Sunday, July 28, 2013

Age-less

This month I spent two full Saturdays enrolled in a Diversity and Social Justice course on Ageism and Adultism.  Rather than compete in Oppression Olympics, these –isms are forms of age-based oppression that can result from segregation of older adults and young people who each become subordinated into “the other.”  The first Saturday (diversity education) assignment was a rhetorical triangle analysis of how the media represents youth and elders; and the second Saturday (social justice action) assignment was a paper explaining how I would intervene to stop age-based oppression.  Inspired by Martin Luther King, Jr., I have a dream that we will one day live in a world where people will not be judged by their age, but by the content of their character . . . so here’s my call to action for a healthy age-less society:
Breaking the age barrier:  This consciousness-raising course reminded me of my bargain trip to Malta just months before it joined the EU in 2004.  Merhba (hello in Malti)! Unbeknownst to me, I had joined Grand Circle Travel, which served members of AARP and continues to cater to the age 50+ set.  In Malta, entrance fees were waived for seniors, who apparently were subsidizing the cost of my tour package because the tour director often had to single me out to purchase my adult admission ticket (“I’ll pay for this one”) everywhere we went—and sometimes I got away with youth admission! As a teetotaler, I was a popular dining companion giving away my complimentary glasses of wine during lunch and dinner (night cap).  Dining table discussions centered on health concerns.  Early to bed, early to rise, my senior travel companions would remind each other to take their meds during breakfast.  One senior sent this photo of “independent, intrepid” me--our group's lone younger adult wandering up Mt. Etna, the largest volcano in Europe, during a day trip to Sicily. 
                                                                                       
Though my grandmother had dementia, she remained physically strong and energetic into her 90s.  But within weeks of my grandmother’s reluctant move into a nursing home, we noticed sudden changes in her like weight loss, lack of appetite, slower gait, uncharacteristic quietness, etc.  When we discussed our concerns with the nursing home staff, they assured us that these symptoms were “just part of normal aging so nothing to worry about.”  In my grandmother’s case, nothing was done while her condition deteriorated until she died of pneumonia.  I believe the nursing staff’s stereotyping and negative attitudes toward aging as a process of “inevitable decline” permeates American culture, which equates good health with youth, and thus fails to value health promotion among older adults.

Ageism affects how we treat older adults.  Internalized ageism affects our own behavior as we age, our will to live and even how long we live.  Based on the Cycle of Liberation, here are steps I have taken, and plan to take, to stop age-based oppression:

1.  Waking up:  The nursing home staff’s apparent ignorance of my grandmother’s true health condition (which I strongly suspect was depression, as my grandmother always said she'd rather die than live in a nursing home) and inaction (perhaps neglect) was the critical incident that caused me to really challenge assumptions about what is “normal” aging versus serious health concerns that require appropriate medical attention. 

2.  Getting ready:  My consciousness-raising included learning from gerontology courses taught by Chief Nursing Officer Dr. C at the Jewish Home (Aging Processes) and Executive Director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform  (Ethical and Legal Issues in Aging), which helped clarify my perspective.  After my grandmother’s experience, I simply wanted to avoid nursing homes, but Dr. C’s Aging Processes class, which included a field visit to the five-star rated Jewish Home, challenged me to see how culture change is possible to empower nursing home residents to maintain or even improve their biological, psychological and social functioning. 

I will further my gerontology studies so I can continue learning while challenging misinformation by health care providers who may not be adequately trained to understand the specific conditions of old age.  For example, weight loss through dieting is not recommended for older adults, who tend to lose muscle mass in addition to fat.  Studies suggest that being a little overweight is actually healthful in later years, with a little fat “reserve” (e.g., on hips and buttocks of pear-shaped bodies) to be used in case of illness or padding in the case of a fall.

3.  Reaching out:  Knowledge from my Aging Processes class has empowered me to speak up to challenge negative attitudes toward aging and the aged.  As I often hear laypersons stereotype conditions like hypertension and central obesity as part of the “normal” aging process, I respond by pointing to studies showing that they can be prevented through lifestyle and environmental interventions.  Successful health promotion involves sharing information about the realities of aging that can affect sensation and perception so we can recognize when and how to make adaptations and accommodations to these changes.  For example, it is liberating to acknowledge vision or hearing loss so one can take corrective actions (e.g., obtain eyeglasses or hearing aids), which help maintain a sense of balance and reduce risk for falls that could otherwise jeopardize one’s health and ability to age in community.  
Jessica and Kayi of American Red Cross’ Asian Community Preparedness with high school student volunteers visit Ageism and Adultism class to discuss their intergenerational disaster preparedness program, Youth for Chinese Elderly. 
 
4.  Building community:  Working with others of different ages toward a common purpose may decrease ageism.  For example, American Red Cross Bay Area Chapter’s Youth for Chinese Elderly program connects bilingual Chinese youth volunteers with monolingual Chinese elders to promote disaster preparedness, which fosters mutual caring between generations.

Since health status is a reflection of lifelong habits and influences or life course cumulative disadvantage, I support intergenerational health promotion and disease prevention programs—particularly as the rapid rise of childhood obesity places the current younger generation increasingly at risk for developing chronic health conditions (heart disease, diabetes) at earlier ages and even premature death, so the younger generation can learn from the experiences of older adults.  We find common ground in the universal experience of aging.  As time goes on, most of us (who survive premature death) eventually will find ourselves as older adults so everyone is a stakeholder in intergenerational health programs that increase quality of life for all ages. 

5.  Coalescing:  Through a generous grant from San Francisco Department of Aging and Adult Services, I participate in the Healthier Living Coalition with allies to promote the evidence-based Healthier Living-Chronic Disease Self-Management Program workshops that are offered to adults with chronic conditions and their caregivers, which attracts participants from age 18+.  Organizing these free workshops presents an incredible opportunity to address the intersectionality of age, disability, gender, race/ethnicity, socio-economic status, etc. to reduce health disparities in our diverse communities. 
This month’s SDA general meeting focus was on emergency preparedness for seniors and people with disabilities.  Carla Johnson from Mayor’s Office of Disability demonstrates $4,000 evacuation chair.


6.  Creating change and maintaining:  I want to improve quality of health care by creating culture change for person-centered care and gerontology training among health care providers who serve older adults.  As there is so much to do and so little time, I spread my time among different organizations involved in advocacy (Community Living Campaign, Gray Panthers, Senior and Disability Action), gerontology education (American Society on Aging, Gerontological Society of America) and health promotion for all ages (Bay Area Nutrition and Physical Activity Collaborative, Healthier Living Coalition). 

LaborFest:  age-less Medicare and intergenerational literacy
Every July I look forward to LaborFest, which celebrates its 20th anniversary this year.  Before studying gerontology, I worked in the employee benefits field in the design, funding and administration of employer-sponsored retirement and health/welfare plans.  As my work involved consulting with employers on cost-effective ways to manage health care costs, I developed an interest in promoting health and wellness programs that emphasize self-care.    
From left: Steve Zeltzer, LaborFest founder; Charlie Andrews, healthcare writer; Brad Wiedemier, SEIU-UHW board member; and Steve Early, labor journalist. 

Today’s LaborFest program included a discussion of Healthcare, Wellness Programs and Obama’s Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Labor.  The panel discussed the impact of cuts in healthcare as a conscious program of downsizing toward privatization, especially services to the vulnerable poor and elderly: 10% cut in Medi-Cal reimbursement rates (effect is actually around 30% for nursing homes when retroactive liability included), 8% cut in In-Home Supportive Services.  They also characterized wellness programs as part of a cost-shifting trend (“if you have a health problem, you pay more”) because of the emphasis on individual responsibility over social and environmental factors, and the effect of cafeteria plans as pitting the “healthy young” against older persons with chronic conditions.  Instead of the individual mandate in “capitalist-controlled” Obamacare, they favor single-payer, Medicare for all ages.
Maestra’s DVD cover shows army of uniformed volunteer literacy teachers marching with oversized pencils symbolizing the triumph of education when the 1961 Cuban National Literacy Campaign wiped out illiteracy within one year--remarkable when one considers that almost a quarter of the Cuban nation was illiterate prior to the start of Revolution on July 26, 1953.  

In 2001, I traveled to Cuba with Global Exchange to study its universal healthcare and education systems.  So immediately following the Healthcare discussion, I stayed put in the auditorium for a screening of Catherine Murphy’s Maestra (Teacher), an empowering documentary about the 1961 Cuban National Literacy Campaign that mobilized 250,000 volunteers to teach 707,000 Cubans of all ages how to read and write (though the film doesn’t mention teaching propaganda), which meant freedom—and especially female liberation just two years after the 1959 Cuban Revolution.  Almost half of the volunteer teachers were secondary and high school students, the majority were females who left their urban homes (one forged her father’s signature on her permission slip) for the first time to teach in the countryside where they also worked alongside campesinos in the fields.  It was so beautiful to hear (actually I read the film’s English subtitles) from one teacher, who volunteered at age 7 to teach an illiterate 58-year-old man: “He never treated me like a child, nor I treated him like an old man.  We were teacher and student.”  Another volunteer mentioned that older students were proud to have their own teacher, instead of being ashamed to be taught by a young person.  In 1962, UNESCO certified Cuba as free from illiteracy. 
Maestra filmmaker Catherine and Cuban social psychologist Norma Guillard, who is featured in the documentary sharing her experience as a 15-year-old literacy volunteer in Cuba.  I found Catherine age-less, looking pretty much the same as when we were on a Global Exchange Reality Tour of a very polarized Venezuela in November 2003, during the attempted recall of President Hugo Chavez, who was implementing his Bolivarian Revolution (similar to Cuban Revolution).  Catherine grew up close to her grandmother from Havana, where Catherine studied during Cuba's Special Period in the 1990s.  
Maestra panel included college educators who discussed the privatization of community colleges like the state’s de-funding of Older Adults and lifelong education programs (SB 173) in favor of a triage-like strategic plan that focuses on training a workforce for corporate employers, instead of higher education for all. 
Catherine, Norma and Steve are all smiles.  To learn more about literacy as a social justice issue, check out Catherine's The Literacy Project


Old like All, My old like smile?

In the service learning component of my introductory gerontology class, I volunteered with Project SHINE (Students Helping In the Naturalization of Elders) as an ESL Citizenship Coach to 30th Street Senior Center participants from Peru, Mexico, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Colombia, China and India.  I found dictation amusing: for example, the classroom instructor would dictate, “All people want to be free” and a senior would write, “Old people one to be free,” then I would politely correct, “All, not Old” and “want, not one.”  In my reflection paper, I wrote: 

I value my SHINE experience because coaching ESL reminded me of my own roots.  My parents escaped Communist China to immigrate to Hawaii, as adult refugees with no knowledge of the English language.  English was also my second language so we were all learning English—singing along with the Carpenters, James Taylor, Simon and Garfunkel, etc.  I remember singing the opening of "The Sounds of Silence," incorrectly as, “Hello darkness, smile friend” when the lyrics are really, “Hello darkness, my old friend.”  Repeat correction:  “My old, not smile.”  I actually like both versions :-).

25 comments:

  1. From http://www.aarp.org/health/healthy-living/info-08-2013/bill-clinton-vegan.2.html:

    Clinton traces his decision to change back to the morning in February 2010 when he woke up looking pale and feeling tired. His cardiologist quickly brought him into New York-Presbyterian Hospital, where he underwent emergency surgery to insert a pair of stents. One of his veins had given out, a frequent complication following the quadruple-bypass surgery he had undergone in 2004.

    At a subsequent press conference, Clinton recalls, his doctors tried "to reassure the public that I wasn't on the verge of death, and so they said, you know, this is actually fairly normal." Soon after, he received a "blistering" email from Dean Ornish, M.D., the renowned diet and heart disease expert.

    "Yeah, it's normal," wrote Ornish, an old friend, "because fools like you don't eat like you should."

    Prodded into action, Clinton started by rereading Dr. Dean Ornish's Program for Reversing Heart Disease, which urges a strict, low-fat, plant-based regimen . . .

    Clinton is clearly enjoying every virtuous bite, helping himself to seconds of both the quinoa and the beans. He still has a hearty appetite, but what he loves to eat now is obviously good for him.

    It's a testament to his discipline that he pulled off a 180-degree pivot overnight — motivated not only by his own urge to live but by the goals he has set for his foundation. Worried by the increasing prevalence of diet-related disease among Americans of all ages, he and the Clinton Foundation are committed to promoting healthier lifestyles, with what he sees as far-reaching effects on the nation's finances, quality of life and even climate change, which is exacerbated by meat production. "I wanted to do it because this health and wellness work I've been doing is increasingly important to me," he says.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is This What Aging Really Looks Like?
    Creative types are attempting to get a grip on time’s passage by documenting it
    http://www.nextavenue.org/blog/what-aging-really-looks

    ReplyDelete
  3. Google takes on aging in latest ‘moonshot’
    Google is now searching for longer life, announcing on Wednesday the formation of a new health company focused on aging and associated diseases. . . .
    Slowing the aging process promises considerable bang for the buck, because many illnesses appear to be the effect, not cause, of getting older, including cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s and various forms of cancer.
    “By the time you get really sick, it’s hard to put you back together again,” said Brian Kennedy, chief executive of the Buck Institute for Research on Aging in Novato. “But slowing aging delays the onset of all these diseases.”
    http://blog.sfgate.com/techchron/2013/09/18/google-takes-aim-at-death-in-latest-moonshot/

    ReplyDelete
  4. 6 Aging Myths We Need to Stop Believing
    Contrary to popular belief, getting older is not synonymous with declining health
    By Deepak Chopra, M.D. | Grandparents.com | February 13, 2014
    . . . Aging doesn't have to mean decline, in fact, just the opposite . .
    Myth No. 1: Your genes predetermine how healthy you are.
    Why it's not true: Although the gene sequence you were born with is fixed, gene expression depends on how you live your life. . . your thoughts, emotions, levels of stress, sleep, exercise, breathing, and mind-body coordination can affect your gene expression.
    This means that you can turn on or dial up the good genes and turn off or dial down the bad genes. The idea that we can influence our genes is the new science of epigenetics . . . we may find . .that we each have much more control over the cellular biology of aging.
    Myth No. 2: Getting older means feeling older.
    Why it's not true: We each have a chronological age and a biological age. Your chronological age is the age on your birth certificate and answers the question, "How many times have you, in this body, revolved around the sun?"
    Your biological age basically reflects how well your body is functioning. Biological age is based on everything from your blood pressure and body fat, to your bone density and cholesterol levels. It is determined by several factors and does not have to match your chronological age.
    How you perceive the process of aging, your expectations and beliefs; how you experience time and how energetic you feel actually determine the biology of aging. . . You can be much younger biologically than what your birth certificate says.
    Myth No. 3: Your body gets frail as you age.
    Why it's not true: Your body doesn't have to get frail when you get older. You can increase both the strength and mass of your muscles and even improve bone density through exercises and weight-training. . . walking for 30 minutes, five days a week, can add more than seven years to your life, according to a recent Harvard University study.
    Myth No. 4: Your brain is destined to deteriorate over time.
    Why it's not true: If you think you lose brain cells as you get older, and those cells are gone forever, think again. Research shows that some areas of the brain involved with memory and learning continue to produce new nerve cells every day. So while you do lose brain cells every day, you also are constantly replacing brain cells.
    The best thing you can do to build new brain cells is to keep your brain active with new activities and learning. And one of the best things you can do for your brain later in life, research shows, is learn a new language. (Though learning anything new is good for your brain.)
    One more thing about your brain: Only 3 to 4 percent of disease-related gene mutations, including mutations for Alzheimer's disease, are genetically determined. Most disease-related gene mutations are influenced by lifestyle — including emotions, quality of sleep, diet and stress levels. You don't have to get Alzheimer's disease or lose mental alertness as you grow old, unless you have a rare gene mutation.
    Myth No. 5: Your energy decreases as you get older.
    Why it's not true: Energy levels in the body don't depend on age. They depend on your attitude and are influenced by the quality of your life. Meditation, restful sleep and exercise are the best ways . . .
    Myth No. 6: The older you are, the more unhappy you are.
    Why it's not true: Happiness has nothing to do with aging. In fact, the later years can be the best time of your life. Many studies have shown that people get happier as they age.
    If you eat healthfully, exercise, take care of your mind and stay connected with others, you can influence your happiness levels and what I call your "Set Point".
    http://www.nextavenue.org/article/2014-02/6-aging-myths-we-need-stop-believing

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Vast Majority of Baby Boomers Are Overweight or Obese
    Alexandra Sifferlin
    July 1, 2014
    Aging baby boomers are smoking and drinking less, but overweight and obesity are on the rise, according to a newreport from the U.S. Census Bureau. That’s especially concerning when you consider the many other diseases and disabilities—including arthritis, type-2 diabetes, heart disease and hindered mobility—that can come with excess body weight.
    The percentage of overweight and obese Americans 65 and older has grown: 72% of older men and 67% of older women are now overweight or obese. Baby boomers started reaching age 65 in 2011, and the report, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health, also shows many of these older Americans are not financially prepared to pay for long-term care in nursing homes. That’s concerning, since America’s aging population, which is now around 40 million, is estimated to double by 2050.
    What’s the best way to handle overweight and obesity in people 65-plus?
    “There are not many studies of weight loss among the elderly. It’s a rich and fertile area,” says Dr. Adam Bernstein, research director at the Cleveland Clinic’s Wellness Institute. “The prescription would not be the same for a middle-aged person or youth.” Bernstein, who was not involved in the report, says it is possible for older men and women to lose weight, though doctors are likely to immediately focus on the consequences of excess body fat, like high blood pressure and erratic blood sugar. “If the clinician makes the determination a person is overweight and no other comorbid conditions, then what seems appropriate is a diet and exercise plan,” he says.
    Past research published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicinehas shown the baby boomer generation has its share of pervasive health problems, including high rates of cholesterol and hypertension. The authors concluded that there’s a need for policies that encourage prevention efforts and healthy-behavior promotion among boomers.
    This new report adds urgency to the call for better health among boomers. Indeed, the costs of not taking action could be severe.
    The new Census Bureau report shows that the average cost of a private room in a nursing home in 2010 was $83,585 a year—and less than one fifth of older men and women have the finances to live in a home for more than three years. Medicaid covers long-term care for qualified, low-income seniors, but as the number of people in that group grows, the costs will hurt.
    “Most of the long-term care provided to older people today comes from unpaid family members and friends,” Richard Suzman, director of National Institute on Aging’s division of behavioral and social research, said in a statement. “Baby boomers had far fewer children than their parents. Combined with higher divorce rates and disrupted family structures, this will result in fewer family members to provide long-term care in the future.”
    The findings highlight the need to make healthy changes early. And if we want to cut long-term healthcare costs in the future, Americans need to get healthier.
    http://time.com/2945095/the-vast-majority-of-baby-boomers-are-overweight-or-obese/

    ReplyDelete
  6. When Being Obese Could Save Your Life
    Posted: 07/17/2014 8:05 am EDT
    You've just had a heart attack, and you're in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. If you're overweight or moderately obese, you're actually more likely to survive that heart attack than if you were a normal weight or underweight person.
    It's what doctors and researchers call the "obesity paradox." While being overweight probably helped land you in the hospital with a heart attack in the first place, that extra weight could work in your favor after the fact. In fact, dozens of studies from the past several years indicate that people who are overweight or moderately obese according to the body mass index are more likely to survive chronic conditions like cardiovascular disease, kidney disease and diabetes than normal weight or underweight people.
    But whether the obesity paradox is a real phenomenon with a yet-to-be-discovered biological basis or just a statistical fallacy drawn from bad data is up for (angry) debate. . . .
    Kalantar-Zadeh wrote an editorial in the journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings that compared the obesity paradox to a bad friend whose influence lands you both in jail. You wouldn't be there in the first place if it weren't for that bad friend -- but once in jail, that friend protects you from bad conditions and other inmates. The effects of the obesity paradox are especially pronounced in old people and those with acute and chronic diseases, Kalantar-Zadeh wrote.
    "I don't let my kidney disease patients and patients on dialysis lose weight," Kalantar-Zadeh said to HuffPost. "If I tell your 91-year-old grandma to lose weight, am I helping her or hurting her? This is all about who benefits from losing weight, and who doesn't." . . .
    In fact, obese and severely obese patients with cardiovascular disease had 27 percent and 22 percent lower chances, respectively, of dying from any cause compared with people with normal BMIs. . . .
    "One of the problems with the obesity paradox is that we've been making the wrong measurements," Myers told HuffPost. "Most of these studies only have BMI available, and what we really want to measure is body composition -- namely, how much visceral fat you have, which is associated with high metabolic risk."
    One simple and cost-effective way to more directly measure body composition is to take a patient's waist circumference, Myers said, since the amount of visceral (abdominal) fat is a better predictor of disease than how much a person weighs.
    Another simple explanation for the obesity paradox could be that researchers aren't taking into account a person's fitness level. Myers and other investigators have done extensive research showing that the obesity paradox is not seen among individuals who are fit. . .
    In his meta-analysis on obesity and coronary heart disease, Sharma outlines other possible explanations for the so-called paradox. He suggests:
    • Obese people tend to have coronary heart disease earlier in their life, and it's their young age that helps them survive --not necessarily their weight.
    • Underweight and normal weight patients might have heart disease because of underlying genetic factors, which potentially leaves them worse-off than overweight patients who acquire the disease because of lifestyle factors.
    • Overweight and obese people might receive better medical care. Because of their size, doctors might be more diligent in prescribing overweight patients more heart medications at higher doses than normal weight patients.
    The biggest thing to remember about the obesity paradox, concluded Myers, is that researchers are observing the phenomenon in clinical populations, not the general population. That means the people in these obesity paradox studies are already sick, and that a healthy person shouldn't decide to pack on the pounds based on this research. . . .
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/17/obesity-paradox_n_5592606.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why Everything You Think About Aging May Be Wrong
    By ANNE TERGESEN
    Nov. 30, 2014
    Contrary to the stereotype of later life as a time of loneliness, depression and decline, a growing body of scientific research shows that, in many ways, life gets better as we get older…our moods and overall sense of well-being improve with age. Friendships tend to grow more intimate, too, as older adults prioritize what matters most to them, says Karen Fingerman, a professor of human development and family sciences at the University of Texas at Austin.
    …knowledge and certain types of intelligence continue to develop in ways that can even offset age-related declines in the brain’s ability to process new information and reason abstractly. Expertise deepens, which can enhance productivity and creativity…wisdom—defined, in part, as the ability to resolve conflicts by seeing problems from multiple perspectives—flourishes…
    Still, those who fall into the “stereotype of being depressed, cranky, irritable and obsessed with their alimentary canal” constitute “no more than 10% of the older population,” says Paul Costa, a scientist emeritus at the National Institutes of Health…
    Myth 1: Depression Is More Prevalent in Old Age
    But research indicates that emotional well-being improves until the 70s, when it levels off… older adults focus on positive rather than negative emotions, memories and stimuli… they tend to prioritize emotional meaning and satisfaction, giving them an incentive to see the good more than the bad, Prof. Carstensen says. . .
    While rates of depression in nursing homes tend to be high, Prof. Fingerman says, “In general, when we look at older adults, they tend to be happier, less anxious, less angry and tend to adapt well to their circumstances.”
    Myth 2: Cognitive Decline Is Inevitable
    …concentration and memory slip and, around age 30, scores on tests of abstract reasoning and novel problem-solving begin to decline…an older brain typically takes longer to process and retrieve information from its crowded memory, says Denise Park, a professor of behavioral and brain sciences at the University of Texas at Dallas.
    But recent discoveries also indicate that—barring dementia—older adults perform better in the real world than they do on cognitive tests…“most of what we do is based on the knowledge we have acquired.”… those learning new skills “showed greater improvements in memory, with some also showing improvement in processing speed,” says Prof. Park, who believes that older adults who learn challenging new skills tap more diffuse brain circuits and pathways to compensate for age-related deficits. “Novelty combined with mental challenge is very important…Get out of your comfort zone.”
    Myth 3: Older Workers Are Less Productive
    In jobs that require experience, some studies show that older adults have a performance edge.
    Myth 4: Loneliness Is More Likely
    As people age, their social circles contract. But that doesn’t mean older adults are lonely…
    friendships tend to improve with age…Until about age 50, most people add to their social networks. After that, they eliminate people they feel less close to and maximize interactions with “close partners who are more emotionally satisfying,” says Prof. Carstensen.
    Myth 5: Creativity Declines With Age
    Dean Keith Simonton, a professor of psychology at the University of California, Davis, says creativity tends to peak earlier in fields such as pure mathematics and theoretical physics, where breakthroughs typically hinge on problem-solving skills that are sharpest in one’s 20s. In fields that require accumulated knowledge, creative peaks typically occur later. Historians and philosophers, for example, “may reach their peak output when they are in their 60s,” …
    Myth 6: More Exercise Is Better
    “You get to a point of diminishing returns,” says James O’Keefe, a professor of medicine at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/why-everything-you-think-about-aging-may-be-wrong-1417408057

    ReplyDelete
  8. How Geriatrics Can Help You – Even If You’re Not Yet “Old-Old”
    By Leslie Kernisan, MD
    August 24, 2015
    …Contrary to popular opinion, geriatrics is not just for people who are very old or very frail or have Alzheimer’s disease or live in nursing homes.
    It is for anyone who would benefit from having health care suitably modified to be a better fit for what happens as people get older. And if you’re aged 60 or older, that almost certainly means you.
    Best of all, you don’t need to see a geriatrician in person, in order to benefit from geriatrics.
    …Geriatrics is the branch of health care and medicine specialized in aging and in the care of older adults.
    …in the specialty of geriatrics, doctors developed an approach to better work with aging adults. They got better at considering the big picture of a person’s health and life before diving into a specific medical problem…using a holistic and integrated approach for people with multiple chronic illnesses, rather than trying to treat every disease separately…talking to people who might have problems with their thinking or hearing…working with families, who were often heavily involved in the day-to-day health and life care of their older patients…collaborating with other disciplines, such as social work, physical and occupational therapy and pharmacy.
    In short, geriatrics means the art and science of better health and health care for older adults.
    …geriatrician is a health professional who has completed extra training and certification in geriatrics. The term usually refers to a medical doctor (who has a MD or DO degree), but I have seen it very occasionally used to refer to professionals who are not physicians.
    To be board-certified in geriatric medicine, you have to first do a residency in internal medicine or family medicine…followed by an additional year of clinical geriatrics fellowship.
    The medical specialty of psychiatry also offers a geriatric subspecialty, so some psychiatrists are certified as geriatric psychiatrists.
    …learn more about geriatrics and geriatricians at HealthInAging.org, the consumer health site maintained by the American Geriatrics Society.
    Gerontology is the study of aging and of older adults.
    It’s a broad field and covers aging from a variety of angles, including social science, psychology, public health and policy. Some gerontologists are even specialized in physiology and biological processes, so this aspect of gerontology can overlap quite a bit with geriatrics.
    …both gerontology and geriatrics involve developing expertise related to aging adults.
    But as a medical specialty, geriatrics is more narrowly focused on health and medical care for seniors.
    …United States has a serious shortage of geriatricians. So those of us in this field end up tending to people who most urgently need a doctor specialized in geriatrics, which means the oldest and the frailest.
    …“At what point would you start to benefit from what we know and do in geriatrics?
    For most people, the answer is at some point in their 60s…by then, most people have become physiologically less resilient in their mind and body, although only a minority have developed chronic impairments.
    Medication side-effects start to become more of an issue. Falls are also often related to age-associated changes in strength, vision and balance. And people in their 60s are certainly more susceptible to develop delirium during hospitalization, compared to people who are younger.
    …Since most older adults will have to get health care from non-geriatricians, there’s currently a big push afoot to make sure that all people in health care…get better at applying what we know in geriatrics.
    …The most important member of a health care team is the patient, followed by the family caregiver.
    …In an aging America, everyone should be equipped with the knowledge and resources to help optimize the health of seniors.
    So for better health in aging, don’t forget to think geriatrics…for all seniors, not just for the very old.
    http://www.nextavenue.org/why-you-may-need-a-geriatrician-even-if-youre-not-old/

    ReplyDelete
  9. An Aging Population, Without the Doctors to Match
    By MARCY COTTRELL HOULE
    SEPT. 22, 2015
    …We were suddenly confronted with decisions about his care that we didn’t understand. Many families face similar questions: Do we move Mom out of her house to assisted living? Dad is so forgetful and argumentative, does he have dementia? Do our parents have enough money to hire a caregiver — and do we? When should we move them to a nursing home? What kind of care will they need when they get there?
    These are difficult questions. Yet when you look around for help, you find there isn’t much to be had.
    Why not? Most health care professionals have had little to no training in the care of older adults. Currently, 97 percent of all medical students in the United States do not take a single course in geriatrics.
    Recent studies show that good geriatric care can make an enormous difference. Older adults whose health is monitored by a geriatrician enjoy more years of independent living, greater social and physical functioning and lower presence of disease. In addition, these patients show increased satisfaction, spend less time in the hospital, exhibit markedly decreased rates of depression and spend less time in nursing homes.
    Our family witnessed the value of geriatric care firsthand.
    …Dr. Kenneth Brummel-Smith of Florida State University… explained that, of all the suffering that goes with dementia, pain is one of the most common and least recognized, simply because patients can’t express themselves.
    Dr. Brummel-Smith urged me to have my dad examined by a local geriatrician, whom he recommended. In a week, the new doctor came to the nursing home. Dr. Brummel-Smith’s suspicions had been right. Despite my father’s broken hip and history of arthritis, he was receiving nothing for pain. Immediately, the geriatrician put my father on a regimen of 1,000 milligrams of Tylenol, three times a day. He discontinued the mood-altering drug. After that, my father’s behavior rapidly turned around. His quality of life vastly improved. He could look around at his surroundings. He could converse. He could smile when we played music for him…
    But, as relieved as I felt, I could not help wondering: What about all the other people in nursing homes who aren’t as fortunate as my father?
    Currently there are fewer than 8,000 geriatricians in practice nationwide — and that number is shrinking. …At the same time, the nation’s fastest-growing age group is over 65. Government projections hold that in 2050 there will be 90 million Americans 65 and older, and 19 million people over age 85. The American Geriatrics Society argues that, ideally, the United States should have one geriatrician for every 300 aging people. But with the looming shortage of geriatricians, the society projects that by 2030 there will be only one geriatrician for every 3,798 older adults.
    Why such a growing gap between an increasing number of patients and a decreasing number of doctors required to treat them? Geriatrics is a low-paying field of medicine, even though it requires years of intensive specialization. Most geriatricians are reimbursed solely by Medicare andMedicaid, whose rates make it unsustainable to keep an office running. Many medical clinics and geriatric hospital units nationwide are closing down.
    For those entering their senior years, according to Dr. David Reuben, a leading geriatrician at the U.C.L.A. Medical Center, a true national crisis is brewing.
    A vast majority of Americans have no conception of what lies ahead and — without geriatricians available to provide their health care — how substantially their lives will be affected…
    The co-author, with Dr. Elizabeth Eckstrom, of “The Gift of Caring: Saving Our Parents From the Perils of Modern Healthcare.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/23/opinion/an-aging-population-without-the-doctors-to-match.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. Some Older Patients Are Treated Not Wisely, but Too Much
    NOV. 6, 2015
    Paula Span
    …Evidence is accumulating that older adults with diabetes, hypertension and other conditions should be treated less aggressively than they commonly are. “Deintensification,” the Michigan researchers have named this approach…
    “In our health care system, we are all more scared of failing to do something than of doing too much,” said Dr. Jeremy Sussman, a primary care physician and research scientist at the Ann Arbor hospital.
    Under current guidelines, most older patients with diabetes don’t have to get their blood sugar to rock bottom; a 7.5 or 8 percent HbA1c produces the same benefits as very low glucose.
    Blood pressure readings, too, should be allowed to rise as patients age — up to 150 millimeters of mercury for systolic pressure. The previous goal was to keep it below 140.
    Complicating this question, a large trial of intensive blood-pressure control, announced Monday in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that patients randomized to an extremely low blood pressure goal — 120 millimeters of mercury or below — in fact did see substantially lower death rates. The benefit was seen in patients over age 75.
    But the new trial did not include people with diabetes, who are at higher risk for cardiovascular problems. A widely cited study called Accord, published in 2008 in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that intensive therapy to reduce blood glucose actually resulted in higher mortality. Expect debates among those who treat older patients about how to apply these results.
    Generally, there are good reasons to be less vigilant. In older people with diabetes, for instance, maintaining very low blood sugar — often called “tight control” — can do more harm than good. “People can feel fatigued and weak, get cold sweats, feel like they’re going to pass out,” said Dr. Tanner Caverly, lead author of the Michigan survey, published in JAMA Internal Medicine. The fainting and falls that may result can have devastating consequences.
    Yet a large national study by Dr. Sussman and his colleagues, published last month in JAMA Internal Medicine, reveals how rarely deintensification occurs among patients over age 70…
    “There’s been a huge effort to ensure that fewer people are undertreated,” Dr. Sussman said. “Now, maybe we’ve crossed the line and too many people are overtreated.”
    Examples of both extremes are easy to find.
    Among older adults, substantial proportions still don’t take advantage of vaccines, among the simplest of health protections. A third of those over age 65 didn’t get flu shots last season, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More than 40 percent haven’t been vaccinated against pneumonia, and fewer than a quarter have gotten the shingles vaccine.
    But older Americans receive too many colonoscopies and too many mammograms. Last year, a study found that more than half of nursing home residents with advanced dementia, a terminal disease, were receiving drugs of questionable value; about a fifth took statins to lower cholesterol.
    Overtreatment, however, rarely brings the sort of hand-wringing that undertreatment does. You might think it would be welcome news that older diabetics can do well with lower doses of medication, and that in some cases they might be able to stop taking glucose-lowering drugs altogether.
    Tight control takes great effort, and it makes sense for young and middle-aged people with diabetes. The benefits accrue slowly, over years, so younger patients are more apt to receive them. The young have stronger bones and better balance, so they are less likely to be injured in the falls that too-low blood sugar can cause.
    Older, frailer people with lower life expectancy and many additional health problems face different trade-offs…
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/10/health/some-older-patients-are-treated-not-wisely-but-too-much.html

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jewish Home’s new Square a one-stop senior shop
    by dan pine, j. staff
    Thursday, May 19, 2016
    …Jewish Home of San Francisco, which was founded in 1871…has evolved into the largest private nonprofit senior residence and skilled-nursing facility in California...
    Daniel Ruth, the Jewish Home’s executive director, also knew it was time for a transformation…master plan is the Square, a $145 million, 45,000-square-foot reimagining of the 9-acre Jewish Home campus,... opens in 2018, it will be a prime health and wellness destination for San Francisco seniors, their families and caregivers…
    The Home currently serves 1,800 residents and short-term rehab patients per year…
    The Square, to be built adjacent to existing Jewish Home structures, will include medical clinic offices, a pharmacy, a water aerobics pool, a health club, a beauty salon, a cinema and a Jewish education center, all rolled into one...
    …a sense of belonging that comes when seniors opt to engage rather than disengage.
    Ruth is confident in the adage: If you build it, they will come.
    “Nobody wants to institutionalize seniors,” he said. “Seniors want to live in their own homes as long as possible. So we had to come up with new methods to support frail older adults and help them continue to live in their own homes as long as possible, bringing services to them or bringing them to a one-stop shop of coordinated services.”
    … designed with seniors in mind: ample windows to let in natural light, vibrant colors, wide corridors and hallways, and even carpet patterns that fall under what he calls “smart design for aging.”
    …online component, with a website offering virtual support, a personalized appointment calendar, livestreaming of Square events and social connection opportunities…
    Only a few years ago, the Jewish Home faced an existential crisis.
    In March 2011, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill that mandated massive cuts in Medi-Cal reimbursements to facilities such as the Jewish Home, …ordered to pay back the state up to $21 million retroactive to the day the bill was signed…
    Eventually, California’s coffers recovered. Medi-Cal reimbursements to the Home — its primary source of income — were restored, and the large “balance due” to the state eliminated…that scare accelerated his determination to change the mission and business model, …
    …San Francisco Post-Acute Care Project determined that the city faced an inadequate supply of skilled-nursing beds, fewer options for Medi-Cal patients and too few services for dementia patients.
    …intense challenges faced by spouses, adult children and caregivers — such as having to drive long distances to take loved ones to and from various appointments. …more seniors are choosing to live at home.
    “So there was an opportunity for some kind of program that acts as a convener,” Ruth continued, “a continuum-of-care retirement community without walls, where you bring health and social service providers together, making it easier on the family. Instead of going to eight different places, you can come to one location.”
    ...Home’s assisted-living areas, which will feel more like, well, a home. No more medical carts racing down corridors, no more overhead paging systems or nurses’ call lights. Instead, personnel will be alerted on smartphones and pagers.
    …bring the cooking closer to residents, along with the sounds and aromas of mealtime. A calmer atmosphere for residents and staff is the goal.
    … Wiener said. “We have a growing number of seniors in San Francisco, particularly lower-income seniors and middle-class seniors without a lot of resources. They’re at risk for being isolated in their homes, while others need care beyond what they can receive there. So for an existing, successful institution, which has the capacity to care for seniors, expanding makes all the sense in the world.”…
    http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/77608/jewish-homes-new-square-a-one-stop-senior-shop/

    ReplyDelete
  12. Embracing the Spectrum
    It becomes more vital for us to detect the subtleties that make us individuals and to see one another in infinitely different shades of the hue we call “age.”
    by Jeanette Leardi, ChangingAging Contributor
    December 9, 2016
    …More broadly than any other time since the Civil War, Americans have experienced domestically the human impulse to “otherize.” The tenor of our discourse has morphed even further away from civility and inclusion and toward embracing “us vs. them” rhetoric.
    No matter if we are discussing political affiliation, economic position, or social identity, out of our mutual fear and insecurity we have decided to opt for perceiving people at one or the other extreme end of a spectrum rather than be willing to consider every individual as occupying a distinct and often shifting position along that spectrum…
    We use labels …as convenient shortcuts that excuse us from the difficult task (and patriotic obligation) to do the mental heavy-lifting that requires us to think about how characterizing others impacts our lives.
    The insidious thing about otherization is that it is applied to all kinds of distinctions: race, ethnicity, gender, ability, and sexual orientation, to name a few. And, of course, to age. We otherize members of each generation as an easy way of distancing ourselves from what we believe are the weaknesses of that stage of life. Older adults bear the brunt of ageism because most people believe in the patently false idea that getting older means nothing but deterioration and decline, and they fear such a future. But older adults, too, can be ageist toward successive generations, out of frustration that in their advanced years they are no longer counted among the young in our youth-centric culture.
    It’s ironic that otherization should occur so easily regarding the issue of age. After all, it’s much easier to assign the label of “them” to people who are not of our own race, ethnicity, gender, ability, or sexual orientation. In these cases, “them” is a more permanent designation. But we are all aging. If we are fortunate and survive long enough, all of us eventually become old people. The “them” finally become the “us.” Aging is a slow transformation along the chronological spectrum, and it behooves us to keep that in mind. And as we age, our distinctions among one another increase, not decrease. Therefore it becomes more vital for us to detect the subtleties that make us individuals and to see one another in infinitely different shades of the hue we call “age.”
    We Americans need to take a closer look at the damage of mistrust, fear, and hostility we cause in our insistence to otherize others as we place them at the far extreme on the spectrum of existence. Racially, ethnically, ably, sexually –– and generationally –– we are, first and foremost, humans. And secondly, we live in the United States and should be socially vested in the survival and prosperity of our nation. When we consider these two fundamental commonalities, those lesser boundaries that separate us from one another become less relevant and important.
    Furthermore, it is not only more moral but also more practical to recognize and honor the diversity that is our country’s greatest strength. Now more than ever, America’s motto, E Pluribus Unum –– Out of Many, One –– must be transformed from a childhood-memorized slogan into a call to arms as we strive with one another to coexist and be interdependent. Let’s reject red and blue, young and old, and all other facile and intellectually lazy binary terms as we sensitize our skills of perception and welcome the natural variety to be found in any concept we categorize, be it color, political belief, or age. It’s the only thing that can save us –– and our nation –– from our otherizing selves.
    http://changingaging.org/disrupting-ageism/71061/

    ReplyDelete
  13. The current moment: what’s ageism got to do with it?
    Posted on December 7, 2016 by Ashton Applewhite
    I wake these days remembering that something awful has happened. Reality assembles itself, and I feel worse. The multicultural, egalitarian, globalized society I hope to inhabit is under assault. Bigotry is ascendant. Racism, sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance—pick your prejudice!—are sanctioned, even celebrated. How do we respond to attacks on those most vulnerable? How does the mission to build a movement against ageism fit into this historical moment?
    Until I thought hard about it, just posing that last question felt self-indulgent. Why insist on adding another “ism” to the list when so many higher-profile forms of discrimination, racism in particular, rightfully demand bandwidth? Should ageism move to the back of the line, at least Medicare is in the crosshairs? Here’s the thing: we don’t have to choose. It’s not a competition. And it’s not zero sum. All forms of discrimination intersect with and compound one another. The flip side is that when we make a community a better place in which to be from somewhere else, to worship a different god, to have a disability or be non-white or non-rich, we also make it a better place in which to grow old.
    Ageism is the perfect target for collective advocacy because it affects everyone. That very attribute, its universal nature, means that we undermine ageism when people of all ages show up for stuff. It’s that basic. The vital task for each of us—youngers and olders alike—is to join whatever struggle matters most to us in the days ahead. Stand up and step out—into the community, the classroom, the courts, the town squares.
    Age-integrating the struggles ahead means coming to grips with our own internalized ageism, the voices that whisper “too old” or “too young,” that make us complicit in our own marginalization. At times there may be good reasons to sit tight, but age alone is not one of them. Only when each of us rejects this culture’s ageist script can we play the roles for which we were born—and we were all born for this time. Every stage of life has its strengths, from physical resilience to historical perspective, and we are strongest when we collaborate. If everyone in a group is the same age, whether 17 or 70 and whether it’s focused on carbon emissions or hate speech, it will be less creative and less effective. We are stronger together in the streets as well. Many olders are more vulnerable physically, but less likely to be victims of violence or seen as threats. Let’s change that. Let’s share the risk.
    Standing together—whether in front of a mosque or a clinic or an encampment or a bank—undermines age stereotypes and builds solidarity. We are all old or future old, and Joining forces across our years offers a unifying cause in these divided times. We add ageism to the list of “isms” that we will not tolerate—implicitly, because all ages show up, and explicitly, because we insist upon it. Dismantling ageism changes from aspirational goal to certain outcome. We move organically towards a society where young and old, gay and straight, black and white, rich and poor all have a voice and a path. We have no other option, because we’re going to need all hands on deck—and because the possibility for radical social change has never been greater.
    http://seniorplanet.org/this-moment-in-history-whats-ageism-got-to-do-with-it/

    ReplyDelete
  14. I’M NOT AGING “WELL” — I’M GETTING OLD, GODDAMMIT
    12/09/2016
    ERICA MANFRED
    “I’m taking a page from Martin Luther King: ‘I have a dream that one day elders will live in a nation where they will not be judged by the tautness of their muscles but by the content of their character.'”
    People used to think of growing old as part of the natural progression of life from birth to death. Not anymore. Now we go directly from middle age to you’re-just-as-old-as-you-feel.
 “Old age” has been dropped from our vocabulary. “You’re not old!” people say when I describe myself that way. I’m 74 with an assortment of age-related ailments and a generous complement of sags and wrinkles. If I’m not old, who is?
    Today, we’re supposed to age “well.” The term is fraught with expectations that I, for one, can’t meet. If I’d belonged to an earlier generation, I’d have been expected to retire to the proverbial rocking chair on the porch — but my age mates are not going gently into that good night. Older people in the 21st-century expect to be able to ski, play tennis, run marathons, bicycle, swing dance and even sky dive indefinitely. These days, if you slow down with age it’s your own fault. It means you’re not eating right, working out, taking the right supplements, thinking positive enough.
    The Boomer generation was going to live fast and die young. We’re still living fast but we’re not dying young — so we live as fast as possible as a way to pretend that we’re not going to die at all. Unfortunately, those of us who are suffering the physical and mental ravages of age are an uncomfortable reminder to our more youthful peers that they, too, will one day grow old.
    I am assailed daily with stories of elders who do amazing things at advanced ages — run marathons at 85, teach yoga at 90, bungee jump at 96. These stories are supposed to be inspiring. I find them depressing. I will never do any of those things. The rest of us old folks — those who actually suffer from common ailments of aging such as arthritis, heart disease or emphysema — feel left behind in the mad rush to never get old. I wind up wanting to stay home, because in this age-well-or-you’re-worthless world, struggling to keep up is humiliating.
    Many people in their 70s do not have physical limitations. They can do everything they did at 50, and more power to them, but not being one of them makes me and a lot of other seniors feel like pariahs among our peers.
    I have a 77-year-old friend with spinal stenosis, a common and painful ailment of older people. She is unstable on her feet and can’t get around without a walker. She is very sociable but refuses to go out because she’s ashamed to be seen with her walker. The ageism that makes her afraid to be seen with a walker winds up further marginalizing older people who are already segregated from the mainstream. It’s no wonder that loneliness is becoming an epidemic among seniors.
    Even retirement communities advertise themselves as for the “active senior.” If you’re not active, you’d better find somewhere else to live.
    It’s time that the media stop fishing for clicks with their stories of older people engaging in extreme sports and focus on celebrating seniors who find a way to live well despite physical limitations — people like Carmen Herrera, who sold her first painting at 89, or Barbara Beskin, who landed her dream job as an industrial designer in Silicon Valley at 90; or even seniors like Joe Bartley, who got bored with retirement and was thrilled to be hired as a waiter at a local diner at age 89.
    It’s also about time we seniors stop judging each another by how “youthful” we act or look.
    I’m taking a page from Martin Luther King: “I have a dream that one day elders will live in a nation where they will not be judged by the tautness of their muscles but by the content of their character.”
    http://seniorplanet.org/im-not-aging-well-im-getting-old-goddammit/

    ReplyDelete
  15. Standing Up to Ageism
    Looking for a Mighty New Year's Resolution? Try Embracing Age.
    Holly Parker, Ph.D
    ...ageism…encompasses a jumble of biased ideas and practices related to a person’s age.
    • Unflattering stereotypes about a person’s age (e.g., unattractive, less capable, “uncool”)
    • Agreeable yet nonetheless paternalistic stereotypes (e.g., unassuming, sweet)
    • Views about how people should behave based on their age (e.g., don’t speak out, hide your sexuality, don’t wear that, don’t go there, get out of the way of younger people)
    • Discrimination toward people solely based on their age (e.g., hiring and promotion decisions)
    …Science tells us that ageist attitudes can have a profoundly harmful impact on older adults’ employment, their economic and social opportunities, and their mental and physical well-being. People who are older face ageist attitudes in the very system they entrust their healthcare to (including many physicians and psychologists), which ends up reducing the quality of care they receive. Problems that erode quality of life are apt to receive less active inquiry, attention, and treatment from healthcare providers. For instance, if you’re an older adult with a brain injury, providers are more likely to fail to notice your needs for services compared to a younger person with a brain injury. What if you’re an older woman who is experiencing abuse at the hands of your intimate partner? Sadly, social workers are less prone to look on what’s happening to you as abuse compared to a younger woman in an abusive relationship. Even many of the textbooks used to educate and train the geriatric healthcare providers of tomorrow are rife with ageism. One study analyzed the language in textbooks written for physicians and professionals specializing in geriatrics. It revealed that over half (55%) of the geriatrics textbooks painted a broadly unfavorable portrait of older adults’ cognitive abilities, and roughly one third (32.5%) depicted a somewhat adverse image of the intellectual abilities of older people. Only 12.5% of the books offered a truly evenhanded view of cognition and growing older. And if you’re doing the math, you’ll realize that no books illustrated an optimistic take on aging. When the very tools we use to train healthcare professionals reflect ageism, it’s hardly staggering that we’re churning out providers who hold ageist views themselves.
    …The big picture is one that portrays older adults as less capable people to feel sorry for…Regrettably, many older individuals also come to take on ageist stereotypes themselves, moving through life in lockstep with those biases, elevating the odds they’ll actually come true….It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    …When we unquestioningly accept and follow ideas about what behavior is kosher for old people, then we become the old people we envision. Not only does this confirm our own ageist beliefs, it fuels others’ age biases too when they see us acting out the stereotype.
    Ageist notions can even lead young people to move more sluggishly, in line with a common stereotype. People who anticipate that aging means feeling down and being infirm and absent-minded are more likely to have such problems as they age…
    …Despite societal ageism, our overall emotional health tends to rise as we get older. We evolve and become more sophisticated artists of living over the years.
    …we have the choice to bring ourselves back to the big picture of life, reminding ourselves that the experience of growing old is a gift not all of us receive. And for those of us who get it, what better way to take advantage of precious added time than by enjoying a healthy, connected, meaningful, and fun life on our own terms, rather than buying into ageist stereotypes and weighing ourselves down with them?...
    https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-future-self/201612/standing-ageism

    ReplyDelete

  16. Castro’s casa: social work lessons from Cuba
    Social workers defy poverty, foster social justice and prevent social problems leading to poor health by supporting the oldest population in Latin America.
    Rory Truell
    Tuesday 18 July 2017
    In a street of salmon and teal painted houses, once home to wealthy colonial administrators, sits the Casa del Abuelo. Now a community centre providing free day services for older inhabitants of the neighbourhood, Casa del Abuelo – or home for grandparents – was the first of many such facilities set up by Fidel Castro during a wave of social reforms to provide care and support for ordinary Cubans after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the US economic blockade crippled the country’s economy…
    Julio, an 89-year-old member, clasped my hand as she showed me around the converted colonial mansion. She explained that each day in this community-led enterprise starts with breakfast and a discussion about politics.
    After this, it is exercise classes. “The key to long life is an active mind and body,” she said. She then showed me the occupational therapy facilities and crafts that members make daily. “The men don’t do this though,” she said with a smile. “They prefer checkers – they think it’s more manly.”
    In the large sitting room a picture of Castro hangs prominently, as does a photo of Che Guevara in the hallway. Castro opened the centre in 2000, the first in a wave of social care initiatives that are the envy of the world. He aimed to have a social worker in every community, with a ratio of at least one social worker to every 1,500 residents.
    “They build and support the relationships with each person here and their families,” Julio said of the social workers’ role at Casa del Abuelo. “And if we don’t have a family, we are supported to feel that we are part of a new family, here at the centre.”
    Social workers are also responsible for writing a biannual social diagnosis report, which informs local and national authorities about the needs of their communities. This often results in extra care programmes and the reorganisation of resources to support and enable people of all ages to access healthcare and education.
    At the Cuban Association of Social Workers, however, staff explain that there are a number of challenges for the profession.
    The ageing population is an issue. Since the revolution, life expectancy in Cuba has risen by more than 20 years.But this is coupled with a low birth rate, meaning social work is focused on the needs of the oldest population in all of Latin America.
    As a consequence of its economic isolation, Cuba also struggles with poverty. With a degree qualification that takes five years, social workers will earn the equivalent of just $40 per month, a little less than doctors.
    And while social work is considered an occupation, it is not recognised as an independent discipline, so qualifications are taught through the health or sociology departments of universities. This problem, by no means limited to Cuba, means the work is often seen as a second-tier vocation rather than a profession equal in importance to health or education.
    But social work is what holds everything together. “In Cuba,” explained social worker Alberto, “there are three elements to every medical diagnosis: physical, psychological and social.” Social workers contribute to each of these, so only they can understand a person’s total wellbeing. “Social work in Cuba is about the prevention of social problems that would otherwise lead to poor health,” he said.
    …social workers regularly encourage families to visit to counter the depression that can be caused by isolation.
    In Cuba, we see a lesson for all societies. Social work is recognised by the government as a way of fostering social justice and wellbeing through prevention strategies and the active support of marginalised people. This is something we can all learn from.
    https://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2017/jul/18/social-work-cuba-fidel-castro-ageing-population

    ReplyDelete
  17. Stop Treating 70- and 90-Year-Olds the Same
    By LOUISE ARONSON
    AUG. 11, 2017
    …Those two groups — the “young old” and the “old old” — don’t just differ in how they look and spend their days; they also differ biologically…
    With advancing age, the immune system weakens (a phenomenon called immunosenescence) and chronic diseases compromise the body’s resistance to infectious organisms. Older adults are thus more susceptible to infections — more likely to get sick, more likely to require hospitalization and more likely to die.
    …Older people may need different dosing or even biologically different vaccines.
    …There may also come a point toward the end of many lives when vaccination no longer makes sense…all medical decisions, cannot be based on age alone. Both the speed and extent of aging vary widely, not only among but also within individuals; you can have hearing loss but no vision changes, or stiffened joints but supple arteries. Human diversity reaches its apex in old age.
    With good luck, some people don’t move from adulthood to what we might call “oldhood” until their 70s, and occasionally later still. By contrast, stressors such as poverty, racial prejudice, incarceration and illness can accelerate aging, making others “old” in their 50s, with cellular changes and risks of chronic disease and death akin to those of people many decades their senior.
    A growing body of literature illustrates why these differences matter, both for immunizations and in health care more generally.
    …changes in the kidneys, heart, skin and other organs steadily decrease older people’s ability to tolerate chemotherapy and radiation. There are simply different risk-benefit ratios for older adults; the frailest and oldest often incur all the immediate harms of treatments, from prevention to intensive care, without seeing the benefits.
    The sad fact is that we frequently don’t know how to best care for the old. Treatments rarely target older adults’ particular physiology, and the old are typically excluded from clinical studies. Sometimes they are kept out based on age alone, but more often it’s because they have one of the diseases that typically accompany old age. And yet we still end up basing older people’s treatment on this research, because too often it is all we have.
    Equally troublesome is the failure of studies to measure outcomes that reflect older people’s priorities. Most would rather live comfortably and independently for a shorter time than live for a slightly longer time confined to a bed or nursing home.
    It’s not that any age subgroup from babies to elders matters more than others. It’s that they all matter and that they are different. Some may believe that focusing more research and treatment on the old will take resources away from younger populations. But we can do both. Insurance companies continue to pay top dollar for questionable, useless and even harmful care for older people, money that could be spent on more effective care.
    …In the 21st century, when the number of older adults will surpass the number of children worldwide, we need to similarly target oldhood.
    Here are two easy steps that would help the C.D.C. correct the deficiency in its vaccine recommendations and increase equality throughout our health care system. First, whenever we apply something to people by age and are tempted to divide the life span into just childhood and adulthood, we should add oldhood to the list as well. Second, the National Institutes of Health should require that older adults be included in clinical studies, just as it already does for women and minorities.
    Life is a three-act play. It’s time our medical system reflected that truth.
    Louise Aronson, a professor of geriatrics at the University of California, San Francisco, is working on a book on “oldhood.”
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/opinion/sunday/vaccinations-elderly.html

    ReplyDelete
  18. Doctors often don’t ask older patients about the nagging problems of aging
    By Judith Graham November 26
    Being old and sick in America frequently means that a doctor won’t ask you about troublesome concerns you deal with day to day: difficulty walking, dizziness, a leaky bladder, sleep disturbances, memory lapses and more.
    It means that if you’re hospitalized, you have a good chance of being treated by a physician you’ve never met and undergoing questionable tests and treatments that might end up compromising your health.
    It means that if you subsequently seek rehabilitation at a skilled nursing facility, you’ll encounter another medical team that doesn’t know you or understand your at-home circumstances. Typically, a doctor won’t see you very often.
    In her new book, “Old & Sick in America: The Journey Through the Health Care System,” Muriel Gillick, a professor of population medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of the Program in Aging at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, delves deeply into these concerns and why they’re widespread.
    Her answer: A complex set of forces is responsible.
    Some examples:
    ●Medical training doesn’t make geriatric expertise a priority.
    ●Care at bottom-line-oriented hospitals is driven by the availability of sophisticated technology.
    ●Drug companies and medical-device manufacturers want to see their products adopted widely, and they offer incentives to ensure that this happens.
    ●Medicare, the government’s health program for seniors, pays more for procedures than for the intensive counseling that older adults and caregivers need.
    In an interview, Gillick offered thoughts about how older adults and their caregivers can navigate this treacherous terrain. Her remarks have been edited for clarity and length:
    Q: What perils do older adults encounter as they travel through the health-care system?
    A: The journey usually begins in the doctor’s office, so let’s start there. In general, physicians tend to focus on different organ systems. The heart. The lungs. The kidneys. They don’t focus so much on conditions that cross various organ systems, so-called geriatric syndromes. Things like falling, becoming confused or dealing with incontinence.
    Q: What can people do about that?
    A: ... request a geriatric assessment or consultation that will bring these issues to the forefront…
    It looks at the whole person. And it focuses on that person’s functioning — on what they can do. Can they dress themselves, walk, get to the bathroom? Can they cook meals? Take a bus downtown? Balance their checkbook?
    An outpatient geriatric assessment is typically 1½ to two hours and conducted by an interdisciplinary team. A social worker or a mental-health professional will ask about the person’s family situation. Are they living alone? Do they have support? A nurse practitioner will look at physical function. And a physician will go over medical concerns and examine the cognitive performance of the individual. Then the team pulls all these pieces together to look at what’s going on with that person.
    When someone starts being frail — having consistent difficulty doing things — an assessment of this kind is often a good idea…
    — Kaiser Health News
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/doctors-often-dont-ask-older-patients-about-the-nagging-problems-of-aging/2017/11/24/343a5564-ce39-11e7-a1a3-0d1e45a6de3d_story.html

    ReplyDelete
  19. There is a shortage of doctors specializing in older patients — here’s why that needs to change
    Published: Dec 17, 2017 11:21 p.m. ET
    BY ALESSANDRA MALITO
    ...As of last year, there were only about 7,300 certified geriatricians in the U.S. About 30% of people 65 years and older will need to be cared for by a geriatrician, according to the American Geriatrics Society’s Geriatrics Workforce Policy Studies Center, but only one geriatrician can care for a patient panel of about 700 people. That means there should be at least 20,000 geriatricians for the more than 14 million older Americans living today.
    Why the shortage? A few reasons, said Laurie Jacobs, chair of the Department of Medicine at Hackensack University Medical Center in Hackensack, N.J. and president-elect of the American Geriatrics Society. … not compensated as highly as other doctors…the average annual salary of a private practice geriatrician is $184,000, whereas the average student loan debt for a medical school graduate in 2015 was $183,000.
    Patients require more time to discuss (and sometimes repeat) instructions for medication, review previous medical history and assure no two or more medications negatively interact with one another. The time geriatricians take to speak with and treat their patients isn’t always approved by health insurance companies, and there could be poor Medicare reimbursements as a result, according to a 2009 study published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine. In addition, there aren’t enough role models for students and residents to shadow. And aging isn’t always appealing — not for doctors or society, she said.
    The need for doctors specifically caring for older Americans is exacerbated by the fact that people are living longer and may juggle numerous medical problems as they age. The fastest-growing segment of the U.S. population is the 85 and older group of Americans,…With those extended years comes the potential for more medical stressors, too. Eight in 10 people have at least one chronic disease by the time they turn 50 years old, but people 65 and older are likely to face two or more chronic illnesses, such as arthritis or dementia. It can be discouraging for future geriatricians to see that though, especially during training, Resnick said…“Old people take a long time to recover, only you don’t see that as a trainee, because now you’re on to the next patient. The field doesn’t look that appealing because of the way we train people.”
    …Even if geriatricians aren’t directly caring for older patients, their research in the fields of medicine can trickle down to help them. “We hope to have an impact on other physicians, and not just geriatricians,” Jacobs said. Because older people have ailments in all aspects of medicine — be it heart, respiratory, dental and pharmaceuticals — geriatricians’ expertise in these various specialties will assist in how they help other doctors treat their older patients.
    But there’s hope for the field, Resnick said. With a change in training and a stronger presence of a mentor, young doctors-in-training may have a newfound interest in geriatrics, especially if they had a close relationship to their own grandparents. Geriatricians also have one of the highest levels of job satisfaction of any medical specialty, only below pediatric emergency medicine, according to that 2009 study, because of their steady hours and relationships with “inspirational seniors.” The best people suited for a career in geriatricians are those who value a long-lasting relationship, prefer working in a multidisciplinary team and want challenges at work, according to a 2000 study published in Family Medicine. They also should “derive satisfaction from making seemingly small but nonetheless important changes in peoples’ lives,” the study found.
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/there-is-a-shortage-of-doctors-specializing-in-older-patients-heres-why-that-needs-to-change-2017-12-15

    ReplyDelete
  20. For Doctors, Age May Be More Than a Number
    By HAIDER JAVED WARRAICH
    JAN. 6, 2018
    …In many professions, a premium is placed on experience, with age often a surrogate for expertise — but probably no profession places more primacy on age than medicine. Nothing is more reassuring to patients than seeing a silver-haired doctor walk up to their bedside. To this day, medicine is largely an apprenticeship, with young physicians huddling around older physicians,…
    Yet, as the field evolves into one where data and evidence are beginning to outweigh anecdotes and opinions, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: In medicine, a lack of experience may not actually be a bad thing.
    A paper published last year by researchers at Harvard showed something very striking — patients being taken care of by younger doctors were less likely to die. Younger, less experienced physicians are also less likely to order unnecessary tests in both men and women, to face disciplinary action from state medical boards or be cited for improper prescription of opioid painkillers and other controlled substances. These findings are far from isolated: The majority of research shows a consistent, positive relationship between lack of experience and better quality of clinical care.
    How can this be? For one, younger doctors are more likely to adopt innovative practices, such as prescribing newer medications with fewer side effects, or learning new ways of doing procedures such as performing cardiac catheterization from the wrist rather than the groin, which is safer for patients.
    Their inexperience also allows them to be free of malignant relics from the past. Having not trained in an era steeped in medical paternalism, younger physicians are more likely to place the patient on the pedestal rather than themselves. Nowhere is this truer than at the end of life. Research shows that younger doctors are more likely to discuss important but difficult issues with critically ill patients such as prognosis, preferences for life-sustaining treatments, hospice and the place where patients may want to die.
    For all their qualities, though, young physicians are finding that opportunities to succeed are actually dwindling in medicine, which is getting more crowded at the top as doctors delay retirement. A fifth of American doctors are older than 65, a proportion expected to rise to a third by 2021…
    To move forward, recognition is needed not just for the traditional model of learning in medicine — the young learning from the old — but also for the fact that there is much that more experienced physicians can learn from young doctors. Mentorship is a two-way street, with the most successful academics also being the greatest champions of their trainees. To encourage it, mentorship needs to be formally considered a factor in academic promotions… Models also need to be developed to shorten training time, which is far too long given that the average age of physicians completing training is the early to mid-30s.
    As a young doctor, I constantly look to my mentors for guidance. Yet, at the same time, I also believe that experienced physicians need to look to younger doctors to bring a fresh perspective to health care’s most vexing questions, like developing new patient-focused models of care, disentangling the role corporate interests play in the development of medical norms and guidelines, and incorporating patients’ values in medical treatment.
    Over time, I have begun to see my lack of experience as a strength. Feeling like I have more to learn forces me to keep my eyes and ears open as I hope to learn from all those around me…
    Young doctors are ready to make health care both more innovative and patient-centric. But are the senior doctors they work with, and the patients they take care of, ready for them?
    Haider Javed Warraich, a fellow in cardiovascular medicine at Duke University Medical Center, is the author of “Modern Death: How Medicine Changed the End of Life.”
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/06/opinion/sunday/for-doctors-age-may-be-more-than-a-number.html

    ReplyDelete
  21. You’re Over 75, and You’re Healthy. Why Are You Taking a Statin?
    Paula Span
    JAN. 5, 2018
    Should a 76-year-old who doesn’t have heart disease, but does have certain risk factors for developing it, take a statin to ward off heart attacks or strokes?
    … When they entered common use in the 1990s, “it was very exciting,” said Dr. Ariela Orkaby, a geriatrician at the Harvard Medical School and lead author of a new study on statins in older adults. “Suddenly you had a drug that could reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke by 20 or 30 percent or more.”
    So current medical guidelines recommend statins for people in that no-heart-disease category, a strategy called primary prevention — but only for those up to age 75. Yet almost half of adults aged 75 and older take statins, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported.
    Some of those people probably are taking drugs that aren’t helping and can cause problems, researchers and geriatricians say. On the other hand, some older patients who likely would benefit from statins aren’t taking them.
    …To be clear: Statins make sense for adults of any age who already have heart disease, who have suffered a heart attack or stroke, or who have had arteries unblocked with a procedure like stenting. This is called secondary prevention.
    …But for people over age 75..,not sufficient evidence to reach a conclusion. As with many clinical trials, the major statin studies mostly haven’t included patients at advanced ages.
    …Dr. Orkaby and her Harvard colleagues hoped to help resolve such questions with their recent study, published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, comparing physicians over age 70 who took statins for primary prevention with those who didn’t.
    The team matched each group for 30 variables and found that over an average of seven years, statin-takers had an 18 percent lower death rate, though not a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events.
    …What’s not debatable is that while statins do effectively lower cholesterol in older people, their advantages and disadvantages add up differently than at younger ages.
    A fairly common side effect, for instance, is myalgia, muscle aches sometimes combined with fatigue. Dr. Orkaby estimates that up to 30 percent of statin takers experience this symptom.
    …Myalgia reverses when people stop taking statins (which also have more serious, but very rare, side effects). Still, many older people already struggle to remain mobile and perform daily tasks.
    At advanced ages, “it’s easier to lose your functional ability and harder to get it back,” said Dr. Lee. Further, older people often take multiple drugs. Statins interact with scores of them, including proton pump inhibitors (like Nexium), blood pressure and heart medications (like Plavix), and many antibiotics.
    Complicating the debate, the 2013 guidelines called for “high-intensity” statin therapy — high doses of atorvastatin (Lipitor) or rosuvastatin (Crestor) — for primary prevention up to age 75, for those who can tolerate it.
    …All of which argues for a thoughtful conversation for patients in their late 70s and beyond whose physicians suggest starting — or stopping — a statin.
    It can take two to five years for a statin to pay off preventively, so a healthy 80-year-old expected to live that long might well opt to take one or to continue taking one.
    “It’s a well known, proven therapy that might prevent a devastating illness,” Dr. Orkaby said. By trying different statins at different dosages, she said, patients usually can find a comfortable regimen.
    On the other hand, she routinely stops statins for nursing home residents — who are already very ill — or for elders who are frail, have life-limiting diseases, or grapple with an already daunting number of prescriptions.
    “There are a lot of unknowns,” Dr. Orkaby said. “We don’t want to do harm by prescribing a medication. And we don’t want to do harm by withholding it.”
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/health/statin-over-75.html

    ReplyDelete
  22. How an innocent Instagram photo led to a terrifying skin cancer diagnosis
    by Rheana Murray / May.07.2018
    …In November, Sarah Frei shared a photo of her beloved grandfather, John Rzeppa, grinning for the camera …
    It's a lovely photo — but unbeknownst to the family, it terrified one of Frei's Instagram followers, who quickly recognized the mark on her grandfather's face as problematic.
    "I was scrolling through Instagram one morning and I saw this picture of Sarah's grandpa and I've seen pictures of him before, but he had this very obvious melanoma on his forehead," Dr. Jennifer Mancuso, a board-certified dermatologist in Detroit told TODAY. "I think anyone would recognize it with any amount of training. I looked back at some older pictures and it was clear it was growing."
    "I started freaking out," Mancuso continued. "I knew I had to message her."
    Frei, 30, knew Mancuso as Jenny, an old friend from high school. She was concerned when she received the message and immediately alerted her mother, Linda Renema. They knew about the mark, of course, but had been told it wasn't anything to worry about.
    "When we checked and biopsied it a few years ago, they said it was just an age spot, not to worry about it," Renema told TODAY. "They did remove it with dry ice and it kind of disappeared and then gradually started to come back. But I wasn't concerned because they told me it was an age spot. In retrospect, I wish I had been."
    They made an appointment to see a doctor, where a biopsy was performed, and sure enough, Mancuso's hunch was confirmed: Rzeppa, a survivor of prostate cancer and two heart attacks, had skin cancer.
    The 91-year-old was diagnosed with melanoma, the most serious type of skin cancer. Fortunately, doctors at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit were able to remove 100 percent of the cancer. He later returned for a skin graft, and healed just in time for Frei's wedding, which was held on April 28.
    …Frei doesn't think her grandpa has any idea how popular he's become thanks to the internet, or how social media helped lead to his diagnosis and eventual cure.
    "What he said to me was that (he) just wanted to get it taken care of and get it over with, and that it was a relief to take care of it," Frei told TODAY.
    But she and her mother are both shocked by how a simple Instagram post sparked a medical journey.
    "My mom and I have talked about this a few times ... It's amazing how social media has created this platform for good things to come from it," Frei said.
    Renema, a registered nurse, agreed.
    "I think more and more, social media is going to be playing a bigger part in health care," she said. "And obviously it worked for good this time."
    https://www.today.com/health/melanoma-thanks-instagram-man-diagnosed-skin-cancer-t127304

    ReplyDelete
  23. A Doctor Speaks Out About Ageism In Medicine
    By Judith Graham
    MAY 30, 2019
    ...In medical school, physicians learn that people in the prime of life are “normal” and scant time is spent studying aging. In practice, doctors too often fail to appreciate older adults’ unique needs or to tailor treatments appropriately.
    Imagine a better way. Older adults would be seen as “different than,” not “less than.” The phases of later life would be mapped and expertise in aging would be valued, not discounted.
    With the growth of the elder population, it’s time for this to happen, argues Dr. Louise Aronson, a geriatrician and professor of medicine at the University of California-San Francisco, in her new book, “Elderhood.”
    It’s an in-depth, unusually frank exploration of biases that distort society’s view of old age and that shape dysfunctional health policies and medical practices.
    In an interview, edited for clarity and length, Aronson elaborated on these themes.
    Q: What might the stages of elderhood look like for a healthy older person?
    In their 60s and 70s, people’s joints may start to give them trouble. Their skin changes. Their hearing and eyesight deteriorate. They begin to lose muscle mass. Your brain still works, but your processing speed is slower.
    In your 80s and above, you start to develop more stiffness. You’re more likely to fall or have trouble with continence or sleeping or cognition — the so-called geriatric syndromes. You begin to change how you do what you do to compensate.
    Because bodies alter with aging, your response to treatment changes. Take a common disease like diabetes. The risks of tight blood sugar control become higher and the benefits become lower as people move into this “old old” stage. But many doctors aren’t aware of the evidence or don’t follow it.
    Q: You’ve launched an elderhood clinic at UCSF. What do you do there?
    I see anyone over age 60 in every stage of health. Last week, my youngest patient was 62 and my oldest was 102.
    I’ve been focusing on what I call the five P’s. First, the whole person — not the disease — is my foremost concern.
    Prevention comes next. Evidence shows that you can increase the strength and decrease the frailty of people through age 100. The more unfit you are, the greater the benefits from even a small amount of exercise. And yet, doctors don’t routinely prescribe exercise. I do that.
    It’s really clear that purpose, the third P, makes a huge difference in health and wellness. So, I ask people, “What are your goals and values? What makes you happy? What is it you are doing that you like best or you wish you were doing that you’re not doing anymore?” And then I try to help them make that happen.
    Many people haven’t established priorities, the fourth P. Recently, I saw a man in his 70s who’s had HIV/AIDS for a long time and who assumed he would die decades ago. He had never planned for growing older or done advance care planning. It terrified him. But now he’s thinking about what it means to be an old man and what his priorities are, something he’s finally willing to let me help him with.
    Perspective is the fifth P. When I work on this with people, I ask, “Let’s figure out a way for you to keep doing the things that are important to you. Do you need new skills? Do you need to change your environment? Do you need to do a bit of both?”
    Perspective is about how people see themselves in older age. Are you willing to adapt and compensate for some of the ways you’ve changed? This isn’t easy by any means, but I think most people can get there if we give them the right support…
    https://khn.org/news/navigating-aging-a-doctor-speaks-out-about-ageism-in-medicine/

    ReplyDelete
  24. Doctors are ageist — and it's harming older patients
    June 26, 2019
    By Liz Seegert
    …Frequently excluded from clinical trials are the very older adults the medications are meant to help — and whose changing physiology causes them to metabolize drugs differently…some doctors fail to recognize when standard medication doses are only appropriate for much younger patients.
    Yet medication-related problems are estimated to be one of the top five causes of death in those 65 and older, and a major cause of confusion, depression, falls, disability and loss of independence. One in three seniors who take five or more medications will have at least one bad drug reaction each year; two-thirds will require medical attention. And those over 65 are 2.5 times more likely to visit an emergency room for an adverse drug reaction than younger individuals.
    …We medicalize the natural process of aging, then look down on the patients who come seeking treatment while not adequately preparing the doctors they visit to address their particular needs…without a major change in the values, training and attitude of the mainstream health care community, more and more of us will be harmed when we seek care as senior citizens.
    Ageism “permeates the attitudes of medical providers, the mindset of older patients, and the structure of the health care system, having a potentially profound influence on the type and amount of care offered, requested, and received,” according to research by geriatricians Karin Ouchida and Mark Lachs for the American Society on Aging.
    …This bias is associated with new or worsening disability, poorer mental and physical health, and use of fewer preventive health services.
    …older adults were less involved in their own health care decision-making and doctors were less tolerant, less respectful and less optimistic.
    Even government health agencies like the CDC frequently lump everyone over 65 into one homogenous group. But these individuals’ remaining lifespans could easily exceed 20 or 30 years, and they’re no more alike than are infants and tweens or kindergarteners and high schoolers.
    These stereotypes matter. Many physicians, as well as older adults themselves, believe pain, fatigue, depression and dependency are a “normal” part of aging. These older patients are less likely to seek health care for themselves, and if they do, risk being undertreated. Ailments like poor hearing or cognitive decline can brand a patient as noncompliant or “difficult.” Studies show providers communicate differently with older adults…less patient, less engaged and provide less information…treatable conditions like chronic pain or arthritis are dismissed as just a part of old age.
    …The American Geriatrics Society estimates that 30 percent of people 65 and older need care from a geriatrician…in short supply. As of 2018, only about 3,600…certified geriatricians were practicing, leaving a serious gap in elder care…Primary care doctors, who can manage some of the chronic conditions common among seniors, such as diabetes and high blood pressure, are at times turning older patients away.
    One root cause is the lack of medical training to attend to the special demands of older patients…
    Medical students don’t want to specialize in elder care,…according to Louise Aronson, a geriatrician and author of Elderhood ....It’s probably because no one really wants to think about growing older and dying.
    …Some hopeful signs…senior-specific emergency departments, …to assess older patients for cognitive function, medication interactions, depression and appropriate home support…“age-friendly care,” emphasizing holistic approaches and what matters to the person, rather than subjecting them to every available invasive intervention.
    …older patients offer valuable lessons…managing complexity, demonstrating patience, effective listening, fostering inclusivity — and treating people with dignity and respect, regardless of their number of years on the planet.
    https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/doctors-are-ageist-it-s-harming-older-patients-ncna1022286

    ReplyDelete
  25. How Capitalism Exploits Our Fear of Old Age
    Getting older isn’t all loss and no gain—we may actually become happier and more emotionally resilient.
    Valerie Schloredt posted Jul 29, 2019
    …ageism against older people remains the most unexamined and commonly accepted of all our biases. Look at media, from advertising to news, that portray aging almost exclusively in terms of loss—of physical and mental abilities, rewarding work, money, romance, and dignity. That sad and often denigrating picture leads us to fear aging. To distance ourselves from our anxiety, we label older people,them as “the other,” and marginalize them—perhaps most obviously in casual, patronizing remarks to strangers.
    I’m seeing ageism a lot more clearly now that I am subject to it…In reality, we humans retain all sorts of qualities and abilities as we age.
    We’re also adaptable...we may actually get better at some things, like discarding superficial values, solving emotional problems, and appreciating life’s pleasures.
    That bonus in emotional resilience may come in handy, because we’re aging in an economically, politically, and socially volatile era. According to Applewhite, poverty rates for Americans older than 65 are increasing and 50% of the baby boom generation feel they have not saved enough to create sufficient income should they live into their 80s and 90s. And while employment discrimination against older people (40 and up) is well known but difficult to prove, half of the boomer generation doesn’t see how they will be able to retire at all, Applewhite reports.
    In her new book, Downhill from Here: Retirement Insecurity in the Age of Inequality, Katherine S. Newman looks at the current economic landscape for older Americans and concludes, “Retirement insecurity is an increasingly serious manifestation of the vast inequality that is eating away at the social fabric of America.” What is now a bad situation for many boomers could be even worse for Gen Xers and millennials when their turns come.
    So here we are, becoming more vulnerable over the years in a system that already treats people as expendable…economic systems …are the result of choices… remember that economic interdependence is intergenerational. Older people are an intrinsic part of society. Most of them have supported younger and older people in whatever ways were available. And whether working or retired, they buy products and services and pay taxes and contribute labor, support, and finances to their families and communities.
    Applewhite caps her manifesto with recommendations that strike me as parts of what could be a Great New Deal for Age. It could start with more flexibility in employment so people could have longer careers, with more time out for training, exploration, and family. Resources would be put into accessible design for public spaces, as well as programs to support mobility for people across the spectrum of age and ability. That would facilitate their inclusion in community, and they would be in good shape to take part because of improvements in health policy, clinical practice, funding, and research. And if, toward the end of life, more intensive care were needed, workers and family members doing paid and unpaid care work would be fairly compensated or supported.
    The truth is that improving systems to include older people would improve access and prosperity and quality of life for everyone…
    https://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/travel/aging-capitalism-book-movement-against-ageism-20190729

    ReplyDelete