out by inflation.
    The 5.9% increase in Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustment, announced in October, was the highest in 40 years, lifting benefits by $92 per month. But 73% of seniors said their household expenses increased by at least $96 per month in 2021, and nearly half said their expenditures had increased by more than $144 per month, according to a survey by the Senior Citizens League (TSCL).
    “Some people are just getting into some real bad situations,” said Mary Johnson, a Social Security and Medicare policy analyst for the league. “The problem is when living on fixed income, it’s not like you can go out and get a part-time job, because many seniors often retired because of health problems or other issues.”
    Johnson said inflation has continued to spiral upward since the 2022 adjustment was announced, and by January it was already falling behind the rate of inflation. “The December consumer price index data indicates that the Consumer Price Index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W), which is used to calculate the Social Security COLA, was 7.8% through December 2021. That’s 1.9 percentage point higher than the 5.9% COLA that beneficiaries actually received in January,” she noted.
    The average retiree benefit in 2021 was $1,564, which jumped to $1,656.30 in January with the 5.9% increase, Johnson said. But with December inflation of 7.8%, that benefit would need to increase by $122 to $1,686 just to keep up. She added that the average retiree faced a shortfall of about $30 per month due to inflation through the end of last year.
    Johnson does a monthly tracking of inflation, and the CPI-W data in February showed an 8.6% increase year over year. “No one alive who is retired today has ever seen that. We haven’t seen inflation that high since 1981,” she said.
    The survey of more than 3,000 Senior Citizens League members also revealed that a sizable segment of the retiree community does not have adequate savings. Johnson said close to half reported that they did not have any savings at all. That’s not exactly a surprise, she said, pointing out that a report by the General Accounting Office in 2019 found that 46% of seniors did not have adequate savings.
    One of the more alarming findings of the survey is that 43% of the respondents without savings said they are using their credit cards and carrying debt for more than 90 days. “So they are going into debt, and with interest rates going up it’s going to be much harder for them,” she said. The Senior Citizens League, she said, will be addressing that issue and pointing people to resources that are geared toward debt management.
    Beyond that, Johnson said the league is seeing a huge increase in the number of people applying for safety net programs, “and the first thing they have been showing up for is SNAP benefits,” she said. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly the Food Stamp Program, provides benefits to eligible low-income individuals and families. Johnson said many seniors are also visiting food pantries.
    Seniors are furthermore applying for Medicare programs to help cover the cost of premiums. And they are applying for rental assistance, she said. In fact, Johnson said, the cost of housing was the second biggest concern, after food, for seniors who participated in the survey.
    “They are reporting higher than typical rental increases,” Johnson said. She noted that even though the typical annual increase is about 5%, seniors are reporting 7% and higher. One senior replying to the survey even reported having two sizable increases within the same year, Johnson said. The respondent felt the owners were trying to encourage her to leave so that they could charge more for the unit.
    https://www.fa-mag.com/news/inflation-taking-heavy-toll-on-seniors-on-fixed-income-66949.html

    ReplyDelete