Friday, March 31, 2017

Aging in America 2017 conference highlights

Welcome mural at Hostelling International in Chicago, which offered $34 per night rate for my student/non-profit worker budget!  For the third time in five years, American Society on Aging (ASA) held its Aging in America (AiA) conference at the Hyatt Regency Chicago ($239 per night).  I volunteered again for a behind-the-scenes experience, working with ASA staff like Patricia Morazan (volunteer coordinator and fundraiser extraordinaire for homeless Petaluma senior after 15 agencies declined to help) and Steve Moore (poster coordinator and popular webinar host).
Hostel advice: forget the maps ...follow your instincts
During my daily mile-long walk from hostel to conference site, I approached Trump International Hotel and Tower (tallest reinforced concrete building in the world) as a reminder of who’s President … and the March 16, 2017 release of his “skinny budget,” which proposed a 17.9% cut in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), impacting discretionary programs “that are duplicative or have limited impact on public health and well-being.”  Trump’s budget director Mick Mulvaney defended cuts to the Community Development and Community Services Block Grant programs, which fund Meals on Wheels (MOW) in some communities, suggesting that MOW is ineffective. In response, the media quickly came to the defense of MOW.  Linda Qiu of The New York Times provided this fact check

“Meals on Wheels helps 2.4 million people each year, including 500,000 veterans and 226,000 older citizens in the three states Mr. Mulvaney specified. And a body of research shows that it does work.  Evaluation of the home-meal delivery program found that participating helped reduce feelings of loneliness and the risk of falls while improving nutrition and food security, and even decreasing government spending.
‘If you can provide these lower-cost programs and keep seniors out of nursing homes, that in essence will save money,’ said Kali S. Thomas, a professor of health services at Brown UniversityDr. Thomas’s research showed that Medicaid spending could be reduced by $109 million if all states were to increase the population of people who received home-delivered meals by 1 percent.”
SF Examiner featured Riding Along with MOW driver Viena as she delivered meals + safety checks to homebound seniors in San Francisco’s Bayview district! 
Since military spending appears to be Trump’s priority (America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again proposed increases in the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and Veterans Affairs), The Daily Show proposed militarizing MOW to trick Trump into funding the home-delivered meal program for frail, homebound seniors. 

At this year’s AiA conference, almost every session included reference to MOW...since I work with homebound seniors who rely on MOW, it was very touching to hear such overwhelming support! ASA Board Chair Bob Blancato, also Executive Director at National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs, issued this forceful statement

“While details are still emerging, it is hard to see how key programs that provide vital nutrition services to older adults, like the Older Americans Act and the Social Services Block Grant (SSBG), are not reduced. These programs now operate on the edge in terms of funding and any reductions will mean service disruptions and waiting lists for needy older adults. We intend to work individually and collectively with other aging organizations to keep this budget from ever passing.”
When I overheard Douglas (architect) and Ellen (gerontologist) Gallow’s conversation about MOW, I chimed in and learned their Ohio-based Lifespan Design Studio consulted on George W. Davis Senior Residence and Senior Center in San Francisco, one of the educational trip offerings at this summer’s IAGG Congress!

Advocacy
ASA President Bob Stein shared stage with ASA Hall of Fame Awardee Percil Stanford, who was instrumental in founding the Department of Gerontology at San Diego State University.  Stanford, a 2016 Influencer in Aging, advocated for all ages:

As our society ages, it is strategically smart to fully utilize all human assets regardless of age…Instead of embracing policies that separate ages, allocate more time toward understanding how limited resources can serve multiple age groups. Food, shelter, clothing and health care are essentials for everyone.”
During the general session, ASA Board Chair Bob Blancato told us our meeting was “not a 3,000 person group therapy session,” rather an opportunity for advocacy “to do right” because “silence is complicity.”  As a follow-up to last month’s National Call-In Day to Congress against repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Bob urged us to call Congress to Vote No on the American Health Care Act, which would cut over $800 billion from Medicaid. #itsNOTokay.
Later on Day 4 (or March 23, the 7th anniversary of ACA), we learned that Republicans cancelled vote on Trumpcare largely due to support for Medicaid.
ASA and NCOA United: A Stronger Voice for Advocacy was standing room only.  A larger venue would have been more appropriate for the announcement that ASA, which has focused on professional education and publications, joined National Council On Aging (NCOA) to advocate for low-income older adults.  While both organizations remain nonpartisan, there was discussion about the disconnect between aging advocates and seniors who "voted against their interests" by supporting Trump (who appealed to their “nostalgia, fear of danger and anxiety about social change,” according to "Trump's Graying Army" by Molly Ball of The Atlantic, yet scorned as “basket of deplorables” by candidate Hillary Clinton).
On platform: Kevin Prindiville, ASA Director; Bob Blancato, ASA Board Chair and NCOA Director; Carol Zernial, NCOA Board Chair; Howard Bedlin, VP Public Policy and Advocacy at NCOA; Richard Browdie, ASA Director and NCOA Past Chair; Josefina Carbonell, NCOA Director and former Assistant Secretary for Aging in George H.W. Bush Administration (self-described as the “token Republican”); Bill Benson, ASA Director (reminded us that advocacy is centerpiece of Older Americans Act).  When an audience member expressed disagreement with focus on low-income seniors, Howard acknowledged that modest-income white Americans might perceive low-income seniors get more benefits than deserved, e.g., better health insurance, but everyone hurts when our safety net is threatened. Next step is joint webinars to build capacity.
In Beltway Insiders Round-Up: What You Need to Know About Aging Policy Now, Amy Gotwals, Chief of Public Policy and External Affairs at National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (n4a) moderated discussion with panelists Bob Blancato, Howard Bedlin, Jennifer Dexter, and Tony Sarmiento.  They were uniformly opposed to American Health Care Act (aka "the more you need, the less you get") and Trump’s “skinny budget” proposals:
·         HHS programs (18% cut):  Low Income Energy Assistance Program, Community Development & Community Services Block Grants (include funding for MOW)
·         Elimination of Corporation for National and Community Service, which provides funding for RSVP, Senior Companion and Foster Grandparent programs

·         Elimination of Legal Services Corporation, which provides legal assistance to low-income people including seniors
·         Labor program (21% cut): Elimination of Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP), only federal program to employ low-income older adults.  Tony corrected the “alternative facts” about his organization, Senior Service America Inc. (includes SCSEP), based on Evaluation of SCSEP Process and Outcomes Study Final Report (2012), by Social Policy Research Associates and Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and Charter Oak Group SCSEP Surveys.
SFSU Gerontology Professor Brian de Vries expressed concern over the disdain for facts in reframing to advance agenda, which is so contrary to fact-checking that he requires of students (--like yours truly).  Afterwards, I mentioned to Brian that disdain for facts in this era of Post-Truth Politics seems to have started comically with Stephen Colbert’s truthiness, in which people who “know with their heart” trump people who think with their head (latter perceived as elitist).

Reframing Aging
Coming of Age in Aging America: Documentary and Discussion.  After screening the one-hour documentary Coming of Age in Aging America, Vital Pictures President and film producer Christine Herbes-Sommers moderated a panel discussion addressing the challenges and opportunities of our changing demographic:
The documentary will be broadcast on PBS stations in April and May, and a companion toolkit is in the works. [Check out video clip, Thinking Out Loud: Learning To Be Old and Interdependency, featuring late geriatrician Dennis McCullough, author of My Mother Your Mother: Embracing Slow Medicine (2008).] Christine mentioned that at age 68, with both parents deceased and after 45 years of documentary filmmaking, Coming of Age in Aging America is her last film because she will enroll in MFA in Classical Realist Painting and Drawing!

Poverty & Health Outcomes
Lisa Marsh Ryerson, President of AARP Foundation, which focuses on creating opportunities for low-income older Americans, delivered the opening general session talk, Out of the Shadows: Poverty and Other Social Determinants of Health.  She discussed 5 building blocks to eradicate poverty from a systemic view (v. individual failure):
1.     adopt integrated perspective
2.     strengthen social connections via Connect2Affect because isolation and loneliness is as bad as smoking 15 cigarettes 
3.     active listening to resist assumptions about motivation, wants and needs; instead, listen with intention to guide sustainable solutions
4.     use opportunities to collaborate and connect to services
5.     get out of silos to join others for collective impact
I was seated to right of Justice in Aging’s Kevin Prindiville who was tweeting,
as panelists spoke:
  • Candace Baldwin, Director of Strategy, Aging in Community at Capital Impact Partners, a nonprofit Community Development Financial Institution, has partnered with AARP Foundation for Age Strong initiative to invest in projects and organizations that benefit older adults
  • Bill Rivera, SVP Litigation at AARP Foundation, mentioned studying social welfare policy in Sweden, which has low poverty rate   
  • Fernando Torres-Gil, Director of the Center for Policy Research on Aging, reminded us that as we get older, we are more at risk of falling into poverty/insecurity, so we need to rebuild our social welfare safety net.
This discussion made me think about The New York Times' op-ed piece, “To Fix Health, Help the Poor” (December 9, 2011), by Elizabeth H. Bradley and Lauren A. Taylor

“It is Americans’ prerogative to continually vote down the encroachment of government programs on our free-market ideology, but recognizing the health effects of our disdain for comprehensive safety nets may well be the key to unraveling the “spend more, get less” paradox. Before we spend even more money, we should consider allocating it differently.”
They later published The American Health Care Paradox: Why Spending More Is Getting Us Less (2013), critiquing the “medicalization”—or treatment of social determinants of health as medical problems:

“Rather than relying almost solely on medicine to improve health outcomes, we could look at alternative interventions: adequate housing for people who seek shelter in emergency departments, better nutrition for those suffering from diabetes, transportation services for older adults who can no longer drive to their medical appointments safely. In some cases, such interventions might help obviate the need for additional medical care entirely, while in others they might make certain treatments more successful and efficient.” –Elizabeth H. Bradley and Lauren A. Taylor, “American Health Care: Too Much, Too Late?” The New Yorker (November 13, 2013) 
Partnering with Municipalities: Building Sustainable Bridges Between Community and Clinic:  Executive Director Lynnzy McIntosh and Implementation Director Maripat Gallas from Consortium of Older Adult Wellness (COAW) in Lakewood, CO, talked about improved health outcomes in evidence-based disease self-management and fall prevention programs by using referrals from health partners, a peer coach to support participants, $50 incentive for program completion, etc.
Introducing the National Center on Law and Elder Rights (NCLER) was presented by Directing Attorney Jennifer Goldberg (filling in for Faye Gordon, NCLER Project Director who is on maternity leave) and Executive Director Kevin Prindiville of Justice in Aging—Fighting Senior Poverty Through Law.  Starting September 2016, ACL awarded a 5-year contract to Justice in Aging to launch NCLER, a legal support center providing training (basic and advanced webinars twice a month, but no CLE credit), case consultation (email ncler@justiceinaging.org) and technical assistance to aging & disability and legal networks on topics relating to public benefits, consumer rights, housing, advance directives, etc.
Mental Health     
New Strategies for Engaging Older Adults in Behavioral Health Services: Oregon’s Tri-County Region of specialists (Shannon Baggerman and Kim Jackson of Washington County, Stephanie Barnett-Herro of Clackamas County, and Lauren Fontanarosa of Multnomah County) introduced Older Adult Behavioral Health Initiative (OABHI). The OABHI team conducted over 100 stakeholder interviews to identify challenges older adults face when attempting to access behavioral health services (both system and individual levels), service gaps, programs experiencing success, ideas for system integration and partnerships, etc.  In response to findings, the OABHI team developed the following strategies:
  • Workforce development: system navigation and clinical training (Portland State University’s training modules to increase knowledge of behavioral health issues of older adults); Behavioral Health Resource Guide for ADRC toolkit and decision flowchart to facilitate appropriate help at right time and level of care; normalize getting help (“some people find it helpful to talk to someone, would you be interested…?”); Wraparound for Older Adults with complex needs (medical, behavioral and aging)
  • Community engagement: senior center projects to incorporate talking about mental health, warmline (suicide prevention & loneliness, challenge is sustainable funding); community events (May is Older Americans and Mental Health Month, focus on strength-based resiliency, resource fairs, community night out with police, etc.)
  • Program implementation: peer support (similar to Senior Companions, but hiring challenges), PEARLS (Program to Encourage Active Rewarding Lives for Seniors)  for culturally specific providers (8 sessions delivered in-home, one-on-one, focused on problem-solving to reduce depression); Substance Abuse Relapse Prevention for Older Adults: Group Treatment Approach (2005 SAMHSA curriculum,16 group sessions to start in July, using cognitive behavioral therapy and self-management) 
  • Cross-system collaboration: suicide prevention (Suicide Prevention Council’s Get Trained To HelpZero Suicide Initiative), Dementia Task Force (Mobile Crisis Team, Mental Health Response Team, Collaborative Older Adults Solutions Team (COAST))
Mental Health and Aging Policy in the New Administration: Brian Altman, Division of Policy Innovation Director at Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) providing an update:
·         increasing trend in opioid misuse among adults age 50+ appears largely driven by adults age 50-64 (baby boom generation more likely to use psychoactive drugs compared to earlier cohorts)
·         about 95% of opioid misusers age 50+ used prescription pain relievers nonmedically without using heroin
·         opioid misuse also more prevalent among Hispanic, living in poverty, fair or poor health, with past year major depressive episode, and past year alcohol use disorder
·         protective factors include: appropriate assessment and care for physical and behavioral health issues; social connectedness; sense of purpose/meaning; resilience around change

He shared the following SAMHSA toolkits:
Trump’s “skinny budget” proposed funding SAMHSA substance abuse treatment activities, with $500 million increase to expand opioid misuse prevention, treatment and recovery services.
Edwin Walker, Acting Assistant Secretary for Aging at U.S. Administration for Community Living (ACL), shared resources from ACL’s Behavioral Health homepage and the following evidence-based programs:
  • PEARLS 
  • Healthy IDEAS (Identifying Depression, Empowering Activities for Seniors)
  • IMPACT (Improving Mood Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment) 
  • Florida BRITE (BRief Intervention and Treatment for Elders) identify non-dependent substance use/prescription medication issues and provide strategies prior to need for more extensive/specialized substance abuse treatment
  • HomeMeds medication safety program
ACL and SAMHSA have partnered with NCOA to present Older Americans Behavioral Health Series of issue briefs and webinars.  Another resource is National Coalition on Mental Health and Aging (NCMHA).


Trauma and Resilience: Understanding and Using Trauma-Informed Services with Older Adults featured panelists:



Brian Sims, psychiatrist and Senior Medical Director/Behavioral Health at National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD), said ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) have long-lasting effects on health and well-being (health-risk behaviors as coping mechanisms, chronic disease, early death); holding on to traumas eventually explode, and recommended reading The Body Keeps Score: Brain, Mind and Body in the Healing of Trauma (2014).  He said introducing medication will put out fire, but not cure; trauma-informed care considers following:

  • Ask underlying question, “what happened to you?” because experiences shape who you are
  • Symptoms = adaptation to traumatic events (abuse, loss, chronic stressors)
  • Healing happens in relationships with the power of empathy

Dr. Sims mentioned he was survivor of POT=Post-Obama Trauma 😀.



Laura Gilman, Care Management Team Manager at Jewish Family Services of Greater Kansas City, talked about Trauma Informed Care: Through Lens of Caring for Our Holocaust Survivor Community. She provided examples of triggers, particularly with institutionalization/hospitalization (medical interventions were lethal/experimental; bright lights, small confined spaces, showers; mistrust related to receiving care from unknown person) and PTSD (neurotoxicity results in cognitive/mental health challenges). She noted the impact of dementia on brain function that might worsen a trauma survivor’s response to triggers: increased potential for survivor to be living in trauma period due to short-term memory loss, and reduced ability for language expression of needs and wants. 



Tobi Abramson, Director of Geriatric Mental Health at New York City Department for the Aging, talked about Resilience and Growth After Trauma.  She shared tips to build resiliency, or transform trauma from pathology to growth:

  • encourage supportive relationships
  • create narratives to boost sense of identity and control
  • develop resilience skills to be flexible and take risks
  • practice mindfulness techniques like focus on breathing when hurt
  • understand there is no answer to “why me?” instead ask “what steps can I take to deal effectively with situation?”
  • view setbacks as experience to learn from, not to be defeated

She noted value of rumination to help reframe trauma with different outcome.  For people who cannot use language, she suggested arts (dance, music, painting, etc.) to create engagement and referred to National Center for Creative Aging.

In Embracing a Trauma-Informed Service Approach, Sue Dichter and Megan Mariner of Northern California Presbyterian Homes & Services (NCPHS) shared their experiences of working with residents during building renovation and relocation, which seemed to trigger past trauma or losses as they refused to leave or confronted hoarding problems.  Resident services coordinators devised opportunities to mitigate stress and build community, starting with safe activities like community meals (including monthly cooking classes), resident storytelling (Inviting Wolf In: Thinking About Difficult Stories, by Loren Niemer and Elizabeth Ellis), and bingo games with cleaning supplies as prizes (hint to hoarders).
 
Creative Expression 
Using Music and Technology to Drastically Improve Our Lives as We Age: Ginna Baik, Senior Care Business Strategist at CDW, partnered with  Andy Tubman, MT-BC, co-founder of Musical Health Technologies/Sing-Fit, to deliver a music health technology kit to actively engage participants in music therapy incorporating movement (beyond passively listening to music, like Music & Memory) for a multi-sensory experience in a group setting.  He inspired us to “Let’s exercise those neurons!” to the tune of Bill Withers’ “Lean on Me”:
·         listening to the lyrics (“Sometimes in our lives we all have pain, We all have sorrow But if we are wise, We know that there's always tomorrow…”)
·         clapping side by side (“Lean on me, when you're not strong, And I'll be your friend I'll help you carry on, For it won't be long 'Til I'm gonna need Somebody to lean on…”)
Andy explained how structured singing is a catalyst for biochemical and neurological change: full brain workout, neurochemical release (oxytocin, dopamine, endorphins, serotonin), respiratory benefits (increase lung capacity), immunity fortitude, and socialization.  He also reminded us that former Arizona congresswoman Gabby Giffords, who was shot in the head, credited music therapy to her speech recovery.
Before a general session, Gold Coast Encore Chorale sang the Beatles’ “When I’m 64” with choir members holding up signs with ages higher than 64 in finale!
Group Drumming for Wellness by Rachelle Norman, MT-BC, Founder of Soundscaping Source LLC, provided 10 reasons to learn an instrument as an adult.

General Sessions: Drugs and Pets
Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging President and CEO Richard Browdie moderated Ensuring Access to Affordable Treatments, sponsored by AARP (co-founded by Leonard Davis to sell insurance products) and PhRMA (trade group representing pharmaceutical industry).
  • Leigh Purvis, AARP Director of Health Services Research, discussed why older adults are particularly vulnerable to high drug costs (Medicare beneficiaries have high utilization of average 4.5 prescriptions/month; modest incomes or median income less than $25,000; limited financial resources).  
  • Lori Reilly, PhRMA EVP for Policy, Research and Membership, explained cost to develop new medicine more than doubled over past decade (on average, it takes more than 10 years and $2.6B to research and develop a new medicine, while just 12% of drug candidates that enter clinical testing are approved for use by patients).  She offered following solutions: modernize drug discovery and development process; promote value-driven healthcare; and ensure patients directly benefit from manufacturer rebates.
General session offered no opportunity for audience Q&A. On stage, there was no mention of AARP’s support of Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, which prohibited the federal government from negotiating discounts with drug companies.  Trump favors the idea of Medicare negotiating drug prices to ensure affordability for all Americans.  (See Consumer Reports' "Is There a Cure for High Drug Prices?")
Exhibit hall vendor Journeyworks displayed publications of common substances (ab)used by my clients. 
Better Together: Healthy Aging for Pets and People was moderated by Steve Dale and co-sponsored by dog food company:
  • Zara Boland discussed the power of pets in our lives, assisting in the retention of independence and quality of life, providing benefits for better physical health (pet owners have 21% fewer doctor visits, get out and about more), social connection (pet is often catalyst to start conversation, promoting civic engagement and community), and emotional well-being.
  • Steven Hannah discussed molecular nutrition to optimize longevity of dogs to address concerns of senior dog owners (less interaction, lower engagement, more loner)
  • Gerardo Perez-Camorgo talked about life stages of cats, who are considered geriatric at age 11+
  • Matt Kaeberlein’s Dog Aging Project aims to increase healthy life span of pet dogs
While I recognize the value of pets to my homebound clients, there have been times when I felt like calling ASPCA after home visits with dogs and cats confined to small indoor spaces and bouncing off the walls, ready to follow me out the door to escape outside. 
Aging in Community

Housing Older Adults: Advocating for Expanded and Appropriate Options featured the following speakers: 
Stephanie Firestone, Senior Strategic Policy Advisor at AARP Office of International Affairs discussed Diverse Housing Options: housing cost burdens rise with age, especially for renters and owners with mortgages; projected increase in senior homelessness; oldest households drive growth in single-person households through 2035; increase supply of affordable, accessible housing via incentives for builders and more effective utilization of existing housing (Accessory Dwelling Units, like Fonzi’s bachelor pad above the Cunningham’s family home garage in Happy Days TV show; or homesharing like Golden Girls).

Cindy Campbell, Director of International & Philanthropic Innovation, Office of Policy Development & Research, at U.S. Housing & Urban Development (HUD), discussed Supportive Services & Housing:
  • Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly: only 1 in 4 eligible low-income elderly households receive this assistance
  • Service Coordinators in Multifamily Housing: 2014 study noted that seniors in buildings with supportive services less likely to enter costly nursing homes and hospitals
  • Supportive Services Demonstration for Elderly Households in HUD-Assisted  Multifamily Housing: include full-time enhanced service coordinator (duties beyond information and referral) + half-time wellness nurse (to monitor health conditions and encourage self-care), subject to 4-year evaluation to measure Medicare claims to assess impacts
  • Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) assisted over 110,000 veterans, and reduced veteran homelessness by 36% between 2010 and 2015
  • Shared housing in Germany (grant to owner to make home “age-appropriate” + grant to senior to live in shared housing) and Netherlands (college student lives rent-free if provides 30 hours of care to senior at home)
Trump’s skinny budget proposed 13% cut for HUD. (Notably, on his first day as HUD secretary, 65-year-old neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson joked that he likes operating on younger people more than an "old geezer" because latter could "die in 5 years or something else.") 
Jayna Lynott, Senior Strategic Policy Advisor at AARP Public Policy Institute, presented on Age-Friendly Housing Policies, showing winner of last month’s Future of Housing: ReDefine Home Design challenge  and sharing several AARP studies:
Kathy Sykes, Senior Advisor for Aging and Public Health at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) presented on Housing and Environmental Health:
 Trump’s skinny budget proposed 31% cut for EPA.
  
Receptions

2016 Rosalinde Gilbert Innovations in Alzheimer’s Disease Caregiving Legacy Awards 



AARP hosted reception for Next Avenue’s 2016 Influencers in Aging 

 Not forgotten

AiA17’s weeklong conference in Chicago, with attendees from all 50 states and other countries, was an awesome opportunity to get beyond the San Francisco bubble.  At AiA17, particularly in light of Trump’s proposed “skinny budget,” there seemed to be greater emphasis on protecting the safety net for the most vulnerable seniors living in poverty. It was good to hear from other attendees expressing concern about the forgotten, anxious middle-class who are losing ground yet who are “trying to get along without public relief” and perhaps not income-eligible for subsidized housing, SSI, Medicaid, IHSS, SNAP, and other safety net programs.  Trump appealed to “The forgotten man and woman will never be forgotten again—his supporters were mostly white, native-born working class.

Yet, as The Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus observed in her March 17, 2017 opinion piece, “Trump wants the forgotten men and women to stay forgotten”: 

“The Republican health-care plan that Trump endorsed and the budget he just submitted cater more to the interests of the billionaires Trump chose for his Cabinet than to the lower-income, rural and older voters who formed the backbone of his electoral support. …
The new system would hurt the oldest consumers. Insurers would be free to charge those between 50 and 64 five times as much as younger enrollees; under Obamacare, that differential is limited to three times as much.” 

Rising income polarization has gutted the middle-class.  Growing income inequality seems related to growing political polarization, with like-minded people clustering themselves and rarely engaging with people of different political persuasions.

At AiA17, San Francisco presenters included Brian de Vries (LGBT Aging), Carroll Estes (Social Security), Anne Hinton (SF Tech Council), Kate Hoepke (Village Movement), Brooke Hollister (Dementia), Susan Poor (Village Movement), and Cathy Spensley (Age-Friendly Communities).  While they do awesome work, I decided to skip their sessions to learn what is happening outside of our San Francisco bubble.  I also attended the most sessions on Mental Health and Aging, which is the focus of my studies and client home visits.

Fortunately, ASA posted power point presentations on its website for conference registrants so I could access some missed sessions.  Since March is National Nutrition Month, there were several sessions on Food Insecurity and Malnutrition; some resources:
Save the date: next year’s ASA conference in San Francisco on March 26-29, 2018!

Chicago: Year of Public Art 






6 comments:

  1. How to Grapple With an Aging Population
    A new documentary, 'Coming of Age in Aging America,' advocates for change
    By Shayla SternEditorial DirectorJune 20, 2017
    Filmmaker Christine Herbes-Sommers …In her upcoming film project, Coming of Age in Aging America, she tackles difficult questions about how our country will withstand and transform to accommodate its booming population of older adults.
    Next Avenue: You have been working on Coming of Age for several years. Has the project changed since you first started working on it?
    Christine Herbes-Sommers: It’s interesting because the fundamental premise of the film has not changed in five years. The public discourse has changed in five years. We are undergoing the most transformational demographic shift in the history, which is to say as a population, not just in the United States but also abroad, we’ll have a lifespan 20 years longer than our parents or grandparents. This is huge. What do you do with those 20 years? What does that 20 years mean?
    The second point or premise of the film is that an aging society is not just about old people. It is about structures and the homes and families and the infrastructures and the transportation infrastructure that all of us rely on but were built for a different demographic. Across the board, they are built for a different demographic. How do you look at an 85-year lifespan now, which is not uncommon that when you reach the age of 65 you have an 80 percent chance of living to 85 and being healthy?
    Certainly, older adults are more active and working and living longer now. But the film seems to look at aging as a bigger, societal issue.
    Yes. It’s not what do you do with those extra 20 to 25 years, but how do you recreate the institutions of your society in order to incorporate thinking that your life is going to be longer? For so long, people thought, ‘Yeah, we get to 65 or 70 and we die’ – and we now know that is not a fact. What I hope this film does is say to everyone: ‘You have all these pieces of information. You know there are more older people out there struggling to get across the street while everyone else is pushing them over. You know it’s a strain on Social Security, and so on and so forth. You know all of that stuff, but have you connected the dots?’ These dots are big huge demographic and structural dots and we have to connect them in order to create the blueprint and groundwork for a truly productive aging society.
    How do we get to that point — especially just coming to terms with this growing society?
    A generation from now, we’re not going to be calling it an aging society. It will be the new normal. It will be what we all expect. We could either have people dying in their houses from isolation and failure of federal policy to provide Meals on Wheels and so forth, or we can say right now, ‘OK. What are the short-term possibilities, the mid-term possibilities and the long-term possibilities?’
    But that’s really the way we have to start thinking about it. Not from the perspective of how are we going to save the system, but rather, how can that system innovate to respond to these changing demographics?
    Please talk more about how the film addresses these types of possibilities for dealing with this ‘new normal.’
    In the short term, it’s knowing how to have and keep programs — like Meals on Wheels. In the long term, it’s bricks and mortar. Most older people want to age in place and most of them are living in the suburbs. The suburbs are a dreadful place to age. How do we deal with that issue? Right now it’s binary. Either you’re living in your own home or you’re shuffled off to Buffalo. There must be different possibilities there. And we really have to think about that as both a social justice issue as well as a social capital issue.
    http://www.nextavenue.org/grapple-with-aging-population/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Medicaid Cuts May Force Retirees Out of Nursing Homes
    By JORDAN RAU JUNE 24, 2017
    ORANGE, Va. — Alice Jacobs, 90, once owned a factory and horses. She has raised four children and buried two husbands.
    But years in an assisted living center drained her savings, and now she relies on Medicaid to pay for her care at Dogwood Village, a nonprofit, county-owned nursing home here.
    “You think you’ve got enough money to last all your life, and here I am,” Ms. Jacobs said.
    Medicaid pays for most of the 1.4 million people in nursing homes, like Ms. Jacobs. It covers 20 percent of all Americans and 40 percent of poor adults.
    On Thursday, Senate Republicans joined their House colleagues in proposing steep cuts to Medicaid, part of the effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Conservatives hope to roll back what they see as an expanding and costly entitlement. But little has been said about what would happen to older Americans in nursing homes if the cuts took effect.
    Under federal law, state Medicaid programs are required to cover nursing home care. But state officials decide how much to pay facilities, and states under budgetary pressure could decrease the amount they are willing to pay or restrict eligibility for coverage.
    …Many entered old age solidly middle class but turned to Medicaid, which was once thought of as a government program exclusively for the poor, after exhausting their insurance and assets.
    A combination of longer life spans and spiraling health care costs has left an estimated 64 percent of the Americans in nursing homes dependent on Medicaid…
    With more than 70 million people enrolled in Medicaid, the program certainly faces long-term financial challenges. Federal Medicaid spending is projected to grow 6 percent a year on average, rising to $650 billion in 2027 from $389 billion this year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
    Even if Congress does not repeal the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid will remain a target for cuts, experts say.
    While most Medicaid enrollees are children, pregnant women and nonelderly adults, long-term services such as nursing homes account for 42 percent of all Medicaid spending — even though only 6 percent of Medicaid enrollees use them.
    …The House health care bill targets nursing home coverage directly by requiring every state to count home equity above $560,000 in determining Medicaid eligibility…
    Dogwood Village receives about half of its $13 million annual operating costs from Medicaid, with rates from $168 to $170 a day. Some residents who come to the nursing home after a hospital stay are initially covered by Medicare, but if they stay longer than 100 days, that benefit ends, and those without savings move to Medicaid.
    “You have patients who have spent their life savings, and they come here,” said Kristen Smith, the admissions coordinator. Ms. Smith said patients now are older and sicker than they used to be, frequently arriving directly from a hospital.
    …Medicaid helps pay for care for people with disabilities,
    Major Medicaid cuts would compel Dogwood Village to cut staff, supplies and amenities — changes that would affect the quality of care for all residents, not just those on Medicaid.
    If that does not save enough money, the nursing home might have to reduce the number of Medicaid residents, said Vernon Baker, who resigned as administrator in April. “It’s not like our toilet paper or paper towels are like the Ritz-Carlton’s,” he said.
    Some residents do not even know they are on government insurance; administrators often complete the paperwork to start Medicaid once other insurance expires. Others are embarrassed that they are dependent on a program that still carries stigma.
    They should not be, said Jennifer Harper, the assistant director of nursing. Relying on Medicaid for nursing home care has become the new normal...
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/24/science/medicaid-cutbacks-elderly-nursing-homes.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plan on Growing Old? Then the Medicaid Debate Affects You
    Your Money
    By RON LIEBER JUNE 30, 2017
    ...One in three people who turn 65 end up in a nursing home at some point. Among the people living in one today, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 62 percent cannot pay the bill on their own.
    And when that happens, Medicaid pays. The very Medicaid program that stands to have hundreds of billions of dollars less to spend if anything like the health care bills on the table in Washington come to pass.
    …Reality forces our hand, however, when the first nursing home bills arrive. The average annual cost is $82,128 for a semiprivate room, according to Genworth, which sells insurance that can help pay those bills. Most people can’t pay that amount and certainly not for long, especially after 10 or 20 years of retirement spending…
    Ask around. Someone you know has quietly faced these facts and probably turned to Medicaid. Chances are, you, a family member or a close friend will someday, too.
    …So if anything like the proposed cuts come to pass, the impact will be meaningful. In addition to nursing homes, Medicaid may also pay for home- and community-based care for older adults,…
    How does this all trickle down to an individual? First, you need to qualify for Medicaid. This will depend on your income, assets and condition. Each state has its own rules, and a federal website provides links to all of them. In general, you have to be pretty close to destitute, with certain important exceptions related to homes and spouses, among other things.
    The most detailed, plain-English guide I’ve found to the rules so far is called “How to Protect Your Family’s Assets From Devastating Nursing Home Costs.” As the title suggests, an entire industry has grown up around helping people qualify for Medicaid while still having something left for spouses and heirs…
    Medicaid must pay for nursing homes, but not every nursing home takes Medicaid patients. Nor do the ones that do accept Medicaid patients have to let in every Medicaid patient who wants an empty bed. That means that people with at least some ability to pay at the beginning of their care may have an advantage getting a bed at their favored nursing home...But many people don’t want to be in a nursing home at all. They would much rather live in their own residence for as long as possible. This is where things get tricky, and where the various proposals in Congress could make a big difference. Medicaid must cover nursing home care, but state Medicaid plans don’t have to cover community- or home-based care that might allow you to stay out of a nursing home for some period of time or forever.
    …Advocates for seniors and the industries that serve them are in general agreement here: that care at home and in your nearby community will probably be cut first, given that Medicaid isn’t required to pay for that but is required to pay for nursing home care.
    Once Medicaid administrators push that domino, here’s how the rest of them might fall. People who cannot get care in the community or at home will simply make different choices if they meet the eligibility requirements.
    “They will end up in nursing homes, when they could have been cared for at home,” said Joe Caldwell, director of long-term services and supports policy at the National Council on Aging. “And nursing homes are way more expensive.” How much? Close to three times as much.
    If they tough it out at home without the help they need, they may become injured or sick. That could lead to a hospital stay that’s even more expensive than a nursing home. And who picks up the tab for that? The federal government, except Medicare this time and not Medicaid (which states contribute to as well).
    So to review, big Medicaid cuts could lead all of us to miss out on the care that many of us like best — and costs the government the least — because it will be cut first…
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/your-money/plan-on-growing-old-then-the-medicaid-debate-affects-you.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. A Proven Commitment to Providing Food Security
    Mayor Edwin M. Lee
    Jul 21, 2017
    For many San Francisco residents, home-delivered meal programs provide so much more than nutritious food options and warm dinners. These organizations are the gateways to warm conversations, caring companionship and much-needed human interaction for seniors, persons with disabilities, and families in need.
    Sadly, these critical service providers are under attack.
    The current administration’s proposed federal budget would cut the Community Development Block Grant program, a crucial source of funding for home-delivered meals. Other vital programs that support nutrition initiatives are being dramatically reduced, imperiling the food security of millions of residents across the country.
    Many of the beneficiaries from these programs are seniors with limited mobility options, leaving them unable to travel to a local grocery store. Others live in disadvantaged communities that do not have nearby healthy food alternatives — areas commonly referred to as food deserts.
    Enrollees in these programs are often tied to fixed incomes, making the stability and reliability of home-delivered meals crucial to their health and wellbeing. And there are precious few outside resources for those who enroll in these programs — 70 percent of the enrollees are seniors who live in poverty, and many live in Single Room Occupancy (SRO) units that lack cooking facilities.
    With these proposed rollbacks potentially threatening many of our important non-profit partners, we need to support them at the local level. That is why our proposed budget includes $9.6 million annually for our home-meal delivery programs, assisting organizations such as Meals on Wheels, Self Help for the Elderly, and Centro Latino de San Francisco.
    Overall, my annual budget includes a total of $18.7 million in nutritional initiatives, which include community meals and grocery delivery services in addition to home-delivered meal programs. That more than doubles the funding levels from seven years ago, when I first took office.
    Our community meal programs help feed veterans, and cater to the diverse ethnic makeup of San Francisco, serving up Chinese, Kosher, Russian, and Samoan-Hawaiian cuisines, among others. Last year, home-delivered meal programs contracted by the Department of Aging and Adult Services delivered more than 1 million meals through community dining programs and nearly 2 million home-delivered meals.
    Without support from the city, our non-profit partners would struggle to meet the growing demands of their clients. During the next 20 years, the number of senior residents in San Francisco is projected to grow by 100,000.
    Our country continues to experience great upheavals, and our vulnerable communities are the most susceptible to these tumultuous changes. We are doing our part to ensure that no San Francisco resident goes hungry because of some misguided policy developed in Washington D.C.
    https://medium.com/@mayoredlee/a-proven-commitment-to-providing-food-security-3afcc362ef4b

    ReplyDelete
  5. Home-delivered meals might reduce ER visits, study suggests
    By Carolyn Y. Johnson April 2
    Delivering meals to vulnerable sick people might be a simple way to cut back on emergency room visits and hospitalizations, reining in some of the costliest kinds of medical care, according to a new Health Affairs study.
    Low-income seniors or disabled younger people who received home-delivered meals — particularly meals designed by a dietitian for that person's specific medical needs — had fewer emergency visits and lower medical spending than a similar group of people who did not receive meal deliveries.
    “This is an excellent study that really points out, again, how important it is to get food to people,” said Craig Gundersen, a professor of agricultural strategy at the University of Illinois, who was not involved in the study. “Some people's response is that will drive up the federal budget, which on one hand it does. But on the other hand, we have to look at the cost savings associated with this ... [through] non-trivial reductions in health-care costs in our country.”
    There's growing evidence that the forces that shape health aren't just access to medicines, doctor's visits or surgeries, but factors such as the neighborhoods people live in, economic security and access to housing or transportation. These social factors that contribute powerfully to people's health have not traditionally been seen as part of the medical system, but they are a growing area of interest for health-insurance companies interested in containing costs. People who lack reliable access to food are responsible for $77.5 billion per year in excess health-care expenditures, according to one analysis.
    The study drew its participants from the Commonwealth Care Alliance, a nonprofit community-based health plan in Massachusetts that provides coverage to people who are eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare. People who qualify for both programs tend to be poor with complicated health problems, and the health plan offered enrollment in a regular home-delivery meal program or one that was tailored to the patient's specific dietary needs.
    People who received medically tailored meals had about 1.5 fewer emergency room visits, on average, over a 19-month period, compared with a similar group that did not receive meals. They were hospitalized about half as often. People who received home-delivered meals saw a smaller reduction in emergency room visits.
    “We do know that people, when they face food insecurity, often make a lot of trade-offs: Do I pay for my food? Do I pay for my medicine?” said Seth Berkowitz, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who led the work. “Not knowing where your next meal is coming from is stressful. It may be difficult to manage your chronic condition when you’re worrying about that.”
    Unlike a gold-standard medical trial, in which people would have been randomly assigned into groups that either received the meals or did not, the researchers created comparison groups that closely matched the demographic and health conditions of the people who received meals. That's a major limitation of the study, since it's possible that those who received meals had other characteristics that accounted for their lower use of emergency and hospital services.
    While it doesn't prove that the meals were the cause of the decreased dependence on the emergency room, the study provides a tantalizing hint that providing meals could help people avoid costly medical care. The people who received a medically tailored diet spent $220 less per month than the comparison group. Those who received meals at home saved $10 per month….
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/04/02/study-suggests-home-delivered-meals-might-reduce-er-visits/

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ben Carson says he’s raising rents to put poor Americans to work. But in the District, the majority are either elderly, disabled or already at work
    By Hannah Natanson July 13
    Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson has said his proposal to raise rents for America’s poorest citizens will force low-income tenants to find jobs and become more self-sufficient. But in D.C. — where his proposal will likely cause a larger increase in rent than any of the 50 states would see — that rationale does not stand up to scrutiny, housing experts and advocates say.
    More than half — 53 percent — of D.C. residents receiving federal rental assistance are elderly or disabled, according to data compiled by the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Even if their rents go up, most of these individuals are physically unable to work, said Claire Zippel of the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute…
    Carson’s plan, announced in April, would cause the rent paid by extremely low-income Americans to at least triple. If approved by Congress, the proposal would increase the monthly minimum rent charged by public-housing facilities from $50 to $150. It would also raise the rent paid by tenants in subsidized housing from 30 percent of adjusted income to 35 percent of gross income.
    Under the plan, individuals who are over the age of 65 or are disabled will be exempt from the rent increases for six years, though they could start seeing incremental raises within three years, according to Will Fischer of CBPP. Nationwide, seniors and disabled people make up more than half of the 4.7 million families who receive federal subsidies, HUD officials have said.
    The proposal is currently in draft form; to advance the plan, HUD must next ask a member of Congress to formally introduce it as a bill.
    In a recent interview with Fox News, Carson said the plan marks the administration’s effort to “give poor people a way out of poverty.”
    …Zippel, though, said she thinks Carson’s strategy is unlikely to push the majority of those affected out of poverty.
    “If you’re elderly or disabled you may have many barriers to finding work and might not in many cases be physically or mentally capable of working,” Zippel said. “Elderly and disabled people are probably not the kind of folks who we want to be pushing into the labor market because they can’t work.”
    …Carson’s plan comes on the heels of a broader Trump administration crackdown on safety net programs and repeated assertions from federal officials that extremely low-income Americans need to get back to work. State legislators around the country are also turning to increasingly aggressive tactics to force the poor into the workforce.
    At a rally in Missouri in November 2017, President Donald Trump vowed to prioritize reforming the social welfare system and described what he sees as a typical recipient of federal assistance.
    “I know people, they work three jobs and they live next to somebody who doesn’t work at all,” Trump said then. “And the person who’s not working at all and has no intention of working at all is making more money and doing better than the person that’s working his and her ass off.”
    Housing experts say this portrayal of America’s poorest — from the president and from other officials — is wildly off-base, especially in the District. Fischer pointed to a disconnect between government rhetoric and the actual makeup of America’s poorest citizens. Zippel said the “image that’s been presented” of households aided by federal rental programs is a “misconception.”
    “It seems like a punitive solution in search of a problem that doesn’t quite exist,” Zippel said, referring to Carson’s plan.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/ben-carson-says-hes-raising-rents-to-put-poor-americans-to-work--but-in-the-district-the-majority-are-either-elderly-or-disabled-or-already-work/2018/07/13/b85866a0-8127-11e8-b658-4f4d2a1aeef1_story.html

    ReplyDelete