fa·cil·i·ty (fə-sĭl′ĭ-tē)
n. pl. fa·cil·i·ties
2. often facilities
a. A building, room, array of equipment, or a number of such things, designed to serve a
particular function: hospitals and other health care facilities.
b. Something that facilitates an action or process: The region has very poor transportation
facilities.
3. facilities Informal A restroom or public toilet.
facility. (n.d.) American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition.(2011). Retrieved September 30 2018 from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/facility
My response was a surprise to some who knew me as a gerontology student, focused on home- and community-based
services to facilitate aging in place. But as a gerontologist three
years after graduation, I decided to be intentional in gaining experience at
every level in the continuum of care which includes facilities, such as Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE, aka Assisted Living) and Skilled Nursing Facilities
(SNF). I have avoided working at for-profit
facilities because resident care means more than profits (though I was fine
working at for-profit accounting and financial organizations prior to launching
my gerontology career). Also, I have
observed how residents with complex medical needs are underserved at RCFEs, and
ought to receive more appropriate care at SNF. In
any case, I have remained focused on health promotion and wellness throughout
the continuum of care.
SFSU Gerontology Program
Coordinator Darlene Yee-Melichar and San Francisco Aging & Adult Services
Commission Advisory Council President Leon Schmidt welcomed attendees in Library Special Events Room filled to capacity. (Took photos from front row, where I was seated next to fellow SFSU Gerontology alumna and solo ager Betty Burr.)
Keynote speaker Scott Wiener, State
Senator, discussed
his Legislative Agenda for Seniors in the SF Bay Area: his authoring of SB 219
LGBT Bill of Rights in Long-Term Care (LTC) and SB 2021 Extending Prescription
Drug Co-Pay Limits; ongoing efforts to ensure all seniors have access to
housing, nutrition and health care; livable wage for IHSS workers so seniors can
age in home; and “if they’re in assisted living or nursing home (facilities), make
it a positive experience.” He also commended 30th Street Senior
Center for its meals and supportive services so seniors are not isolated.
SFSU Gerontology Advisory Council
President and alumnus Tom Berry, with Openhouse co-founder Marcy Adelman and Darlene
Yee-Melichar, presented Distinguished LTC Advocate Award to Senator
Wiener.
Close-up of LTC Advocate Award
30th Street Senior Center Director Valorie Villela
and Beth Macleod, LCSW.
SFSU Gerontology alumna and
Eldercare Advocacy Bay Area Founder Cristina Flores with her mother and daughter –
three generations, though they appear to be from the same generation?!
Professor Yee presented Developing Gerontology Workforce Competency to Promote Healthy Aging &
LTC. She predicted growth in nursing home care because demand will drive supply, as baby boomers age into the
oldest-old (age 85+) with higher level of care needs in the next 10 to 20
years. Graduate gerontology students can
complete 480 hour internship as SNF Administrator-In-Training (AIT); without a
master’s degree, the state requires completion of 1,000 hours SNF AIT.
DAAS Program Analyst and urban planner
Valerie Coleman presented Age & Disability Friendly SF, noting San
Francisco is unique in including “Disability” to Age-friendly initiative that began implementation this year.
Hey, that’s my photo of Dance
Generators (with Beth Macleod) performance at 2015 Party with a Purpose celebration of Long-Term Care Coordinating Council's 10th Anniversary, from blog post at http://geronature.blogspot.com/2015/10/aging-disability-friendly-san-francisco.html!
Gwen Harris, SFSU Gerontology alumna
and Geriatric Care Manager, presented on Palliative Care & Quality of
Life. She recommended that every 18 year
old should be given voter registration and Advance Care Directive.
At this month’s SF End-of-Life
Network meeting held at Cypress Golden Gate (RCFE), Art for Recovery Program
Director Cindy Perlis discussed her 30 years of art therapy with cancer
patients at UCSF.
Eat a rainbow of colorful doughnuts
for breakfast at Pathways to Improved Care: Rehabilitation Symposium at Laguna Honda!
Paul Christopher Focht, Aud.D., presented
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hearing
Impairment. He conducts otoscopic
inspection of the ear canal for cerumen (aka “earwax”) buildup that can cause problems
with hearing and balance, which increase risks for cognitive decline and falling. When we age, cerumen impaction is more common because the cerumen is much drier so it gets hard and creates a
plug. As many as two-thirds of residents in LTC facilities may suffer from cerumen impaction, and Medicare covered nearly 1.7 million impaction removal procedures at a cost of more than $51 million in 2016!
Older Americans (age 65+)
continue to make themselves heard during elections. In 2016, their turnout rate was 70.9%, the highest
of any age group. The majority (51%) voted for Trump, with the
strongest support from older white men (59%) and older white women (53%).
Ian Haney Lopez, UC Berkeley Law
Professor and author of Dog Whistle
Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism & Wrecked the Middle Class (2014), talked about The Future of Whiteness at Rights
and Wrongs: A Constitution Day Conference at SFSU. He presented a crash course on how political
strategists have exploited racial pandering to build resentment toward government, manipulating voters into
supporting policies that favor the wealthy. Starting with the 1964 Southern Strategy, they could appeal to rising anxiety/fear among whites to break the New
Deal coalition, bringing race into politics—not in name, but “code” such as law
and order, state’s rights, Silent Majority, Real American, end welfare as we know it, etc.
Similar to Reframing Aging, Ian seeks to reframe the Race-Class Narrative for cross-racial solidarity and shared
prosperity. High levels of inequality negatively affect even the affluent, possibly because inequality reduces social cohesion so everyone suffers.
Check out video, “We Must Talk About Race to Fix Economic Inequality.”
Cal State University (CSU):"As the CSU got darker, funding got lighter"
When I invited Marc Dollinger, SFSU Richard and Rhoda Goldman Chair of Jewish Studies and Social Responsibility, to speak at a RCFE about his new book Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in the 1960s, he cautioned that he sometimes found that “older crowds are not as excited or engaged” with his presentation because “it could represent a revision of their own memory,” and offered a less risky topic based on his three other books. My response was bring it on! with excitement that Marc’s new book presented a challenging perspective that would take us out of our comfort zone and stimulate brain connectivity! We learned new vocabulary, filiopietistic (ethnic self-congratulations, like aren’t Jews great?) historiographic analysis (the interpretation of the writing of history over time).
Cal State University (CSU):"As the CSU got darker, funding got lighter"
When I invited Marc Dollinger, SFSU Richard and Rhoda Goldman Chair of Jewish Studies and Social Responsibility, to speak at a RCFE about his new book Black Power, Jewish Politics: Reinventing the Alliance in the 1960s, he cautioned that he sometimes found that “older crowds are not as excited or engaged” with his presentation because “it could represent a revision of their own memory,” and offered a less risky topic based on his three other books. My response was bring it on! with excitement that Marc’s new book presented a challenging perspective that would take us out of our comfort zone and stimulate brain connectivity! We learned new vocabulary, filiopietistic (ethnic self-congratulations, like aren’t Jews great?) historiographic analysis (the interpretation of the writing of history over time).
Elderly, conservatives shared more Facebook fakery in 2016
ReplyDeleteBy Seth Borenstein
Published 4:28 pm PST, Friday, January 11, 2019
Sharing false information on Facebook is old.
People older than 65 and ultraconservatives shared about seven times more fake information masquerading as news on the social media site than younger adults, moderates and super liberals during the 2016 election season, a new study finds.
The first major study to look at who is sharing links from debunked sites finds that not many people are doing it. On average only 8.5 percent of those studied — about 1 person out of 12 — shared false information during the 2016 campaign, according to the study published last week in the journal Science Advances. But those doing it tend to be older and more conservative.
“For something to be viral you’ve got to know who shares it,” said study co-author Jonathan Nagler, a politics professor and co-director of the Social Media and Political Participation Lab at New York University. “Wow, old people are much more likely than young people to do this.”
Facebook and other social media companies were caught off guard in 2016 when Russian agents exploited their platforms to meddle with the U.S. presidential election by spreading fake news, impersonating Americans and running targeted advertisements to try to sway votes. Since then, the companies have thrown millions of dollars and thousands of people into fighting false information.
…When other demographic factors and overall posting tendencies are factored in, the average person older than 65 shared seven times more false information than those between 18 and 29. The seniors shared more than twice as many fake stories as people between 45 and 64 and more than three times that of people in the 30- to 44-year-old range, said lead study author Andrew Guess, a politics professor at Princeton.
The simplest theory for why older people share more false information is a lack of “digital literacy,” said study co-author Joshua Tucker, also co-director of the NYU social media political lab. Senior citizens may not tell truth from lies on social networks as easily as others, the researchers said.
Harvard public policy and communication professor Matthew Baum, who was not part of the study but praised it, said he thinks sharing false information is “less about beliefs in the facts of a story than about signaling one’s partisan identity.” That’s why efforts to correct fakery don’t really change attitudes and one reason few people share false information, he said.
…Nagler said he was not surprised that conservatives in 2016 shared more fake information, but he and his colleagues said that does not necessarily mean that conservatives are by nature more gullible when it comes to false stories. It could simply reflect that there was much more pro-Trump and anti-Clinton false information in circulation in 2016 that it drove the numbers for sharing, they said.
However, Baum said in an email that conservatives post more false information because they tend to be more extreme, with less ideological variation than their liberal counterparts and they take their lead from President Trump, who “advocates, supports, shares and produces fake news/misinformation on a regular basis.”
…MIT’s Deb Roy, a former Twitter chief media scientist, said the problem is that the American news diet is “full of Balkanized narratives” with people seeking information that they agree with and calling true news that they don’t agree with fake.
“What a mess,” Roy said.
Seth Borenstein is an Associated Press writer.
https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Elderly-conservatives-shared-more-Facebook-13527831.php