Thursday, April 30, 2015

Homeless

Housing is a basic need, yet homelessness can happen to anyone due to factors outside of one’s personal control: increasing income inequality/poverty, cuts to government safety net programs, lack of affordable housing, discrimination, natural disasters, tragedy, serious illness or disability, loss of employment, domestic violence, evictions, etc. 


“The toughest thing about being homeless is the ageing.”--Christopher Young of homeless encampment near Airbnb’s San Francisco headquarters

"Nobody wants to be old and alone and homeless,…and their pride keeps them from asking for help.”-- Sandi Bachom, What It's Like To Be Suddenly Poor And Homeless At 70

When San Francisco’s public housing wait list, closed since 2010, opened for homeless people over a six-day period earlier this year, over 10,000 households signed up, with the average age of the head of household who applied was 66. Though older adults age 60+ make up 19% of the City’s population, they represent 34% of the City’s population that is poor—even access to SSI and Social Security benefits often fail to cover the cost of housing.

According to UCSF Professor of Medicine Margot Kushel, about half the homeless population is age 50+, and a quarter to a third of homeless seniors have significant cognitive impairment that makes it difficult to complete steps to be housed. 


Housing the Homeless
At last month’s Town Hall to End Homelessness, Arondo Washington Cox presented Camp Unity, one of a handful of self-managed, transitional tent villages in Seattle that provide a “safe and private place to live” with a strict code of conduct (sex offender and background checks, no alcohol/drugs, random drug tests) while moving every three months.  Set-up costs are $2,500 for 50 tents, plus $5,000 monthly operating cost for 50 people.  Camp amenities include shower, bathroom, electricity, washer/dryer, WiFi, communal kitchen, 24-hour security, and trash removal.  To help end homelessness, Campers have access to supportive services and 10 have graduated to permanent housing in the past year. 

How would this work in San Francisco, and for seniors and persons with disabilities? 

Estimated at around 6,400, the number of homeless on the streets of San Francisco is about the same as it was in 2005 when then Mayor Gavin Newsom launched his 10-year Plan to Abolish Chronic Homelessness, and after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake when homeless formed “Camp Agnos” outside City Hall.  In the past decade, more than 11,000 formerly homeless have been housed, while new homeless are added to the count. (Senator DiFi is seeking to revise HUD's definition of homeless to include persons doubled-up with friends or family, couch-surfing or living in single-room occupancy hotels.)  

San Francisco spends $165.7 million per year on homelessness, but millions more are needed to house the remaining thousands of homeless. (As reported in The Daily Show, Utah claims it is more cost-effective to invest $10-12,000 to house formerly homeless versus $20,000 for homeless to remain on the streets, including emergency services and jail time costs.) 
Journalist Gary Kamiya, who wrote “The Outsidersabout perpetual homelessness in the March 2015 issue of San Francisco magazine, moderated a community panel.  District 6 Supervisor Jane Kim, who spent one night in a homeless shelter, said she experienced intense boredom during the 12-hour lock-up, except for one-hour smoke break, with no services.  As a result, she has funded a pilot yoga program at Next Door shelter for its clients and minimum wage staff.  She also proposed a luxury condo sales tax to fund below-market rate housing.
Hospitality House’s Community Building Program Manager and formerly homeless Joe Wilson advocated for anti-poverty programs, in contrast to the hypocrisy of no more homeless by having shelter in the prison system, which is being used to address poverty and mental illness; and how the presence of homeless reminds people of suffering so they’re criminalized based on Elizabethan Poor Laws distinguishing the deserving versus undeserving poor.


Homeless Prevention
At this month’s Senior & Disability Action (SDA) meeting, affordable housing activist Calvin Welch talked about reforming short-term residential rental law, which could help prevent homelessness as landlords evict tenants to list rooms for short-term rentals that are a bigger factor than Ellis Act evictions. Share Better SF has proposed a ballot initiative that would cap vacation rentals to 75 nights per year, impose fines on hosting platform companies like Airbnb for listing rentals out of compliance, and require quarterly reporting to the City.  (Since February, unlimited short-term rentals are allowed when a host is present, 90 days per year of entire-house rentals by absentee hosts, and no fines/reporting requirements.) 5,000 units are taken off the market for short-term rentals. 

SF Anti-Displacement Coalition hosted all-day Tenant Rights Fair: Knowledge is Power – How to Stay in Your Home with information tables and workshops (offered in English, Chinese and Spanish) to empower tenants to defend against rising evictions that result in homelessness for persons who cannot afford market rate housing after being evicted.  Most vulnerable are long-term tenants in rent-controlled units, seniors on fixed income, and persons with disabilities who require reasonable accommodations like ground floor units in buildings without elevators (limited supply).
Section 8 – Know Your Rights presented by Bay Area Legal Aid housing staff attorney Monique Farris and Housing Rights Committee Executive Director Sara Shortt: half of Section 8 voucher holders are seniors and persons with disabilities; no new Section 8 vouchers except 100 for veterans; wait list has been closed; takes average 6 months to find landlord who will accept Section 8; pay only amount determined by Housing Authority because side payments are illegal that could lead to subsidy termination based on fraud.  Sometimes landlords no longer want to participate in Section 8, so no repairs made; in that case, tenant can contact Department of Building Inspection/Department of Public Health/Housing Authority to cite landlord; use repair and deduct with caution and only if attorney involved to avoid eviction on record.  Subsidy can be terminated if program rules violated, but right to request hearing within 10 business days of notice.
Navigating Buyouts presented by Eviction Defense Collaborative staff attorney Deepa Varma and Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus housing rights staff attorney Katherine Chu: value of buyout increases over time, so first to leave gets least money; how high can you go depends on litigation costs, rent differential, encumbrances, certainty, emotional cost, and some landlords are actually nice. 
Your building is for sale, how to stay in your home presented by Housing Rights Committee organizer Fred Sherburn-Zimmer and tenant: if you’re under rent control, nothing changes when your building is sold . . . but be prepared to organize with neighbors (power of community > power of one); estoppel form (assert any rights not specified in lease); declare protected category (senior or disabled person in Owner Move-In or Ellis Act eviction); reject new House Rules; get support (legal, friends, tenant groups, allies); pressure to drop eviction!


Homeless with Disabilities
At this month’s Mayor’s Disability Council meeting, Director of Housing Opportunities, Partnership & Engagement (HOPE) Bevan Dufty said that many homeless clients have disabilities, so his office tries to work with them to overcome problems in the shelter or services that don’t meet their needs.  Challenges include: homeless clients have to give up things because the only storage in a shelter is a drawer under the bed; married couples cannot stay together in a shelter; more clients are seniors and persons with disabilities yet shelter staff not trained to assist with activities of daily living, especially in the case of people discharged from hospital going directly to shelter.  He also mentioned last month’s launch of The Navigation Center, a one-stop shop for homeless to obtain services like case management, laundry and meals; and opening of LGBT-focused shelter (29% of City’s homeless identify as LGBT) in June.


Homeless Living
Fundraiser for St. Francis Living Room, a non-profit serving homeless and low-income older adults in the Tenderloin for over 20 years, with a weekday hot breakfast program, practical assistance and activities to promote the well-being of participants.  Hosted by Program Director Greg Moore and Board President Pedro Torres (pictured above), this full house event held at Sweet Inspiration Bakery Café had something for everyone – pasta dinner (vegetarian pesto for yours truly), meeting other supporters and Martha Boesing's wonderful Song of the Magpie performance (very cool to hear her mention St. Francis Living Room in typical day of homeless older adult)! 
Richmond Senior Center Director Linda Murley, Curry Senior Center (Tenderloin) Director David Knego, DAAS Program Analyst Maria Guillen and YMCA Central (Tenderloin) Senior Program Coordinator Gloria Garcia enjoy socializing, food and drink.
Martha’s play was based on her Faithful Fools “street retreat,” which involved living like a homeless older person in the Tenderloin for a week. She contemplated that it would be scary to live on the street, and then wondered what she would do . . . with “no house to clean”?  Her typical day was getting in and out of shelter at 7, then foraging for food, including begging people who would look right through her as if she didn’t exist.  She revealed that "seniors first" policies on lunch lines and at shelters were ways to "get us out of there ... people can't stand to look at us, it's too distressing ... it makes them think about their parents whom they've abandoned to some old people's home ... or maybe they think: 'That's where I'll end up.'" 

She talked about sleep deprivation, criticized Care Not Cash, stale food, etc.   She likened the homeless to nomads who wander, remembering a book she read that nomads were kinder and wiser than people who lived in separate square boxes.  She noted that magpies are omnivores who eat anything, moving and foraging throughout the day.
Sweet Inspiration owners Chef Michael Colter and Wendy Mogg (certified sign language interpreter) serve poppyseed cake for dessert.

Back to Nature
Ohlone tribe lived at Lands End prior to 1776 Spanish settlement in San Francisco. No one should be homeless, and I wanna sing out, "This land was made for you and me!"

Martha’s reference to nomads and foraging made me think about traditional hunter-gatherer cultures like the nomadic Ohlones, whose lifestyles were really sustainable ("kinder and wiser" except for burning belongings after a person’s death?) and starvation was unheard of so they didn’t have to practice agriculture.  It’s tragic to think that their native lands that provided such a varied diet (acorns, buckeyes, berries, nuts, seeds, mushrooms, weeds, etc.) were taken from them, replaced with government subsidies like processed wheat flour and rancid oil—recipe for Indian fry bread and diabesity. 
Coastal strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis) thrives on sandy soil: these wild berries can be eaten fresh or dried, its leaves and roots used to make tea.
Food is also medicine, like yarrow used by Ohlones to treat stomachaches and skin sores.

Nature provides an abundance of food so no one should really go hungry, especially when there are so many snails and edible plants growing wild that can be foraged. Think about perfectly edible “invasive weeds” thrown into compost bins, when they could be fed to starving people.  Even “pests” like snails in our gardens are sources of edible protein.  Eating wild brings us closer to nature.


Natives like sticky monkey flower, Indian paintbrush, seaside daisies and California poppy are drought-tolerant and natural feast for the eyes!

At Dis/Play exhibition at SOMArts Gallery, Arc of San Francisco’s ArtReach Studios students collaborated to create Magic Tree intended as a peaceful and spiritual place that can be entered alone, liberated from the crowd and free to play.
Safe to Touch wall displayed tactile art by the artists of Artful Steps within Stepping Stones Growth Center, embracing inclusion, accessibility and unification of diverse communities.

Check out California School for the Deaf visual artist David Call's Eye Hand Studio website for Deafhood Unleashed (2011), The Missing Jigsaw Pieces (2012), Resistance (2012), The Deaf Eye (2012), and The Power of ASL (2013) -- all featured in Dis/Play, as commentaries about Deaf people being oppressed by audists who focus on the hearing and speech approach to education, when Deaf people are visual learners who use natural hand signs.


At Dis/Play Closing Reception, deaf-owned and operated Mozzeria had mobile pizzeria with built-in oven serving awesome flatbread with braised greens, white garlic sauce, currants, shallot-brown sugar and brie.

18 comments:

  1. Elvis Summers Builds Tiny Home for Homeless Neighbor
    BY TIARE DUNLAP
    04/30/2015 AT 11:55 PM EDT
    "I know you told me you lived down the street, but I mean where exactly do you sleep?"
    That's the question Elvis Summers asked his new friend Smokie. Summers and Irene "Smokie" McGhee had struck up a casual friendship as McGhee, 60, stopped by his apartment most mornings to collect recyclables and chat.
    "I figured she at the very least had a cardboard box, a tarp, or something, but she had none of that," Summers, 37 tells PEOPLE. "She was like, 'Well, I don't have anything I just sleep next to the building.' "
    "I asked, 'Is there an awning or anything?' " he continues. "She was like, 'There's a chair.' "
    "That got me. I just jumped in the car and went to Home Depot. I was like, 'Screw it.' I mean I skipped on buying a little bit of food – a lot of bit of food – skipped on a couple of bills and just made it happen."
    The Seattle native then spent about five days and $500 dollars building a 3½ by 8-foot mobile house to give Smokie a safe space to sleep.
    "I felt so good," Smokie told CBS Los Angeles of her first time in her new home. "I was so relaxed. I think I must've slept half of the day.”
    News of Summers' good deed, along with a time-lapse video he made of the construction, have gained global attention.
    "There are people emailing me all over the world saying they want to help," says Summers. "I probably have one of the most vivid and large imaginations of anybody and yet I couldn't foresee this blowing up so fast and so far."
    Summers started a GoFundMe page to "build tiny houses for homeless women, men, children, U.S. veterans and families who are homeless." As of Thursday night, the page has raised more than $19,000.
    In addition to raising funds to build more houses, Summers hopes that this story will inspire others to reevaluate the assumptions they make about the homeless.
    "Since [Smokie] looks weathered and her teeth are pretty much gone," Summers says people assume she's an addict. "And it's absolutely not true."
    The do-gooder says he didn't know how Smokie became homeless until she was asked about it on a newscast.
    "I still am choking up over it," he tells PEOPLE. "She was married for a long time and had a house and her husband died. And she lost her husband and then she lost her house and that's how she ended up on the street."
    "And she does have a son but one he's got six kids of his own. Her son tries to help her but she says, 'I'm the mother and that's my son. He shouldn't be burdened having me on the couch when I should be the one taking care of him.' "
    Now that she has a roof over her head, Smokie told ABC she'd like to start looking for a job.
    Meanwhile, Summers has taken on a new job of his own: working with the LAPD to find a government-owned lot where more tiny houses could be built for the city's homeless.
    http://www.people.com/article/los-angeles-man-builds-tiny-house-homeless-woman

    ReplyDelete
  2. Roll Out the Old Unwelcome Mat: Anti-Displacement Activists Advise Potrero Hill Tenants
    By Julia Carrie Wong
    Wednesday, May 6 2015
    Last Tuesday, as people began to trickle in to an open house for what one real estate broker described as "a double whammy"— two adjacent homes on Potrero Hill featuring bay views going on the market for $1.8 million apiece —Tarin Towers was upstairs in one of the units advising a tenant on how to make the building seem like an undesirable investment.
    "Follow them arround, and if they try to open any cabinets, say, 'Do you have a search warrant?'" Towers, a 42-year-old poet and activist, suggested.
    The tenant, who asked not to be identified out of fear of antagonizing her landlord, had taped printed signs all over the walls of the two-bedroom apartment she shares with a roommate: "We feel it is important that you know that two women who are SENIORS live here, one for nearly 30 years, the other for 5 years. Please don't evict us. We will fight to stay in our home. Thank you for taking this into consideration."
    The tenant politely greeted the first broker who ducked into the apartment, but then said, "I want you to know that two seniors live here, and we are going to fight to stay."
    "Okay, no problem," the man replied. "Are my shoes okay?"
    The tenant said yes, and Towers whispered, "At the Tenant's Union they said you should make people take off their shoes because it's a pain in the ass."
    The tenant, a 61-year-old Ph.D. candidate, had just found out a few days earlier that her landlord was planning to sell the building. Such news is often the harbinger of eviction for San Franciscans these days (the real estate brokers' information sheet on the buildings boasts that the properties are a "Terrific and unique development opportunity!"), so the tenant attended the San Francisco Anti-Displacement Coalition's Tenants' Rights Fair on April 25 to gear up for a fight. That's where she met Towers, a 20-year resident of the Mission who is about to be evicted from her own apartment after a two-year battle. When Towers heard about the Potrero Hill open house, she offered to help.
    The tenants at the two properties on Potrero Hill haven't received eviction notices yet, but they all are fearful. Putting up signs and informing potential buyers that they won't go happily is a preemptive strike in a city that has seen a 54.7 percent increase in evictions over the last five years. Still, none of the tenants who were home on Tuesday seemed particularly optimistic. They all had buyouts on their minds, and none thought staying in San Francisco would be feasible.
    "If there's one thing I would change about my fight," said Towers, who has just a few weeks to find a new home, "I would have made a big deal at the open house. It wouldn't have made a difference, but it might have made me feel better."
    http://www.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/san-francisco-news-sucka-free-city-activists-housing-potrero-hill-tenants/Content?oid=3593272

    ReplyDelete
  3. Join the SF Tenants Union, Housing Rights Committee,
    Community Tenants Association, Senior and Disability Action,
    and others to support strengthening protections against evictions in SF.
    Upgrade Eviction Protections – Support Just Cause 2.0
    What is Just Cause 2.0?
    San Francisco’s “just cause” eviction protections need an upgrade. Landlords and speculators are using loopholes and aggressive tactics to force tenants out and charge higher rents. Attempted evictions are up more than 54% in the past 5 years and thousands of homes are at risk this year. In the face of this major threat to ordinary San Franciscans, we need to strengthen existing laws.
    Some of the reforms we need include:
    1. “Vacancy control” after evictions. Landlords should not be allowed to raise the rents after evictions. We need to take the profits out of evictions and help make rents more affordable. With vacancy control the next tenant moving in after the eviction would be entitled to the pre-eviction rent level.
    2. Stop “gotcha” evictions. Too many tenants are being threatened with eviction for technical or trivial lease violations. These evictions need to stop. The rent ordinance needs to be strengthened to give tenants a right to defend themselves against sham evictions and evictions on pretext.
    3. Give a cure a chance. Increasing numbers of tenants are being evicted for technical fouls such as changing roommates without making a formal request for approval or for innocent oversights and correctible transgressions. Our rent law should give tenants an opportunity to cure and keep their homes whenever it is possible to do so.
    4. Require eviction notices to include information, in English and other languages, for where tenants can get help.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Crowdfunding Thy Daily Bread
    By Jeremy Lybarger
    Wednesday, Jun 17 2015
    On a warm Friday morning in the Tenderloin, about a dozen seniors line up outside a locked door on Golden Gate Avenue... They're here to score the free breakfast — oatmeal, toast with peanut butter, fruit, yogurt, and cereal — that's served daily inside St. Francis Living Room. . . has until the end of the month to raise $50,000 to stay open through November, or it will close permanently. After missing the deadline for a key grant, the nearly 30-year-old nonprofit is attempting to crowdfund the cash.
    The tech boom has not been kind to the city's nonprofits. Shoestring budgets, a skeleton crew of volunteers, and erratic support from grantmakers force organizations to scramble to stay afloat. A final blow of rising rent is often the death knell for small outfits like St. Francis. As Bloomberg reported in November, nearly 2,000 nonprofits in the city either relocated or shut down between 2011 and 2013.
    St. Francis managed to negotiate a sweetheart lease with building owner Mercy Housing but still struggles to meet overhead costs. The San Francisco Food Bank supplies most of the food.
    Greg Moore, St. Francis's program director, knows there's nothing inherently newsworthy about another nonprofit facing extinction. "I'm curious why you're writing about us," he says when I meet him in the small bullpen that serves as the organization's administrative office.
    The answer has to do with the community St. Francis serves: homeless and low-income people age 60 and older. This is St. Francis's clientele, a vulnerable population that's growing. . .
    There are 11,000 seniors in District 6, which includes the Tenderloin; according to Moore, another 1,000 people became seniors last year alone. Moore tells me that the majority of the "50 to 80" people who eat here every day have come in at least twice a week for more than two years…
    Surveying the well-lit dining room at St. Francis, Greg Moore sees a harsher reality. "Eighty-five percent are below the federal poverty line, 30 percent are homeless, 60 to 70 percent abuse alcohol or drugs, 25 percent are veterans," he says, referring to St. Francis's clients. "These people need help."
    Ironically, the kind of help that St. Francis provides means that the organization is often neglected by grantmakers, who tend to prioritize more comprehensive treatment and intervention programs. St. Francis practices what Moore calls "case management lite": free breakfast, plus referrals to social service agencies that specialize in housing and addiction counseling…
    Although other organizations in the Tenderloin offer free breakfast, they're not always accessible to seniors. "Curry is maxed out for breakfast," Moore says, referring to Curry Senior Center on Turk Street, "and Glide is too far away." In addition, many seniors prefer services just for them. They feel uncomfortable mingling with younger clients who can sometimes be more aggressive.
    http://www.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/tenderloin-st-francis-living-room-homeless-crowdfunding-soup-kitchen/Content?oid=3722382

    ReplyDelete
  5. San Francisco's Homeless Policies Have Been a $1.5 Billion Failure
    By Jeremy Lybarger on Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:10 AM
    A major new report from the nonprofit Coalition on Homelessness investigates how criminalizing homelessness in San Francisco has only exacerbated the crisis. Much like America’s War on Drugs, the city’s crackdown on homelessness has been a costly failure, leaving in its wake people who feel victimized by the very system that’s supposed to help them.
    The report’s title, “Punishing the Poorest,” neatly sums up city policy. “Since 1981, San Francisco has passed more local measures to criminalize sleeping, sitting, or panhandling in public spaces than any other city in California,” the report states. In fact, San Francisco has 23 state and municipal anti-homeless laws on the book; the average number for other California cities is nine.
    What has been the outcome of all this progressive lawmaking? Walk any street downtown and you’ll see the answer, but the empirical data is sobering to say the least.
    As the report notes, the city has shelled out $1.5 billion on homeless services over the past decade, yet there’s still only one shelter bed for every six homeless people. Quality of life laws — those that penalize sitting or sleeping in public, among other “nuisances” — have led to mass citations and incarceration. The report finds that between October 2006 and March 2014, the SFPD issued 51,757 citations for “quality of life crimes.” Ninety percent of the report’s respondents were unable to pay their last citation, which can then lead to additional fees or even an arrest warrant.
    Nobody denies that homelessness is a complex, systemic issue — the image of a snake eating its own tail comes to mind — but, as the report suggests, the city’s rampant criminalization of homeless people only compounds the problem. . .
    In many cases, “being approached” meant being asked to relocate, often to other areas where homeless people reported feeling unsafe.
    One of the more disheartening findings in the report is that police officers rarely provided referrals to social service agencies. The argument that homeless people wouldn’t be interested anyway doesn’t change the fact that, in a better system, officers would be resources rather than displacers.
    More than half of respondents also reported being searched by police; 46 percent had their belongings confiscated. Some respondents said that among those belongings were identification cards, prescription meds, tents, blankets, and clean syringes.
    As the report makes clear, police officers aren’t social workers, and their ability to get homeless people into shelters or get them food is necessarily limited. The Department of Public Health’s Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) is supposed to fill some of those gaps. On average, however, HOT only places nine homeless people per month into permanent housing. Their ability to make significant inroads in managing the city’s homeless population is equally limited.
    Even some of the city’s more progressive efforts are a bit disingenuous. Mayor Ed Lee’s Navigation Center, an experimental indoor encampment, opened in the Mission in March; meanwhile, citations for homeless camping have tripled under Lee’s administration. Not that Mayor Lee should be the poster boy for anti-homeless policing:
    Across all of the mayoral administrations of the past thirty-five years there has never once been a concerted effort to ‘decriminalize’ homelessness, roll-back enforcement, or approach ‘quality of life’ laws from a civil rights or human rights perspective.
    …The Coalition's report acknowledges the sheer wrongheadedness of many city policies while also offering actionable recommendations.
    http://www.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2015/06/18/san-franciscos-homeless-policies-have-been-a-15-billion-failure

    ReplyDelete
  6. From Coalition on Homelessness’ Punishing the Poorest: How the Criminalization of Homelessness Perpetuates Poverty in San Francisco (p. 3):

    The management of homelessness in public space is a complex issue for a society that tolerates mass homelessness, yet that desires public spaces clear of visible poverty. Mix this impossible situation into a society that systematically punishes its poorest residents and the outcome is devastating for those experiencing homelessness. This is an ineffective and costly policy approach.
    Specific policy recommendations are offered in each section of the report and summarized in the conclusion. The overarching recommendation drawn from this study is to move away from matching increased investments in homeless services with increased criminalization toward a model that redoubles the City’s investments in housing and services while reducing the criminalization of homelessness and poverty.
    A practical approach to this policy framework would be to repeal the existing anti-homeless laws at the state level, reduce enforcement of existing anti-homeless laws, and extend the civil and human rights that are protected for housed San Franciscans to those who do not have access to homes. Alternatives to the issuance of citations and incarceration for non-violent crimes committed by homeless people, such as the provision of housing and services, would both help people resolve their homelessness and save the City millions in criminal justice expenditures.
    While these recommendations are drawn from our survey findings, they are far from novel, and are the primary recommendations from the Federal Interagency Council on Homelessness, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Right to Rest Act will be heard in California’s legislature next year to address both of these issues on the state level, but the City can realize these recommendations on its own by taking a series of concrete actions laid out in this report and conclusion.
    However, fully responding to the myriad problems in the criminalization of homelessness also requires a broader policy approach that includes: • Increased investment in affordable housing. • Increased investment in supportive health and mental health services for seniors and those with disabilities without arrest or law enforcement engagement. • Reforms to the fines, fees, and court-ordered debts applied to low-income individuals. • Avoiding unnecessary investment in excessive police personnel and jail facilities

    http://www.cohsf.org/Punishing.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  7. From Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness by U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, June 2015:

    Many of the causes of homelessness for individual adults are similar to causes of homelessness among families. People experiencing homelessness have little or no income. They cannot afford a place to live. There is insufficient affordable or subsidized housing. They may have limited access to housing opportunities because of past criminal records, substance use disorders, or untreated mental illness. Their social support networks are frail or non-existent. Survival—seeking food and shelter—becomes all-consuming. It is difficult to get a job without an address or a place to store your belongings. Mental illness and substance use disorders sometimes result in people being screened out or expelled from shelters, transitional housing, or public housing…
    Solutions include the basics: jobs that pay enough to afford a place to live, affordable housing, better access to income and work supports, and expanded access to health and behavioral health care, including trauma-informed care. Individuals become homeless because of a shortage of housing, support, and care, but also because the services that do exist are often fragmented and difficult to access. Better coordination across programs and services is needed. Mainstream programs need to pay attention to housing stability, focus on homelessness prevention, and connect people to housing resources…
    Some people are becoming chronically homeless each year, and this group is likely to include people with disabling health or behavioral health conditions who have a history of cycling in and out of jails, prisons, psychiatric hospitals, and other institutional settings, as well as other adults with disabilities who experience homelessness and are unable to return to housing.
    People experiencing chronic homelessness have high and complex service needs. Individuals experiencing chronic homelessness have high rates of mental illness and/or substance use disorders. Chronic homelessness is associated with severe symptoms of substance use, schizophrenia, and other mental health disorders. Many individuals who experience chronic homelessness have not been effectively engaged or retained in outpatient treatment and show increasingly high rates of chronic, disabling, and/or life-threatening health conditions (hypertension, asthma, HIV/AIDS, liver disease). For individuals experiencing chronic homelessness overall, there are high rates of abuse, violence, and separation from families as children, but these rates are highest among women.
    Individuals experiencing chronic homelessness also have high rates of institutionalization or incarceration. Encounters with the justice system can interrupt care, increase exposure to trauma and violence, and exacerbate health conditions. The literature on the cost of chronic homelessness is extensive and in agreement. Most of these costs are borne by the health care system due to frequent and avoidable emergency room visits, inpatient hospitalization for medical or psychiatric care, sobering centers, and nursing homes. Among individuals experiencing chronic homelessness, there is a large cohort of people born between 1954–1966, most of whom are now in their 50s. As this cohort ages, they have increasing health care needs related to chronic illness and age-related conditions that will likely lead to even higher costs.
    http://usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/USICH_OpeningDoors_Amendment2015_FINAL.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ruling against rousting sleepers gets S.F.’s attention
    By Emily Green, Bob Egelko, and Kurtis Alexander
    Sunday, August 16, 2015
    …The Department of Justice has lifted a little-known case in Boise, Idaho, into the national spotlight by declaring in a court filing that it’s unconstitutional for cities to criminalize homelessness for those who don’t have another option.
    While the Justice Department’s statement was directed only at a Boise law that forbids sleeping in public, and was not legally binding, it sent a broader signal of where the federal government stands on homelessness and showed the department’s willingness to get involved when it smells injustice.…
    “The city will evaluate this,” Christine Falvey, a spokeswoman for Mayor Ed Lee, said about the Justice Department’s position. “We don’t yet know what or if there are implications on our local ordinances, but enforcing laws that protect public safety and the health of people we serve are paramount.”
    Among the primary laws targeting homeless are a camping ban, a prohibition on blocking sidewalks and the much-publicized 2010 sit-lie law, which was sponsored by then-Mayor Gavin Newsom and approved by voters, barring sitting or lying on sidewalks between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m. The city also closes it parks, often a hideaway for the homeless, between midnight and 5 a.m.
    Roughly 11,000 citations were issued for violations of these ordinances in 2014, according to the advocacy group Coalition on Homelessness in San Francisco. The numbers do not include citations for nearly 20 additional “quality of life” laws that the group said are used to criminalize people on the streets, such as panhandling and trespassing.
    The group’s executive director, Jennifer Friedenbach, said the city should be trying to help those with no place to go, not punishing them.
    …The mayor’s office said it’s spending an extra $28.9 million this year to boost housing and services for the homeless and has budgeted for 500 new single-room-occupancy rooms with full service for people with nowhere to go.
    Still, advocates for the homeless point out that there are far more people living on the streets than the city can provide shelter for, leaving the city with cracking down as the only option.
    The Justice Department’s filing was submitted Aug. 6 in support of a private lawsuit that challenged Boise’s enforcement of ordinances against camping or sleeping on public property.
    Such laws violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment when a city lacks adequate shelter space or imposes restrictions that make shelters unavailable to groups of homeless individuals, the department said.
    “Sleeping in public is precisely the type of universal and unavoidable conduct that is necessary for human survival for homeless individuals who lack access to shelter space,” a Justice Department lawyer said in the filing to a federal judge. “If a person literally has nowhere else to go, then enforcement of the anti-camping ordinance against that person criminalizes her for being homeless…Instead, we need to work with our local government partners to provide the services people need, including legal services, to obtain permanent and stable housing.”
    San Francisco has a seemingly intractable homeless problem as well as a massive shortage of beds to house the homeless.
    Roughly 3,500 people are sleeping on the street, according to the city’s biennial homeless count, released in July, and an additional 3,200 people are homeless but make do whether it’s in shelters, transitional housing or jail. The numbers are up over a decade ago.
    The number of shelter beds, meanwhile, is roughly 1,100. On any given night, 97 percent of those beds are occupied.…
    http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Ruling-against-rousting-sleepers-gets-S-F-s-6445569.php

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sleeping is a crime in San Francisco
    By Jennifer Friedenbach on August 27, 2015
    Last week, an encampment of elderly black people near our office in the Tenderloin was cleared out. The men don’t bother folks, but they don’t move very fast either. After a while, the police officers got frustrated with how long it was taking for them to move across the street and threw their belongings in a truck. Gone went their camping gear and their medicines. No small loss when you’re suffering from extreme destitution.
    At a time when the Department of Justice is calling the citation, arrest and forced displacement of homeless people for sleeping cruel and unusual punishment, new data from the San Francisco Police Department indicates it is fully engaged in this practice.
    A total of 13,390 citations were given to homeless people last year for anti-homeless “offenses,” including panhandling, trespassing, urination/defecation, drinking in public or other activities that homeless people have no other choice but to perform in public. This amounts to 258 citations a week, or 37 a day. Of those, 11,920 citations were issued for sleeping or sitting in public spaces alone.
    The department is on track to issue 30 percent more citations this year for resting in public than in 2014, according to SFPD data. This is in direct contrast to recent statements by San Francisco policymakers that The City does not criminalize homeless people.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.
    A recent study by researchers at the UC Berkeley Human Rights Center and the Coalition on Homelessness not only found the enforcement of such laws unconstitutional, but ineffective and counterproductive. The findings indicate that the majority (70 percent) of the affected people had received at least one citation in the past year with nearly 50 percent of those living unsheltered receiving five or more. As homeless folks cannot afford to pay the fines, 90 percent of citations went unpaid.
    Unpaid tickets can lead to warrants, bad credit and arrests, all of which creates a barrier to obtaining work, housing and exiting homelessness. The current system of mass citation was also found to cost The City millions in policing and court costs.
    Meanwhile, Mayor Ed Lee announced this week that he plans to clear homeless people out for the Super Bowl party and promised them housing that has already been promised to folks at the Navigation Center.
    On Aug. 6, the DOJ filed a statement of interest brief in a case opposing an anti-camping ordinance in Boise, Idaho, on the grounds of cruel and unusual punishment. According to a press statement issued by Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the Civil Rights Division, “Criminally prosecuting those individuals for something as innocent as sleeping, when they have no safe, legal place to go, violates their constitutional rights.”
    Less then a week later, the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness took it a step futher by releasing official guidance for communities coping with the growth of homeless encampments. The guide emphasizes that forced dispersal of homeless encampments is not an appropriate intervention and can make it more difficult to have lasting positive housing and services outcomes.
    In a further step, the Department of Housing and Urban Development released statements on Aug. 17 that it is considering reductions of homeless housing and services funding for those local governments, which pass anti-homeless laws.
    This is great news for human rights, and it should be a serious wake up call for San Francisco. Housing has long been recognized as the true solution to homelessness. Our city officials need to stop relying on police and get serious.
    We have a lot of affordable housing in the pipeline; we have a lot of city-owned property. Housing for homeless people should be the priority at those sites.
    Jennifer Friedenbach is executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness.
    http://www.sfexaminer.com/sleeping-is-a-crime-in-san-francisco/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Report: SF needs to adapt services for an aging homeless population
    By Joshua Sabatini on April 11, 2016
    San Francisco’s existing system of care for homeless residents was never designed to address an older population, leaving it ill-equipped to meet the needs of today’s growing number of seniors living on the streets, says a new city report.
    More than half of San Francisco’s homeless shelter residents are age 50 or older, which has created many challenges for The City. Older homeless residents are often confused as to how to access shelter and unable to receive proper medical care.
    They are vulnerable to violence on the streets, and lack targeted outreach to connect to housing. In some cases, they end up on the streets when terminally ill, according to the “Assessment of the Needs of San Francisco Seniors and Adults with Disabilities” report.
    The report was released last month by the Department of Aging and Adult Services...
    In the report, the department supports Mayor Ed Lee’s planned creation of a homeless department as part of his budget proposal, calling it an opportunity to discuss “the unique needs of this group and a potential remodeling of the service system to reduce the presence of frail and chronically ill seniors on San Francisco’s streets.”
    San Francisco’s aging homeless population is growing, much like elsewhere in the U.S. In 2009, the median age for persons using homeless shelters in San Francisco was 45. That increased to 49 this year. Twenty percent, or 377, of the average 1,878 shelter occupants last year were age 60 or older.
    “There is a group of late stage baby boomers that has always been over-represented in the homeless population and they are now aging into the senior bracket,” Sam Dodge, The City’s homeless czar, wrote in an email to the San Francisco Examiner.
    But systems in place are unable to adequately care for the growing population because younger homeless residents were the initial targets for outreach.
    “San Francisco’s homeless system was designed for a younger homeless population needing short term treatment, but increasingly the people living on The City’s streets are struggling with chronic health conditions and physical disabilities that require continuing care,” the report said.
    …Drawing from focus groups and “informant interviews” (service providers or city staff), the report makes such statements like “violence stalks homeless seniors.” …It also provides sobering statistics, like how older homeless persons die 20 to 30 years earlier and at an up to five times higher rate than the general population of older persons, often from conventional ailments like heart disease and cancer.
    For those who are terminally ill, the options may be limited other than returning to the street. The report said that “many of the hospice facilities that serve homeless persons were created at the outset of the AIDS epidemic, and their services tend to be limited to men. Women with terminal illnesses may be more likely to be discharged from hospitals to the street.”
    When seniors are housed in supportive housing, the services are not tailored to their demographic but rather are more generic, the report said, …“Seniors in supportive housing often find their way to health treatment by way of behavioral health interventions, being [held] for psychiatric events only to end up in a skilled nursing facility,” the report said.
    Violence is also a reality for those living on the street… “The Tenderloin was seen as too risky, and some even avoided housing opportunities there, and ‘the Haight is not safe anymore,’ a development the seniors tied to a rough crowd of younger homeless adults.”
    Some seniors may choose to live on the streets and not use a portion of their social security benefits for housing costs….
    Some seniors, however, may not even be aware of their housing options…
    http://www.sfexaminer.com/report-sf-needs-adapt-services-aging-homeless-population/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Long-time Western Addition resident engaged in eviction battle
    By Nashelly Chavez on April 12, 2016 10:31 pm
    A 99-year-old woman is fighting eviction from her Western Addition home as the building’s owners claim she broke the conditions of her legal agreement, housing advocates say.
    About 30 supporters gathered at the San Francisco Supreme Court on Tuesday to show support for Iris Canada, a long-time San Francisco resident who has lived in her Western Addition apartment since the 1950s.
    Two weeks ago, Canada was served an eviction notice after a year-long legal battle with the property owners, according to housing advocates. Canada, her family and housing advocates have since sought to squash the eviction and reinstate her status as a life estate resident.
    “The bottom line is that we have a 99-year-old woman that is being evicted,” said Tommi Avicolli Mecca, an organizer with the San Francisco Housing Rights Committee. “I don’t care about the legal stuff. I care about what is going to happen to this woman.”
    Building owners claim Canada broke conditions listed in a life estate deed that she signed in 2005, according to court documents. The deed, which ensures Canada’s right to the residence until her death, was the product of a remediation agreement after the building’s owners attempted to evict her using the Ellis Act in 2002, according to Iris Merriouns, Canada’s great niece.
    The agreement ensured Canada would temporarily own the unit until her death, as long as she agreed to permanently live in the unit by herself and paid a fixed amount of money every month.
    The building owners claim Canada broke the conditions of the agreement, alleging she moved to live with family members in Oakland for more than two years and failed to keep the unit in “good condition and repair,” according to court documents.
    Family members say Canada left her home only to visit her niece, who was diagnosed with advanced cancer.
    “This litigation right now, this eviction, is a product of the landlord trying to renege on that deal and to take away that life estate,” said Laura Chiera, an attorney with the Homeless Advocacy Project, which provides legal services for the homeless and people at risk of becoming homeless.
    Mark Chernev, who is representing the building owners, did not return calls or emails from the San Francisco Examiner.
    Canada’s eviction points to a larger issue in The City, where elderly people are being pushed out of homes and onto the streets, according to Board of Supervisors President London Breed, who attended the event.
    ”The trend is clear when you see all these senior citizens on the streets,” Breed said. “They have dementia, they have mental illness issues. I’ve gone out there in the middle of the night to see what the hell is going on. And if you look, you see seniors out on the streets.”
    http://www.sfexaminer.com/long-time-western-addition-resident-engaged-eviction-battle/

    ReplyDelete
  12. Prevent and End Homelessness Among Older Adults
    By Katrina Cohens
    April 11, 2016
    More older adults are homeless or at risk of homelessness than at any time in recent history. As the population ages, more adults are aging into poverty. The lack of affordable housing and higher costs for health care and other necessities are also leaving greater numbers of older adults at risk of poverty and homelessness, and systemic economic problems are contributing to the problem.
    A Special Report by Justice in Aging, How to Prevent and End Homelessness Among Older Adults, created in partnership with The National Alliance to End Homelessness, outlines the problem and recommends policy solutions that can be put in place now to ensure that all older adults have a safe place to age in dignity, with affordable health care, and sufficient income to meet their basic needs.
    Read the paper and watch the accompanying video about Bill, a 67 year-old Oakland, CA resident who has struggled with homelessness. Please share the report with other advocates in your network by forwarding this email or sharing through social media.
    http://www.justiceinaging.org/prevent-and-end-homelessness-among-older-adults/

    ReplyDelete
  13. Homeless But at Home in San Francisco
    New America Media, Profile, Anna Challet, Posted: Jun 27, 2016
    EDITOR’S NOTE: This story is part of The San Francisco Chronicle’s SF Homeless Project.
    To the average observer, San Francisco’s homeless population might look chaotic, a sign of the widening cracks in the city’s façade. But Darnell Boyd, adrift for years and now living in a shelter in the South of Market neighborhood, not only finds structure in the chaos, but also builds it for the people around him.
    Hanging out in front of the main library recently, he saw that another homeless man was having a mental health crisis. Boyd talked the man into coming with him to Hospitality House, a drop-in service center a few blocks away, and remained with him and tried to keep him calm until the police finally had to be called.
    “There was definitely a time in my life when I wouldn’t have looked twice at him,” Boyd says. But now, here, he’s come to see people differently.
    He’s 55 and has been homeless for about ten years, in cities all over the country – Phoenix, Orlando, D.C., Denver.
    He’s one of many people in San Francisco’s aging homeless population who won’t qualify for much (if any) Social Security income when they turn 65, because their history of formal employment has been inconsistent and confined to low-wage work.
    Boyd is also an African American man living in a city that has lost most of its black residents. It’s one thing to be a black man in a city where less than 5 percent of the population is black, and another to be black in that city and not have a home.
    And yet this is where he would like to stay. Over the decade that he’s been moving around the country, he’s lived in San Francisco off and on, and he keeps coming back.
    …“Now I’m so used to being out in the streets. I’m too far gone,” he says.
    He stopped drinking last year, when he was living in San Diego. “I started running and it sweat the alcohol out of my system,” he says. He hasn’t done much running since arriving back in San Francisco in December. “Here I run and people start clutching their purses. Somebody’s going to have a heart attack if I run here!”
    He says that being poor and black is different from being poor in other communities. “We’re not like the immigrant community. The immigrant community is close-knit. With us it’s every man for himself,” he says.
    And yet it’s community that’s keeping him in San Francisco. For him, it’s become a place where people recognize him.
    He’s got a small group of guys at the shelter who get together to argue about current events. He makes a stop at the library almost every day to read the New York Times, and he follows the black papers too – the San Francisco Bay View, the L.A. Sentinel, the Washington Afro.
    Over the years, he’s also become a fixture of groups that organize on behalf of low-income people, like the Central City SRO Collaborative and Hospitality House. “I join everything,” he says. “I don’t want to sit around doing nothing.”
    At organizing meetings throughout the Tenderloin, everybody knows his name. If there’s a rally, or a budget hearing at City Hall, or a voter registration drive, he shows up. He calls himself and the people he organizes with “lobbyists for the broke.” He says that in San Francisco, it feels like poor people have a voice, and he hasn’t gotten that impression elsewhere.
    He’d like to live in an SRO, but he’s no longer worried about how he’s going to survive.
    “At this point in my life, all I need is one room and a bed and a dresser and a lamp,” he says. And, he might have added, the community he’s building for himself and the people around him. “I’m just going to continue looking out for other people around here.”
    http://newamericamedia.org/2016/06/homeless-but-at-home-in-san-francisco.php

    ReplyDelete
  14. 'I wasn't crazy.' A homeless woman proves the feds owe her $100,000.
    Petula Dvorak, The Washington Post
    Tuesday, August 23, 2016
    WASHINGTON - …80-year-old Wanda Witter. .. Her tower of three suitcases …inside those bags is all the paperwork to prove the government owes her more than $100,000. And she was right.
    "They kept thinking I was crazy, telling me to get rid of the suitcases," said Witter, a former machinist from Corning, N.Y., who is divorced and the mother of four adult children.
    "I knew, when I committed to homelessness, I had to be very careful about what I did. 'Don't do anything stupid,' I told myself. Because they'll think I'm a mental case," she said.
    She was right about that, too.
    More than a dozen years passed before Witter finally met someone who didn't think she was a nut job, who finally believed her - a social worker named Julie Turner.
    Turner, who works for the Downtown Cluster of Congregations, got a call a nine months ago from the Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless asking if she could work with Witter.
    …Instead of dismissing the hard-edged homeless woman as crazy, Turner patiently waded through the contents of her bags with her.
    "She had all the paperwork there, neatly organized, in order. She was right all along. They did owe her all that money," the 56-year-old social worker marveled.
    Witter should be getting her check from Social Security for $99,999 in the next few days, said her new attorney, Daniela de la Piedra, …That's the largest amount that the Social Security Administration can cut to get her the money fast. She might be owed even more, which would be paid out later, once all the paperwork is done.
    It will be the end of a long quest. Witter wandered the streets of Washington for about 16 years, calling the Social Security's 800-number, sending them letters and trying to get someone to listen to her predicament.
    It started after she lost her job as a machinist at Ingersoll-Rand plant in Corning, N.Y., where she made turbine and engine parts.
    So Witter . . started taking classes …raduated in three years and then went to paralegal school, where she earned her certificate.
    She thought she could find work in the nation's capital so she moved to D.C. around 1999.
    "Washington was where all the lawyers were supposed to be," she said.
    But finding work wasn't easy. Who wanted an unsmiling woman on her way to 70 who still carried herself like a machinist in their office? No one, it turned out. She got odd jobs stuffing envelopes or working in offices and ran out of money.
    Meanwhile, the Social Security benefits Witter finally decided to draw in 2006 were all over the place. The amounts ranged from $900 to $300 a month, Witter said. And she wanted to know why. She called the agency's 800 number and asked. No one had an answer.
    Sick of the imprecision, she wrote "VOID" across the checks and mailed them back, refusing to cash checks that she knew weren't right…
    "..I had business here, and I couldn't leave until it was finished. I wasn't going anywhere without the money they owe me," she said…
    When you're homeless, getting mail is difficult. The checks were returned to Social Security before they even got to Witter, …checks in '07, in '08," de la Piedra said. "Several checks came back as undeliverable, with no current address and no bank account. So by October, Social Security stopped sending checks to her….They stopped contacting her.""They kept sending me to mental counselors. I wasn't crazy. I wasn't mentally ill," she said.
    After all those years, Turner listened.
    "She needed economic help, not mental help," Turner said. "That's part of the problem with homelessness in D.C. So many cases are written off as being about mental illness. A lot of times, homelessness really is simply about economics."…
    http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/I-wasn-t-crazy-A-homeless-woman-proves-the-9179493.php

    ReplyDelete
  15. A third of the homeless people in America are over 50. I’m one of them.
    by CeliaSue Hecht Sep 29, 2016
    …Not having a home is hard. Now imagine not having a home at the age of 66.
    Elderly homelessness is on the rise. A combination of slow economic recovery from the recession and an aging baby boomer population has contributed to the rise of the 51 and older homeless population. The percentage has spiked by almost 10 points since 2007 — in 2014, the 51-and-older group represented nearly a third of the national homeless population.
    I never thought I’d be living in my car at age 66…
    I USED TO BE MIDDLE CLASS. NOW I’M NOUVEAU POOR.
    Then the recession arrived... I was running out of money fast and needed steady work…. Unemployment shot up 5 percentage points in 2009, peaking at 10 percent the next year.
    …I needed money badly, and when I turned 62 I applied for early retirement to activate my Social Security checks. At $672 a month, it wasn’t enough then, and it’s still not enough now.
    The breaking point: a terrible, dangerous roommate situation
    …put my faith into a world where I had always been able to land on my own two feet, and moved out with no solid living plans. Sadly, my story is not uncommon. Domestic abuse is cited as the main reason for immediate homelessness for 50 percent of women without homes.
    Two years later, and I’m living out of my car in search of a home…
    Across America, affordable housing is hard to come by…
    Health is the biggest risk when you’re homeless
    There are many common and outdated myths that portray homeless people as drug addicts, lazy, or mentally ill, or that they have chosen to live like this. But that certainly doesn’t describe me or most of the people that I’ve met. We do not choose to live like this. We have lost our jobs and homes in poor economic times and are struggling to get by on Social Security checks and savings.
    Yet we face so much discrimination, even by law. In most cities, it is illegal to sleep in cars, in tents, and in most public places. For this reason, I call myself “unhoused” instead of homeless, as the term is loaded with derisive connotations.
    The toll the lifestyle takes on your health is truly taxing. Lack of sleep and poor nutrition... I’m also limited by not having a home — without a refrigerator, the food won’t last a day or so. Without a stove, I cannot cook anything.
    I WAKE UP EACH DAY AND WONDER IF I’LL BE ABLE TO SURVIVE THE NEXT CRISIS
    As someone who is elderly, these problems are exacerbated. I have less flexibility, mobility, and energy than younger people. I end up having more hospital visits, which are necessary to treat the blood clots in my lungs and edema, or swelling in my legs, that has formed from prolonged periods of sitting in my car. I was in and out of the hospital 13 times this year alone, and last year I had surgery for breast cancer.
    I tire easily, and it can be hard to walk due to my swollen legs and feet…
    Homelessness is really lonely
    It can be really tough to maintain a community. People I meet are often coming and going, dying, getting arrested, hospitalized, or leaving town…Losses like these feel, and are, truly catastrophic.
    It’s been easier to maintain a social life online…
    My dog is the most important living thing in my life right now
    Unhoused people often prioritize feeding their pets over even themselves. It’s not that surprising — dogs are vital and necessary for providing comfort, protection, and companionship for women without homes, especially during this dangerous and isolated period of their lives.
    My dog, Cici, a spotted Dalmatian mix, gives me a reason to wake up in the morning…
    The crises are difficult, but so is the everyday loss of privacy and dignity
    …How can I live my life with no job, no money, and no place to go home to?...
    http://www.vox.com/first-person/2016/9/29/12941348/homeless-over-50-statistic

    ReplyDelete
  16. Man cited for eating pizza at SF bus stop
    By Steve Rubenstein
    Updated 6:54 pm, Monday, April 3, 2017
    In addition to all the other things that are against the law, there is eating at a bus stop.
    A man who bought pizza for his companion on her birthday was cited for eating pizza at a bus stop at Market and Seventh streets in San Francisco.
    “This is a real waste of police services,” said Kelley Cutler, an organizer with the Coalition on Homelessness.
    Cutler said the pizza eater, a homeless San Francisco senior citizen, brought his citation to homeless-outreach workers Friday.
    According to Cutler, a police officer cited the man March 5 after he was observed eating pizza in the bus shelter. Eating on most public transit is prohibited but the rule is rarely enforced and Cutler said she could not recall it ever being enforced at a bus shelter.
    The offense described on the citation is “eating in the shelter.”
    Cutler said the man was more amused than outraged by the ticket.
    “Some people get agitated or upset, but he was being a good sport,” Cutler said. “He laughed about it. He kept saying he bought the pizza for his friend on her birthday.”
    The citation said the man is due in court Wednesday, but Cutler said the citation would likely be dismissed if the man can show court officials he is seeking homeless services. Her client was cited for violating an ordinance against “eating or drinking in or on a system facility or vehicle in areas where those activities are prohibited by that system,” which can carry a fine of $250.
    Homeless outreach workers said Monday that they could not recall a similar instance of pizza prosecution, although another coalition worker did recall that a client of his had been cited some months ago for skateboarding on a Fulton Street sidewalk at 3 a.m., instead of in the street.
    Muni spokesman Paul Rose said he didn’t know whether it was OK or not OK to eat at a bus shelter. He said that passengers can be cited for eating on vehicles and inside Muni Metro stations but that the “food prohibition doesn’t necessarily extend to bus shelters.”
    The pizza citation, Cutler said, was what some authorities refer to as a “quality of life” enforcement.
    “The problem is, whose quality of life are you talking about?” Cutler asked. “The officer can say, ‘Move along, move along.’ The problem is, there’s nowhere to move along to.”
    http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Man-cited-for-eating-pizza-at-San-Francisco-bus-11047391.php

    ReplyDelete
  17. Falling wages, rising housing costs fuel homelessness among aging Americans
    By Stacey Burling
    Wednesday, January 16, 2019
    PHILADELPHIA — If current trends continue, the number of aging homeless people will more than double in three major metropolitan areas, straining social and medical services, a report released this week concluded. It said that improvements in housing plus services aimed at preventing medical crises could sometimes save cities money.
    The report was the work of researchers from several universities, including the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Delaware and was funded by four foundations. Data from New York, Boston and Los Angeles County were analyzed.
    Philadelphia’s homeless shelters also are struggling with an influx of older homeless people who have complex medical problems the shelters are not designed and staffed to handle. The city is working with area hospitals to provide better transitional care for homeless patients who no longer need hospital treatment but are too sick to live safely in most city shelters.
    The report said the coming boom in aging homeless people stems from younger, less educated baby boomers who faced economic challenges in their youth: falling wages and rising housing costs. A disproportionate number wound up homeless, an effect that has persisted for decades.
    Now in their 50s and 60s, they are biologically older than most people their age and already facing the medical problems of aging.
    The report projected that the number of homeless people 65 and up will grow from 570 in 2017 to 1,560 in Boston by 2030, from a little above 5,000 to 13,900 in Los Angeles, and from 2,600 to 6,900 in New York.
    The national population of people 65 or older experiencing homelessness is estimated to grow from 40,000 to 106,000 by 2030. The predicted spike is based on 30 years of existing census data.
    New York spends an average of $25,000 on homeless people age 55 to 59, a figure that rises to more than $28,000 in people aged 70 and up. That includes the cost of shelter, emergency department visits, inpatient hospitalization, and nursing-home stays. Costs hovered around $20,000 in the other cities.
    The researchers said the cities likely could save money, especially in the oldest, sickest group, by helping older homeless people find permanent housing and providing them with adequate medical and social support. They estimated that costs would rise in Boston, but that New York and Los Angeles County could save $20 million to $33 million a year by providing more housing and medical services.
    https://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Falling-wages-rising-housing-costs-fuel-13539162.php

    ReplyDelete
  18. WHY AMERICANS ARE RETIRING INTO HOMELESSNESS
    By Carly Stern
    MAR 27 2019
    AMONG OLDER HOMELESS ADULTS, 44 PERCENT BECAME HOMELESS FOR THE FIRST TIME AFTER AGE 50, ACCORDING TO THE HOPE HOME STUDY OF THE BAY AREA’S HOMELESS POPULATION.
    Researchers from the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) interviewed 350 homeless adults aged 50 and older through population-based sampling in Oakland, California, over five years (the project has been renewed, ending in 2022)… estimate that half of the single homeless adults are age 50 or older, compared to 11 percent in the early 1990s — a 354 percent uptick. This data is emblematic of a graying homeless population across the nation: America’s homeless elderly population is projected to nearly triple by 2030, according to new research encompassing New York City, Boston and Los Angeles County. And this problem spans the globe: A 2017 report on the U.K.’s homeless population found that the population of homeless people over 60 had increased 111 percent since 2009, and for those over 75 it had increased by 155 percent — compared to an increase of 48 percent in the general population.
    …This age cohort actually faced an elevated vulnerability for homelessness all their lives, says Margot Kushel, a UCSF professor of medicine who leads the HOPE HOME study. The second half of the baby-boomer generation entered the labor market during a 1970s recession. Their early adulthood coincided with the decline of unions, the Vietnam War, an era of mass incarceration and the war on drugs, Kushel says. At the same time, the federal government began to retreat from the affordable housing market: Today, the U.S. government spends roughly 30 percent of what it used to spend on subsidized affordable housing before the 1980s, she says.
    Still, historical risk factors alone don’t explain late homelessness. Only 16 percent of HOPE HOME’s participants who became homeless after age 50 had degrees higher than high school diplomas, and 63 percent worked unskilled or semi-skilled jobs. Many had physically demanding, low-paying jobs without robust benefits... And lack of quality health care, poor nutrition and insufficient time for sleep increased physical vulnerability.
    Kushel says many participants spoke about some destabilizing event after age 50. People’s bodies gave out, leaving them unable to do physical labor. A job got outsourced and they were less competitive in the market. A partner lost his or her income, or a parent with whom they lived died. Even so, there’s no single overarching narrative for these experiences, notes Kenneth Perez, a clinical research coordinator for the HOPE HOME study.
    Nationally, homelessness has been rising since 2017 following years of decline, according to the 2018 Annual Homeless Assessment Report. These new waves are outweighing successful efforts to reduce chronic homelessness through interventions like Permanent Supportive Housing and the Housing First model, Kushel says. What’s more, the physical strain of living on the streets can cause people in their 50s to display geriatric conditions typical of those in their 70s and 80s. Henwood suggests that may require shifting care models from “homeless services” to “aging programs” with staff equipped to handle conditions like dementia. Today’s shelters and permanent supportive housing weren’t designed for an aging population, says Claudia Ponath, a project manager for the UCSF study.
    “Unless and until we’re prepared to accept the fact that we’re going to have large numbers of people in their 50s, 60s and 70s living and dying on our streets, we need to act,” Kushel says. What’s more, this issue could touch anyone, though it disproportionately affects minorities …Nobody would tell 72-year-olds that they only deserve housing if they get back to work, Perez says. From a taxpayer standpoint, he notes that homelessness prevention is far less costly than interventions, just as disease prevention is cheaper than dealing with late-form illness.
    https://www.ozy.com/acumen/why-americans-are-retiring-into-homelessness/93301

    ReplyDelete