Showing posts with label filial piety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label filial piety. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 30, 2021

National Family Caregivers Month

According to Recognize, Assist, Include, Support, Engage (RAISE) Act Family Caregiving Advisory Council’s Initial Report to Congress (Sep. 2021): 

·       In USA, 1 in 7 people is a caregiver and more than 2/3 of people will need assistance with daily tasks as they age.

·       In USA, more than 53 million family caregivers provide approximately $470 billion in unpaid support annually for their loved ones to be able to live in their communities.

·       Family caregivers often provide support without a formal assessment of their needs or of the person receiving support; learn “on the job,” taking on complex medical, administrative and care coordination activities.

·       Lost income due to family caregiving is estimated at $522 billion each year.

Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers’ Working While Caring: A National Survey of Caregiver Stress in the U.S. Workforce (Sep. 28, 2021) found that 1 in 5 full-time workers care for a family member with a serious illness/disability; nearly 20% of them quit a job to care for a relative, while 44% switched to part-time work. Rosalynn Carter has advocated for establishment of a new Office of Caregiver Health, within the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, intended to improve coordination within the bureaucracy. 

My Administration is committed to strengthening American families and easing the burdens of caregiving.  That is why my American Rescue Plan provided an additional $145 million in funding for the National Family Caregiver Support Program,…also provided States with additional Medicaid funding to strengthen and enhance their home- and community-based services (HCBS) program.  My Administration’s Build Back Better agenda will build on this down payment by continuing to invest in the caregiving infrastructure for HCBS and increasing pay and benefits to address the direct care workforce crisis.  I will also fight to expand paid family and medical leave nationwide.  Each of these elements is critical to better supporting family caregivers.

--Joseph R. Biden, Jr., A Proclamation on National Family Caregivers Month (Oct. 29, 2021) 

It takes a village + infrastructure, like job-protected leave and healthcare coverage, to support family care partners.

·       Effective Jan. 1, 2022, California Family Rights Act (AB 1033) expanded to grant eligible employees up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave to care for parent-in-law with a serious medical condition. 

·       Effective Jan. 1, 2023, Parent Health Care Act (AB 570) will allow adult children to add their parents/step parents (who are not eligible for Medicare) as dependents to their individual health insurance coverage. 

https://twitter.com/CaregiverAction/status/1457888929127014402 

This year’s NFCM theme is #CaregiverAnd, which encourages family caregivers to “celebrate the passions and interests that enrich their lives.” 

During the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, many family caregivers were on their own without the usual respite supports from other relatives/neighbors/friends (as people formed their own pods/bubbles) and formal supports like home health/adult day centers/congregate care settings. Compared to non-caregivers during this pandemic, research found that family caregivers experienced higher rates of anxiety, depression and disturbed sleep; and reported less social interaction, more worries about finances and food, even after controlling for income and employment. Caregivers who fared the worst were female, young, lower-income, and providing care for people with cognitive disabilities (dementia) or behavioral/emotional problems. 

According to UCLA study, Who Is Caring for the Caregivers? The Financial, Physical, and Mental Health Costs of Caregiving in California (Nov. 29, 2021): 

·       In 2020, 1 in 4 California caregivers provided 20+ hours of care to a family member/friend in a typical week, yet only 1 in 11 received payment for any of the hours spent providing care

·       Majority of caregivers in California are women (57.7%), middle age or ages 26-64 (67.5%) and provide care to mainly older adults ages 65+(64.7%).

·       Nearly half (44.4%) of California’s estimated 6.7 million adult caregivers reported experiencing some level of financial stress in 2020 due to their role.

·       About 1 in 5 (20.9%) caregivers reported that caring for their relative/friend was somewhat to extremely financially stressful.

·       1 in 7 caregivers (13.5%) reported a physical or mental health problem within the past 12 months due to caregiving.

Aging boomers in later life have fewer family members to rely on for caregiving (due to never married, divorce, no kids, etc.). (China has recognized tradition of family caregiversand “Confronted By Aging Population China Allows Couples To Have Three Children.”) 

“I’m a single woman, so I say mom has me, but I don’t have a me.”—Lily Liu, who took “gap year” from her job to set-up infrastructure of care for her mom, featured in AARP documentary, Caregiving: The Circle of Love (2016) 


AARP hosted Beyond the Burnout: A Morning Forum for Caregivers. Lily Liu, former AARP archivist/historian, has been caregiver for her 90-year-old mother diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease for past 40 years and more recently dementia; she decided not to bring home care aides during pandemic due to risk of infection. Lily talked about her nuclear family’s immigration from China to USA (her parents came for graduate studies when she was a child), thanks to 1965 Immigration Act. As a 1.5 immigrant family caregiver, Lily was imbued with Chinese cultural norm of filial piety (“even if I didn’t read Confucius, there was an expectation to care for elders in the family”) and challenges like having no extended family members to help out (but “family by choice”—someone acting like “big sister” as “accountability coach” before she reached burnout), linguistic barriers (terms like “MRI, UTI, and ADL are hardly understandable in English” and interpreting in another language), shift in power dynamic when providing care (“almost become a parent of your parent”), exploring trauma for Chinese immigrant parents who lived during 20th century wars and civil strife, etc. 

(See Mission Local’s “For Mao survivors, the pandemic has been a cakewalk.” In 2015, Administration for Community Living awarded its first grant to develop “person-centered, trauma-informed” care for Holocaust survivors.) 

Patti Davis wrote her handbook + memoir, Floating in the Deep End: How Caregivers Can See Beyond Alzheimer’s (2021), based on her caregiver support group, Beyond Alzheimer’s (started in 2011) and caring for her father Ronald Reagan who died in 2004. After her attempt to license Beyond Alzheimer's into “AA of caregiver support” fell through, she decided to write her book to share lessons, like addressing grief (“you’re well-served to inhabit and surrender to grief early on…grief is not biodegradable, it will wait and come find you…”), looking beyond disease to essence of person (“Alzheimer’s is stripping away of façade… my father was sweet, gentle person so it was easier”), educating about disease and acceptance to take on challenges like taking away car keys (avoid 86-year-old George Weller’s 20-second drive through farmer’s market in Santa Monica killing 10 people, and injuring many others.) She broadly viewed a caregiver as someone who shows up to provide support; her father received homecare from paid caregivers when he was “bedridden” during last three years of his 10-year illness.

Kupuna edge”

“When you’re a caregiver … you’re the nurse, you’re the physician, you’re the lawyer, you’re the chauffeur, you’re the accountant. You play all of these different roles that most people go to school and get a degree for, and you are expected as the caregiver to become all of that overnight and as the disease progresses.”— Poki‘i Balaz, geriatric NP, “Our Kūpuna, Our Kuleana: Senior Care Crisis in Hawaiʻi,” Hawai’i Business (Feb. 4, 2020) 

Growing up with kupuna (grandparents) in the same household, family caregiving was reciprocal: my grandparents cared for me and my siblings (while my parents worked outside of our home) until we became more independent, and then we reciprocated as my grandparents with dementia became more dependent on us for activities of daily living. This caregiver experience was more like something we grew into as needs arose, rather than “overnight.” And I suppose it helped that my grandparents had more than a single caregiver playing different roles, and benefited from many family caregivers with specialized roles including physician (though trained in OB-GYN; my cousin didn’t become a geriatrician until after grandparents died), lawyer, accountant, and we were all (non-degreed, but licensed) chauffeurs!

Last month, Hawaii Business magazine covered the role of kupuna in caring for grand keiki in a series of articles about Hawaii’s so-called kupuna edge:

·       "Grandparents Help Hawai‘i Parents Get the Job Done: Grandmothers and grandfathers are storytellers, sources of wisdom, keepers of family legacies and teachers. But perhaps their most important role in Hawai‘i is to help working parents raise their keiki.” 

·       "Do’s and Don’ts of Using Grandparents for Child Care: Lessons learned from both grandparents and parents about navigating these relationships.” 

·       "Grandparents Are Great, But They Can’t Solve All of Hawai‘i’s Child Care Needs: Hawai‘i’s high cost of living often drives the need for grandparent-provided child care. But many grandparents can’t provide care because they are still working or live on the Mainland. Here’s what else is needed.” This article noted that grandparents who are the primary caregivers for their grandchildren tend to experience worse physical and mental health than those who provide occasional or no child care at all. 

Kupuna might wish to exchange worse health for a stipend while serving in foster grandparent program and more low wage opportunities await them in proposed Caring Corps for older adults in charge of universal early childhood education?! 

This month, the Advisory Council to Support Grandparents Raising Grandchildren (SGRC) released its Initial Report to Congress. Highlights:

·       In USA, 2.7 million children are being raised in the homes of grandparents.

·       The child welfare system increasingly relies on kin or grandfamilies to provide care for children, yet they are less likely than non-related foster families to receive needed supports and services.

This report also provides recommendations that will inform development of the National Family Caregiving Strategy.

As COVID-19 pandemic seemed to accelerate hospital discharge preference of patients to go home rather than receive rehabilitation care from a skilled nursing facility (SNF), some exciting Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS) policy proposals: 

·       Choose Home Care Act of 2021 (S.2562/H.R. 5541) would increase access to health services at home by giving eligible Medicare beneficiaries the option to choose home-based extended care as an alternative to SNF care after being discharged from the hospital. 

·       Justice in Aging is advocating for change in federal Medicaid law to apply retroactive coverage of HCBS services after hospital discharge, just as Medicaid allows services to be covered up to 3 months for SNF. 

Advance care planning

Geriatricians are expert at managing syndromes that are associated with age (e.g., dementia)… are good at deprescribing, looking at list of medications and possibility of interactions…eliminating what’s not necessary… really useful if multiple chronic illnesses… key to good care as we get older is constant, ongoing communication with your doctor… about what you want, how aggressive you want, that trade-off between things that might possibly prolong life versus side-effects and quality of life.

--Jay Luxenberg, MD, On Lok Chief Medical Officer, “Do We Need New Doctors As We Age?” Not Born Yesterday podcast (Oct. 15, 2021) 

UCSF geriatrician Dr. Anna Chodos presented on Advance Care Planning (ACP): how to make decisions based on context (emotions, needs, resources), personality, values, and experiences.

ACP includes medical and financial/legal considerations.

Wonder how many people attended this webinar? I asked all 4 questions! Answers:

·       Even if elder orphan is unable to name a surrogate, it is appropriate to document that person’s preferences—even if “terrible system” for people who are not going to have an advocate, POLST may or may not be useful.

·       “Many of us deal with people who are really complex and seem to have a lot of wishes for what life is like now that don’t match up with what are some stated long-term goals like living forever, getting better…it’s a process we continue to revisit…most people do not like thinking about the hard stuff…Most people don’t get the point, they don’t understand what the heck we’re asking them to do…completing advance directive takes at least a half hour, if not an hour.” 

·       “Assuming they have a program where you can live forever,…what most religions promise people. No, I haven’t started referring people to Jehovah’s Witness programs, but I hope that was like a cheeky question…they’re plenty of religions that have very specific requirements for how people get healthcare.” 

According to AARP, Hawaii has 157,000 family caregivers providing $2.1 billion value of u(n)paid care! AARP HI Pre-Crisis Planning for Dementia featured elder law attorney Laurie Adamshick, who shared her family caregiving experience. 

For solo agers (“elder orphan” without family caregiver), she advised hiring a professional fiduciary. 

Chinese American Coalition for Compassionate Care (CACCC) and AACI hosted Chinese American Cultural Challenges at End of Life (EOL) presented by Esther Luo, MD, Kaiser Permanente palliative care specialist. According to Pew Research, Asians are the fastest growing racial/ethnic group in USA, and Chinese are the largest Asian origin group making up 24% of this group.

According to California Health Care Foundation’s Help Wanted: Californians’ Views and Experiences of Serious Illness and End-of-Life Care (2019), majority of Californians at EOL do not want to “burden” family, want to die at home, prefer “natural death” and do not want to suffer pain.  

Compared to whites, Chinese Americans receive more aggressive EOL care including invasive mechanical ventilation when hospitalized and deaths in ICU so fewer die at home.

Few Chinese Americans enroll in hospice due to cultural challenges, including finding providers with cultural sensitivity (honor family-based v. individual decision-making) and language fluency. About 25% of Chinese Americans live in traditional multigenerational household; modern Chinese family structure is more like the family depicted in The Farewell (2019) film: adult children live separately from aging parents, varying acculturation (immigrant with limited English so gaps in communication with USA-born children/grandchildren), working adult children may have limited time for direct care, so more common to hire or place elder in care home.

Traditional filial duties might include nondisclosure to protect psychological well-being of elderly parent; advocate for aggressive treatment to prolong life; pressure to perform duties to avoid disapproval of community (save “face”); provision of food at EOL as cultural obligation to demonstrate love and care. 

“New” approach to filial piety involves ACP with parents initiating discussion and decision-making in context of not being burden to family, and reframing love/care by honoring elders’ wishes. 

Good death is part of 5 blessings, along with love of virtue, longevity, wealth, health. To traditional Chinese, components of good death are defined by one’s accomplishments of familial responsibility; “natural death” in old age; minimal suffering and free from pain; and maintaining good family relationships. 
 
Dr. Luo recommended indirect communication preferred when discussing EOL: use another person’s EOL experience; frame discussion as standard question and  part of routine care; acknowledge cultural taboos and ask for permission (e.g., some may fear invoking “bad luck” if they discuss death, or talking about death might invite death to come sooner); use provider’s own experience as example. 

Last month, I completed mandatory First Aid/CPR/AED training. During COVID-19 pandemic to prevent contamination, rescuers place material over the victim’s mouth and nose. This mannequin did not look like Resusci Anne

During COVID-19 pandemic, call 911 and stick to compression-only CPR: check for response, check for breathing (look; careful about exposure if you listen and feel), then start chest compressions 100-120 beats per minute to the rhythm of BeeGees’ Stayin’ Alive! Use AED defibrillator. 


SF DPH COVID-19 data before Thanksgiving/National Day of Mourning gatherings.

Ageism in healthcare

Kaiser Health News’ Navigating Aging columnist Judy Graham moderated stimulating 90-minute panel discussion, Confronting Ageism in Healthcare: A Conversation for Patients, Caregivers and Clinicians. What we can do:

·       Louise Aronson, MD, UCSF geriatrician and author of Elderhood: suggested how to communicate with provider to get your needs met—e.g., “I feel that I’m not getting attention my symptoms warrant (use “I” statement), and I came to you because of your reputation as a good doctor” (compliment!). And she incited us to “make a ton of noise and don’t shut up until things change…that’s how other social change movements succeed, own it, be noisy. Let’s do it!” She added Essential Caregiver Bill (HR 3733) in Zoom chat box

·       Michael Wasserman, MD, geriatrician and immediate past president of California Association of Long-Term Care Medicine (CALTCM): encouraged us to “speak truth to power”; called out federal government spending $10 billion a year subsidizing graduate medical education, but failing to train doctors to care for Medicare beneficiaries; the failure to develop policies focused on older adults due to the lack of geriatric expertise among policymakers (notably, failure of Biden administration to appoint gerontology expert to COVID-19 task force)—“honestly, the federal government didn’t listen, and now we have over half a million deaths amongst older adults from COVID and close to 200,000 of them from nursing homes…honestly, the policymakers don’t seem to care.” (The lack of gerontology expertise proved fatal in nursing homes that cut off family visits since March 2020 through Nov. 12, 2021 when finally CMS lifted visitor restrictions in nursing homes.)  

·       Rebecca Elon, MD, geriatrician and family caregiver (see “Aiding Her Dying Husband, a Geriatrician Learns the Emotional and Physical Toll of Caregiving”): recommended starting local and with groups for a louder voice!

·       Javette Orgain, MD, family physician and medical director for Longevity Health Plan of Illinois: called for intergenerational living, closing technology gap, increased funding of home-based care and improving nursing homes!

·       Jesse Mauer, JD, Executive Director of Maine Council on Aging, which promotes Anti-Ageism Pledge: advocated to include age in every DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) conversation to “help us move collectively together”! (Check out recorded 2021 Wisdom Summit: Embracing a New Normal, Bouncing Forward to Build an Age-Positive Maine.) 

Despite anti-ageism guide to language tip, “do not use ‘elderly’ as a reference to a group,” transcript showed use of “elderly” in reference to a group almost interchangeable with “older adults” in same sentence:

·       Dr. Orgain said she “began care for older adults prior to becoming a physician, so I had some experience there that fostered my love for the care of the elderly.”

·       Judy Graham asked Dr. Orgain about “the lack of resources and what that says about how we approach our elderly population and what it means for those older adults.”

Maine’s Anti-Ageism Pledge includes “call attention to ageist language,” which depends foremost on what “the person wants to be described” as an equity consideration, and otherwise “refer to people over 60 as older people instead of seniors or the elderly.”

[Similarly, University of Iowa researchers Clarissa A. Shaw, PhD and Jean K. Gordon, PhD, advocate for an individualized, person-centered approach to communication accommodation based on person’s preferences and needs, not stereotypes of aging; for example, not all older adults find “elderspeak” (which arises when caregivers take on parental role) to be patronizing, particularly when it facilitates comprehension (e.g., slow speech, simplified sentence, long pause, loud voice, repetition, etc.). Otherwise, elderspeak is harmful!] 

Judy Graham summarized efforts to address ageism in healthcare: remove old age as a cause and symptom of disease; identify ageist beliefs and language (Frameworks Institute); tackle ageism at grassroots level (Changing the Narrative); require geriatrics education for medical students; include older adults in clinical trials; bring in geriatrics expertise; build age-friendly health system. 

Joined screening of 16-minute video premiere of Changing the Narrative’s Antidotes for Ageism: A Brief Guide to Creating Inclusive Care in an Ageist Society, followed by discussion with talking heads from video. Take-aways:

·       Our age does not define us (so stop attributing everything to “growing older”); instead, age-inclusive healthcare starts with caring for people as individuals because “every person is living a unique human experience.” 

·       “If you are receiving care: Talk to your provider. Ask questions. Your goals shape the course of your healthcare. Clarify what you value to avoid under- or over-treatment. Advocate beyond conversations with healthcare providers.  Seek care providers that truly listen to you, and support your vision for your health.” (Can this be done in typical 15- to 20-minute visit?!)

·       “If you are a healthcare professional: Active listening and letting patients guide care.” 

Geriatrician Jeff Wallace, MD, advised: “Get to know the patient, whether they’re age 20 or age 80, and get the background, and that’s the fun part in many ways, to learn about your patient to start…the therapeutic relationship with a patient starts with respect. You have to respect them, and they have to respect you…doctors should be interrupted more often…it’s okay to say, ‘let’s just timeout, and I really want you to focus on this.’”

Consultant Carolyn Love said she understood that doctors and nurses are medical experts, but patients are experts of their own body so providers need to listen.

Gilliane Lee, recent graduate of occupational therapy (OT), talked about shift to focus on safety as well as quality of life for older adults, and responded to following Q&A:

Q: What are some things that can be done to encourage more people to work with older adults?

A: “Bring them to assisted living facilities (ALF) and getting that exposure so that they can understand that there is such a need for providing care.”

Oy vey, will exposure to ALF for understanding “need for providing care” translate to encouraging more people to work with older adults? Possible to deter people from working in ALF setting like Brookdale, the nation’s largest senior living provider and target of federal lawsuit on behalf of 83 families alleging elder neglect and financial abuse, as well as lawsuit by California Attorney General?! As a graduate gerontology student, I watched Life and Death in Assisted Living (2013), PBS Frontline documentary that featured my instructor Pat McGinnis, founder and Executive Director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform; that horror show convinced me to stay away from for-profit ALF!  

“Too many assisted living centers, care centers, and nursing homes are places I would never allow a loved one to enter. Most wouldn’t either if they knew what the facilities were really like. However, families who schedule facility tours and interviews when considering placing a parent or grandparent, do not see that side…Families must learn to get behind the scenes in order to see the truth.” --Linda L. Schlenker, OTR, author of Aging in America: A Wake-Up Call and Call to Action for Seniors and Those Who Love and Serve Them (2008), calling out non-profit Mayo Clinic and St. Anne’s Home, Little Sisters of the Poor (SF) as exceptional

Been there, done that with my own stint working in ALF (non-profit, of course)! People who get behind the scenes by working in ALF see truth of “need for providing care”: understaffing, lack of staff trained in gerontology and experienced in working with older adults, low morale, high turnover, etc. Residents who wait too long for assistance end up trying to manage on their own, resulting in falls, bedsores, medication errors, other neglect.

Exposure to older adults segregated in ALF seems to reinforce warehousing people based on old age/disability. More encouraging to meet older people where they are in a variety of settings, listen and let their complexity grow on you until you decide this could be an interesting way to earn a living 😉!

Ageism in media

Ageism isn’t even recognized in Pew Research’s list of 15 biggest problems facing the nation; in contrast, racism and sexism make the list. 

November 2021 issue of The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences featured several articles about media coverage of aging and ageism.

In Aging Narratives Over 210 Years (1810-2019), Reuben Ng, PhD, found aging narratives in newspapers, magazines and nonfiction books have become more “negative” over 210 years, from “uplifting narratives of heroism and kinship” in the 1800s to “darker tones of illness, death, and burden” in the 1900s as older adults came to be viewed as dominant occupants of almshouses and described as deserted by their children and too infirm to work. Contributing to this ageism were the diminishing status of older adults, loss of warmth, loss of competence, social ostracism, and medicalization of aging. Defying this trend was fiction, which provided “positive” portrayals of older adults through romantic courtship and war heroism.

In Ageism in COVID-Related Newspaper Coverage: The First Month of the Pandemic, researchers analyzed 287 articles concerning older adults and COVID-19, published between March 11 and April 10, 2020, in four major U.S. newspapers (USA Today, The NY Times, LA Times, The WaPo), the term “ageism” appeared only five times and only in The NY Times opinion pieces, suggesting that journalists were not calling out ageism. 

This failure to call out or name ageism seems to normalize ageism so it’s not viewed as the problem it is with harmful impacts. 

Journalists continue to confuse assisted living and nursing home, needing to issue corrections like “This story has been corrected to refer to Brookdale as an assisted living and memory care center instead of a nursing home.”  In “The Forgotten Nursing Home Tragedy” (NY Times, Nov. 4, 2021), journalist stated “Nurses were routinely working at several elder-care facilities at once”—more likely the reality is lower-paid certified nursing assistants (CNA) who have closer hands-on contact with residents (assisting with toileting, bathing, dressing, feeding, etc.) work at multiple nursing homes? Important to understand differences: ALF v. SNF, CNA v. nurse.

Wish more journalists would follow reporter Laura Wenus’ advice to consult someone with expertise in the field because “elder care and nursing care is a complex industry” so it helps to turn to a second pair of eyes to ensure “using the right terms and describing the relevant systems correctly.” 

SF Dept. of Disability & Aging Services (DAS) hosted SF Dignity Fund Community Needs Forum (“What do older adults & adults with disabilities living in San Francisco need?). This took place on day after holiday weekend, 39 showed up on Zoom, mostly DAS staff; service providers who participated talked about workforce challenges like finding social workers who are Cantonese bilingual and who are familiar with African American culture. 

I completed 36-item SF Dignity Fund Community Needs Assessment survey, commenting on need for gerontology training in workforce development to better serve diverse older adults, like designing a more age-friendly survey! Wonder how many older adults/people with disabilities had stamina to actually answer all survey items: e.g., 5-item Likert scales for #6 Please rate your agreement with the following (19) statements about your needs; #17 Please rate your agreement with the following (15) statements about any barriers you have experienced when trying to participate in services. By the time I got to survey's demographic information section, I just wanted to get over ordeal so quickly selected "Decline to answer"! 

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Senior moment

When I tell people that I’m studying gerontology, some people will look puzzled, “What are you studying?”  After I explain that gerontology is the study of aging, they continue to look puzzled, “Why?”

Gerontology program representatives recruit students with dazzling statistics about career opportunities to prepare us for the Silver Tsunami:  since the baby boomers began turning age 65 last year, 10,000 people will turn 65 every day for the next 20 years.  By 2030, almost 20% of the U.S. population will be age 65+ (http://www.agingresearch.org/content/article/detail/826,
http://www.careersinaging.com/careersinaging/why.html & http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/nocat-uncategorized/un-urges-countries-to-address-needs-of-ageing-population.html). 

My reasons for studying gerontology are more personal:  growing up the youngest in a multi-generational household, I’ve always valued the “been there, done that” wisdom of elders and enjoy their company.  Our lives are enriched when everyone can “age in community” rather than be sent away to institutions (nursing homes) where they become invisible.

I think my defining senior moment (“aha, I want to work with seniors”) came to me just a little over a year ago after I attended this inspiring rally with senior advocates to urgently save Adult Day Health Care (ADHC). 
  ADHC rally:  “We won’t go to a nursing home!”

Thanks to “fiscal conservative” Mayor Jerry Brown, a 71-year old senior, Adult Day Health Care (ADHC) will lose its funding as a Medi-Cal benefit, effective December 1, 2011.  Statewide, this funding loss would impact 310 ADHC centers that serve about 37,000 fixed-income seniors and adults with disabilities (AWD), who would be forced into costly institutional care (nursing home) or staying at home alone until their health deteriorates into emergency room visits or hospitalizations.  San Francisco, which has the highest proportion of seniors and AWD in the state, would see the closure of ten ADHC centers affecting thousands of current and future patients without personal choice to safely continue living in their homes (“aging in place”).

Rally to stop elimination of ADHC

On Thursday (October 20, 2011), I attended a noon rally at City Hall to Save ADHC.  It was a well-organized event, almost theatrical, that started on time, provided seats and refreshments for elders and AWD, featured the requisite sound bites by local politicians (including four mayoral candidates), followed by powerful personal narratives from ADHC participants and caregivers, and covered by TV stations.  Like members of a studio audience, we applauded louder when signaled by peppy conductors positioned at each side of the stage.

Politicians speak first
Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Executive Director Anne Hinton introduced Mayor Ed Lee, who spoke about ADHC serving our most vulnerable population—elders and AWD—and how taking away ADHC would also burden working families who rely on ADHC so they can go to their jobs to support their elders.  Then he announced plans for consideration at next week’s Board of Supervisors meeting to release funds (undisclosed amount, but later revealed in press release to be $3.4 million) from a reserve to cover ADHC effective December 1.

Afterwards, Supervisor Eric Mar stepped up to declare this memorable sound bite:  “We are an aging City! We are a City that ages friendly!”  Next came Supervisors John Avalos and David Chiu, both mayoral candidates.  Then Bayview ADHC Director Cathy Davis led a rousing chant, “We won’t go to a nursing home!”  We heard from an aide to Supervisor Jane Kim (no-show due to illness) followed by Senator Leland Yee, who reminded us that he previously worked at On Lok and was the only Democrat who voted not to cut ADHC funding. 

ADHC women & caregivers

Then finally we got to hear from the real stakeholders:  ADHC participants and their caregivers – all women (who tend to outlive men)!  Caregivers did double duty as translators for three elderly immigrants from Philippines, Ukraine and China.  Each spoke about how ADHC helped transform their lives by offering health care, meeting place for socialization, exercise therapy, social services, etc. after experiencing depression, isolation, multiple chronic health problems from the loss of a spouse and accidents that limited their ability to perform ADLs (activities of daily living).  
The highlight was listening to a woman, standing beside her silent mother who was holding Avalos for Mayor campaign lit.  This daughter described each morning’s routine at home when she prepares to send her mother to “school” (what her mother calls Bayview ADHC) so she can go to work.  From the time her mother wakes up until the 9 am bus arrives to pick her up, the mother continually asks, “What am I supposed to do today?” though the daughter repeatedly responds, “You’re going to school today.”  The daughter told us, “You see, my mom has Alzheimer’s disease.  Can you imagine a day with my mom at home by herself or at a nursing home?”  She said that her mother could do all the things she didn’t know how to do, and she remembered all the times her mother stood strong for her, so now she was going to stand strong for her mother.  At this point, I got all choked up at this model of Confucian filial piety and wanted to excuse myself from the masses so I could bawl out in private, but then . . .

ADHC anthem

Hene Kelly, who represents 900,000 seniors from California Alliance of Retired Americans (CARA), told us that other cities won’t pick up ADHC, but San Francisco is different because we care about all; Governor single-handedly cut ADHC and can reverse it; instead, he proposed a “transition plan” but nothing to date, and December 1 is coming soon.  Then, Hene broke out into the following song, which we sang back to her line by line in People’s Mic fashion:

Everywhere we go
People want to know
Who we are
So we tell them
We are the seniors
Mighty seniors, mighty seniors
Fighting for health care
Fighting for respect
Watch out, we’re going to win health care
Adult Day Health Care is a right
Get out of our way
Give it back to us!

Jaywalking & wheeling to Governor’s office
About 25 of us (including a Bay Citizen reporter and photographer—separate positions, while I assumed both roles for this coverage!) followed James Chionsini of Planning for Elders, who led a march to the Governor’s office to present a 3” stack of signed petitions.  As we made our way from City Hall to Governor Brown’s office, many held up eye-catching STOP signs that served a dual purpose to declare our message and STOP traffic when the red light suddenly came on while we were still crossing McAllister Street!
“STOP ADHC Elimination”
“STOP Dissing Grandma”
“STOP This is not how we treat our elders”

Winning signs
State Building Security wouldn’t allow us to bring in signs so we left them planted outside.  While waiting in line to go through security check, I judged the signs as contestants and decided on the following winners:

Most effective message to support cause:
“Honk to save ADHC”
“NO ADHC means taking Independence & Dignity away from our frail, Elderly and Disabled”

Most informative signs:
“Gov. Brown: Adult Day Health Makes $ense . . . “
“Average Daily Cost Assisted Living $153 Nursing Home $308-435 Emergency Room Visit $1200+++ ADULT DAY HEALTH $79/day YOU DO THE MATH”

15 minutes of fame: Occupy Governor’s Office!
James explained that we didn’t have an appointment so we weren’t all that surprised when the receptionist behind a glass window told us that the Governor was not in San Francisco to receive us and the signed petitions.  Hene made a cell phone call using speaker phone to the Governor’s Office in Sacramento, listened to a recording of menu options before reaching a constituent affairs representative named “John.”  The Governor was not available to come to the phone so Hene said she would send a letter with the petitions; “John” said the Governor’s office would respond in 90 days; some shouted, “We need a response in a week!”   Hene said we would follow-up in one week with “John.”

Then we politely exited and vans were waiting outside to escort the senior and AWD activists.  Not quite the Power of 504 demonstration (when AWD occupied the old San Francisco federal building for 26 days in 1977 until the fed agreed to implement regs to enforce the 1973 Rehab Act), but I walked away with a “Power to the People” feeling. 

Postscript:  Prior to December 1, 2011, the State reached a settlement with advocates to allow ADHC centers to provide services until the launch date of the new Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS) program (http://www.californiahealthline.org/articles/2011/11/18/state-reaches-settlement-to-establish-new-version-of-adhc.aspx, http://www.californiahealthline.org/capitol-desk/2012/10/program-launches-for-seniors-disabled.aspx)